• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Admits "Stars" in Ryzen Master Don't Correspond to CPPC2 Preferred Cores

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,766 (8.50/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD in a blog post earlier today explained that there is no 1:1 correlation between the "best core" grading system displayed in Ryzen Master, and the "preferred cores" addressed by the Windows 10 Scheduler using CPPC2 (Collaborative Power and Performance Control 2). Deployed through BIOS and AMD chipset drivers, CPPC2 forms a middleware between OS and processor, communicating the system's performance demands at a high frequency of 1 ms (Microsoft's default speed for reporting performance states to processors is 15 ms). Ryzen Master, on the other hand, has had the ability to reveal the "best" cores in a Ryzen processor by ranking them across the package, on a CCD (die), and within a CCX. The best core in a CCX is typically marked with a "star" symbol on the software's UI. The fastest core on the package gets a gold star. Dots denote second fastest cores in a CCX.

Over the past couple of months we've posted several investigative reports by our Ryzen memory overclocking guru Yuri "1usmus" Bubly, and a recurring theme with our articles has been to highlight the discrepancy between the highest performing cores as tested by us not corresponding to those highlighted in Ryzen Master. Our definition of "highest performing cores" has been one that's able to reach and sustain the highest boost states, and has the best electrical properties. AMD elaborates that the CPPC2 works independently from the SMU API Ryzen Master uses, and the best cores mapped by Ryzen Master shouldn't correspond with preferred cores reported by CPPC2 to the OS scheduler, so it could send more workload to these cores, benefiting from their higher boosting headroom.



The "best cores" as defined by SMU and reported by Ryzen Master are hence decided on the basis of electrical properties, and hard-coded at the time of die binning in the factory. The "preferred cores" as defined by CPPC2 are those cores to which AMD wants the OS scheduler to send the most traffic to, not just on the basis of their superior physical or electrical properties, but also being optimal for Windows scheduler core rotation policy. Windows scheduler is programmed to not keep a long application work thread allocated to a particular core indefinitely, but to periodically rotate it between a pair of two cores. The rationale behind this is thermal management (spreading the heat across two cores that are spatially apart).

On monolithic multi-core chips such as the i9-9900 or i9-9980XE, in which all cores not only sit on the same die, but are also part of the same group (no CCX here), core rotation works as intended, as all cores share the L3 cache, and a relieving core can pick up work from where its rotation pair partner has left off, by pulling data from the L3 cache.

AMD's "Zen" multi-core topology complicates this, as not all cores share the same L3 cache; and in 12-core, 16-core, or Threadrippers, not all cores sit on the same die. This is where CPPC2 fits in, giving Windows the awareness of the topology it needs, so it can rotate threads among cores without hurting performance by forcing workloads onto a core that uses a separate instance of cache, which forces data reloads from RAM. So how does CPPC2-reported "favored cores" fit into the scheme of things? CPPC2 deliberately misreports "favored cores" to the Windows scheduler — to build core rotation pairs within localized groups of cores, rather than picking cores from different CCXs or CCDs to build rotation pairs.

"Ryzen Master, using firmware readings, selects the single best voltage/frequency curve in the entire processor from the perspective of overclocking. When you see the gold star, it means that is the one core with the best overclocking potential. As we explained during the launch of 2nd Gen Ryzen, we thought that this could be useful for people trying for frequency records on Ryzen," reads the AMD blog on the discrepancy between Ryzen Master "best cores" and CPPC2 Preferred Cores. "Overall, it's clear that the OS-Hardware relationship is getting more complex every day. In 2018, we imagined that the starred cores would be useful for extreme overclockers. In 2019, we see that this is simply being conflated with a much more sophisticated set of OS decisions, and there's not enough room for nuance and context to make that clear. That's why we're going to bring Ryzen Master inline with what the OS is doing so everything is visibly in agreement, and the system continues along as-designed with peak performance," it adds. "Best cores" and "preferred cores" are hence both "right." The former refers to a physically high-quality core, while the other is more "circumstantial", for better performance.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,441 (2.03/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
So it's to mitigate Windows poor management of resources based on outdated ideas of thermal needs for other branded processors?

