• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD A10-5800K vs. Intel Core i3 3220 Head to Head

Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#1
Introduction

Choosing hardware for a computer can be a daunting task. For most, choosing the right processor can be as equally challenging. For those not familiar with processors and performance, Intel has held the king of performance for many years but AMD has shaken up the competition as recent.

In 2011 AMD introduced Zacate and Llano which used AMD’s Fusion technology and they called these new processors APU’s (Accelerated processing Units). Fusion was the world first on die graphics processor that gave consumers a low priced solution for an budget OEM, custom desktop or laptop namely in the $300 to $600 range. The pride of AMD’s Fusion technology was not only price but more than adequate video capabilities. Last year, AMD rolled out Trinity and took their “Bulldozer” cores and they evolved into the new “Piledriver” cores which also incorporated Fusion technology. This resulted in a much better APU replacing Llano in their line-up. AMD’s strategy with the new processors is: Bobcat (good), Trinity (better) and Vishera (best).


In the meantime, Intel keeps the train rolling with their “Tick Toc” strategy. Every other year, Intel’s plan is new architecture (Tock) and on the flip side, increasing transistor density (Tick). This year, Intel rolled out IvyBridge and uses 22nm fabrication and increased the transistor density with their new “Tri-Gate” transistors resulting in a more efficient processor. Intel’s strategy remains core i3(good), core i5(better) and core i7(best).



Today, we are going to take a look at AMD’s and Intel’s lower priced offerings namely Intel’s core i3 3220 and AMD’s A10-5800K and put them head to head in competition. Since both IvyBridge and Trinity’s introduction, many still lean toward Intel not realizing AMD has stepped up their game. Will Intel still take the cake in this arena? Let’s roll both processors to the bench and fire them up and see who hits the finish line first.
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#2
Intel IvyBridge

Intel continues its business plan as mentioned with their “Tick Tock” strategy. SandyBridge brought to the table 32nm fabrication process and IvyBridge shrinks the die to 22nm along with increasing transistor density with the new “Tri-Gate” transistors. Here we see a diagram of the i3 3220. The architecture does not change from SandyBridge and Intel’s next generation due out mid 2013 is named Haswell. Haswell will bring new architecture to the table.

Here is the Ivy Bridge 22nm die. Along with Intel using up to 4000 graphics with Ivy, it has DX 11 support along with Open GL and Open CL support. There are also some modifications to Ivy Bridge that will have better single threaded performance dedicating all the resources to the single core. In multi threaded applications the resources are used simultaneously. Intel says a 5-15% performance boost on the processing side over Sandy Bridge but a 20-50% increase on the GPU.



Intel’s model structure stays the same as SandyBridge with “K” models being unlocked for overclocking but non “K” models are locked have no overclocking. Here is the current Intel line-up including SandyBridge processors that will eventually be phased out. As we see in the diagram, Intel’s architecture has an on die graphics processor on all IvyBridge CPU’s. As the models egress, so do the graphics processors. The 3770 models feature Intel’s 4000 GPU’s and bottom out on the i3 models with Intel’s 2000 graphics. Today’s head to head competition features a dedicated GPU but Intel’s on die GPU’s really do not stand up to AMD’s solution as we will see later.




AMD Trinity

AMD Trinity APU’s use AMD’s new Piledriver cores that evolved from Bulldozer cores. Bulldozer, in many persons opinion, was a flop for AMD. AMD did not have the instruction set nailed and performance was very lack luster. That changed with Piledriver.

The main focus from AMD with Piledriver was to maximize the resources with their newly designed cores and they have done just that. Each module is made from two of AMD’s “Four Star” x86 cores and they use two modules making four cores. In addition, each core is connected through pipelines sharing the resources with the principle of efficiency. AMD still dedicates a large amount of the die to the on-die GPU but as we see, the cores change to AMD’s new Piledriver cores, which come with 2MB L2 cache (Llano had 1MB L2 cache). AMD also carries on their 32nm fabrication and each module and has two integer cores & a floating point. A four core Trinity APU has 2 modules (4 integer cores and 2 floating points per core).



