• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD 955 vs Intel i7 920

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (2.04/day)
Likes
799
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
So I guess the universal conclusion is you can't go wrong either way :)
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
147 (0.04/day)
Likes
0
Location
United States
Processor AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Thuban 2.8GHz Socket AM3
Motherboard ASUS M4A87TD/USB3 AM3 AMD 870 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD
Cooling Stock
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 100315L Radeon HD 6850 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX
Storage WD Caviar Black WD6401AALS 640GB 7200 RPM | WD Caviar Blue WD5000AAKS 500GB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Dell U2410
Case Antec 900W
Power Supply Rosewill Green Series RG530-S12 530W Continuous
Software Windows 7
Wow, this thread grew. lol

So what is the main difference between the i5 and i7 other than power? i5 doesn't have hyperthreading, correct?
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
i7 has a QuickPath Interconnect link while i5 doesn't (it does, but it is strictly under the processor cap). Both have hyperthreading and turbo. i7 also supports tri-channel memory while the rest are dual channel.


For what it is worth, the i7 920 takes the majority of gaming benchmarks (even with slower cards) in comparison to the 955.

920: 9
955: 4
tie: 3
 
Last edited:

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,759 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
true enough its been said in multi gpu that i7 wins but in the games same with single card

but you will notice as the graphics settings are turned up and AA is turned up its still limited by the gpu so while i7 gives more frames the fact remains that the phenom dosent really lose anything as both run games well and with a decent gpu any game will be playable and even with multi gpus in alot of games at higher resolution where multi gpu makes sense

to be honest if i had the money id go i7 but ive never had good luck with intel cpus

but even so i7 dominance is undisputed but i5 when overclocked closes the gap with i7 and i5 is the more easy to digest finacially platforms so to speak from intell

again if u got the money go i5 or i7 if u want perfromance on the cheap go AMD

that article u linked said it best most games show an advantage with i7 but in terms of real world playability all systems are delivering high frame rates in all titles :toast:
 

Wile E

Power User
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
24,318 (5.89/day)
Likes
3,682
System Name The ClusterF**k
Processor 980X @ 4Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 BIOS F12
Cooling MCR-320, DDC-1 pump w/Bitspower res top (1/2" fittings), Koolance CPU-360
Memory 3x2GB Mushkin Redlines 1600Mhz 6-8-6-24 1T
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 580
Storage Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB, 2xSeagate 320GB RAID0; 2xSeagate 3TB; 2xSamsung 2TB; Samsung 1.5TB
Display(s) HP LP2475w 24" 1920x1200 IPS
Case Technofront Bench Station
Audio Device(s) Auzentech X-Fi Forte into Onkyo SR606 and Polk TSi200's + RM6750
Power Supply ENERMAX Galaxy EVO EGX1250EWT 1250W
Software Win7 Ultimate N x64, OSX 10.8.4
To add to that, why buy something that eats more power and runs hotter when you don't need it? I can buy what I want, and I got a PII because they are easy to use, run cool and don't use a lot of power. I buy based on my needs.
That just makes you a tree-hugging hippy pansy. :D

At any rate, I'd go i7 920. Not as much for the performance difference, but because of greater flexibility of the platform, and the better upgrade potential.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Has anyone found a benchmark running 8 threads on Phenom II 955 and Core i7 920? That would tell you if hyperthreading/extra power consumption is worth it or not.

If no one has seen such a benchmark, maybe we should make one. :D
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,429 (5.77/day)
Likes
8,945
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
Has anyone found a benchmark running 8 threads on Phenom II 955 and Core i7 920? That would tell you if hyperthreading/extra power consumption is worth it or not.

If no one has seen such a benchmark, maybe we should make one. :D
Ive seen a bunch with video encoding. Supreme Commander would be a great bench for gaming and multi-threading but no one seems to give a rats ass about it.
 
