• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Announces Radeon RX 5600 XT Graphics Card

Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
1,637 (0.64/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Budget Box
Processor Xeon E5-2667v2
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Pro
Cooling Some cheap tower cooler, I dunno
Memory 32GB 1866-DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) XFX RX 5600XT
Storage WD NVME 1GB
Display(s) ASUS Pro Art 27"
Case Antec P7 Neo
This is the starting price. Nvidia will counter. AMD will counter back. Plus, once Polaris is gone, I expect the 5500 and 5600 to take those price slots. It may take a while, but we’re looking at decent upgrades from current mid-range.

My bit of disappointment is that no 5800 series was discussed. I didn’t expect it, as there were no rumors leading up to CES about it, but still, that will be the place where the market disruption will help us most.
 

Durvelle27

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
6,678 (1.56/day)
Location
Memphis, TN
System Name Black Prometheus
Processor |AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Motherboard ASRock B550M Pro4|MSI X370 Gaming PLUS
Cooling Thermalright PA120 SE | AMD Stock Cooler
Memory G.Skill 64GB(2x32GB) 3200MHz | 32GB(4x8GB) DDR4
Video Card(s) |AMD R9 290
Storage Sandisk X300 512GB + WD Black 6TB+WD Black 6TB
Display(s) LG Nanocell85 49" 4K 120Hz + ACER AOPEN 34" 3440x1440 144Hz
Case DeepCool Matrexx 55 V3 w/ 6x120mm Intake + 3x120mm Exhaust
Audio Device(s) LG Dolby Atmos 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RMX850 Fully Modular| EVGA 750W G2
Mouse Logitech Trackman
Keyboard Logitech K350
Software Windows 10 EDU x64
You've already running your third 5700XT? Why, if I may ask?

But there's a group of clients who were buying because of the raw performance value. That's gone, so they'll leave.
Does this card offer any selling point (feature etc) that will bring new clients? I don't see any.
Different rigs

1700X
3600
3900X
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
198 (0.08/day)
Pretty weird product but I am guessing that by now these chip are becoming pretty cheap to make.



You can but why ? 300$ for a 1660Ti isn't uncommon and this thing is going to be faster that it. Why does AMD always have to price their equivalent products dismally low ?

Are they not allowed to make money, is this some strange conspiracy to keep AMD out of the elite high margins club of Nvidia ? The stuff I sometimes read on here man, it's like some of you are begging to be ripped off by one company in particular while the other is expected to die out.
This is a very weak "argument" considering the 1660 super costs $230 and is on par with the 1660ti. Basically the RX 5600xt costs $50 more than the 1660super, yet according to AMD's OWN numbers is only 10% faster on average across all games they've tested.

The 1660ti is now an old product, that is basically obsolete and the real competition is the 1660super, which again costs $50 less and according to AMD's OWN numbers is ONLY 10% slower. To me the 1660s is a much, much better value!
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.27/day)
Can i be the first one to say that 279-299$ for AIB designs for such card is a death sentence?
For a card 5-25% faster than a $279 1660 Ti? Not really.

You can find the 5700 regularly at $279, I saw some just last week and purchased one a few months ago at the same price on Newegg. Now, that isn't AIB, so if something like the Asus Strix 5600XT drops at $279, it *might* be ok, but it still feels like these cards should have dropped with a slightly lower MSRP. At 10-20% increased performance of the 1660Ti, that still puts it ~20% slower than the 5700, but also at ~20% lower MSRP ($349 vs $279).

Overall, at $279 for a good AIB iteration like the Strix, Gaming X, Aorus, Taichi, etc, it's likely ok pricing, but picking up a 5700 when they are at $279 is still the best deal currently, and with a small undervolt, they are almost inaudible, I run my 5700 at 935mv and it's not noticeable over ambient sound unless it is absolutely silent in the room.
Where can you find RX 5700 regularly for $279?

Well, because they used to do that.

Here's another question: since everyone always expects AMD to be the cheaper option, who will buy their cards when they aren't?
There is a $279 RX 5600 XT agains a $279 1660Ti beating it by 5-25% (depending on titles). So it is better for the same price.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
This is the starting price. Nvidia will counter. AMD will counter back.
That only happens if you release a product of equal performance for less money or more performance for same money. Someone always tries to adjust to get the best bang for your buck.
In this case Amd released a product with more performance (than 1660ti) for more money. Nothing will change in the grand scheme of things. Status quo if you will.
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
198 (0.08/day)
For a card 5-25% faster than a $279 1660 Ti? Not really.

