• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces 3rd Generation Ryzen Desktop Processors

Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,627 (1.09/day)
12cores 24 threads at the same TDP as the 2700X and at half the price of Intels offering is pretty damn nice! Im pretty sure most B450 Mobos or all of them would support a 2700X so thats a great upgrade for a B450 owner. AMD was only 3% behind Intel in IPC and with a 15% increase that does put them in the lead I would think (depending on application). I do wonder what the all core Boost would be, my guess for the 3800X is 4.3Ghz all core and if anyone remembers at the start of the yr the 9900K at 4.8GHz was getting beat by the engineering 8 core AMD so...anyway be good to see independent reviews.
I wish someone would do more of these in depth reviews covering IPC, the claims by AMD (or Intel) aren't verifiable till you run samples at fixed clocks!
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,618 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
And what's with the TDP increase? Going from 3,6/4,4 to 3,9/4,5 results in 40W extra? Makes no sense.
Likely headroom for multi-core turbo. As with Intel, AMD's specified turbo speeds are single-core, but unlike Intel multi-core scales fluidly based on thermal and power headroom. In other words, it's likely that a stock 3800X will have significantly faster all-core turbo than a stock 3700X (given that motherboards enforce TDP as a power limit, that is).

So if +2 cores costs about ~50$ to 70$ extra and +4 cores costs +100$ extra then 16 core model would cost between 599$ and 649$
Tho i feel AMD backed themselves into a corner by slapping Ryzen 9 name to 12 core parts and going straight to 3900X. This does not leave much space to fit supposed 16 core variants on top and name them differently.
Why? Ryzen 9 just denotes high end SKUs, not a specific core count. The only argument against calling this Ryzen 9 3900X is to avoid consumer confusion, which, well, isn't really a thing in this kind of market. If you're looking at a >$500 CPU and can't tell specs of different SKUs apart, you're doing something wrong. I get that calling it 3900X leaves little room for both a 16-core and a TR lineup, but there's nothing wrong with overlapping names or otherwise differentiating TR - it's an entirely separate line, after all. 16-core could be 3920X, 3950X, even 3990X - and TR naming would adjust based on this. I agree that it's not ideal, but TR and HEDT are such niche markets it really shouldn't matter.

I wish someone would do more of these in depth reviews covering IPC, the claims by AMD (or Intel) aren't verifiable till you run samples at fixed clocks!
Anandtech has specifically stated that they will be covering this in their upcoming review. Likely downclocking all chips to a common frequency like they've done before.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
413 (0.18/day)
Well if they went with 3900X already this could also indirectly confirm that they might be skipping Zen2 based Threadripper this year. We'll see i guess.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,487 (0.67/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,627 (1.09/day)
Well if they went with 3900X already this could also indirectly confirm that they might be skipping Zen2 based Threadripper this year. We'll see i guess.
Most rumors seem to suggest the same, there's also rumors that the next TR will be based on zen 3 ~ the one with (up to) 4 way SMT.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
243 (0.07/day)
System Name Home PC
Processor Ryzen 1600X - 3950@1.3v
Motherboard Asus Prime X370 Pro
Cooling Thermaltake Contac Silent 12
Memory Dual channel G skill F4-3200C16-8GVKB
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 GTR - XFX Double Dissipation R9 290
Storage Samsung SSD Evo 120 - Adata SU80 256 - Seagate 2TB (ST2000VX003)
Display(s) AoC 931wx (19in, 1680x1050)
Case Green Magnum Evo
Power Supply Green 1200B-OC+
You see a staggering 22 percent increase in PUBG frame-rates, and up to 34 percent increase in CS:GO. This may look like insignificant e-Sports titles as opposed to the big AAA ones, but give valuable insights to the chip's gaming prowess. We're convinced that Zen 2 will be faster than any Intel processor at gaming when it comes out.
TPU's words !



In CR15 :
Ryzen 1800x = 161 so 3900x would be 212.52 which is above 9700K or below 9900K ( This link ) which hard to believe.
Also MT for 1800X = 1637 so 100% would be 3274.
sure those numbers are awesome, but one thing is that AMD's IPC is now above (at least Broadwell)
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,618 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
TPU's words !