Why AMD doesn't just come out with this info is beyond me, it's not like people won't understand that MS does a shitty job of making Windows run the best these days.
 
Joined
Jun 19, 2010
Messages
178 (0.05/day)
Location
North-Rhine-Westphalia
Processor Ryzen 2700
Motherboard B450
Cooling Thermalright ARO
Memory 2x 8GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) RX 570 8GB
Storage 256GB SSD
Display(s) UHD 40" HDR TV
Case Sharkoon AM5 Window red
Audio Device(s) USB Headset
Power Supply beQuiet PurePower10 400W
Software Win10
This news is very enlighting, thank you very much.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,212 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
I used to believe that in the past Intel paid m$ to sabotage performance on AMD chips, that opinion changed over the years. This shows how AMD seems to have avoided working with m$ to improve performance within Windows. Now m$ has no excuse but to improve the performance relationship between windows and AMD/Ryzen. Something Intel should fear, I would think, fear of an AMD CPU advantage, however, I also think Intel could benefit from these changes in the long run.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
147 (0.04/day)
Location
Denmark
System Name Bongfjaes
Processor AMD 3700x
Motherboard Assus Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill FlareX 3200MT/s CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Adata SX8200 Pro 1TB + Lots of spinning rust
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2268wm
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster AE-5
Power Supply Seasonic TTR-1000
Mouse Pro Intellimouse
Keyboard SteelKeys 6G
Lmao, with every passing day i feel more and more scammed for buying a 3700x and Crosshair VII x470 board

You dumb asshole, Axaion.
 
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
65 (0.02/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700X @ 3.9 GHz, 1.285V
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F Gaming
Cooling Custom Water Cooling
Memory 2x8GB G.SKILL SniperX 3600C19 @ 3400C14
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 5700XT Reference
Storage ADATA SX8200 480GB, Samsung 960 EVO 250GB, Hitach 3TB
Display(s) MSI MAG341CQ
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DGX
Power Supply Corsair HX620
AMD didn't "admit" anything, they explained the discrepancy. I don't believe they ever specified what Ryzen Master indicates when it labels the "best" cores.

Lmao, with every passing day i feel more and more scammed for buying a 3700x and Crosshair VII x470 board

You dumb asshole, Axaion.
... why? This has zero impact on users.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
147 (0.04/day)
Location
Denmark
System Name Bongfjaes
Processor AMD 3700x
Motherboard Assus Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill FlareX 3200MT/s CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Adata SX8200 Pro 1TB + Lots of spinning rust
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2268wm
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster AE-5
Power Supply Seasonic TTR-1000
Mouse Pro Intellimouse
Keyboard SteelKeys 6G
AMD didn't "admit" anything, they explained the discrepancy. I don't believe they ever specified what Ryzen Master indicates when it labels the "best" cores.



... why? This has zero impact on users.
That if they cant even get their own software right, then what hope is there?
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
1,282 (0.79/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name Ol' Beastie | 雨上がりの空
Processor R7 3700X | i7-4790K
Motherboard B450I Aorus (F50) | H97N-WIFI (F7)
Cooling NH-U9S | NH-C14S
Memory 16GB Trident Z 3200C16 | 16GB Fury 1866C10
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 2060 S FE | EVGA GTX 1070 SC ACX3.0
Storage SX8200 - MX300 - Blue3D | 850 EVO
Display(s) BenQ GW2765HT | Samsung F2380
Case M1v5 + Pelican 1514 | TJ08T-E
Audio Device(s) DT 770 80Ω - Blue Snowball iCE
Power Supply Corsair SF600G + Cablemod | Seasonic SSR-550PX
Mouse Logitech G602 | Logitech MX Master
Keyboard Noxary X60 R - FMJ - Noxary T60 R2 - RAMA M10-B
Software Windows 10 1909
Huh, my best cores are the ones being utilized regardless of whether I use the 1usmus plans or Ryzen plans.