LOL. According to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is only 20% faster than the 1660ti, only 10% in esports titles, competing against a now obsolete product.

The real competition is the 1660super, which replaces the 1660ti and costs $230, according to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is ONLY 10% faster, yet costs $50 more.

I can't see anyone recommending this card at $280 for just 10% more performance over the $230 1660super. I'd rather recommend people save up for few months and buy the RX 5700, which goes on sale often for $300, sometimes even less. Certain blower cards have been on sale for as low as $280, which is how much this turd costs!
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
8,863 (3.36/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 7900 - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora Edge
Motherboard ASRock B650 Pro RS
Cooling 2x 360mm NexXxoS ST30 X-Flow, 1x 360mm NexXxoS ST30, 1x 240mm NexXxoS ST30
Memory 32GB - FURY Beast RGB 5600 Mhz
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 7900 XT - Alphacool Eisblock Aurora
Storage 1x Kingston KC3000 1TB 1x Kingston A2000 1TB, 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) LG UltraGear 32GN650-B + 4K Samsung TV
Case Phanteks NV7
Power Supply GPS-750C
LOL. According to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is only 20% faster than the 1660ti, only 10% in esports titles, competing against a now obsolete product.

The real competition is the 1660super, which replaces the 1660ti and costs $230, according to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is ONLY 10% faster, yet costs $50 more.

This is a very weak "argument" considering the 1660 super costs $230 and is on par with the 1660ti. Basically the RX 5600xt costs $50 more than the 1660super, yet according to AMD's OWN numbers is only 10% faster on average across all games they've tested.

The 1660ti is now an old product, that is basically obsolete and the real competition is the 1660super, which again costs $50 less and according to AMD's OWN numbers is ONLY 10% slower. To me the 1660s is a much, much better value!

Ease up buddy you don't need to repeat yourself a million times, we get it, you think the Nvidia option is better because it costs 50$ less ... and it's also slower. Solid argument.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
688 (0.27/day)
LOL. According to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is only 20% faster than the 1660ti, only 10% in esports titles, competing against a now obsolete product.

The real competition is the 1660super, which replaces the 1660ti and costs $230, according to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is ONLY 10% faster, yet costs $50 more.

I can't see anyone recommending this card at $280 for just 10% more performance over the $230 1660super. I'd rather recommend people save up for few months and buy the RX 5700, which goes on sale often for $300, sometimes even less. Certain blower cards have been on sale for as low as $280, which is how much this turd costs!
5700 will be a half year old card when the 5600 XT enters the market. Of course its price lowered since then. However, I can't really see blower cards for $280 or even $300. Cheapest 5700 is $330 on Newegg. Plus some weeks or months after the release, 5600 XT price will lower. Compare MSRP to MSRP. When prices need to fall, they will fall.

You've already running your third 5700XT? Why, if I may ask?

But there's a group of clients who were buying because of the raw performance value. That's gone, so they'll leave.
Does this card offer any selling point (feature etc) that will bring new clients? I don't see any.
No, it is not gone. The $279 5600 XT offers 5-25% performance over the $279 1660Ti. So it's a better product for the same price. And I'm curious about the OC ability of the card. I think it will be higher than we are used to about AMD cards. Back to 2013, the 290X offered same perfomance as the GTX 780, but it was cheaper. Now it is priced equally (speaking of the 5600 XT only) but offers more performance.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
264 (0.05/day)
Processor Intel Core i3 8350K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Z370-P
Cooling Thermalright Macho Rev.C
Memory 12GB DDR4 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Geforce GTX 1050 2GB DDR5 128bits
Storage 2TB + 2TB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 794MB
Software Tubuntu 22.04 LTS x64 + Windows 8.1 x64
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15 Single Thread: 215 points
dead product mainly for introduction price without forget tdp but at simple seek could use around 50w more than gtx 1660 ti / super

resuming this 5600 xt (2020 card) show similar performance around gtx 1070 (2016 card) but using possible aroud 20 to 30w more with around 50% reduced node (gtx 1070: 16nm / rx 5600: 7nm)

at simple seek seems very bad product, maybe amd need consider throw gcn for make new gpu arquitecture, especially in tdp related (more notorious with gtx cards because them lack of rt cores and in consequence show less tdp)