In CR15 :
Ryzen 1800x = 161 so 3900x would be 212.52 which is above 9700K or below 9900K ( This link ) which hard to believe.
Also MT for 1800X = 1637 so 100% would be 3274.
sure those numbers are awesome, but one thing is that AMD's IPC is now above (at least Broadwell)
Remember that IPC is workload dependent. Gains in Cinebench do not necessarily translate to gains in other applications/workloads. Still, these CPUs look friggin' amazing, and I can't wait for reviews to start arriving. There's definitely a 3700X or 3800X with my name on it somewhere out there.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,627 (1.09/day)
Speaking of IPC, was the 15% gain specified against zen/zen+ or anything Intel?
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,618 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
3700x is 65w, so yeah its very possible


Go ask the leakers, but i think the am4 platform might be the limiting factor, i mean im pretty sure they can reach 16 cores on zen 2
A few likely scenarios:
1: Waiting for chip availability. This SKU will require top bin chips (low power at high clocks). Those are being taken by EPYC ATM, and ensuring availability of more mainstream chips at launch is more important. After all, the 12c can use chiplets with disabled cores, so it only limits Ryzen 5 production. A 16c SKU would take a significant chunk out of the available silicon for Ryzen 7.
2: Holding off to see what Intel does. Launching a high-clocked 16c32t monster just as Intel prepares to launch their next generation of ... 10-core? 14nm++++++++ chips would be a smart move.
3: Holding off due to RAM being the main bottleneck and wanting to put their best foot forward. AM4 means dual-channel DDR4, so even with an improved IMC, feeding 16 fast cores would be difficult. A 16-core would still be a monster for fitting workloads, but it might not be the best PR move to launch a flagship that doesn't excel in gaming applications - and after all, the highest SKU you launch is going to be the most talked-about. As such, it makes (far) more sense to stick with lower core count chips to begin with, to show off gains in these use cases, and then launch the 16c SKU later for "semi-workstation" builds.

Personally, I think it's likely a mix of allt three. There are likely more factors coming into play too.

Speaking of IPC, was the 15% gain specified against zen/zen+ or anything Intel?
Zen(1).
AnandTech said:
AMD is promoting a +15% direct IPC increase from Zen 1 to Zen 2
Source.
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
89 (0.04/day)
Location
Denmark
I'm wondering if this 3700x is maxed out or did AMD leave some headroom to OC it slightly more. That would be great :)
BTW. I see that a lot of people like to throw crap and laugh from somebody giving information which is presumably true and yet these people still have problem grasping what presumably means and how you should perceive it. It is really weird and laughable for me :)
99% you wont see higher than 4.6ghz on all cores. Best hope is 4.5ghz. Hope Im worng, but In 99% sure they Cant :) We know How ryzen act In oc from Zen and Zen +.

Amd trying to Do The higheste clock speed on 1/2 core out of The box always.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
1,269 (1.00/day)
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Carbon
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14
Video Card(s) RX Vega 64 Red Devil
Storage M.2 Samsung Evo 970 250MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) realtec 5.1
Power Supply Corsair AXi 760W
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
99% you wont see higher than 4.6ghz on all cores. Best hope is 4.5ghz. Hope Im worng, but In 99% sure they Cant :) We know How ryzen act In oc from Zen and Zen +.

Amd trying to Do The higheste clock speed on 1/2 core out of The box always.
I don't think you should compare Zen and Zen+ to Zen2 so much in terms of performance. Zen was the first release and zen+ was a slight tweak. Zen2 is different even though it can work in the same AM4 slot. Maybe OC isn't there and you might be right but it can also be there. Although the odds are there is no OC potential since the Zen and Zen+ are stuck without OC. Who knows. We will have to wait and see.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,618 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
99% you wont see higher than 4.6ghz on all cores. Best hope is 4.5ghz. Hope Im worng, but In 99% sure they Cant :) We know How ryzen act In oc from Zen and Zen +.

