• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Computex 2019 Lisa Su CEO Keynote: Live Blog

Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
20 (0.03/day)
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k
Motherboard AsRock Z77 Extreme 4
Cooling Corsair H80
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 2x4
Video Card(s) HIS RX 480 8GB
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250GB, WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD68
Power Supply Corsair GS600
Ohoho Im soo exited with this announcement. My old 3770k & RX480 already served me well. My wallet is ready :clap:
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
591 (1.19/day)
Location
London, UK
so the rumors were indeed lies, no 5ghz boost.

I bet overclocked 9700k still beats AMD at 1080p sadly... not that it matters, but just sad... I was hoping for bigger performance jump this round. silicon is just a dying beast is all there is to it.
There were no lies, those leaks were Engineering Samples chips. That was an unfair demo, pairing 9700k x 3700x was terrible.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,439 (1.06/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
With what we have seen so far, 4.6GHz is gonna be the cap for RyZen 3000 using conventional cooling. Also highly likely each tier of RyZen would have heavily binned chiplets. OC a 3700X upwards maybe more difficult than people think
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,636 (0.83/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
There were no lies, those leaks were Engineering Samples chips. That was an unfair demo, pairing 9700k x 3700x was terrible.
9700k is $400....more than fair, plus it consumes twice the power.

I thought AMD would go cheaper to really undercut, but it looks like Lisa has had enough of that shit.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
7,405 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name phangirldle
Processor 8700K @ 5.1 Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling 120mm Custom Liquid
Memory 32 GB 3600 Mhz DDR4 16-16-16-36-364 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 2080 Ti Windforce (Undervolted OC 1925MHz)
Storage 3x1TB SSDs
Display(s) Alienware 34" 3440x1440 120hz, G-Sync
Case Jonsbo U4
Audio Device(s) Arctis 7
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse silent click gaming mouse
Keyboard tenkeyless
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
With what we have seen so far, 4.6GHz is gonna be the cap for RyZen 3000 using conventional cooling. Also highly likely each tier of RyZen would have heavily binned chiplets. OC a 3700X upwards maybe more difficult than people think
that's basically the current cap for SK-x basin falls using conventional cooling.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
47,285 (8.66/day)
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Big Fella
Processor Ryzen R7 2700X (stock/XFR OC)
Motherboard Asus B450-i ITX
Cooling Corsair H110 W/ Corsair ML RGB fans
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS mod to Gaming Z) w/ Corsair H55 AIO
Storage 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000 Pro NVME
Display(s) Phillips 328m6fjrmb (32" 1440p 144hz curved) + Sony KD-55X8500F (55" 4K HDR)
Case Fractal Design Nano S
Audio Device(s) Razer Leviathan + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G903 + PowerPlay mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
Real world TDP will be higher.. 65w does not mean exactly it..
Probably Ryzen 3500 may be 65w
If i'm sidegrading from a 2700x (105W) to a 3700x (65W), both measured by AMD's standards i know i'm in for a big drop in wattages and temps, and i'm frigging excited for that
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,439 (1.06/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
that's basically the current cap for SK-x basin falls using conventional cooling.
I just want a 20+ core TR3 to replace my X99.........
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
591 (1.19/day)
Location
London, UK
9700k is $400....more than fair, plus it consumes twice the power.
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,636 (0.83/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
I'm pretty sure the point is that intel just disabled HT and still charges you an arm and a leg. Every comment on this sounds like it comes from salty intel 8 core owners.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,551 (1.09/day)
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
The 9900k would likely beat the 3700x but be beaten by 3800x as well, they've positioned Ryzen 7 vs i7 & Ryzen 9 vs i9 ~ fairly self explanatory.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
217 (1.04/day)
With what we have seen so far, 4.6GHz is gonna be the cap for RyZen 3000 using conventional cooling. Also highly likely each tier of RyZen would have heavily binned chiplets. OC a 3700X upwards maybe more difficult than people think