:)
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
198 (0.08/day)
Ease up buddy you don't need to repeat yourself a million times, we get it, you think the Nvidia option is better because it costs 50$ less ... and it's also slower. Solid argument.
Yeah, slower by only 10% according to AMD's OWN numbers. Once the real tests come forward and reviewers get their hands on these, those numbers are going to go down, so realistically its probably only 5% faster, yet costs 20% more.

This card is like 1 year late to the market, barely performs 10% more based on AMD's OWN numbers, yet costs over 20% more. Garbage value, crap card, DOA!
 

Durvelle27

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
6,678 (1.56/day)
Location
Memphis, TN
System Name Black Prometheus
Processor |AMD Ryzen 7 1700X
Motherboard ASRock B550M Pro4|MSI X370 Gaming PLUS
Cooling Thermalright PA120 SE | AMD Stock Cooler
Memory G.Skill 64GB(2x32GB) 3200MHz | 32GB(4x8GB) DDR4
Video Card(s) |AMD R9 290
Storage Sandisk X300 512GB + WD Black 6TB+WD Black 6TB
Display(s) LG Nanocell85 49" 4K 120Hz + ACER AOPEN 34" 3440x1440 144Hz
Case DeepCool Matrexx 55 V3 w/ 6x120mm Intake + 3x120mm Exhaust
Audio Device(s) LG Dolby Atmos 5.1
Power Supply Corsair RMX850 Fully Modular| EVGA 750W G2
Mouse Logitech Trackman
Keyboard Logitech K350
Software Windows 10 EDU x64
Yeah, slower by only 10% according to AMD's OWN numbers. Once the real tests come forward and reviewers get their hands on these, those numbers are going to go down, so realistically its probably only 5% faster, yet costs 20% more.

This card is like 1 year late to the market, barely performs 10% more based on AMD's OWN numbers, yet costs over 20% more. Garbage value, crap card, DOA!
Except its quoted to be 20% faster in AAA titles.

Esports titles was stated to be 10% which in those titles who cares as you are already above 150FPS anyways

I guess you glanced over that part

Typical
 
Joined
May 21, 2009
Messages
264 (0.05/day)
Processor Intel Core i3 8350K @4.6Ghz
Motherboard ASUS Z370-P
Cooling Thermalright Macho Rev.C
Memory 12GB DDR4 2400Mhz
Video Card(s) Gigabyte Geforce GTX 1050 2GB DDR5 128bits
Storage 2TB + 2TB
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster 794MB
Software Tubuntu 22.04 LTS x64 + Windows 8.1 x64
Benchmark Scores Cinebench R15 Single Thread: 215 points
Yeah, slower by only 10% according to AMD's OWN numbers. Once the real tests come forward and reviewers get their hands on these, those numbers are going to go down, so realistically its probably only 5% faster, yet costs 20% more.

This card is like 1 year late to the market, barely performs 10% more based on AMD's OWN numbers, yet costs over 20% more. Garbage value, crap card, DOA!

yeah once appear huge quantity of titles tested (case tpu review) performance is more lower as your said

waiting for tpu review but i think this card show bad tdp compared gtx 1660ti / super

almost forget hopefully amd can show products in proper time (no more 1 or more years later)

:)
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
540 (0.12/day)
$250 would have been much better. The 1660 super is just too close and that card will probably overclock better. Nvidia generally has a better memory controller as well which will make their 6 gb last longer.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
For a card 5-25% faster than a $279 1660 Ti? Not really.




There is a $279 RX 5600 XT agains a $279 1660Ti beating it by 5-25% (depending on titles). So it is better for the same price.

lol,which is it ?

is it like 5700xt matching 2070 super*
(in one game out of five)


280 is msrp reference,but since amd can't sell a card with a decent reference cooler aibs are sold for +$20-40 premium,which is either $70 over aib 1660S or $30 cheaper than 2060.
it's fine if the performance ends up close to 2060,but not if it's too close to 1660S.
if 2060 drops by $30,this is doa.