Amd trying to Do The higheste clock speed on 1/2 core out of The box always.
I don't think you should compare Zen and Zen+ to Zen2 so much in terms of performance. Zen was the first release and zen+ was a slight tweak. Zen2 is different even though it can work in the same AM4 slot. Maybe OC isn't there and you might be right but it can also be there. Although the odds are there is no OC potential since the Zen and Zen+ are stuck without OC. Who knows. We will have to wait and see.
I guess we'll see when reviews arrive. It'll be very interesting to see just how much of the lack of OC headroom for Zen/Zen+ was architectural and how much was due to the production process. Still, TSMC 7nm is still a mobile-first, low-power process, so even getting it to 4.6GHz is quite the achievement.
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
1,269 (1.00/day)
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 2700X
Motherboard MSI X470 Gaming Carbon
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14
Video Card(s) RX Vega 64 Red Devil
Storage M.2 Samsung Evo 970 250MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) realtec 5.1
Power Supply Corsair AXi 760W
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
I guess we'll see when reviews arrive. It'll be very interesting to see just how much of the lack of OC headroom for Zen/Zen+ was architectural and how much was due to the production process. Still, TSMC 7nm is still a mobile-first, low-power process, so even getting it to 4.6GHz is quite the achievement.
I agree. Even if the Zen2 doesn't go 5Ghz I think it will have still a nice performance boost over the 2000 series which either way, for me, is amazing as is. I'd like to see the benchmarks and how AMD has progressed with its Zen architecture over the few years.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
344 (1.24/day)
99% you wont see higher than 4.6ghz on all cores. Best hope is 4.5ghz. Hope Im worng, but In 99% sure they Cant :) We know How ryzen act In oc from Zen and Zen +.

Amd trying to Do The higheste clock speed on 1/2 core out of The box always.
If AMD did not lie on the r20 single threaded test, 4.5GHz 3800x is comparable to 5GHz 9900k single threaded.
So all core 4.5GHz = 9900k all core 5GHz
4.6GHz = 9900k 5.1GHz .

If 3800x going 5GHz, that will be = 9900k at 5.55 GHz
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,400 (2.04/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name Newer Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 3700X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
Trolling again are we? No one even mentions adoredtv and you come in insulting people.
It was mentioned by a post earlier in the thread. If people keep swearing that some leaker is correct, then when they're not so spit on, its fair to comment.

That 12 core, 5Ghz claim seems like blind optimism now. Yet it was spouted by a few channels.

Still, these chips look good. Waiting for reviews. And seeing Intel push out a 'special' 9900 is quite funny. Reviews required for an AMD, Intel head to head on their best 8 core parts...
 
Joined
Sep 22, 2012
Messages
1,004 (0.38/day)
Location
Belgrade, Serbia
System Name Intel® X99 Wellsburg
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-5820K - 4.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage V E10 (1801)
Cooling EK RGB Monoblock + EK XRES D5 Revo Glass PWM
Memory CMD16GX4M4A2666C15
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX1080Ti Poseidon
Storage Samsung 970 EVO PLUS 1TB /850 EVO 1TB / WD Black 2TB
Display(s) Samsung P2450H
Case Lian Li PC-O11 WXC
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G900 / SS QCK
Keyboard Deck 87 Francium Pro
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Only more evidence that Intel need new architecture as AMD done with Zen, urgently, they have no time for waiting.
They should work with new core and in mean time to sell Skylake, Coffee Lake, etc to try to stay with AMD in track...
No, Intel offer much more expensive i9-9900K, you can buy two 2700X.
How Intel sell one i9-9900K for price of two 2700X that's questions for buyers.
What they could OC him 500MHz...

Increase frequency of processors only on few cores, less than processor have is not real overclocking.
Because you get better performance only in some situations.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
291 (0.18/day)
Ok so i feel somewhat dissapointed. Tho the SKU's AMD revealed are not entirely suprising considering their performance lead now. Meaning they can ask for more that they originally planned.
The 3800X SKU is especially pointless considering that problably every 3700X can do those clocks at 70$ less. And what's with the TDP increase? Going from 3,6/4,4 to 3,9/4,5 results in 40W extra? Makes no sense.

$199 Ryzen 5 3600 6-core/12-thread. 3.60 GHz/4.20 GHz. 65W
$249 Ryzen 5 3600X 6-core/12-thread. 3.80 GHz/4.40 GHz. 95W
$329 Ryzen 7 3700X. 8-core/16-thread. 3.60 GHz/4.40 GHz. 65W
$399 Ryzen 7 3800X 8-core/16-thread. 3.90 GHz/4.50 GHz. 105W
$499 Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core/24-thread. 3.80 GHz/4.60 Ghz. 105W

So if +2 cores costs about ~50$ to 70$ extra and +4 cores costs +100$ extra then 16 core model would cost between 599$ and 649$
Tho i feel AMD backed themselves into a corner by slapping Ryzen 9 name to 12 core parts and going straight to 3900X. This does not leave much space to fit supposed 16 core variants on top and name them differently.

