• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Computex 2019 Lisa Su CEO Keynote: Live Blog

Joined
Aug 7, 2017
Messages
23 (0.01/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard MSI MPG X570 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Corsair H100iv2
Memory Trident Z Royal Silver 2x8GB
Video Card(s) MSI RX 6700 XT Gaming X
Storage Corsair Force MP600 500GB, WD Caviar Blue 4TB
Display(s) LG 27UD68
Power Supply Seasonic Focus Plus Gold 650w
Ohoho Im soo exited with this announcement. My old 3770k & RX480 already served me well. My wallet is ready :clap:
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,494 (0.69/day)
Location
London, UK
so the rumors were indeed lies, no 5ghz boost.

I bet overclocked 9700k still beats AMD at 1080p sadly... not that it matters, but just sad... I was hoping for bigger performance jump this round. silicon is just a dying beast is all there is to it.

There were no lies, those leaks were Engineering Samples chips. That was an unfair demo, pairing 9700k x 3700x was terrible.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.98/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
With what we have seen so far, 4.6GHz is gonna be the cap for RyZen 3000 using conventional cooling. Also highly likely each tier of RyZen would have heavily binned chiplets. OC a 3700X upwards maybe more difficult than people think
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
There were no lies, those leaks were Engineering Samples chips. That was an unfair demo, pairing 9700k x 3700x was terrible.

9700k is $400....more than fair, plus it consumes twice the power.

I thought AMD would go cheaper to really undercut, but it looks like Lisa has had enough of that shit.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,209 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
With what we have seen so far, 4.6GHz is gonna be the cap for RyZen 3000 using conventional cooling. Also highly likely each tier of RyZen would have heavily binned chiplets. OC a 3700X upwards maybe more difficult than people think

that's basically the current cap for SK-x basin falls using conventional cooling.
 

Mussels

Freshwater Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
58,413 (8.21/day)
Location
Oystralia
System Name Rainbow Sparkles (Power efficient, <350W gaming load)
Processor Ryzen R7 5800x3D (Undervolted, 4.45GHz all core)
Motherboard Asus x570-F (BIOS Modded)
Cooling Alphacool Apex UV - Alphacool Eisblock XPX Aurora + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate
Memory 2x32GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB @3866 C18-22-22-22-42 TRFC704 (1.4V Hynix MJR - SoC 1.15V)
Video Card(s) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Underclocked to 1700Mhz 0.750v (375W down to 250W))
Storage 2TB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2
Display(s) Phillips 32 32M1N5800A (4k144), LG 32" (4K60) | Gigabyte G32QC (2k165) | Phillips 328m6fjrmb (2K144)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Logitech G560 | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Fractal Ion+ 2 860W (Platinum) (This thing is God-tier. Silent and TINY)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE ( Sexy white keycaps)
VR HMD Oculus Rift S + Quest 2
Software Windows 11 pro x64 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS) OpenRGB - ditch the branded bloatware!
Benchmark Scores Nyooom.
Real world TDP will be higher.. 65w does not mean exactly it..
Probably Ryzen 3500 may be 65w

If i'm sidegrading from a 2700x (105W) to a 3700x (65W), both measured by AMD's standards i know i'm in for a big drop in wattages and temps, and i'm frigging excited for that
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,717 (0.98/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) 32'' 4K Dell
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
VR HMD HTC Vive + Oculus Quest 2
Software Windows 10 P
that's basically the current cap for SK-x basin falls using conventional cooling.

I just want a 20+ core TR3 to replace my X99.........
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,494 (0.69/day)
Location
London, UK
9700k is $400....more than fair, plus it consumes twice the power.

It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.

I'm pretty sure the point is that intel just disabled HT and still charges you an arm and a leg. Every comment on this sounds like it comes from salty intel 8 core owners.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
The 9900k would likely beat the 3700x but be beaten by 3800x as well, they've positioned Ryzen 7 vs i7 & Ryzen 9 vs i9 ~ fairly self explanatory.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2019
Messages
324 (0.17/day)
With what we have seen so far, 4.6GHz is gonna be the cap for RyZen 3000 using conventional cooling. Also highly likely each tier of RyZen would have heavily binned chiplets. OC a 3700X upwards maybe more difficult than people think
Pay attention the TDP limit of 105W - same as old generation so they can be compatible with all the boards, they could release 125W with higher clocks but they could have got bad PR from customers that aren't happy that their cheap A320 board doesn't support the new CPU's,
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
It wont be $400 for long. Price wise yes, core wise, no. Comparing apples to oranges is not fair no matter how you look at.
They compared the 3800X core wise with the 9900K. It's not AMD's fault Intel decided to disable HT on a product 3700X is competing with.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,494 (0.69/day)
Location
London, UK
The 9900k would likely beat the 3700x but be beaten by 3800x as well, they've positioned Ryzen 7 vs i7 & Ryzen 9 vs i9 ~ fairly self explanatory.

