• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD Debuts New 12- and 16-Core Opteron 6300 Series Processors

Joined
Dec 6, 2011
Messages
4,785 (2.17/day)
Likes
1,187
Location
Still on the East Side
#1
AMD today announced the immediate availability of its new 12- and 16-core AMD Opteron 6300 Series server processors, code named "Warsaw." Designed for enterprise workloads, the new AMD Opteron 6300 Series processors feature the "Piledriver" core and are fully socket and software compatible with the existing AMD Opteron 6300 Series. The power efficiency and cost effectiveness of the new products are ideal for the AMD Open 3.0 Open Compute Platform - the industry's most cost effective Open Compute platform.

Show full news post
 

fullinfusion

Vanguard Beta Tester
Joined
Jan 11, 2008
Messages
9,605 (2.65/day)
Likes
3,363
Processor I7-7700K
Motherboard Asus Z270 Maximus IX Code
Cooling Custom water plus another cooler
Memory Corsair Vengeance LED Red 4x8GB 32GB 3200MHz kit
Video Card(s) 2 x MSI RX Vega 56 and a single MSI RX Vega 64 in test rig
Storage 960 EVO/960 Pro M.2 nvme 250/1TB, Samsumg 850 evo 256/ WD 1TB blue
Display(s) Nexius 32" freesync 2 HDR
Case Corsair Obsidion 650D/ cardboard box
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 1300W
Mouse Mionix Naos 7000
Keyboard G15
Software Windows 10 Home
#2
Wow nothing wrong with it's price!

16 real cores :twitch:
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,888 (1.01/day)
Likes
742
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
#3
If there were desktop boards for these I'd be all over the 12 core variant.
 
Joined
Jul 13, 2010
Messages
43 (0.02/day)
Likes
10
Location
Slovakia
System Name Pap1er
Processor AMD FX 8370 @ 4550 MHz
Motherboard GIGABYTE 990X-Gaming SLI
Cooling Corsair H50
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro RX 570 4GB
Storage OCZ-VECTOR150 @ 120GB / Radeon R7 @ 240GB / WD20EURS @ 2TB
Display(s) LG 29UC88 Curved UltraWide Monitor
Case Corsair 230T Graphite Series - Orange
Audio Device(s) OnBoard
Power Supply Corsair CX750M
Mouse Creative Sound BlasterX Siege M04 Gaming mouse
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#4
If there were desktop boards for these I'd be all over the 12 core variant.
I would also like to see desktop board for these meat grinders
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,888 (1.01/day)
Likes
742
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
#6
Not all that real.
More real than intel's 8 cores 16 threads. The 8 extra threads only appear in specific scenarios and in others they don't exist whereas AMD's 16 cores are always capable of doing 16 tasks simultaneously it just doesn't scale perfectly because 1 core will do 100% single core performance but 16 will only do around 1260% instead of semi perfect scaling like what intel has where 1 core does 100% and 8 cores do 799% and with hyper threading it maxes out at 1038% so in some scenarios(3D graphics rendering) the 2000$ 8 core intel will beat the 600$ 16 core AMD and the AMD will win in video encoding and similar dumb work loads like searching for stuff so the AMD is a better server CPU than the intel.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
1,262 (0.27/day)
Likes
609
Location
South Africa
System Name Firelance
Processor i5-3570K @ 4.6GHz / 1.19V
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H @ F16h mod BIOS
Cooling Corsair H105 + 4x Gentle Typhoon 1850
Memory 2x 8GB Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3-1600 CL9 @ CL7
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC @ 2000 core / 2300 mem
Storage 2x 256GB Samsung 840 Pro (RAID-0) + Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 (3TB)
Display(s) Dell U2713HM (25x14) + Acer P243W (19x12)
Case Fractal Design ARC XL
Audio Device(s) Logitech G930
Power Supply Seasonic M12-II Bronze Evo Edition 750W
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard Logitech G19
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 Service Pack 1
#7
And, sadly, the Xeons will still beat the ever living crap out of these.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,530 (0.46/day)
Likes
377
System Name Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor FX 8320 @ 4.5Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard ASrock 990FX Extreme 4 / Lenovo Y580
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus / Big hunk of copper
Memory 16GB Samsung 30nm DDR3 1600+ / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX R9 390 / GTX 660M 2GB
Storage Seagate 3TB/1TB + OCZ Synapse 64GB SSD Cache / Western Digital 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
Power Supply Antec Truepower Blue 750W + Thermaltake 5.25in 250W / Big Power Brick
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
#8
And, sadly, the Xeons will still beat the ever living crap out of these.
I dunno. In multithreading AMD was beating Intel. Xeons are another story but when it comes to price for the performance. That I'd be interested to see.
 