Joined
Nov 14, 2007
Messages
147 (0.04/day)
Likes
0
Location
United States
Processor AMD Phenom II X6 1055T Thuban 2.8GHz Socket AM3
Motherboard ASUS M4A87TD/USB3 AM3 AMD 870 SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD
Cooling Stock
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 1600 (PC3 12800)
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 100315L Radeon HD 6850 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX
Storage WD Caviar Black WD6401AALS 640GB 7200 RPM | WD Caviar Blue WD5000AAKS 500GB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Dell U2410
Case Antec 900W
Power Supply Rosewill Green Series RG530-S12 530W Continuous
Software Windows 7
What would be the best (cheapest) motherboard for the i7?
 

crazyeyesreaper

Chief Broken Rig
Staff member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
8,759 (2.72/day)
Likes
3,650
Location
04578
well mailman i know for a fact with 2 5850s and my 940be at stock 8000 units on screen i still peg 60fps with vsync on using core optimizer which forces the game to use up to 32 cores as it works for both sup com and sup com fa
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
488 (0.15/day)
Likes
33
Cpu - Intel core i7-860 (2.8Ghz with turbo boost to 3.46ghz with 4 core/8threads )
Mobo - Gigabyte P55 UD3R
555$ total
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,429 (5.77/day)
Likes
8,945
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
Cpu - Intel core i7-860 (2.8Ghz with turbo boost to 3.46ghz with 4 core/8threads )
Mobo - Gigabyte P55 UD3R
555$ total
You have Micheal Jackson in your avatar. You cannot be trusted with computer advice or small boys.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Ive seen a bunch with video encoding. Supreme Commander would be a great bench for gaming and multi-threading but no one seems to give a rats ass about it.
Naw, we'd need something that can specify how many threads to create (to make sure it always creates 8, regardless of how many processors are detected) and it must be CPU/RAM intensive in order to keep the hard drive out of it as much as possible. It must also be identical in how it operates no matter the system.

I do have an app that meets all those requirements but it is a computational light weight but, if someone has a 965 or 955 at stock and would like to try it, it would at least be something.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,429 (5.77/day)
Likes
8,945
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
Naw, we'd need something that can specify how many threads to create (to make sure it always creates 8, regardless of how many processors are detected) and it must be CPU/RAM intensive in order to keep the hard drive out of it as much as possible. It must also be identical in how it operates no matter the system.

I do have an app that meets all those requirements but it is a computational light weight but, if someone has a 965 or 955 at stock and would like to try it, it would at least be something.
I got a 955 at stock. PM me the details. In the meantime look at this Dirt2 bench.....
 

Attachments

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
You got PM...


Dirt2 benchmark? It's only 1680x1050 at 1x AA and the sole 920 in there is overclocked. The benchmark looks like it is clearly GPU limited seeing as most of the benchmarks on the higher end CPUs are in a statistical tie.
 
Joined
Dec 21, 2009
Messages
146 (0.05/day)
Likes
10
System Name Uhh WTF
Processor A10-5800K
Motherboard ASrock FM2A85X-Extreme4-M
Cooling Coolermaster Vortex PLUS
Memory 8GB Samsung 1600MHZ 1.35v
Storage 120GB Agility3
Display(s) ASUS 23" TN Panel
Case Silverstone SST-PS07
Power Supply 550W Antec Modular "Basiq" 80PLUS
Software Windows 8 x64
I honestly doubt you'll notice a difference between the two, but the Core i7 920 is faster, especially in multi-threaded applications.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Preliminary tests are very interesting. In a simple task such as int and decimal addition, 4 threads is actually faster than 8 by quite a broad margin (2388193212.75 to 2876328473.25 and 1499773664.25 to 1545510125.25). I'm waiting for MailMan though...
 
Joined
Jan 26, 2009
Messages
488 (0.15/day)
Likes
33
You have Micheal Jackson in your avatar. You cannot be trusted with computer advice or small boys.
your avatar is very good... :roll:
You cannot be trusted with computer advice or small boys
Cpu - Intel core i7-860 +
Mobo - Gigabyte P55 UD3R
is a nice combination .....
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
The testing is done and it yielded some very interesting results.

Testing Method
Basically, the application just adds either 1 + 1 or 1.0 + 1.0 for one second and repeats this 10 times.

Not basic...
1) It starts 8 threads which just add in an endless loop.
2) Once all threads have been started, it zeros all their count from 0 to 8.
3) It does nothing for one second while the threads count.
4) It reads the value of each thread, 0 to 8, and zeros it.
5) It repeats step 2-4 nine times for a total count of 10.
6) It adds up all those scores producing the cumulative score ("[C]") and averages the value for each test ("[0]" through "[9]").
7) Repeat steps 1-6 for doubles (1.0)
8) Repeat steps 1-6 for ulongs (1) but only 4 threads.
9) Repeat steps 1-6 for doubles (1.0) with 4 threads.


