• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Am I the only one mad I paid for a 680 when could just got the 670?

Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
3,788 (0.95/day)
Likes
671
Location
Pompano beach, Florida
System Name HAL
Processor Core i7 4770k @ 4.6 ghz.
Motherboard Asus Maximus VII Hero
Cooling H80i Closed loop liquid cooling.
Memory 4x 4 (16) GB Corsair Vengeance ddr3 2133 @ 2200
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 FTW
Storage 256 GB Ocz V4 SSD "Thank you Kreij (Dean)" + 2x 1TB drives.
Display(s) 50" Samsung, UHD, 4k, 60hz.
Case Corsair Carbide MId tower
Audio Device(s) LG system through optical 5.1
Power Supply CORSAIR Enthusiast Series TX850M
Software Microsoft Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Haven (3720), Cinebench (932)
#51
Usually i get mad after watching Linus for other reasons. You know the saying "You have a face or voice for radio" ? Linus videos remind me of West Hollywood strangely.

Hmm, now i want to change my drape colors... Dam you Linus!!!! I just wanted to see benchmarks :banghead:
I know the saying "The grass is always greener on the other side" :rolleyes:
Learn to like your grass. Your grass likes you..
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,716 (3.98/day)
Likes
6,419
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#52
I like my grass...:pimp:
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,652 (2.25/day)
Likes
5,903
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) GTX1080ti (Heatkiller WB) @ 2Ghz core/1.5(12)Ghz mem
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp 27" (2560x1440)
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
#53
I know the saying "The grass is always greener on the other side" :rolleyes:
Learn to like your grass. Your grass likes you..
Yeah but this grass is only a tad less green and 100 bucks less.

Anyhow, never regret buying stuff. Like folk keep saying - you can overclock the 680 higher than a 670 - it's still the faster card.

And it doesn't look like your dog ate half the PCB, you know the bit where the compute part is meant to be.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (2.04/day)
Likes
1,734
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
#54
$100 is $100 that is 1/5 the price of the 680 people are saving for 7% lower perf on the 670. Wow that is amazing performance, but in any industry this is considered misleading your consumer base. I'm not unhappy with my purchase, hell I wouldn't give the card back to them if they gave me a full refund. However happy I am with their product doesn't change the fact that I did write NV and Gigabyte to tell them how disappointed I was with their decision to fix pricing of the 680 when they knew the 670 was going to be released for $100 less in under 60 days. For shame NV for not just making the 670 your standard, for shame distributor (Gigabyte and everyone else) for allowing this kind of thing to happen to their customers.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
6,652 (2.25/day)
Likes
5,903
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) GTX1080ti (Heatkiller WB) @ 2Ghz core/1.5(12)Ghz mem
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp 27" (2560x1440)
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
#55
I just read the following on Legit Reviews, regarding GK104. It is rumour but makes an awful lot of sense.

That said it will be interesting to see what NVIDIA plans on doing with the GK110 GPU and we have a feeling we might find out next week during GPU Technology Conference. There have been rumors that NVIDIA will be releasing a GK110 powered GeForce GTX 685 and that they company will slowly phase out the GeForce GTX 680. Last month we would have thought that idea was crazy, but looking at how close the GTX 670 and GTX 680 are in terms of performance it could be plausible. It's always fun to speculate, but we will find out the real story soon.

At the end of the day the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 is a great graphics card that is going to bring a world of hurt to AMD. NVIDIA has been unable to keep the GeForce GTX 680 in-stock due to a variety of issues, so it will be interesting to see how well they can do with the GeForce GTX 670. Historically, the lower skus are usually easier to make as they use fallout from higher skus. Since the GTX 670 uses a trimmed down GTX 680 core with some features fused off it should be readily available.
They also said there is a rumour (no proof but word is out there) that the 680's sent to reviewers were cherry picked (most are from both camps?) to specifically be cooler and clock higher. Could well be the 680's aren't quite up to scratch, therefore the 670 picks up the pieces (and does so very well).
 
Joined
Apr 17, 2008
Messages
3,921 (1.10/day)
Likes
892
Location
West Chester, OH
#56
$100 is $100 that is 1/5 the price of the 680 people are saving for 7% lower perf on the 670. Wow that is amazing performance, but in any industry this is considered misleading your consumer base. I'm not unhappy with my purchase, hell I wouldn't give the card back to them if they gave me a full refund. However happy I am with their product doesn't change the fact that I did write NV and Gigabyte to tell them how disappointed I was with their decision to fix pricing of the 680 when they knew the 670 was going to be released for $100 less in under 60 days. For shame NV for not just making the 670 your standard, for shame distributor (Gigabyte and everyone else) for allowing this kind of thing to happen to their customers.
Glad to see your post Binge, I haven't seen you in a while man! :rockout:
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
14,908 (3.43/day)
Likes
5,425
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Dell SK-3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
#57
I always want the top end cards. Hate crippled GPUs, not matter how small, so if I had a 680, I wouldn't regret it.