If you didn’t notice and as I mentioned, AMD dedicates more die space than Intel for the GPU and with Trinity, they top out with AMD’s 7660D GPU which is far superior to Intel’s 4000 graphics package. The result in my initial Trinity review was far superior graphics package than Intel and to be frank, Intel was choppy at best with most games. With YouTube, videos and movies being at an all time high, AMD takes the crown here over Intel’s 3220 core i3 in graphics.



Graphics part of computing has become to some as important to regular computing nowadays. The UVD (Unified Video Decoder) that AMD uses is based on an ATI video processor. This is incorporated into the same die of the GPU for hardware decoding videos, along with the Advanced Video Processor (AVP). UVD handles decoding of video codecs entirely in hardware. Moving back in time, we saw UVD+ in the Radeon 3000 days, UVD 2 in the Radeon 4000 days and UVD 2.2 in RV770 and RV730 series of GPUs. Today, AMD uses UVD 3. UVD 3 (Universal Video Decoder 3) is a new version of the graphics for smoother and better video.



Here is AMD’s Trinity line-up. The Athlon series was an afterthought and requires a dedicated GPU but still an inexpensive solution for most. Trinity tops out with AMD’s 7660D with the A10-5800K on die GPU and bottoms with the A4-5300K and 7480D graphics.



Next, is a look at the motherboards.

ASRock FM2A85X Extreme 6

For the A10-5800K, the board selected is the ASRock FM2A85X Extreme 6.



MSI Z77 MPower


And for the Intel core i3 3220, we see the MSI Z77 MPower.



Test Bench

Processors: Intel core i3 3220/AMD A10-5800K
Motherboards: MSI Z77 MPower/ ASRock FM2A85X Extreme 6
PSU: Nexus 1100 Watt
Memory: 8G G.Skill 2400MHz Trident tuned at 1600MHz Cas 9
Graphics: Sapphire 7970
Hard Drive: 240G OCZ Revo Drive/ 120G OCZ Vertex 3
Cooling: Custom Water
Case: Phobya WayCoolit Test Bench





Benchmarking Mindset

There are countless benchmarks that can be performed in the head to head competition. We narrowed them down to a manageable amount. I will test CPU, platform specifics, real world, synthetics and some gaming using a dedicated Radeon 7970. This should give a well rounded look at performance.

Let’s start with platform/motherboard specific benchies
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#3
Memory


Aida 64

AIDA64 implements a set of 64-bit benchmarks to measure how fast the computer performs various data processing tasks and mathematical calculations. Memory and cache benchmarks are available to analyze system RAM bandwidth and latency. Processor benchmarks utilize MMX, 3DNow!, SSE, XOP, FMA, and AVX instructions, and scale up to 32 processor cores. For legacy processors all benchmarks are available in 32-bit version as well. AIDA64 Disk Benchmark determines the data transfer speed of hard disk drives, solid-state drives, optical drives, and flash memory based devices.

There is no secret here. Intel owns AMD with memory read/write and copy speeds along with Latencies. We will see if the additional bandwidth equates to better performance shortly.






Disk Performance

ATTO

The ATTO Disk Benchmark performance measurement tool is compatible with Microsoft Windows. Measure your storage systems performance with various transfer sizes and test lengths for reads and writes. Several options are available to customize your performance measurement including queue depth, overlapped I/O and even a comparison mode with the option to run continuously. Use ATTO Disk Benchmark to test any manufacturers RAID controllers, storage controllers, host adapters, hard drives and SSD drives and notice that ATTO products will consistently provide the highest level of performance to your storage.

In disk performance between the platforms using the Asmedia and Intel Controller: Linear speeds trade blows in read and write performance.

We see the Intel core i3 leading AMD’s A10-5800K slightly in read speeds and overclocking does help AMD here.



Similar results in write speeds using ATTO.



USB 3.0/ CrystalMark

CrystalMark is a useful benchmark suite, that lets you to test your CPU, memory, HDD and video (GDI, Direct Draw, OpenGL) subsystems. The program also shows some information about your system. The report can be saved in a text or HTML.