Pay attention the TDP limit of 105W - same as old generation so they can be compatible with all the boards, they could release 125W with higher clocks but they could have got bad PR from customers that aren't happy that their cheap A320 board doesn't support the new CPU's,
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,403 (0.65/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
They compared the 3800X core wise with the 9900K. It's not AMD's fault Intel decided to disable HT on a product 3700X is competing with.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
591 (1.19/day)
Location
London, UK
The 9900k would likely beat the 3700x but be beaten by 3800x as well, they've positioned Ryzen 7 vs i7 & Ryzen 9 vs i9 ~ fairly self explanatory.
9900k x 3800x would have been an even match, 16 threads x 16 threads, it just made no sense 9700k 8 threads x 3700x 16 threads. That was one of the greatest bullshit that I have ever seen in my life.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,269 (1.57/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3900MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 8GB Corsair Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400MHz @ 3400MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 + HDD Toshiba 2TB / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75 Hz / Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Logitech G203 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
Benchmark Scores Time Spy: 2200
Pay attention the TDP limit of 105W - same as old generation so they can be compatible with all the boards, they could release 125W with higher clocks but they could have got bad PR from customers that aren't happy that their cheap A320 board doesn't support the new CPU's,
Meh, Phenom II saw Nforce 4 65w only boards and no one complained, same with the last years of 775.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,551 (1.09/day)
Like I said they've positioned the i9 vs Ryzen 9, that's the only thing I can come up with. Though 8c/8t vs 8c/16t was otherwise unfair.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
591 (1.19/day)
Location
London, UK
They compared the 3800X core wise with the 9900K. It's not AMD's fault Intel decided to disable HT on a product 3700X is competing with.
Oh yeah in gaming with a variable fps, that was another fail, I wanted a single or multithread benchmark apples to apples and that did only happen on the 12 cores. 3900x x 9920 and plus ryzen had a 200mhs difference. 4.4 x 4.6, but in all fairness this was much more fair than 8 threads to 16 threads, even though it had 200mhs more for 3900x.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
7,405 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name phangirldle
Processor 8700K @ 5.1 Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling 120mm Custom Liquid
Memory 32 GB 3600 Mhz DDR4 16-16-16-36-364 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 2080 Ti Windforce (Undervolted OC 1925MHz)
Storage 3x1TB SSDs
Display(s) Alienware 34" 3440x1440 120hz, G-Sync
Case Jonsbo U4
Audio Device(s) Arctis 7
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse silent click gaming mouse
Keyboard tenkeyless
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
Meh, Phenom II saw Nforce 4 65w only boards and no one complained, same with the last years of 775.
Those boards were notoriously crap tho... I used to hate them (775).

123815


Used to have to do that or the OC would be unstable :D
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,636 (0.83/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
System Name More hardware than I use :|
Processor 4.7 8350 - 4.2 4560K - 4.4 4690K
Motherboard Sabertooth R2.0 - Gigabyte Z87X-UD4H-CF - AsRock Z97M KIller
Cooling Mugen 2 rev B push/pull - Hyper 212+ push/pull - Hyper 212+
Memory 16GB Gskill - 8GB Gskill - 16GB Ballistix 1.35v
Video Card(s) Xfire OCed 7950s - Powercolor 290x - Oced Zotac 980Ti AMP! (also have two 7870s)
Storage Crucial 250GB SSD, Kingston 3K 120GB, Sammy 1TB, various WDs, 13TB (actual capactity) NAS with WDs
Display(s) X-star 27" 1440 - Auria 27" 1440 - BenQ 24" 1080 - Acer 23" 1080
Case Lian Li open bench - Fractal Design ARC - Thermaltake Cube (still have HAF 932 and more ARCs)
Audio Device(s) Titanium HD - Onkyo HT-RC360 Receiver - BIC America custom 5.1 set up (and extra Klipsch sub)
Power Supply Corsair 850W V2 - EVGA 1000 G2 - Seasonic 500 and 600W units (dead 750W needs RMA lol)
Mouse Logitech G5 - Sentey Revolution Pro - Sentey Lumenata Pro - multiple wireless logitechs
Keyboard Logitech G11s - Thermaltake Challenger
Software I wish I could kill myself instead of using windows (OSX can suck it too).
9900k x 3800x would have been an even match, 16 threads x 16 threads, it just made no sense 9700k 8 threads x 3700x 16 threads. That was one of the greatest bullshit that I have ever seen in my life.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
570 (1.79/day)
When companies talk about "competition", they mean products having the same price.
If the "competition" has a single core 8-bit CPU at 3Mhz for $329, that's what they will compare the new product with.