LOL. According to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is only 20% faster than the 1660ti, only 10% in esports titles, competing against a now obsolete product.

The real competition is the 1660super, which replaces the 1660ti and costs $230, according to AMD's OWN numbers the 5600xt is ONLY 10% faster, yet costs $50 more.

I can't see anyone recommending this card at $280 for just 10% more performance over the $230 1660super. I'd rather recommend people save up for few months and buy the RX 5700, which goes on sale often for $300, sometimes even less. Certain blower cards have been on sale for as low as $280, which is how much this turd costs!

imo what's sad is that they're wasting functional 5700 dies to take on 1660 super.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 22, 2009
Messages
409 (0.07/day)
Location
Grand Prairie Texas
System Name Little Girl
Processor Intel Q9650 @ 3.6GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte x48 DQ6
Cooling liquid cooling
Memory 4gb (2x2) OCZ DDR2 PC2-9200
Video Card(s) Gigabyte HD6950 unlock to Asus 6970 specs
Storage Crucial CT128M225 128gb SSD
Display(s) Acer 27" LCD @ 2048x1152
Case DIY (spit & glue, ducktape, cardboard)
Audio Device(s) On-board HD Audio
Power Supply ABS Tagan 850w
Software Win7 64bit
Yey, more trash.
 
Joined
Jun 8, 2005
Messages
207 (0.03/day)
I can't find the 5700 for the prices you quote. Did you pick up your's during black friday or cyber november sales?

The one I bought for $279 on Newegg was not any special Holiday sale, just a sale they were doing on an XFX reference blower style. Last week the ones I saw were selling from Dell, same deal, Visiontek branded at $279 with the reference board/blower. Don't see the sale going currently, but if you keep an eye out, you will find them.
 
Joined
Nov 21, 2010
Messages
2,223 (0.46/day)
Location
Right where I want to be
System Name Miami
Processor Ryzen 3800X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VII Formula
Cooling Ek Velocity/ 2x 280mm Radiators/ Alphacool fullcover
Memory F4-3600C16Q-32GTZNC
Video Card(s) XFX 6900 XT Speedster 0
Storage 1TB WD M.2 SSD/ 2TB WD SN750/ 4TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) DELL AW3420DW / HP ZR24w
Case Lian Li O11 Dynamic XL
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 1000W+750W
Mouse Corsair Scimitar/Glorious Model O-
Keyboard Corsair K95 Platinum
Software Windows 10 Pro
Cheapest 5700 on Newegg is $329. 5700 MSRP is $349. If we assume the 5600XT is the same speed as the Vega 56 then the 5700 is 16% faster at 25% higher price at MSRP prices.

5700 can be found for as low as $250 if you catch them on sale.

 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
2,648 (0.56/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600@80W
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling ZALMAN CNPS9X OPTIMA
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G400C9K@3733MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 6750 XT Pulse 12GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 128GB, Kingston A2000 NVMe 1TB, Samsung F1 1TB, WD Black 10TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK IPS 144Hz
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Core GC 500W
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 Ultimate 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit/Manjaro Linux
Since RX5700 AIBs' common price is very close to 350 euros in EU, if RX5600XT AIBs are close to 300 euros, it is a very good product and the best in vfm in its class. Performance diff isn't dramatic after all. And as for the performance, it fits exactly between Vega56 and 64, consuming less than 150W.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
You can find the 5700 regularly at $279, I saw some just last week and purchased one a few months ago at the same price on Newegg. Now, that isn't AIB, so if something like the Asus Strix 5600XT drops at $279, it *might* be ok, but it still feels like these cards should have dropped with a slightly lower MSRP. At 10-20% increased performance of the 1660Ti, that still puts it ~20% slower than the 5700, but also at ~20% lower MSRP ($349 vs $279).