I also wanted to test USB 3.0 performance between the platforms. For today’s test, I used a USB 3.0 doc station with a 240G Verbatim Solid State Drive. Again, AMD and Intel trade blows but Intel was slightly better in 4K and 4KQD32 which is representative of saturated lanes. Both performed very well.

INTEL core 13 3220




AMD A10-5800K Default 3.9GHz




AMD A10-5800K Overclock 4.6GHz

Overclocked, The A10 performs pretty equal to the 3220 trading blows.



Ok, let’s take a look at CPU performance next.

CPU Performance

Sandralite

Specifically designed to provide users with detailed information regarding their computer, SiSoftware Sandralite offers an impressive array of information concerning every single hardware component that is hidden under the hood of the machine. CPU performance is measured by GFlops ((Giga)FLoating-point Operations Per Second and Gips (Giga instructions per second.)

Dhrystone tries to represent the result more meaningfully than MIPS (million instructions per second) because instruction count comparisons between different instruction sets (e.g. RISC vs. CISC) can confound simple comparisons. For example, the same high-level task may require many more instructions on a RISC machine, but might execute faster than a single CISC instruction. Thus, the Dhrystone score counts only the number of program iteration completions per second, allowing individual machines to perform this calculation in a machine-specific way. Another common representation of the Dhrystone benchmark is the DMIPS (Dhrystone MIPS) obtained when the Dhrystone score is divided by 1757 (the number of Dhrystones per second obtained on the VAX 11/780, nominally a 1 MIPS machine).


With Sandralite, The Intel core i3 3220 beats the AMD A10-5800K at default speed in Gips but Intel’s 3220 pulls the victory in GFlops.



The Whetstone benchmark originally measured computing power in units of kilo-Whetstone Instructions Per Second (kWIPS). This was later changed to Millions of Whetstone Instructions Per Second (MWIPS).

With Sandralite’s Whetsone, Intel’s 3220 beats AMD in measuring floating point and arithmetic performance. Floating point and arithmetic are considered by some to be a good measuring stick for a processor but some are not convinced this leads to better real world performance. We will soon see the results.



LinX

Linx is stress test software and a form of Linpack that measures CPU performance in GFlop measurements.

Using Linx(which is a form of Linpack) AMD squeaks out a victory with the A10-5800K overclocked.



SuperPi

Super PI is a computer program that calculates pi to a specified number of digits after the decimal point—up to a maximum of 32 million. It uses Gauss–Legendre algorithm and is a Windows port of the program used by Yasumasa Kanada in 1995 to compute pi to 232 digits. SuperPi is used to measure single threaded performance.

Again, no surprise with SuperPi, Intel rules the roost. Some think SuprPi is an outdated benchmark but there is still a following with it.



wPrime

wPrime is a leading multithreaded benchmark for x86 processors that tests your processor performance by calculating square roots with a recursive call of Newton's method for estimating functions, with f(x)=x2-k, where k is the number we're sqrting, until Sgn(f(x)/f'(x)) does not equal that of the previous iteration, starting with an estimation of k/2. It then uses an iterative calling of the estimation method a set amount of times to increase the accuracy of the results. It then confirms that n(k)2=k to ensure the calculation was correct. It repeats this for all numbers from 1 to the requested maximum. wPrime is used in measuring multi-threaded performance.

Intel beats AMD in wPrime as suspected at stock frequencies but uh oh! AMD takes the lead with multi-threading here.

 
Last edited:
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#4
Synthetic Benchmarks

3DMark 11

3DMark 11 is a DirectX 11 video card benchmark test for Windows that is designed to measure your PC's gaming performance. 3DMark 11 makes extensive use of DirectX 11 features including tessellation, compute shaders and multi-threading. Trusted by gamers worldwide to give accurate and unbiased results, 3DMark 11 is the best way to consistently and reliably test DirectX 11 under game-like loads.

