• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD "Cezanne" APU to Stick with "Vega" iGPU, "Van Gogh" Gets RDNA2

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,211 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
The earliest reports on AMD's next-generation "Cezanne" APU silicon pointed at the possibility of the chip combining "Zen 3" CPU cores with a next-generation iGPU solution based on RDNA2 ("Navi 2#"). AMD plans to launch "Cezanne" in 2021, which makes it the immediate successor to "Renoir." A report by Igor's Lab has fresh details on "Cezanne." Apparently the chip sticks with the "Vega" graphics architecture on its iGPU. This doesn't necessarily mean that it's the same exact iGPU as the 8 CU version on "Renoir."

On the other hand, the "Van Gogh" silicon slated for 2021 is expected to receive RDNA2 graphics. It's important to note here that "Van Gogh" and "Cezanne" sit in the same product stack, and "Van Gogh" does not succeed "Cezanne." Rather, it's the codename for an entry-level APU, succeeding "Dali" (Athlon 3000G), which also means the RDNA2-based iGPU will be a lot slimmer than the "Vega" based one on "Cezanne." It's only by 2022 that AMD will have a performance-segment APU with RDNA2-based iGPU, with "Rembrandt." Find our older article getting into AMD's roadmaps here.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
578 (0.23/day)
Ok so my theory is that they will skip RDNA1 completely because of scaling issues. That's why we never saw a 80CU 5900XT variant on the desktop. Too hot and would require too much power. The choice of foregoing RDNA2 for Cezanne is curious tho as both it and Van Gogh are at A0 so rougly at the same level in development. I would understand if Van Gogh was newer and RDNA2 did not make it into Cezanne before it was taped out but that does not seem the case.

Still it's dissapointing that APU's will largely keep using what many consider bad or at least inferior IP for the GPU portion for the next ~two years to come. Especially when even the new consoles will use RDNA2 and same with low power Van Gogh based laptops next year.

Rembrandt however seems to be shaping up a killer product - 5nm Zen4 + RDNA2. Unfortunately it's years away.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2008
Messages
211 (0.05/day)
Ok so my theory is that they will skip RDNA1 completely because of scaling issues. That's why we never saw a 80CU 5900XT variant on the desktop. Too hot and would require too much power. The choice of foregoing RDNA2 for Cezanne is curious tho as both it and Van Gogh are at A0 so rougly at the same level in development. I would understand if Van Gogh was newer and RDNA2 did not make it into Cezanne before it was taped out but that does not seem the case.

Still it's dissapointing that APU's will largely keep using what many consider bad or at least inferior IP for the GPU portion for the next ~two years to come. Especially when even the new consoles will use RDNA2 and same with low power Van Gogh based laptops next year.

Rembrandt however seems to be shaping up a killer product - 5nm Zen4 + RDNA2. Unfortunately it's years away.
I don't think it was scaling issue, they just needed more time to scale it down and up, but they didn't have time as they focused most of their engineers to RDNA2 to accelerate it, they needed to get RDNA2 faster more than having 5900XT or even RNDA on APU's. So they made the tough choice to focus on RDNA2.

But, even though I would love to see RDNA in APU's ASAP, if they can VEGA to perform better and get it the new features of RDNA, and update the media engine. Then it's good enough, I mean with Ryzen 4000 APU's they brought better performance and efficiency than Ryzen 3000 APU's while using less CU's. The higher clocks and optimised worked very well. But, if the rumours are to be believed, Intel might finally caught up with AMD with their next gen. Xe iGPU's.. So AMD needs even better thing than what they already have in Ryzen 4000 APU's.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,134 (6.10/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse 8 GiB
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 VGA)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
RDNA likely won't support DirectX 12 Ultimate where RDNA2 does. They didn't want to commit any resources to RDNA on APU and instead focused on RDNA2.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
578 (0.23/day)
But, if the rumours are to be believed, Intel might finally caught up with AMD with their next gen. Xe iGPU's.. So AMD needs even better thing than what they already have in Ryzen 4000 APU's.
That's one of the reasons im dissapointed they still use Vega in Cezanne (if this rumors turn out to be true).
But im also biased. II never liked Vega aside from it's use of HBM in the mainstream and ditching analogue IO ports like DVI.
I've always liked pure gaming only architectures like Pascal or Navi. Instead of repurposed compute first architectures like Vega and Turing.