Look, I've got a GTX 580 when I could have got the 570 for a lot less and only a little less performance, but that wasn't good enough for me. Love my 580 and glad I got it.
It's like 15% difference in performance between those two, the GTX670 and 680 is more like 7%, which in most scenarios might as well be in the error margin. 15% is not a lot to justify the price increase imo, but 7% is a fair bit too close imo. I get yer point of course (we're all different and all that) but a €80 price difference is hard to swallow. Especially as there are a lot of 670's out there that are faster than the 680.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,666 (3.96/day)
Likes
8,247
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#58
I like my grass...:pimp:
I have a feeling that you're thinking of a different sort of grass. :eek: :laugh:

It's like 15% difference in performance between those two, the GTX670 and 680 is more like 7%, which in most scenarios might as well be in the error margin. 15% is not a lot to justify the price increase imo, but 7% is a fair bit too close imo. I get yer point of course (we're all different and all that) but a €80 price difference is hard to swallow. Especially as there are a lot of 670's out there that are faster than the 680.
Yeah, there's no right answer here, so just get what you're most happy with. I just hate having something that's been intentionally crippled, no matter how slight the difference or cheaper it is. Of course, if the top model is outrageously expensive, then I'll wait a while for the prices to come down before getting it.

Mind you, I waited ages for the GTX 580 to drop in price and when it didn't I paid the full £400 for it :eek: after trying to feel satisfied with a GTX 560 Ti (no 448 core version then). Oh well, at least I got the insignificantly overclocked version, lol for the same price as a standard one.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,659 (1.30/day)
Likes
1,009
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#60
Yes. :)



Yeah, you could say that the full chip doesn't get better by as much as you'd expect, but it's still better and not crippled. I just hate crippled chips, regardless of price/performance or anything else. The few times I've gotten such a card, I felt distinctly unsatisfied, regardless of the logic of buying it over its more expensive brother. It's just the way it is for me and I won't knock anyone who does get such a card and is happy with it, especially if they've gotten great bang for the buck.

The extra RAM doesn't make a 670 quicker. Only if the 2GB card runs out of memory at high resolution will the extra RAM help.
Look at the 7970 lightning review. It pulls ahead of the 680 at max res, no where else. I'd be willing to bet a 4 GB 670/680 would stay ahead, and it's not surprising. I constantly go over 2 GB usage on 1080p.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (2.04/day)
Likes
1,734
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
#61

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,666 (3.96/day)
Likes
8,247
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#62
Look at the 7970 lightning review. It pulls ahead of the 680 at max res, no where else. I'd be willing to bet a 4 GB 670/680 would stay ahead, and it's not surprising. I constantly go over 2 GB usage on 1080p.
Yes, you've just agreed with me. The card isn't faster per se, it just avoids getting bottlenecked from running out of memory.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,520 (4.81/day)
Likes
5,600
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#63
That is what happens when you rush a product. Whoops. That's okay, plenty of people bought the 680 so I'm sure nVidia doesn't care too much. Honestly, nVidia just needs to get cards sold at this point. You know something else is brewing, it's all marketing.
 

Binge

Overclocking Surrealism
Joined
Sep 15, 2008
Messages
6,979 (2.04/day)
Likes
1,734
Location
PA, USA
System Name Molly
Processor i5 3570K
Motherboard Z77 ASRock
Cooling CooliT Eco
Memory 2x4GB Mushkin Redline Ridgebacks
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 680
Case Coolermaster CM690 II Advanced
Power Supply Corsair HX-1000
#64
That is what happens when you rush a product. Whoops. That's okay, plenty of people bought the 680 so I'm sure nVidia doesn't care too much. Honestly, nVidia just needs to get cards sold at this point. You know something else is brewing, it's all marketing.
Not to make a personal attack out of this, but are you sure you can take that stance without seeming like you support these kinds of business tactics? A rhetoric to the effect, "it is what it is, and I'm ok with it because it is what it is," sounds really accepting. I know companies are a lot like soulless money grabbers, but the people who plainly state that an action of theirs is poor practice toward the customer without any sarcasm will be heard. No customer, current or potential, will benefit by being complacent about poor practice.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,659 (1.30/day)
Likes
1,009
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#65
Yes, you've just agreed with me. The card isn't faster per se, it just avoids getting bottlenecked from running out of memory.
How you word it doesn't matter, the fact is getting a 4 GB 670 can get you better performance than a 680 for less. It may only be memory limited situations, but between mods and these cheap 1440p displays that happens a good bit.