The difference, however, is that the Windows scheduler (being used on the Ryzen and Windows plans) likes to default to Core 0for light loads that don't require more cores. My best cores are 7, 5, 1, 3 in that order (the even numbered ones), indicated in Ryzen Master and verified in how they boost under load and chosen by the scheduler.

Problem is, Core 0 is by and far the worst core on die. It's ranked #8 in perf, and never exceeds 43.3x peak clock. And some applications, like CPU-Z in evaluating single-thread performance, aren't written to leverage any core except Core 0, regardless of power plan.

Because of the variations in production, many other Ryzen 3000 chips have Core 0 amongst their best 4 cores, but many others are unfortunately like mine. And when it comes to the Windows scheduler or simplistic programs, this results in a percentage of chips that either can't make use of maximum available single thread performance, or can't benchmark to reflect their true performance.

An example of how mediocre 7nm yields and binning combine with terrible Windows scheduling and core assignment to create one hell of a silicon lottery.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,288 (0.58/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Tuniq Tower 120
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Samsung 750 Evo 250gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Lmao, with every passing day i feel more and more scammed for buying a 3700x and Crosshair VII x470 board

You dumb asshole, Axaion.
Im not disagreeing with your self assessment, but for different reasons.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,467 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 620 / ASUS HD7870 2GB + GT 710 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
Lmao, with every passing day i feel more and more scammed for buying a 3700x and Crosshair VII x470 board

You dumb asshole, Axaion.
Sell it and buy an Intel. You'll feel better. Right?
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
873 (0.22/day)
Location
Pittsburgh, PA
System Name Dell G5 15 5587 (2018)
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-8750H Processor (Coffee Lake)
Motherboard Intel HM370
Cooling Stock Dell twin-fan and copper heatpipes cooling system
Memory SK hynix 16GB (8GBx2) - 2Rx8 DDR4 SODIMM 2666MHz
Video Card(s) GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q 6 GB GDDR5 RAM
Storage ADATA XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB NVMe M.2 / ADATA SU800 1TB SATA 2.5"
Display(s) Stock Dell 60 Hz IPS LCD panel
Case Stock Dell G5 15 5587 (2018) case
Power Supply Dell Power Adapter 180W NDFTY
Mouse Dell touchpad / D.Va Razer Abyssus Elite
Keyboard Stock Dell G5 15 5587 laptop keyboard with backlit RED LEDs
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit
The difference, however, is that the Windows scheduler (being used on the Ryzen and Windows plans) likes to default to Core 0for light loads that don't require more cores. My best cores are 7, 5, 1, 3 in that order (the even numbered ones), indicated in Ryzen Master and verified in how they boost under load and chosen by the scheduler.
Isn't this supposed to be addressed by 1909's optimization with favored cores?
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2015
Messages
1,282 (0.79/day)
Location
Western Canada
System Name Ol' Beastie | 雨上がりの空
Processor R7 3700X | i7-4790K
Motherboard B450I Aorus (F50) | H97N-WIFI (F7)
Cooling NH-U9S | NH-C14S
Memory 16GB Trident Z 3200C16 | 16GB Fury 1866C10
Video Card(s) NVIDIA RTX 2060 S FE | EVGA GTX 1070 SC ACX3.0
Storage SX8200 - MX300 - Blue3D | 850 EVO
Display(s) BenQ GW2765HT | Samsung F2380
Case M1v5 + Pelican 1514 | TJ08T-E
Audio Device(s) DT 770 80Ω - Blue Snowball iCE
Power Supply Corsair SF600G + Cablemod | Seasonic SSR-550PX
Mouse Logitech G602 | Logitech MX Master
Keyboard Noxary X60 R - FMJ - Noxary T60 R2 - RAMA M10-B
Software Windows 10 1909
Isn't this supposed to be addressed by 1909's optimization with favored cores?
Doesn't work if the program only ever uses Core 0 regardless of what anyone or anything tells it to do. On both 1903 and 1909, I still get the same behaviour on Windows plans - low single thread load stays on Core 0. 1usmus plan makes sure that single thread load migrates to Core 5 or 7. Even the effective clock (taken from an average) on Core 0 tends to be lower than the others.