That being said im not an APU user myself as i have 3800X but i understand many people are and i often suggest APU's for my friends, coworkers etc.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
103 (1.98/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Vega or RDNA, just give these APU's more graphical horsepower. Renoir is rather underwhelming from this viewpoint.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,617 (0.48/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X@95W
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx 400 Black
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G373C7K@3333MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 Pulse 8GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, INTEL 540S SSDSCKKW180H6 180GB, Samsung F1 1TB, Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Zalman Z550
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 173p, multicore 1306p
Those names mean that Vega20 and Navi21 will have 20 and 21CUs respectively and will be quite potent APUs for 1080P with decent graphic settings imho.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
103 (1.98/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Vega20 and Navi21 will have 20 and 21CUs respectively and will be quite potent APUs for 1080P with decent graphic settings imho.
Where do you get those numbers? You know Navi 10 has 40 CU's right?
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,617 (0.48/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600X@95W
Motherboard MSI B450 Tomahawk MAX
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx 400 Black
Memory 2*8GB PATRIOT PVS416G373C7K@3333MT_C16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5700 Pulse 8GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, INTEL 540S SSDSCKKW180H6 180GB, Samsung F1 1TB, Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
Display(s) AOC 27G2U/BK
Case SHARKOON M25-W 7.1 BLACK
Audio Device(s) Realtek 7.1 onboard
Power Supply Zalman Z550
Mouse Sharkoon SHARK Force Black
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit/Win 10 pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 173p, multicore 1306p
Where do you get those numbers? You know Navi 10 has 40 CU's right?
Since Renoir has a Vega8 and the previous gen APU had a Vega11 in it, the codes for the GPU portions of the APUs depict the CUs in them. This pattern goes on for a few gens now and is giving away info like that.

And those codes do not mean the same for the discrete GPUs ofc as we already know.
 
Joined
May 15, 2020
Messages
103 (1.98/day)
Location
France
System Name Home
Processor Ryzen 3600X
Motherboard MSI Tomahawk 450 MAX
Cooling Noctua NH-U14S
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 MHz DDR4 CAS 16
Video Card(s) MSI RX 5700XT EVOKE OC
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512 GB
Display(s) ASUS VA326HR + MSI Optix G24C4
Case MSI - MAG Forge 100M
Power Supply Aerocool Lux RGB M 650W
Since Renoir has a Vega8 and the previous-gen APU had a Vega11 in it, the codes for the GPU portions of the APUs depict the CUs in them. This pattern goes on for a few gens now and is giving away info like that.

And those codes do not mean the same for the discrete GPUs ofc as we already know.
You're mixing commercial names and code names. Vega 11 is a commercial name, navi21 is most probably a code name. Have you read the article? Van Gogh is an entry-level APU with 21 RDNA CUs?
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2020
Messages
219 (2.19/day)
Those names mean that Vega20 and Navi21 will have 20 and 21CUs respectively and will be quite potent APUs for 1080P with decent graphic settings imho.
If that is the case, the integrated Vega will be very potent. Considering the current Vega 8 on the Renoir allows people to game up to 1080p with low settings, a 20/21 CU Vega may easily allow mid settings at a smooth enough frame rate. However another point to consider is the RAM speed since the higher the resolution/ graphical settings, the higher the bandwidth requirement.

Vega or RDNA, just give these APU's more graphical horsepower. Renoir is rather underwhelming from this viewpoint.
I feel AMD's goal was less on the graphic side of things with Renoir, but to introduce more cores for their mobile parts. In particular their 15W processors. APU benefits mobile more than it does for desktops.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,594 (1.49/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 3400G / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard Gigabyte B450 Aorus M / HP 240 G5
Cooling AM3 Wraith + Spire fan / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 + Nvidia Geforce GT 1030 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) Samsung S22F350 @ 75Hz/ Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 x64
I feel AMD's goal was less on the graphic side of things with Renoir, but to introduce more cores for their mobile parts. In particular their 15W processors. APU benefits mobile more than it does for desktops.
They are bandwidth limited with DDR4 anyway. The difference between the Vega 8 and 11 should be a lot higher than it is in reality.
Still, Vega one more time... AMD pulling an Intel on us.
 

MasutaMaestro

New Member
Joined
Jun 30, 2020
Messages
1 (0.17/day)
Van Gogh should be used for cheap laptops and thin laptops that do not have dedicated graphics including premium 2in1 laptops. I don't care that desktop Cezanne APUs won't likely have RDNA. Most desktop users don't need integrated graphics as much as laptop users do. Cezanne would be better off paired with dedicated graphics for desktops and high performance laptops.
 
Top