To put this in the perspective of your "crippled" gpu complaint, there was never a 260/470/570 released that could match their full blown sibling. With this 670 there's multiple units at launch that match or exceed the performance of a 680. This is unlike any prior situation. My point is you're not going to have that kind of buyers remorse with a 670. Even more so if you buy a 4 GB.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,666 (3.96/day)
Likes
8,247
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#66
How you word it doesn't matter, the fact is getting a 4 GB 670 can get you better performance than a 680 for less. It may only be memory limited situations, but between mods and these cheap 1440p displays that happens a good bit.

To put this in the perspective of your "crippled" gpu complaint, there was never a 260/470/570 released that could match their full blown sibling. With this 670 there's multiple units at launch that match or exceed the performance of a 680. This is unlike any prior situation. My point is you're not going to have that kind of buyers remorse with a 670. Even more so if you buy a 4 GB.
And a 4GB GTX 680 will beat a 4GB GTX 670 - you've got to compare like with like. Of course, it would cost a lot more for a much smaller performance gain, so there's a value argument there. Will a 4GB GTX 670 really cost less than a 2GB GTX 680? I dunno, you tell me. I reckon it will all depend on brand, retailer, discounts etc.
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,659 (1.30/day)
Likes
1,009
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#67
And a 4GB GTX 680 will beat a 4GB GTX 670 - you've got to compare like with like. Of course, it would cost a lot more for a much smaller performance gain, so there's a value argument there. Will a 4GB GTX 670 really cost less than a 2GB GTX 680? I dunno, you tell me. I reckon it will all depend on brand, retailer, discounts etc.
The 4gb bit was just icing on the cake, you don't need it for my point to hold true, but for the record the evga 4gb 670 starts at $470, and evga usually marks up more than their competitors for double vram cards.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,666 (3.96/day)
Likes
8,247
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#68
The 4gb bit was just icing on the cake, you don't need it for my point to hold true, but for the record the evga 4gb 670 starts at $470, and evga usually marks up more than their competitors for double vram cards.
You don't need it? That was your whole point! Look, the 670 GPU is inherently weaker than the 680 GPU, so if you keep all other things the same such as clock speed, rig, software, driver settings etc the 680 wins every time. The 670 is only potentially better from a value point of view if priced right and at release time, it's obviously priced very right.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,998 (0.61/day)
Likes
1,578
Location
Visalia, CA
System Name Crimson Titan 2.5
Processor Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme
Cooling CPU: Swiftech H220-X, RAM: Geil Cyclone 2, VGA: Custom EK water loop
Memory 8x4GBs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 XMP2 3000MHz @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX Titan X SCs in SLI under full cover EK water blocks
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Acer XB280HK 28" 4K G-Sync - 2x27" Acer HN274s 1920x1080 120Hz
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T - EK Pump/Reservoir, 360mm EK Radiator
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
#69
I'm not mad at all, why would I be? I've been happily gaming on my 680s since March, the performance is flawless, and I needed to upgrade my 580s in 3-way SLI, as I was starting to experience hiccups at 5760x1080 in 3D in Skyrim after downloading multiple hi-res texture packs for it.

I finally had my last battle in Skyrim in glorious surround 3D two weeks ago (that doesn't mean I don't continue playing) and it was a cinematic experience that I couldn't have fully enjoyed with my previous cards, so I'm as happy as could be with my purchase :)

The 670 is an excellent card, but the 680 will OC much higher, and it's not like I need it to right now, it runs every single game maxed out in full 3D :)