In 3DMark 11, we see a tight race: about 1% difference in total score. Intel wins by a close margin at stock speeds but AMD pulls ahead overclocked. Looks like we are seeing a trend.



3DMark 2013 (Fire Strike)

The new 3DMark includes everything you need to benchmark your hardware. With three all new tests you can bench everything from smartphones and tablets, to notebooks and home PCs, to the latest high-end, multi-GPU gaming desktops. And it's not just for Windows. With 3DMark you can compare your scores with Android and iOS devices too.

Ditto with FireStrike: The A10-5800K overclocked takes a close race.



PCMark 7

PCMark 7 is a complete PC benchmarking solution for Windows 7 and Windows 8. It includes 7 tests combining more than 25 individual workloads covering storage, computation, image and video manipulation, web browsing and gaming. Specifically designed for the full range of PC hardware from netbooks and tablets to notebooks and desktops, PCMark 7 offers complete Windows PC performance testing for home and business use.

The trend continues with PCMark7. Many like this benchmark as it scores the total system with a slew of tests. AMD pulls a very short victory. Very little separation with PCMark 7.



PassMark

Passmark is a fast, easy to use, PC speed testing and benchmarking. PassMark PerformanceTest ™ allows you to objectively benchmark a PC using a variety of different speed tests and compare the results to other computers.

PassMark turns the table back to Intel with a 5% lead at default but AMD passes Intel again. Intel fan boys may be worried?



Maxon Cinebench 11.5

CINEBENCH can measure systems with up to 64 processor threads. ThIS test scene contains approximately 2,000 objects which in turn contain more than 300,000 polygons in total, and uses sharp and blurred reflections, area lights, shadows, procedural shaders, antialiasing, and much more. The result is displayed in points (pts). The higher the number, the faster your processor.

Again, about a dead heat rendering with Cinebench at stock. Overclocked, AMD pulls away.



Unigine Heaven

Heaven Benchmark with its current version 4.0 is a GPU-intensive benchmark that hammers graphics cards to the limits. This powerful tool can be effectively used to determine the stability of a GPU under extremely stressful conditions, as well as check the cooling system's potential under maximum heat output. It provides completely unbiased results and generates true in-game rendering workloads across all platforms, such as Windows, Linux and Mac OS X.

The trend continues.



So far, both processors look to be pretty even with Intel slightly ahead at stock core speeds but AMD is beating Intel when overclocked. Remember, these are synthetic benchies: some do not put much credence in synthetics. None the less, they are measuring tools.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#5
Real World Benchmarks

Excel Trader.net

Trader Net Excel benchmark is an excellent real world tool. It takes multiple Excel spreadsheets and uses them in building OHLC data, Tick conversion, charts, price changes and calculations.
In our first real world benchmark, AMD’s A10-5800K beats out Intel’s 3220 by 10%.

Overclocking hinders AMD compared to stock setting which is confusing. Perhaps it could be AMD workload distribution between the cores?



WinRar


WinRAR is a lightweight, flexible, and easy-to-use archiving utility that can unpack most archive formats, as well as compress to both RAR and ZIP.

Using WinRar, I compressed a 230Mb file and Intel and Intel wins in file compression hands down.



Photoshop

Adobe® Photoshop® CS6 software delivers even more image editing power, new creative options, and the Adobe Mercury Graphics Engine for blazingly fast performance. Retouch with new Content-Aware features, and create superior designs as well as movies using new and reimagined tools and workflows.

Using Photoshop, I took a photo and used Radial Blur and timed the render. AMD beats Intel handily here.



Cyberlink Media Espresso

Media Espresso is a blazingly fast media universal converter that can transcode your videos, photos and music files and out put them to a huge range of portable devices including mobile phones, portable media players and even game consoles.

Using Media Espresso, I took the new James Bond Skyfall trailer in 1080p and converted a MP3 file to a .wav file. The results show Intel better again at stock but behind the A10 at 4.6GHz.