This is what i think 16 core part would look like. Maybe im too optimistic about clocks. They might also go with 3990WX name to position it more like a Threadripper chip.
$649 Ryzen 9 3990X 16-core/32-thread. 4.00 GHz/4.70 Ghz. 125W
Do not expect the 16c version to be released soon unless Intel make so huge/unexpected answers, like releasing new CPUs or/and making huge price cuts
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
6,693 (4.08/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I'm glad they didn't go core-crazy and upped the IPC this gen. 20-25% would have been sweet, but 15% is still something users will feel.
Also, for those considering whether this is a worthy upgrade from Zen+, you're doing it wrong. This is shaping up to be a worthy upgrade from anything but Zen+ instead. Zen+ -> Zen2 may be worth it for some, but I expect that scenario to be very situational.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2018
Messages
219 (0.43/day)
The R5 3600 will sell like hotcakes.

In relation to the rumors, only the deluded ones wanted to believe in them!
 
Joined
Feb 15, 2019
Messages
344 (1.24/day)
The R5 3600 will sell like hotcakes.

In relation to the rumors, only the deluded ones wanted to believe in them!
Can't wait to see

3600 vs 8700k or even 9700k
3700x vs 9900k
3900x vs 9900k
3900x vs 9920x
3900x vs 2920x
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
1,618 (1.74/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
If AMD did not lie on the r20 single threaded test, 4.5GHz 3800x is comparable to 5GHz 9900k single threaded.
So all core 4.5GHz = 9900k all core 5GHz
4.6GHz = 9900k 5.1GHz .

If 3800x going 5GHz, that will be = 9900k at 5.55 GHz
There are a few caveats here:
-Cinebench is a very specific workstation load. While it's an okay general predictor of overall performance, it's a poor predictor of some things (like gaming performance).
-Ryzen traditionally does well in Cinebench compared to Intel.
-Clock scaling is not necessarily linear.
-We don't know all-core turbo speeds of these new Ryzen chips. Though I'm hoping they're as high as it looks even with "normal" cooling. Nor do we know the power limits/cooling/BIOS settings of the demoed Intel chips, which can affect performance quite a lot.

Still, even if we give Ryzen a 10% advantage over Intel in Cinebench performance when compared to other tests, matching the 9900K at lower clocks is very impressive. It's hard to see how this would fail to come very, very close to it across the board.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
797 (0.79/day)
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) aune x1s
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Qpad MK80
Trolling again are we? No one even mentions adoredtv and you come in insulting people.
I never troll, i'm sorry if you think so. I'm 100% serious when i post on this forum, besides it's full of people who believed that guy's "leaks" more like speculations, because they're nothing else more than that, but the way they're being pushed towards people is what's infuriating
 
Joined
Jan 5, 2006
Messages
9,933 (1.96/day)
System Name Desktop / Laptop
Processor Intel i7 6700K @ 4.3GHz (1.180 V) / Intel i3 7100U
Motherboard Asus Z170 Pro Gaming / HP 83A3 (U3E1)
Cooling Noctua NH-U12A 2 fans + Thermal Grizzly Kryonaut + 5 case fans / Fan
Memory 16GB DDR4 Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz CL15 / 8GB DDR4 HyperX CL13
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio / Intel HD620
Storage Samsung 970 Evo 500GB + Samsung 850 Pro 512GB + Samsung 860 Evo 1TB / Samsung 256GB M.2 SSD
Display(s) 23.8" Dell S2417DG 165Hz G-Sync 1440p + 21.5" LG 22MP67VQ IPS 60Hz 1080p / 14" 1080p IPS Glossy
Case Be quiet! Silent Base 600 - Window / HP Pavilion
Audio Device(s) SupremeFX Onboard / Realtek onboard + B&O speaker system
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 750W / Powerbrick
Mouse Logitech MX Anywhere 2 Laser wireless / Logitech M330 wireless
Keyboard RAPOO E9270P Black 5GHz wireless / HP backlit
Software Windows 10 / Windows 10
I'm seriously considering an AMD build as my next upgrade. (probably with nvidia graphics though, since nvidia is still king in perf/watt) Edit: I just read Navi RDNA 50% better perf/watt vs previous GCN...

Things looking better and better for AMD and for us.
 
Last edited:
Top