I'm sorry you're mad about your purchase, don't be, just be happy for the privilege you had of tasting unparalleled performance form your card sooner than many people, a lot of people would love to be in your place, and couldn't, due to lack of inventory, or many other reasons, I'm just happy more people will enjoy Kepler with a more affordable card, and top notch performance, I just hope the 670 doesn't have the same availability problems as its older brother :ohwell:
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,659 (1.30/day)
Likes
1,009
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#70
You don't need it? That was your whole point! Look, the 670 GPU is inherently weaker than the 680 GPU, so if you keep all other things the same such as clock speed, rig, software, driver settings etc the 680 wins every time. The 670 is only potentially better from a value point of view if priced right and at release time, it's obviously priced very right.
I know where you're coming from, I've bought plenty of second best cards. I don't know why you just can't look at this like it is. You're not going to feel bad about a a 1-2% clock for clock difference. This may never happen again, it sure hasn't happened before, but in this case no 670 owner is going to feel like they should have gotten a 680.
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,666 (3.96/day)
Likes
8,247
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#71
I know where you're coming from, I've bought plenty of second best cards. I don't know why you just can't look at this like it is. You're not going to feel bad about a a 1-2% clock for clock difference. This may never happen again, it sure hasn't happened before, but in this case no 670 owner is going to feel like they should have gotten a 680.
I think it's dangerous to blanket all 670 owners with that statement, lol. I for one would feel unsatisfied. So, there you have it, you need just one dissatisfied customer to make that untrue! :toast:
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,437 (1.16/day)
Likes
1,352
#72
I think it's dangerous to blanket all 670 owners with that statement, lol. I for one would feel unsatisfied. So, there you have it, you need just one dissatisfied customer to make that untrue! :toast:
Screenshot of you and your receipt and system or you were never an owner :p
 

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,666 (3.96/day)
Likes
8,247
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#73
Screenshot of you and your receipt and system or you were never an owner :p
An owner of what? I've got a GTX 580, as in my specs.
 

washd123

New Member
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
50 (0.02/day)
Likes
5
#74
I feel bad for anyone who bought a gtx680 at this point 90% of the performance for $100 less? hell yes
 
Joined
Mar 7, 2007
Messages
3,788 (0.95/day)
Likes
671
Location
Pompano beach, Florida
System Name HAL
Processor Core i7 4770k @ 4.6 ghz.
Motherboard Asus Maximus VII Hero
Cooling H80i Closed loop liquid cooling.
Memory 4x 4 (16) GB Corsair Vengeance ddr3 2133 @ 2200
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 FTW
Storage 256 GB Ocz V4 SSD "Thank you Kreij (Dean)" + 2x 1TB drives.
Display(s) 50" Samsung, UHD, 4k, 60hz.
Case Corsair Carbide MId tower
Audio Device(s) LG system through optical 5.1
Power Supply CORSAIR Enthusiast Series TX850M
Software Microsoft Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores Haven (3720), Cinebench (932)
#75
I like my grass...:pimp:
Lol fo sho.. fo sho.. :pimp:

I just read the following on Legit Reviews, regarding GK104. It is rumour but makes an awful lot of sense.



They also said there is a rumour (no proof but word is out there) that the 680's sent to reviewers were cherry picked (most are from both camps?) to specifically be cooler and clock higher. Could well be the 680's aren't quite up to scratch, therefore the 670 picks up the pieces (and does so very well).
Lol that's a heck of a lot of speculation.. First week they come out, with infant drivers and you people are creating g rape vines.. XD
LOL phase out the 680 with a 670 = 685? lmao.. Yes and then they will create a dragon to devour all the remaining 670's for their lack of faith..
Come on.. Infant drivers, infant card.. It's gonna shine. I'm not complaining.

I feel bad for anyone who bought a gtx680 at this point 90% of the performance for $100 less? hell yes
Don't.. Thats not feelin bad, that's hatin.. Don't hate..
This is just like 8800gts vs 8800gtx all over again..
The 670 is not going to destroy the 680. Stop trying to hate on it, just because you didn't want to fork out the extra cash for the 680.

How you word it doesn't matter, the fact is getting a 4 GB 670 can get you better performance than a 680 for less. It may only be memory limited situations, but between mods and these cheap 1440p displays that happens a good bit.

To put this in the perspective of your "crippled" gpu complaint, there was never a 260/470/570 released that could match their full blown sibling. With this 670 there's multiple units at launch that match or exceed the performance of a 680. This is unlike any prior situation. My point is you're not going to have that kind of buyers remorse with a 670. Even more so if you buy a 4 GB.
Post links where these 670s destroy 680's or it never happened..

Quite Frankly, 100 dollars means squat to me..
Even if I get one more FPS, thats one more sweet, sweet, fps I get to enjoy..

I honestly think a lot of people are just hating in here.. That's cool. I'm going to navigate away from this topic..
Stop pissin on peoples cherrios.. :slap:
 
Last edited: