• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Alleged Leaked Details on Intel Comet Lake-S Platform Require... You Guessed It... A New Platform

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
2,700 (2.38/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
Intel's development of their Core architecture in the post-Ryzen world has been slow, with solutions slowly creeping up in core counts with every new CPU release - but much slowly than rival AMD's efforts. Before Intel can capitalize on a new, more scalable and power-efficient architecture, though, it has to deliver performance and core count increases across its product line to stay as relevant as possible against a much revitalized rival. Enter Comet Lake-S: the desktop parts of Intel's new round of consumer CPUs, which will reportedly see an increase in the maximum core count to a 10-core design. This 10-core design, however, comes with an increase in power consumption (up to 135 W), and the need, once again, for beefier power delivery systems in a new, LGA 1200 package (with 9 more pins that the current LGA 1151).

The move to a new socket and the more stringent power requirements give Intel the opportunity to refresh its chipset offerings once again. If everything stays the same (and there's no reason it should change), new Z470 and Z490 chipsets should be some of the higher tier offerings for builders to pair with their motherboards. The new Comet Lake-S CPUs will still be built in the now extremely refined 14 nm process, and allegedly keep the same 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes as current Coffee Lake Refresh offerings. The new CPU offerings from Intel are expected to roll out in Q1 2020.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,347 (4.06/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04 (5.3.0 Mainline Kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,230 (0.30/day)
Processor Core i7 3930K / Core i7 5820K
Motherboard Asus P9X79 Deluxe / Asus X99-A
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212 Plus
Memory 32GB DDR3 1600 (8x4GB)
Video Card(s) GTX 670
Storage Corsair Force Series 3 120GB SSD (2x) Samsung 840 500GB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Antec P180
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 650W
Software Windows 8 Pro 64bit
In all fairness, can we even call it a leak when they clearly wanted us to know,.....?
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
1,675 (1.80/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Super Computer
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H55 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Crucial/Micron Ballistix Sport DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) ASUS GeForce GTX1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB SATA SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) HP 2311x and Acer G206HQL
Case CoolerMaster MasterBox Lite 5 RGB
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G3 Gold
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Logitech Wave K350
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
keep the same 16 PCIe 3.0 lanes as current Coffee Lake Refresh offerings
What the hell Intel?!?!

Intel is really cheating us here. I'm not really pissed about the fact that it's still PCIe Gen 3 but more pissed about the limited number of lanes especially when AMD offers 24 of them. Again... What the hell Intel?!?!
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
394 (0.55/day)
Right, cuz 10nm was on schedule also.
Please don't confuse Intel's personal manufacturing process upgrade, with their desire to utilise a general standard created and maintained by over 900 companies.

10nm is:
1 - A manufacturing process
2 - Specced out by Intel
3 - Developed by Intel in Intel labs
4 - To make Intel hardware at Intel facilities using Intel-designed equipment.
Intel are are the only party responsible for their 10nm processes success or failure.

In comparison, PCI-E is:
1 - A specification
2 - Specced out by PCI-SIG
3 - Developed with their partners across the entire computing industry, in their facilities, using collaborative expertise
4 - To make industry-standard hardware at the facilities of anyone who wants to make that hardware.

There are over 900 companies in PCI-SIG and when that many businesses are involved, and rely on, the correct engineering of an upcoming standard, you can bet your ass that none of them are going to let a specification or a standard out of the door that they aren't able to practically guarantee will actually work and can actually be built.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
988 (1.18/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1900X
Motherboard As Rock X399 Phantom Gaming 6
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua NHU-14S TR4
Memory Gskill RIpjaws V 3600 MHZ 16 GB (2x8) & Gskill Ripjaws 4 3000 MHZ 16GB (2x8)
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
They already told us they will go directly to PCIE 5.0 in 2021.
For the data centre not consumer level