All 1909 means is that Windows will try to allocate load to the best cores. Keyword: try. A lot of the time, Windows doesn't even try. The custom plan tries to force Windows to use best cores, which is pretty visible.

There's also the Windows practice of shuffling load between cores all the time.

Whatever Microsoft claims to be doing, it doesn't change the fact that the Windows scheduler is trash. Which is why I find certain other sites' unfounded ridicule of the 1usmus plan hilarious; YOU as the reviewer may have gotten a golden 3900X with an absolutely shining Core 0, meaning you don't see much benefit from the plan, that doesn't mean EVERYONE got the same return on their investment.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 24, 2011
Messages
65 (0.02/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 1700X @ 3.9 GHz, 1.285V
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX X470-F Gaming
Cooling Custom Water Cooling
Memory 2x8GB G.SKILL SniperX 3600C19 @ 3400C14
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 5700XT Reference
Storage ADATA SX8200 480GB, Samsung 960 EVO 250GB, Hitach 3TB
Display(s) MSI MAG341CQ
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DGX
Power Supply Corsair HX620
That if they cant even get their own software right, then what hope is there?
Their software is right, people just assumed it meant something other than what it does.
 
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
3,212 (1.63/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G700s
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
AMD software maybe right but what matters just as much is microsofts software and how it works AMD software into windows. If AMD and m$ dont work together on the integration of their software with each others software, than when issue rise, it comes down to finger pointing. Its no secret that m$ doesnt appear to like AMD as AMD loves to pass around a headache or two.
 
Joined
May 30, 2018
Messages
815 (1.47/day)
Location
Cusp Of Mania, FL
System Name humble reentry to pc-building after too many years
Processor Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X370-F
Cooling Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x8GB TridentZ RGB [3600Mhz CL16]
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix RTX 2060 OC
Storage 970 EVO 500GB nvme, 860 EVO 250GB SATA, Seagate Barracuda 1TB + 4TB HDDs
Display(s) 32" Samsung F395 [1080/60]
Case NZXT H710
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modi 2 Uber, Sys, Vali 2, Scarlett 2i2 gen2 - LSR 305's, DT-990 Pro's, HD600's
Power Supply Corsair RM650x v2
Mouse iunno whatever cheap crap logitech *clutches Xbox 360 controller security blanket*
Keyboard HyperX Alloy Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro
Huh, my best cores are the ones being utilized regardless of whether I use the 1usmus plans or Ryzen plans.

The difference, however, is that the Windows scheduler (being used on the Ryzen and Windows plans) likes to default to Core 0for light loads that don't require more cores. My best cores are 7, 5, 1, 3 in that order (the even numbered ones), indicated in Ryzen Master and verified in how they boost under load and chosen by the scheduler.

Problem is, Core 0 is by and far the worst core on die. It's ranked #8 in perf, and never exceeds 43.3x peak clock. And some applications, like CPU-Z in evaluating single-thread performance, aren't written to leverage any core except Core 0, regardless of power plan.

Because of the variations in production, many other Ryzen 3000 chips have Core 0 amongst their best 4 cores, but many others are unfortunately like mine. And when it comes to the Windows scheduler or simplistic programs, this results in a percentage of chips that either can't make use of maximum available single thread performance, or can't benchmark to reflect their true performance.

An example of how mediocre 7nm yields and binning combine with terrible Windows scheduling and core assignment to create one hell of a silicon lottery.
Woah... So it's like a meta-level silicon lottery. That's deep.
 