 
Last edited:
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#6
Gaming Benchmarks

Battlefield 3

Battlefield 3 (commonly abbreviated BF3) is a first-person shooter video game developed by EA Digital Illusions CE and published by Electronic Arts. It is a direct sequel to 2005's Battlefield 2, and the twelfth installment in the Battlefield franchise.

In BF3, Intel beats AMD using our Radeon 7970 in both stock and overclocked. As a side note: I used 13.2 Beta drivers for the testing.



Call of Duty

Call of Duty: Black Ops II is a first-person shooter video game, developed by Treyarch and published by Activision (Square Enix for Japan). The single-player campaign features two connected storylines, with the first set from 1986 to 1989 during the final years of the first Cold War, and the other set in 2025 during a second Cold War. The protagonist of Black Ops, Alex Mason returns as the protagonist in the first Cold War section, and chronicles the rise to infamy of the game's primary antagonist, Raul Menendez,[14] a Nicaraguan narco-terrorist and the leader of "Cordis Die", a populist movement celebrated as the champion of victims of economic inequality.

C.O.D shows equal performance at 93FPS but overclocked was a tad slower. When running multi-player and scenes that are not programmed, these things do happen. None the less, looks like relative equal performance with Call of Duty.



Dirt 3

Dirt 3 (stylised DiRT 3) is a rallying video game and the third in the Dirt series of the Colin McRae Rally series, developed and published by Codemasters.

With Dirt 3, we see a reversal. AMD pulls one out here.



Alien vs. Predator

Test your PC's DirectX 11 performance with this free, standalone benchmark test based upon Rebellion's 2010 inter-species shooter Aliens vs. Predator. The test shows xenomorph-tastic scenes using tessellation and other such fancy DX11 features.

AvP also shows equal performance.



Resident Evil 6

Resident Evil 6 is a third-person shooter video game in the Resident Evil series, developed and published by Capcom. Capcom defines the game's genre as "dramatic horror", however there is disagreement among reviewers whether this installment belongs in survival horror genre.

Lastly, Intel’s core i3 3220 again, squeaks out a victory here by 400 points at stock but AMD kicks in at overclocked.




AMD 7660D vs. Intel 2500


I ran a few quick gaming benchmarks to pit AMD’s 7660D against Intel’s 2500 graphics. Let’s take a peek.









In each game, AMD owns Intel for on die GPU performance. Gaming is choppy at best in some games with Intel so they are not even on the same planet against AMD. And to top it off, AMD offers their top on die GPU with the A10-5800K where as Intel does not with the core i3 3220.


Power Consumption


Intel has always been very good with Power Consumption. AMD’s Bulldozer cores were not very good but as we see, AMD idles lower than Intel but still draws much more at load. Remember, AMD still uses 32nm fabrication and next generations are working on 22nm fab. 32 nm will pull more power so we will see what shakes out as AMD evolves. Power consumption was done with the Radeon 7970 FYI.




 
Last edited:
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#7
Summary


The debate may continue on what processor is better but facts are facts. Dissecting the various levels of CPU’s can be confusing as many assume Intel makes the best processors. Intel’s SandyBridge “E” processors (on the high end) continue to be the cream of the crop but dropping $500 to $1000 can be a stretch for most. Intel’s 3770K continues to lead AMD but as most saw with the release of Piledriver (FX-8350), AMD is not far behind. In a matter of fact, FX-8350 is a close competitor to Intel’s 3570K and in many multi-threaded applications; the FX processor beats the 3550K. That debate can live another day.

In the budget sector, we saw today that Trinity (A10-5800K) competes well with Intel’s IvyBridge core i3 3220 and they pretty much trade blows out of the box with no clear winner. Intel does offer more memory bandwidth and slightly faster SSD speeds but these did not equate to the 3220 beating the A10-5800K. Some may argue Intel’s core speed is 3.3GHz and AMD’s 3.9GHz, so core for core would be the fairest comparison but that is not true here. The core i3 3220 cannot be overclocked at all. Here is where AMD shines and wins. In almost every benchmark, AMD rose to the top and beat the 3220.