10 cores with 16 PCI_E lanes. Dare i say whelmed :)
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,395 (0.63/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming/Internet/HTPC
Processor AMD Phenom II 1075T @ 4.0GHz @ 1.42V/Intel i5 4460/Athlon X4 760K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3/ASRock Z97 Extreme6/ASUS FM2+
Cooling Noctua U12S/Lan Shuo Pure copper/Asetek Microchill
Memory 16GB Adata 2133MHz/16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASUS HD7870 2GB /Intel 4600/Gigabyte GT620
Storage Kingston 240GB, Intel NVMe 500GB + HDDs/Samsung NVMe 250GB+ HDDs/Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected)/LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12/Sharkoon Rebel 9/Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply 850W Chieftec/560W Chieftec/400W (80+)
Mouse CoolerMaster/Rapoo/Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster/Microsoft/Logitech
Software Windows
A new platform in 2020 with PCIe 3.0 support. Nice.

The fun part will be next year when cheap PCIe 4.0 x2 SSD models will be offering the speeds of more expensive PCIe 3.0 x4 models.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2018
Messages
157 (0.45/day)
I said it before and I say it again, The TDP and Turbo Boost ratings for both CPU manufacturers are false and misleading and I'm using the most politically correct wordings to express it. And to AMD well yeah they have upped their game after many years but guess what they are still behind at both CPU and GPU even after using the 7nm die shrink process and considering the others have not one can only imagine how far they are actually behind.I must say I like the new ryzen 3600 CPU at least it does 4.2 boost on all cores.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
15,885 (3.21/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 3 1200
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth
Memory 2 x 8GB G-skill Aegis 3000 or somesuch
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case Some old Antec
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + slightly modded Sony DR-ZX302
Power Supply Fractal Design Effekt 400W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cherry MX-Board 3.0
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
Mah FPSess will explode!

I said it before and I say it again, The TDP and Turbo Boost ratings for both CPU manufacturers are false and misleading and I'm using the most politically correct wordings to express it. And to AMD well yeah they have upped their game after many years but guess what they are still behind at both CPU and GPU even after using the 7nm die shrink process and considering the others have not one can only imagine how far they are actually behind.I must say I like the new ryzen 3600 CPU at least it does 4.2 boost on all cores.
Behind ... in games.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
117 (0.09/day)
Location
Texas
System Name Berfs1
Processor i7-9750H (turbo clocked)
Motherboard Dell Precision 7540
Cooling Stock w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 16GB (2x8GB) @3200 MHz
Video Card(s) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 @1440 MHz/2052 MHz (core/memory)
Storage XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB SSD
Display(s) 1080p @60 Hz 100% sRGB laptop screen
Power Supply Dell 240W charger
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores XTU - 2218 points CB15 - 1311 CB20 - 3203
10 cores 135W ?
we knew the 9900k is 95W and eats > 170W when overclocking
so this 10 core will eat 240W ?
Keep in mind, the 9900K stock is rated for 210W under turbo. 240W is a pretty good estimate.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
132 (0.05/day)
There are over 900 companies in PCI-SIG and when that many businesses are involved, and rely on, the correct engineering of an upcoming standard, you can bet your ass that none of them are going to let a specification or a standard out of the door that they aren't able to practically guarantee will actually work and can actually be built.
Don't get it, what are you saying. You trying to say that PCIe 4.0 standard is not ready to be released.

Been ready for a while now, other companies already using it since a year back, only Intel dragging their asses.

Intel just thought they where safe from competition so why hurry developing cpus with PCIe 4.0, now they are paying for it.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
114 (0.07/day)
Location
Perth , West Australia
System Name gamer 14
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700 X
Motherboard Asus AMD X 370
Cooling Standard Air
Memory Corsair Vengeance 2 x 8 gb DDR 4
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon Vega 64 8 Gb HBM 2 Air Cooled
Storage Intel SSD 240 gb Speed Demon & WD 240 SSD Blue
Display(s) Asus XG 32 V ROG
Case Corsair AIR ATX
Audio Device(s) Realtech standard
Power Supply Corsair 850 Modular
Mouse CM Havoc
Keyboard Corsair Cherry Mechanical
Software Win 10
Benchmark Scores Unigine_Superposition 4K ultra 6560
My two cents , these names are just getting better coffee lake , comet lake- s , Icey lake , shiny river , …...

anyway they are still awesome cpus but they cost a lot more than AMD
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
394 (0.55/day)
Don't get it, what are you saying. You trying to say that PCIe 4.0 standard is not ready to be released.