Joined
Mar 31, 2012
Messages
542 (0.26/day)
Likes
113
System Name SIGSEGV
Processor Intel | AMD
Motherboard INVALID| X399
Cooling 2 Heatpipes | EK
Memory 16 Gb DDR4 2400 | 32 GB DDR4
Video Card(s) 1060 | MI25 / Vega Frontier | Tesla K
Storage 1TB 7200/256 SSD PCIE | ~ TB
Display(s) 15,5" / 27" LEDTV | No Display
Case Black & Grey
Audio Device(s) Realtek
Power Supply Silverstone 850W | Unrated PSU
Software LinuxMint KDE | XFCE
Benchmark Scores i dont care about scores
#9
And, sadly, the Xeons will still beat the ever living crap out of these.

Sadly, there is no opteron based server available in my country..
So i have no choice instead using (buying) xeon server and workstation for my lab which is very expensive..
That was very frustating..
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2014
Messages
221 (0.15/day)
Likes
90
System Name the small and silent worker
Processor Xeon E5-2690 v3 (12 core/24 thred, 2.6-3.5ghz, Haswell-EP)
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty X99M/3.1 (LGA 2011-3 micro ATX)
Cooling deepcool lucifer + 140mm fan
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport LT, (16GB x4), DDR4, 2400MHz
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce GT610 (that is right - a 30$, passive GPU :D... this system has a "worker" in name )
Storage Samsung 950 PRO NVMe 512GB
Display(s) nope
Case Silverstone SG10 (a 23 liters volume case - smaller than most "mitx" marketed cases these days)
Power Supply corsair hx750i
Mouse nope
Keyboard nope
Software win 8.1 pro
Benchmark Scores benchmarks passed, that I care about: 1)silence; 2)small space taken; 3)cpu 100% satble load 24/7
#10
soon there will be AMD marketing slides about +400% performance increase over "other competitors" 4 core CPUs :D
 
Joined
Apr 16, 2010
Messages
1,885 (0.67/day)
Likes
549
System Name The Stone that the Builders Refused / Perception Forge version III
Processor i5 4570 /i7-6800k
Motherboard Msi Z87m / Asus x99M-WS
Cooling H80i / nh-d14
Memory 32 gigs patriot 1866 / 16gigs G skill ddr4
Video Card(s) MSI r9 270 / 970 windforce
Storage 120gig 840 evo, 120gig adata sp900 / 2 Samsung 840 raid zero 2tb seagate alot +
Display(s) 23'' asus lcd 29" Lg(r.i.p.) 42" nec monitor
Case Fractal desisn Node 804 / Fractal Design Node 804
Power Supply seasonic G 650 gold / Be Quiet Dark power pro 650 platinum
Mouse corsair vengence M65 / Func Ms3
Keyboard corsair k70 cherry blue /corsair k95 cherry red
Software Window 10 pro / windows 10 pro
Benchmark Scores meh... feel me on the battle field!
#11
...cool and at a great price..... but once again the lemming approach. A bunch of little ...adequate cores. The best result would be a price reduction at intel....bah hhhaaa hhhhaaaa:roll: yeah right. Maybe some day but not by this. Nether the less Amd is still moving in the right direction.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,404 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,483
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#12
I would like everyone to remember what the equivalent Xeon is at that price point. I'm willing to bet that the Opteron is more cost effective, considering a 10 Core Xeon starts at 1600 USD, I think everything needs to be put into perspective. I would rather take two 16c Opterons than a single 10c Xeon, but that's just me.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,888 (1.01/day)
Likes
742
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
#13
soon there will be AMD marketing slides about +400% performance increase over "other competitors" 4 core CPUs :D
it'd be true for the integer math capability but not much else.
 