Intel has dropped the price on its core i3 3220 to $129 equaling the price of the A10-5800K at NewEgg so both platforms would set you back equally. One thing that separates the A10-5800K for those not looking for a dedicated GPU is its 7660D on die GPU. The 7660D handily stomps Intel’s 2500 Graphics. As a bonus, AMD’s 7660D can be Cross-fired with a Radeon 7500 GPU or lower. This gives AMD’s APU’s a huge advantage as it can be used 3 ways: standalone, Crossfire or with a dedicated GPU.

Both processors do shine in cost. With either Intel’s i3’s or AMD Trinity, one can build a system for as low as $400 to $600 and get “decent” performance(decent is interpreted many ways). With the entire package looked at, AMD’s Trinity is a much better choice that Intel’s core i3 3220 hands down for performance and versatility.



Recently, news has been abuzz that AMD’s Jaguar is better than Intel’s core i3. The latest news have a 5.9W quad-core Temash outperforming a 17W Core i-3 Sandy Bridge but admittedly, it is too early to tell. If this is true Intel may have some worries. AMD may be closer in bringing x86 technology to the mobile and ultra mobile arena plus rumor has it; Apple is looking heavily into AMD. Maybe AMD was smarter than most thought developing APU’s and looking into efficiency and leaving high end performance for the time being. Rumor also has Haswell not being the hype some think and Steamroller may give AMD some more life at the high end sector catching Intel. Interesting how things change.
 
Last edited:

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,377 (3.19/day)
Likes
2,101
Location
Home
System Name Asus K50-X5DAB \\ Orange!
Processor Athlon QL-65 2.2Ghz \\ 3570K
Motherboard Laptop \\ ASRock z77 Extreme4
Cooling Laptop \\ H100i
Memory 1x1GB + 1X2GB \\ 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3
Video Card(s) Mobility Radeon HD4570 512mb \\ Zotac 660Ti OC 2Gb
Storage 250Gb \\ Samsung 840 250Gb + Toshiba DT01ACA300 3Tb
Display(s) 15.6" 1366x768 \\ LG 22EA53VQ
Case Laptop Chassis \\ NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange
Power Supply Power Brick \\ Corsair CXM500w
#8
Pretty close in almost all benchmarks, with 5800K having an edge. Based on this I think the FX4300 would be the recommended piece of hardware in the budget range for now. I am surprised the 5800K didn't pull ahead in BF3.
 
Joined
Dec 20, 2010
Messages
652 (0.26/day)
Likes
58
Location
Fresno, CA
System Name LS Vtec B18B1 Bolt Ons
Processor AMD Phenom ii 1045t x6 @ 3.5Ghz OC
Motherboard ASRock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 AM3+
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO Push Pull
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance 8GB (2 x 4GB) Black 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire 7950 Dual-X
Storage Samsung EVO 250gb SSD/Samsung 500gb 7200 rpm/WD Cavirar Green 1TB
Display(s) Acer H236HLbid IPS
Case NZXT Gamma (Powder Coated Champion White)
Audio Device(s) Creative Lab SB0460
Power Supply NZXT HALE82 V2 550W
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
Benchmark Scores Vtec
#9
Thanks for the benchmarks, this means a lot because i'm going to build a budget gaming pc soon.
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#10
Pretty close in almost all benchmarks, with 5800K having an edge. Based on this I think the FX4300 would be the recommended piece of hardware in the budget range for now. I am surprised the 5800K didn't pull ahead in BF3.
I ran the benchmarks and did the Head to head because some people think core i3's are better than Trinity and that is not the case as seen. When jumping to the FX 4300, the platform changes as to AM3+. FM2 motherboards can be bought very cheap as the A10-5800K at $129. For budget conscious users, the A10-5800K Trinity or even 5600K for less may be the call. I wasn't trying to raise awareness yo the FX-4300 but not a bad point.