So 9700K was a totally fair comparison, price wise.
It's not AMD's fault that Intel chose to cripple an i7
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
78 (0.13/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard Asrock Taichi x370
Cooling Stock
Memory 32gb Trident Z @ 2933
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Vega 64
Storage 256 Sandisk Pro SSD, 1TB Mushkin Reactor SSD, 5TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Asus MG279Q
Case Phanteks Ethoo Evolv ATX
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2
9900k x 3800x would have been an even match, 16 threads x 16 threads, it just made no sense 9700k 8 threads x 3700x 16 threads. That was one of the greatest bullshit that I have ever seen in my life.
That's not how it works. Price points are what matter, not the physical makeup of the chip. The 9700k is $400, the 3700x is $330. If you compare the 9900k to the 3700x you're comparing a $500 CPU to one that's almost $200 cheaper than it. They're products competing in a wildly different price segment.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,403 (0.65/day)
Location
Tokyo, Ota
Processor i5 - 7300HQ
Memory 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 6GB
Storage 180GB m.2 SATA | 250GB 850Evo SATA
Display(s) FHD 15" Gsync IPS + Acer H243H
Mouse Rival 300 with Omron main switches.
Keyboard Apex m500 (mx red)
Oh yeah in gaming with a variable fps, that was another fail, I wanted a single or multithread benchmark apples to apples and that did only happen on the 12 cores. 3900x x 9920.
Maybe the should have done a full 30 page review. Go on for about 40 minutes... Just because YOU wanted it...
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,360 (1.25/day)
Like I said they've positioned the i9 vs Ryzen 9, that's the only thing I can come up with. Though 8c/8t vs 8c/16t was otherwise unfair.
Price segment both are MSRP $399. Give Intel a month to lower prices to clear inventory, Such a nice gesture.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,551 (1.09/day)
Like I said in the other thread, Intel doesn't lower prices. Call it ego or whatever but they won't do so & frankly don't need to, considering they still have the OC headroom.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
591 (1.19/day)
Location
London, UK
When companies talk about "competition", they mean products having the same price.
If the "competition" has a single core 8-bit CPU at 3Mhz for $329, that's what they will compare the new product with.

So 9700K was a totally fair comparison, price wise.
It's not AMD's fault that Intel chose to cripple an i7
Remember that is amd is on the attack here, late in the game, not intel and its price, amd is trying to price its price based on the competition had for some months. Blame amd not intel.

That's not how it works. Price points are what matter, not the physical makeup of the chip. The 9700k is $400, the 3700x is $330. If you compare the 9900k to the 3700x you're comparing a $500 CPU to one that's almost $200 cheaper than it. They're products competing in a wildly different price segment.
As per my previous post, amd set that price now, intel had its price for a long time. Like I said before, Intel will set the 9700k much lower as amd launches the 3700x and then you trolls will say, intel was not fair hehe and amd will not move the price and you trolls will cry about it.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,551 (1.09/day)
Remember that is amd is on the attack here, late in the game, not intel and its price, amd is trying to price its price based on the competition had for some months. Blame amd not intel.
Frankly it's the buyers that need to be blamed, many of them want AMD to lower prices just so they can get cheaper Intel or Nvidia products. We've seen it time & again, AMD is not a charity!
 
Top