Joined
May 11, 2006
Messages
61 (0.01/day)
Likes
3
Location
Denmark EU
#14
Not all that real.
Your either to stupid or don't know anything about Amd CPU's they are all independent cores with own multiplier and volt control and if 1 core go's up in speed all the other stays down until used.
That makes for better power usage.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
408 (0.08/day)
Likes
76
System Name Octopussy
Processor 1x Intel Core-i7 3930K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Full water cooling, mostly Aqua Computer and EKWB stuff!
Memory 4x 4GB Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2133 9-11-10-27-1T
Video Card(s) 2x Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage 8x Hitachi 5K3000 3TB RAID-6 (Adaptec 5805); 1x 512GB Samsung 950Pro (Angelbird Wings PX1)
Display(s) PLP: Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT + Dell U3011 30" TFT + Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT
Case CaseLabs TH10A
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-1000XP
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M800
Software MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores A lot.
#15
Your either to stupid or don't know anything about Amd CPU's they are all independent cores with own multiplier and volt control and if 1 core go's up in speed all the other stays down until used.
That makes for better power usage.
I don't get what the power characteristics have to do with the debate about what counts as a "real" core and what does not?!
The fact is that with the Bulldozer architecture AMD choose to implement CMT in the form of modules rather than Hyperthreading as implemented by Intel (here called SMT). A module on an AMD CPU acts as 2 independent cores, but nonetheless they share certain functional units together. So technically they are NOT 2 independent cores. It's more or less the same as with Intels Hyperthreading, where a core can run 2 threads simultaneously and is seen by the OS as 2, but is actually only one core.
So maybe AMDs implementation of CMT/SMT in the form of modules is a step further in the direction of independent cores than Intel is with Hyperthreading. But all that doesn't really matter at all. At the end of the day, what counts is the performance you get out of the CPU (or performance per dollar or performance per watt, whatever matters most to you).

As far as I'm concerned, they should advertise these as 6 modules / 12 threads and 8 modules / 16 threads like Intel does with for instance the 8 core / 16 threads (8c/16t) nomenclature...
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,358 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,074
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#16
Your either to stupid or don't know anything about Amd CPU's they are all independent cores with own multiplier and volt control and if 1 core go's up in speed all the other stays down until used.
That makes for better power usage.
Wow. You must be very smart for insulting and flaming users. Please, go on...
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,404 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,483
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#17
I don't get what the power characteristics have to do with the debate about what counts as a "real" core and what does not?!
The fact is that with the Bulldozer architecture AMD choose to implement CMT in the form of modules rather than Hyperthreading as implemented by Intel (here called SMT). A module on an AMD CPU acts as 2 independent cores, but nonetheless they share certain functional units together. So technically they are NOT 2 independent cores. It's more or less the same as with Intels Hyperthreading, where a core can run 2 threads simultaneously and is seen by the OS as 2, but is actually only one core.
So maybe AMDs implementation of CMT/SMT in the form of modules is a step further in the direction of independent cores than Intel is with Hyperthreading. But all that doesn't really matter at all. At the end of the day, what counts is the performance you get out of the CPU (or performance per dollar or performance per watt, whatever matters most to you).

As far as I'm concerned, they should advertise these as 6 modules / 12 threads and 8 modules / 16 threads like Intel does with for instance the 8 core / 16 threads (8c/16t) nomenclature...
The problem with that statement is that there is enough shared hardware to run two threads in tandem where hyper-threading won't always because it depends on parts of the CPU that are not being used.

Intel uses unused resources in the CPU to get extra multi-threaded performance. AMD added extra hardware for multi-threaded performance as opposed to using just the extra resources available. The performance of a module vs the performance of a single core with HT has costs and benefits of their own. With an Intel CPU, that second thread doesn't nearly have as much processing power that the first thread does, where with AMD, the amount of performance that second "thread" or "core" if you will has much more tangible gains than the HT thread does.

It's worth mentioning that the integer units do have enough hardware to run two full threads side-by-side. It's the floating point unit that doesn't but even still, FMA is supposed to give some ability to decouple the 256-bit FP unit to do two 128-bit ops at once.

I think AMD's goal is to emphasize what CPUs do best, integer math, and let GPUs do what they do best, FP math. Not to say that a CPU shouldn't do any FP math, but if there is a lot of FP math to be done, a GPU is better optimized to do those kinds of operations.

Also, I should add that I'm pretty sure that AMD clocks are controlled on a per-module basis but parts of each module can be power gated to improve power usage. One of the biggest benefits of having a module is that you save die space to add that second thread without too much of a hit on single-threaded performance (relatively speaking).