9900k x 3800x would have been an even match, 16 threads x 16 threads, it just made no sense 9700k 8 threads x 3700x 16 threads. That was one of the greatest bullshit that I have ever seen in my life.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,986 (0.96/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz@3933MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost 3060 Ti 8GB + Sapphire Pulse RX 6600 8GB
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) Gigabyte G27Q + AOC 19'
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 11 x64
Pay attention the TDP limit of 105W - same as old generation so they can be compatible with all the boards, they could release 125W with higher clocks but they could have got bad PR from customers that aren't happy that their cheap A320 board doesn't support the new CPU's,
Meh, Phenom II saw Nforce 4 65w only boards and no one complained, same with the last years of 775.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
Like I said they've positioned the i9 vs Ryzen 9, that's the only thing I can come up with. Though 8c/8t vs 8c/16t was otherwise unfair.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,494 (0.69/day)
Location
London, UK
They compared the 3800X core wise with the 9900K. It's not AMD's fault Intel decided to disable HT on a product 3700X is competing with.

Oh yeah in gaming with a variable fps, that was another fail, I wanted a single or multithread benchmark apples to apples and that did only happen on the 12 cores. 3900x x 9920 and plus ryzen had a 200mhs difference. 4.4 x 4.6, but in all fairness this was much more fair than 8 threads to 16 threads, even though it had 200mhs more for 3900x.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,209 (1.71/day)
Location
Austin Texas
Processor 13700KF Undervolted @ 5.6/ 5.5, 4.8Ghz Ring 200W PL1
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin 120 w/ Arctic P12 Fans
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2x 2TB WDC SN850, 1TB Samsung 960 prr
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case SLIGER S620
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard RoyalAxe
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Meh, Phenom II saw Nforce 4 65w only boards and no one complained, same with the last years of 775.
Those boards were notoriously crap tho... I used to hate them (775).

123815


Used to have to do that or the OC would be unstable :D
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
9900k x 3800x would have been an even match, 16 threads x 16 threads, it just made no sense 9700k 8 threads x 3700x 16 threads. That was one of the greatest bullshit that I have ever seen in my life.

 
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
583 (0.30/day)
When companies talk about "competition", they mean products having the same price.
If the "competition" has a single core 8-bit CPU at 3Mhz for $329, that's what they will compare the new product with.

So 9700K was a totally fair comparison, price wise.
It's not AMD's fault that Intel chose to cripple an i7
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
370 (0.16/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard MSI B550 Tomahawk
Cooling Noctua U12S
Memory 32GB @ 3600 CL18
Video Card(s) AMD 6800XT
Storage WD Black SN850(1TB), WD Black NVMe 2018(500GB), WD Blue SATA(2TB)
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G9
Case Be Quiet! Silent Base 802
Power Supply Seasonic PRIME-GX-1000
9900k x 3800x would have been an even match, 16 threads x 16 threads, it just made no sense 9700k 8 threads x 3700x 16 threads. That was one of the greatest bullshit that I have ever seen in my life.
That's not how it works. Price points are what matter, not the physical makeup of the chip. The 9700k is $400, the 3700x is $330. If you compare the 9900k to the 3700x you're comparing a $500 CPU to one that's almost $200 cheaper than it. They're products competing in a wildly different price segment.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
Oh yeah in gaming with a variable fps, that was another fail, I wanted a single or multithread benchmark apples to apples and that did only happen on the 12 cores. 3900x x 9920.
Maybe the should have done a full 30 page review. Go on for about 40 minutes... Just because YOU wanted it...
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
3,881 (0.89/day)
Like I said they've positioned the i9 vs Ryzen 9, that's the only thing I can come up with. Though 8c/8t vs 8c/16t was otherwise unfair.

Price segment both are MSRP $399. Give Intel a month to lower prices to clear inventory, Such a nice gesture.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
Like I said in the other thread, Intel doesn't lower prices. Call it ego or whatever but they won't do so & frankly don't need to, considering they still have the OC headroom.
 
Joined
May 8, 2018
Messages
1,494 (0.69/day)
Location
London, UK
When companies talk about "competition", they mean products having the same price.
If the "competition" has a single core 8-bit CPU at 3Mhz for $329, that's what they will compare the new product with.

So 9700K was a totally fair comparison, price wise.
It's not AMD's fault that Intel chose to cripple an i7

Remember that is amd is on the attack here, late in the game, not intel and its price, amd is trying to price its price based on the competition had for some months. Blame amd not intel.

That's not how it works. Price points are what matter, not the physical makeup of the chip. The 9700k is $400, the 3700x is $330. If you compare the 9900k to the 3700x you're comparing a $500 CPU to one that's almost $200 cheaper than it. They're products competing in a wildly different price segment.

As per my previous post, amd set that price now, intel had its price for a long time. Like I said before, Intel will set the 9700k much lower as amd launches the 3700x and then you trolls will say, intel was not fair hehe and amd will not move the price and you trolls will cry about it.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
6,728 (1.68/day)
Remember that is amd is on the attack here, late in the game, not intel and its price, amd is trying to price its price based on the competition had for some months. Blame amd not intel.
Frankly it's the buyers that need to be blamed, many of them want AMD to lower prices just so they can get cheaper Intel or Nvidia products. We've seen it time & again, AMD is not a charity!
 
Top