1usmus

AMD Memory Guru
Joined
Jul 28, 2018
Messages
55 (0.11/day)
Location
Ukraine
I had previously heard of 4.75 GHz from Robert in the video. Today I read: "We have proprietary software, but we do not guarantee that the information is correct, therefore we will use OS labels"

compare5.jpg
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
691 (0.69/day)
Location
Tanagra
Processor AMD 2700X
Motherboard Gigabyte B450M DS3H
Cooling Wraith Prism
Memory 16GB DDR4 3000
Video Card(s) Sapphire Pulse RX 570 4GB
Storage Inland 512GB NVMe
Display(s) LG 27UL500-W
Case NZXT H510
Audio Device(s) My ears
Power Supply EVGA 500W
Software Windows 10
Sounds like your typical legacy baggage scenario. Windows can try to use what’s best, but some programs don’t want that so Windows has to default to core0. IMO, it’s the price to pay for extended backward compatibility. If you just update your Mac (if you have one), 32bit programs just went by the wayside. If Windows ever tried that, well, you’d have something slightly better than W10 S mode.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
1,876 (1.81/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Discrepancy between best cores and preferred cores has nothing to do with Microsoft, Windows or Windows scheduler. It is AMD not properly communicating what exactly these mean.

Ryzen 3000 CPUs should be the first mainstream CPUs that have "best performing cores" in this way. This was part of the discussion/argument/controversy about Ryzen 3000 boost clock speeds. So far, all mainstream CPUs have had spec boost speeds than any core can reach, making need for scheduler optimization to keep work on specific high-performing cores secondary.
 
Joined
Aug 14, 2009
Messages
147 (0.04/day)
Location
Denmark
System Name Bongfjaes
Processor AMD 3700x
Motherboard Assus Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 2x8GB G.Skill FlareX 3200MT/s CL14
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Adata SX8200 Pro 1TB + Lots of spinning rust
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2268wm
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Creative SoundBlaster AE-5
Power Supply Seasonic TTR-1000
Mouse Pro Intellimouse
Keyboard SteelKeys 6G
Sell it and buy an Intel. You'll feel better. Right?
If you want to buy it at retail price, ill sell it to you :)

@others, eh i only read the post here so yeah, is it another thing like nvidia boxes being a requirement? :p
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,785 (4.09/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Discrepancy between best cores and preferred cores has nothing to do with Microsoft, Windows or Windows scheduler. It is AMD not properly communicating what exactly these mean.

Ryzen 3000 CPUs should be the first mainstream CPUs that have "best performing cores" in this way. This was part of the discussion/argument/controversy about Ryzen 3000 boost clock speeds. So far, all mainstream CPUs have had spec boost speeds than any core can reach, making need for scheduler optimization to keep work on specific high-performing cores secondary.
I think AMD made the same mistake Microsoft did and marked the "best cores" without taking into account that threads should stay within the same CCX for optimal performance.
Because when you "prefer" something that is not "best", something's definitely amiss.
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,467 (0.64/day)
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming / Internet / HTPC
Processor Intel i5 4460 / Thuban 1455T(Unlocked 645) @ 3.7GHz @ 1.30V / A6 7400K
Motherboard ASRock Z97 Extreme6 / Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3 / ASUS FM2+
Cooling Modified AM2 Asetek MicroChill / Noctua U12S / CoolerMaster TX2
Memory 16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3 / 16GB Adata 2133MHz / 8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) GT 620 / ASUS HD7870 2GB + GT 710 (PhysX) / A6 7400K iGPU
Storage Intel NVMe 500GB, Samsung NVMe 250GB + more / Kingston 240GB + more / Samsung SSD 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected) / LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12 / Sharkoon Rebel 9 / Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Chieftec 850W / Sharkoon 650W / Chieftec 560W
Mouse CoolerMaster / Rapoo / Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster / Microsoft / Logitech
Software Windows
If you want to buy it at retail price, ill sell it to you :)
I never said that I want to feel, the way you feel.
Also I never said that I would like to describe myself, the way you described yourself.
 
Top