Wow. You must be very smart for insulting and flaming users. Please, go on...
Please don't feed the ducks trolls.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2011
Messages
4,358 (1.91/day)
Likes
1,074
Processor Intel Core i7 3770k @ 4.3GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V LK
Memory 16GB(2x8) DDR3@2133MHz 1.5v Patriot
Video Card(s) MSI GeForce GTX 1080 GAMING X 8G
Storage 59.63GB Samsung SSD 830 + 465.76 GB Samsung SSD 840 EVO + 2TB Hitachi + 300GB Velociraptor HDD
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 3440x1440@100Hz G-Sync
Case NZXT PHANTOM410-BK
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium PCIe
Power Supply Corsair 850W
Mouse Anker
Software Win 10 Pro - 64bit
Benchmark Scores 30FPS in NFS:Rivals
#18
Also, I should add that I'm pretty sure that AMD clocks are controlled on a per-module basis but parts of each module can be power gated to improve power usage. One of the biggest benefits of having a module is that you save die space to add that second thread without too much of a hit on single-threaded performance (relatively speaking).
Aq, agree with you.
However I have a question. Don't you think this approach is somehow not ideal for AMD, because in this way, a core is having a lot less transistors than Intel's, therefore the bad performance in single-threaded applications, like games for example?
I don't understand why AMD is still going for strong GPU performance, even on the so called top CPU's, instead of having a GPU with only basic stuff to run the Win 7 desktop, then with the available space to increase the transistor count for each of the cores?? This way I think they will finally have a CPU to compete with the I7. Just some thoughts.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,404 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,483
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#19
Well, AMD has always pushed the "future is fusion" motto. HSA has always been a constant theme of theirs. I will be thrilled when AMD has an APU where CPU and iGPU compute units are shared, further blurring the distinction between massively parallel workloads on GPUs and fast serial workloads on CPUs.

Either way, CPUs are fast enough where there definitely is a point of diminishing returns. A CPU will only go so fast and you can only cram so many transistors in any given area. Also, on games that can utilize multi-core systems well, AMD isn't trailing behind all that much. Considering upcoming consoles have 8c CPUs in them, there will be more of a push to utilize that kind of hardware. It's completely realistic for a machine to have at least 4 logical threads now and as many as 8 for a consumer CPU. This wasn't the case several years ago.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
408 (0.08/day)
Likes
76
System Name Octopussy
Processor 1x Intel Core-i7 3930K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Full water cooling, mostly Aqua Computer and EKWB stuff!
Memory 4x 4GB Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2133 9-11-10-27-1T
Video Card(s) 2x Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage 8x Hitachi 5K3000 3TB RAID-6 (Adaptec 5805); 1x 512GB Samsung 950Pro (Angelbird Wings PX1)
Display(s) PLP: Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT + Dell U3011 30" TFT + Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT
Case CaseLabs TH10A
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-1000XP
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M800
Software MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores A lot.
#20
Aq, agree with you.
However I have a question. Don't you think this approach is somehow not ideal for AMD, because in this way, a core is having a lot less transistors than Intel's, therefore the bad performance in single-threaded applications, like games for example?
I don't understand why AMD is still going for strong GPU performance, even on the so called top CPU's, instead of having a GPU with only basic stuff to run the Win 7 desktop, then with the available space to increase the transistor count for each of the cores?? This way I think they will finally have a CPU to compete with the I7. Just some thoughts.
I guess that's because it's technically very challenging and AMD might simply not be able to come up with something better? Just a guess... ;)
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,950 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
#21
Dual socket with 16 cores, can run 32 VM's in one rackmount tray, company X has 320 employees running thin clients, 10 racks plus one and assuming same drive/memory/board cost the AMD will win for $$$ reason alone. Data entry jobs don't need Xeon core performance for 10 key and typing.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
408 (0.08/day)
Likes
76
System Name Octopussy
Processor 1x Intel Core-i7 3930K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Full water cooling, mostly Aqua Computer and EKWB stuff!
Memory 4x 4GB Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2133 9-11-10-27-1T
Video Card(s) 2x Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage 8x Hitachi 5K3000 3TB RAID-6 (Adaptec 5805); 1x 512GB Samsung 950Pro (Angelbird Wings PX1)
Display(s) PLP: Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT + Dell U3011 30" TFT + Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT
Case CaseLabs TH10A
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-1000XP
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M800
Software MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores A lot.
#22
I think AMD's goal is to emphasize what CPUs do best, integer math, and let GPUs do what they do best, FP math. Not to say that a CPU shouldn't do any FP math, but if there is a lot of FP math to be done, a GPU is better optimized to do those kinds of operations.
Sure? In theory you might be right, but most of at least consumer grade hardware is not that great at FP math (I'm talking about DP-FP of course).
An ordinary Core i7-4770K quad-core has a DP performance of about 177 GFLOPS. Thats for a 84W CPU (talking TDP). NVidia's 780Ti though is rated at 210 GFLOPS DP performance (DP is crippled on consumer chips, I know), but this comes at a cost of a whopping 250W TDP, which is about 3x the power draw! So simple math tells me that the Haswell i7 is about twice as efficient in DP-FP calculations as the current-gen GPU hardware is...
Single precision might be a totally different story though. :)
 