Thanks for the benchmarks, this means a lot because i'm going to build a budget gaming pc soon.
Anytime
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,287 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,395
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#11
I'm glad you did an overclocked comparison, too many reviews glance over the fact that the AMD processor can be overclocked in this price range(assuming you get a K processor), while the Intels can't. They compare stock numbers, which makes the Intel look better, but the AMD overclocked is actually better than the i3. And frankly, if pairing with a discrete GPU the A8-5600K makes even more sense over the Intel offering as it is cheaper and from what I've seen overclocks pretty much just as well as the A10.

I'm also surprised by the power consumption numbers. Everyone says Intel consumes less power, but at idle the AMD platform was actually better. And since PCs sit idle 95% of the time they are one, IMO the fact that the AMD used less power at idle means over its life the AMD would actually use less power than the Intel.
 

HammerON

The Watchful Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
7,435 (2.31/day)
Likes
4,740
Location
Up North
System Name Cruncher / Cruncher 2
Processor i7 6900K / E5 2683 v3
Motherboard X99A Gaming Pro Carbon / ASRock X99 Extreme 4/3.1
Cooling EK Supremacy EVO Elite 2011-3 / EK Supremacy
Memory G.Skill Trident Z 32GB 3200 / G.SKILL Trident Z 16GB 3200
Video Card(s) EVGA 980 Ti Classified / ATI 3650
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 512 GB + Mushkin Reactor 1 TB / OCZ Vertex 4 256 GB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U3011 30"
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D / TT Core V51
Audio Device(s) On-board
Power Supply Corsair AX1200 / EVGA 500W
Software Win 10 Pro/ Win 10
Benchmark Scores Always changing~
#12
Excellent review:toast:
I actually just purchased a A10-5800K last night for a re-build I am doing for my boss. It is replacing a AMD Athlon 64 FX-55 system I built for him 7 years ago. After doing some research I decided it would be a great CPU for his needs.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,241 (5.04/day)
Likes
4,819
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#13
5800 Lacks an L3
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#14

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,241 (5.04/day)
Likes
4,819
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#15
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#16

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,241 (5.04/day)
Likes
4,819
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#17
L3 has to compensate for the latencies of DDR3
 

Retrophe

New Member
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
9 (0.01/day)
Likes
0
Location
Texas
System Name Silver beast
Processor AMD FX-4100 @ 4.3 GHz
Motherboard M5A78L-M LX
Cooling Corsair H60
Memory Kingston HyperX 8gb @ 1866
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 6850
Storage 160 GB Seagate
Display(s) Used Dell
Case Antec 300 Silver
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Dynex 400w lol
Software Win 8 pro x64
#18
Nice review. The idle power difference was a surprise. The 5800k is what my wife's next build will use. Being able to overclock the 5800k's gpu is a nice bonus.
 

de.das.dude

Pro Indian Modder
Joined
Jun 13, 2010
Messages
8,202 (2.99/day)
Likes
2,390
Location
Pune
System Name la de da... | Samsung NP355V5C-S05IN
Processor FX 8320 | AMD A8-4500
Motherboard ASRock 990FX Extreme 4 | Samsung something something
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO push:pull+ 1 panaflow 113CFM + 2 x 120mm NZXTs | Coolermaster Notepal
Memory 2x4GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz CL9 | Samsunng 4GB + 2GB DDR3 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD 7790 GHZ edition! | 7670M + 7640G
Storage 1TB WD10EZEX | W.D 500GB Green AADS | Samsung 1TB
Display(s) dell S2240l 1080p IPS 21.5" | Samsung antiglare 15.6"
Case NZXT Guardian 921RB(@home) and Antec ASK4000B U3(Current)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 with THX True Studio | Realtek something
Power Supply Corsair GS600 | 90W Brick, 6 cell 48000mAh battery
Mouse Logitech G400, GOD TIER MOUSE!! LOGitech F310 gamepad!
Keyboard Logitech K200
Software Windows 8.1 x64 | Windows 8.1 x64
Benchmark Scores real men do bench presses not bench marks.
#19
you had this in the making for a long time. Its excellent. i was so immeres i forgot its past 4 am XD

i would think that people who can afford to spend on a 7970 would have enough money for a processor better than either two, for the sake of balancing.