Been ready for a while now, other companies already using it since a year back, only Intel dragging their asses.

Intel just thought they where safe from competition so why hurry developing cpus with PCIe 4.0, now they are paying for it.
What @juiseman was implying with THEIR post, was that because Intel couldn't do 10nm on time, he didn't trust Intel to implement PCI-E 5.0 when they said they were going to.

My point was that Intel controls when 10nm is ready. They screwed up by announcing it long before they were ready to ship it, and they got hurt by that.

But Intel doesn't control when PCI-E 5.0 is ready. PCI-SIG does that. And if Intel announces (or leaks) that they're going to implement PCI-E 5.0 in future, then that means they (and PCI-SIG) are both sure that PCI-E 5.0 will be ready to go at that time.

Why am I sure of that? Because there are 900 other companies all involved in the decision making here, and the announcement of PCI-E 5.0 being ready to go, would have only happened after those 900 companies all agreed that PCI-E 5.0 was ready to launch and could be delivered on time.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
731 (0.19/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 GB Ballistix Elite DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 590 OC Special Edition
Storage Sabrent Rocket NVMe 4.0 1TB
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q
Case Corsair Carbide 600Q
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 750W Titanium
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
Intel is really embarrassing themselves. This news only makes me more confident in my decision to go with a 3900X for my recent upgrade.
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,612 (1.90/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R5 2600X@4.1
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2304
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3466cas16 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8056 vega 3dmark timespy
What @juiseman was implying with THEIR post, was that because Intel couldn't do 10nm on time, he didn't trust Intel to implement PCI-E 5.0 when they said they were going to.

My point was that Intel controls when 10nm is ready. They screwed up by announcing it long before they were ready to ship it, and they got hurt by that.

But Intel doesn't control when PCI-E 5.0 is ready. PCI-SIG does that. And if Intel announces (or leaks) that they're going to implement PCI-E 5.0 in future, then that means they (and PCI-SIG) are both sure that PCI-E 5.0 will be ready to go at that time.

Why am I sure of that? Because there are 900 other companies all involved in the decision making here, and the announcement of PCI-E 5.0 being ready to go, would have only happened after those 900 companies all agreed that PCI-E 5.0 was ready to launch and could be delivered on time.
Intel does control their design of the Phy pciex controller and lane assignments , for all your assurances that intel are On their game they are not showing products to back that up Imho.
Their are Gpus and Ssds that can use pciex4 and owners who want to use it too.
Intel just sent those customers elsewhere for two years.
 
Low quality post by juiseman
Joined
Oct 25, 2018
Messages
227 (0.69/day)
I guess I rustled some feathers; sorry

I be trollin', trollin', trollin' again
 
Joined
Oct 5, 2017
Messages
394 (0.55/day)
Intel does control their design of the Phy pciex controller and lane assignments , for all your assurances that intel are On their game they are not showing products to back that up Imho.
Their are Gpus and Ssds that can use pciex4 and owners who want to use it too.
Intel just sent those customers elsewhere for two years.
All of this is true, but, again, @juiseman was implying that because Intel fucked up the engineering of 10nm, that intel would therefore be incapable of implementing PCI-E 5.0 on time.

Would you, @theoneandonlymrk, please like to explain to me, exactly how juiseman's point is true, bearing in mind that:

1 - designing a controller to implement an existing standard is nowhere near as complicated as building a new semiconductor manufacturing process from scratch
2 - PCI-SIG doesn't release standards that aren't ready to be implemented, whereas Intel *did* announce a 10nm technology that was nowhere near implementation.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,636 (0.83/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
Joined
Jun 28, 2015
Messages
674 (0.44/day)
This release will need impressive Intel Marketing PR spin. Sad part is just throwing enough money into Marketing will confuse consumers enough to still be quite profitable.
 
Top