Discussion in 'techPowerUp! Club Forum' started by p_o_s_pc, Nov 8, 2007.
POS, I think the ranking should be lowest to highest overclock, not pure speed.
hat makes a good point, we'll have 2 sets of ranks, no biggy
I think it should only be one set =:-c
oh right, that way you're at the top of the list with a low speed oc while pbmaster is towards the bottom for the highest speed?
I just think that's the way it should be. I won't be at the top of the list, it would be... Solaris17 I think, but I'm not sure. I'm more twards the bottom
lol. but i think both of the ranks should be there.
go ahead, good luck and if you get it stable at least 3hrs I will challenge your clock
I think it would be too much clutter, but I'm no "caption" either
lol lets see what pos and ben have to say
I agree, both rankings should be up there. Sure, raising the multiplier is the easiest way to go, but it's still impressive when you get a high clock. All of these speeds we're reaching are rather impressive in my opinion.
well yeah. this is for like the 1337 amd clockers out there.
nope i think i would be at the top i took a 1.8ghz CPU to 3.1ghz.
That's what I'm saying. AMD's are known for being a little more difficult to overclock...everyone here is doing a good job and should all be noted for it.
just lowered my ram timings to 4-4-4-12 from 5-5-5-18 so far so good
nice!! what voltage?
cool, you on micron d9's?
yup, thats gotta be micron d9's... whats your speed?
if your on D9's i think you can get higher.I get 4-4-4-10 @1000mhz @2.2v on my ram and it has D9's unless you have the slower chips.
pos, get on msn
i think you should divide the list up because it is much easier to get a single core to 3ghz than it is for a dual core,and panchoman shouldnt be here with his close attempt at 3ghz
Separate names with a comma.