The app is a light weight in that the mathematical operations it completes are stupefyingly simple; however, it will load your CPU to 100% with those stupefyingly simple calculations. It's kind of like putting a race horse on a treadmill to see how much distance it can cover in a given time (approximately 10 seconds in our case).


The Results



What Do We Learn From This

1) Does hyperthreading help? Without a doubt. The Core i7 is a lame duck without it's hyperthreading even in the 4-threaded tests that should have matched in both tests. Disabling Hyperthreading, even when you need the capability to run just four threads, is a bad idea.

2) How does the higher clockspeed of the 955/965 stack up to the lower clockspeed of the 920 in sheer counting prowess? Not well. Core i7 920, with or without hyperthreading, is clearly faster clock for clock. The Phenom II 955 has the lowest counts/clockspeed ratio of those tested.

3) How does the actual work output compare to the power consumption? This is a guesstimate based on TDP which Intel and AMD measure differently so take with a significant portion of salt. Core i7 920 w/ Hyperthreading is the most efficient with the dual Xeons being last. The Phenom II 955 makes a relatively strong showing here.

4) How does the 955/965 fair compared to the 920 at running 8 vs 4 threads? First, it is surprising to note that all platforms tested did worse with 8 threads versus 4, even a dual Xeon quad core platform. This discovery baffles me. Even then, as expected, the dual Xeons had the least decline in performance going from 4 threads to eight while the Phenom II pulls up the rear. The Core i7 takes a huge loss in this department with Hyperthreading disabled.


Conclusion
In this simple test, Core i7 920 w/ Hyperthreading enabled sweeps the floor of all other processors tested except in comparing 8 threads to 4 threads (dual Xeon saw the smallest loss). If you have a Core i# with Hyperthreading, do not disable it.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,773 (5.13/day)
Likes
5,181
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
Hyperthreading should only be disabled for compatibility purposes, but TBH users should be able to enable and disable the ability on the fly.

Core i series was designed for HT to be enabled compared to the Pentium 4.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
5,576 (1.42/day)
Likes
864
System Name MightyX (MITX)
Processor Core i7 4770K @ 4.2ghz
Motherboard Asus Z87i-Pro
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory 16gb DDR3 1600 LP
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 OC
Storage Lots of SSD's
Display(s) AOC AGON AG352QCX
Case Raven RVZ-01
Power Supply SFX 450 G
Mouse Razer Mamba Tournament Chroma
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
yes, the extra money for the i7 920 IS worth it, in my opinion.

hec I use so little of it's power, but its just really nice knowing it's there if you want to tap it.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,773 (5.13/day)
Likes
5,181
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
majority feel the same way with the slower processors too.
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
5,576 (1.42/day)
Likes
864
System Name MightyX (MITX)
Processor Core i7 4770K @ 4.2ghz
Motherboard Asus Z87i-Pro
Cooling Noctua NH-L12
Memory 16gb DDR3 1600 LP
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 OC
Storage Lots of SSD's
Display(s) AOC AGON AG352QCX
Case Raven RVZ-01
Power Supply SFX 450 G
Mouse Razer Mamba Tournament Chroma
Keyboard Razer Blackwidow X Chroma
Thats probably because the majority buy slower processors, which stands to reason. The OP asked;

I was wondering if the price difference of the 920 is worth it?
My opinion says hell yeah it is.
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (2.04/day)
Likes
799
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
yes, the extra money for the i7 920 IS worth it, in my opinion.

hec I use so little of it's power, but its just really nice knowing it's there if you want to tap it.
The 920 at 1.6ghz still runs all todays games at good fps.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
21,080 (6.22/day)
Likes
10,208
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
Hyperthreading should only be disabled for compatibility purposes, but TBH users should be able to enable and disable the ability on the fly.
I have never encountered a problem with compatibility. I haven't heard of any reports of problems either.

It would be nice if Hyperthreading could be enabled and disabled as necessary but I think that wouldn't be easy to achieve and may come with pretty severe penalties especially in terms of threads getting cut off entirely. Since people should leave it enabled, I think it is fine to leave it an option in the BIOS.


My opinion says hell yeah it is.
I concur.