Overall, at $279 for a good AIB iteration like the Strix, Gaming X, Aorus, Taichi, etc, it's likely ok pricing, but picking up a 5700 when they are at $279 is still the best deal currently, and with a small undervolt, they are almost inaudible, I run my 5700 at 935mv and it's not noticeable over ambient sound unless it is absolutely silent in the room.
Where??
The lowest I am seeing crunnetly on both Newegg and Amazon is $330 XFX RX 5700 THICC II.

dead product mainly for introduction price without forget tdp but at simple seek could use around 50w more than gtx 1660 ti / super

resuming this 5600 xt (2020 card) show similar performance around gtx 1070 (2016 card) but using possible aroud 20 to 30w more with around 50% reduced node (gtx 1070: 16nm / rx 5600: 7nm)

at simple seek seems very bad product, maybe amd need consider throw gcn for make new gpu arquitecture, especially in tdp related (more notorious with gtx cards because them lack of rt cores and in consequence show less tdp)

:)
Where did you get the 50W Watt.
GTX 1660 Super is 125W (consumes 128W according to TPU review,Link : https://www.techpowerup.com/review/gigabyte-radeon-rx-5500-xt-gaming-oc-8-gb/31.html)
RX 5600 XT is 150W ( and faster).
Substracting, 150-125=25W, where the extra 25W came from??
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
198 (0.08/day)
Except its quoted to be 20% faster in AAA titles.

Esports titles was stated to be 10% which in those titles who cares as you are already above 150FPS anyways

I guess you glanced over that part

Typical
You seem blind, so here is AMD's OWN image!


AMD's OWN numbers: On average between all games its only 10% faster! You add 5% due to AMD picking certain titles over others, and realistically its likely only 5% faster overall, yet it costs 20% more!

Again the real competition for the RX5600xt is the 1660super, which costs $230, not the outgoing, 1 year old 1660ti.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
853 (0.37/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GiB(2x4GiB) DDR3-1600 [800MHz]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560D 4GiB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB HDD
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Cooler Master MasterBox E501L
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
You seem blind, so here is AMD's OWN image!


AMD's OWN numbers: On average between all games its only 10% faster! You add 5% due to AMD picking certain titles over others, and realistically its likely only 5% faster overall, yet it costs 20% more!

Again the real competition for the RX5600xt is the 1660super, which costs $230, not the outgoing, 1 year old 1660ti.
You know that 1660 Super is slower than 1660 Ti and RX 5600 XT is faster than 1660 Ti?? Or you dont?
 
Joined
Feb 8, 2017
Messages
198 (0.08/day)
You know that 1660 Super is slower than 1660 Ti and RX 5600 XT is faster than 1660 Ti?? Or you dont?
That is AMD's OWN picture you fool! WTF is wrong with you? I didn't make the picture, I didn't do the testing, AMD did. In their own best case scenario, the RX 5600xt is ONLY 10% faster than the 1660super, yet it costs $50 more or over 20% more!
 
Joined
Jul 9, 2015
Messages
3,413 (1.07/day)
System Name M3401 notebook
Processor 5600H
Motherboard NA
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) 3050
Storage 500GB SSD
Display(s) 14" OLED screen of the laptop
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores 3050 scores good 15-20% lower than average, despite ASUS's claims that it has uber cooling.
Most moaning normally comes from users who wouldn't buy AMD card anyhow, but just wanted it to release something so that The Leather Man's greed is somehow constrained.

It is bloody ridiculous to argue that a card faster than existing $279 card, is not worth $279.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
The numbers in the slides are from separate test beds, 1660 super is Gigabyte's version with 9900k & the one with 1660Ti (ref?) is w/3800x :rolleyes:

I bet you don't read the footnotes do you?
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (3.05/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
You seem blind, so here is AMD's OWN image!


AMD's OWN numbers: On average between all games its only 10% faster! You add 5% due to AMD picking certain titles over others, and realistically its likely only 5% faster overall, yet it costs 20% more!

Again the real competition for the RX5600xt is the 1660super, which costs $230, not the outgoing, 1 year old 1660ti.
This is so sad I don't believe this.
10% faster on average using the rx5700 die.In their own chart it's 8% or less in 8 out of 15,and the 30% number from Borderlands 3 DX12 was just there to bring up the average since in DX11 the game performs better and 1660ti matches Vega 56.In an honest 30 game review this is gonna get no more than 7-8% faster on avg.
Tell me it's fake or RTG are crazy,AIB cards are gonna sell at $300 for sure.
 
Last edited:
Top