infact. what i think, is, that it would have been interesting to see just the bare CPUs pitted together. Also adding a GPU to the i3 which is equivalent to the cost diff between the two would be a fairer comparison
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,571 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,164
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name Red Spy
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.35 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0
Cooling TT Water 3.0 Performer + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 1 x 120mm Blue LED, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1333 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage ADATA 128GB Sata III SSD for OS, WDC Black - 1TB Storage, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD - Games
Display(s) AOC 23" 1080P LCD
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmark Scores BF4 with Mantle on Ultra settings gets around 60 FPS.
#20
Nice Review. Covered almost all bases of a PC life!
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,287 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,395
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#21
Also adding a GPU to the i3 which is equivalent to the cost diff between the two would be a fairer comparison
They are both $129.99, how many free GPUs do you know that would outperform the iGPU on the A10? And actually when you factor in cost of the motherboards, the AMD platform is $100 cheaper, so if you can find a GPU that cost -$100, I'm sure he'd be happy to test it with the i3.;)

And I'm pretty sure the 7970 was used to try to put the most strain on the CPU as possible(within reason of course).
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#22
They are both $129.99, how many free GPUs do you know that would outperform the iGPU on the A10?;)

And I'm pretty sure the 7970 was used to try to put the most strain on the CPU as possible(within reason of course).
Used the 7970 cause:

1- its all I had ATM besides a 6770 Radeon



Wanted to give a more CPU/APU performance approach

There are plenty of reviews of the 3220 and A10-5800k naked too BTW
 
Last edited:

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,287 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,395
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#23
I think the graphs that you did comparing the two without the HD7970 was enough to get the picture accross that the iGPU on the A10 just blows the i3's away.

Also, you repeated the Call of Duty graph.:toast:

Also, a think worth noting between the two is that the AMD APUs support 3 monitors, while the i3 will only handle 2. This has been very useful for me, since I have two machines with 3 monitors attached to them.
 

de.das.dude

Pro Indian Modder
Joined
Jun 13, 2010
Messages
8,202 (2.99/day)
Likes
2,390
Location
Pune
System Name la de da... | Samsung NP355V5C-S05IN
Processor FX 8320 | AMD A8-4500
Motherboard ASRock 990FX Extreme 4 | Samsung something something
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO push:pull+ 1 panaflow 113CFM + 2 x 120mm NZXTs | Coolermaster Notepal
Memory 2x4GB DDR3 Corsair Vengeance 1600MHz CL9 | Samsunng 4GB + 2GB DDR3 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD 7790 GHZ edition! | 7670M + 7640G
Storage 1TB WD10EZEX | W.D 500GB Green AADS | Samsung 1TB
Display(s) dell S2240l 1080p IPS 21.5" | Samsung antiglare 15.6"
Case NZXT Guardian 921RB(@home) and Antec ASK4000B U3(Current)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 with THX True Studio | Realtek something
Power Supply Corsair GS600 | 90W Brick, 6 cell 48000mAh battery
Mouse Logitech G400, GOD TIER MOUSE!! LOGitech F310 gamepad!
Keyboard Logitech K200
Software Windows 8.1 x64 | Windows 8.1 x64
Benchmark Scores real men do bench presses not bench marks.
#24
They are both $129.99, how many free GPUs do you know that would outperform the iGPU on the A10? And actually when you factor in cost of the motherboards, the AMD platform is $100 cheaper, so if you can find a GPU that cost -$100, I'm sure he'd be happy to test it with the i3.;)

And I'm pretty sure the 7970 was used to try to put the most strain on the CPU as possible(within reason of course).
my point exactly :p that the a10 is still a better combo when compared directly to price
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,546 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,908
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
#25
Also, a think worth noting between the two is that the AMD APUs support 3 monitors, while the i3 will only handle 2. This has been very useful for me, since I have two machines with 3 monitors attached to them.
Nope, sorry, i3 3220 supports three monitors just fine. It is same as A10-5800K, monitor support is about board, not chip.

http://ark.intel.com/products/65693/