Joined
Jun 27, 2011
Messages
5,627 (2.38/day)
Likes
2,986
Processor Intel I7 4790k (stock)
Motherboard ASRock H97M-ITX/ac LGA 1150 Intel H97
Cooling Prolimatech megahalem
Memory Crucial 2x4gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 3gb
Storage OWC Mercury SSD 240 GB
Display(s) Asus 144hz
Case Raijintek Metis
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600w psu
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
#23
Sure? In theory you might be right, but most of at least consumer grade hardware is not that great at FP math (I'm talking about DP-FP of course).
An ordinary Core i7-4770K quad-core has a DP performance of about 177 GFLOPS. Thats for a 84W CPU (talking TDP). NVidia's 780Ti though is rated at 210 GFLOPS DP performance (DP is crippled on consumer chips, I know), but this comes at a cost of a whopping 250W TDP, which is about 3x the power draw! So simple math tells me that the Haswell i7 is about twice as efficient in DP-FP calculations as the current-gen GPU hardware is...
Single precision might be a totally different story though. :)
An amd 7970 has ~1060 GFLOPS DP performance at 225 tdp. Amd gpu's are pretty darn great at compute and amd apu's will use amd gpu's not nvidea gpu's. So your comparison with a 780ti is silly.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
408 (0.08/day)
Likes
76
System Name Octopussy
Processor 1x Intel Core-i7 3930K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Full water cooling, mostly Aqua Computer and EKWB stuff!
Memory 4x 4GB Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2133 9-11-10-27-1T
Video Card(s) 2x Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage 8x Hitachi 5K3000 3TB RAID-6 (Adaptec 5805); 1x 512GB Samsung 950Pro (Angelbird Wings PX1)
Display(s) PLP: Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT + Dell U3011 30" TFT + Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT
Case CaseLabs TH10A
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-1000XP
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M800
Software MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores A lot.
#24
An amd 7970 has ~1060 GFLOPS DP performance at 225 tdp. Amd gpu's are pretty darn great at compute and amd apu's will use amd gpu's not nvidea gpu's. So your comparison with a 780ti is silly.
Even it its way of topic:
A nVidia Titan has ~1300 GFLOPS DP at 250W TDP, but that was not the point.
All that compute power on your GPU is pretty useless unless you have a task where you have to crunch numbers for an extended period of time AND your task can be scheduled in parallel, but I guess you know that. The latencies for copying data to the GPU and after processing there from the GPU back to the main memory / CPU are way to high for any mixed workload to perform well, so strong single-threaded FP performance will always be important in some way.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,404 (4.84/day)
Likes
5,483
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#25
Even it its way of topic:
A nVidia Titan has ~1300 GFLOPS DP at 250W TDP, but that was not the point.
All that compute power on your GPU is pretty useless unless you have a task where you have to crunch numbers for an extended period of time AND your task can be scheduled in parallel, but I guess you know that. The latencies for copying data to the GPU and after processing there from the GPU back to the main memory / CPU are way to high for any mixed workload to perform well, so strong single-threaded FP performance will always be important in some way.
Might read into APUs again. There are benefits to be had by having HUMA on an APU, which solves the memory copying problem. The simple point is that CPUs are good at serial processing and GPUs are good at massively parallel ops. Depending on your workload, one may be better than the other. More often than not though, CPUs are doing integer math and GPUs are doing floating point math (single or double).

Basically CPUs are good at working with data that changes a lot (relatively small amounts of data that change a lot). GPUs are good at processing (or transforming if you will) a lot of data in a relatively fixed way.

So a simple example of what GPUs do best would be something like.
Code:
add 9 and multiply by 2 to every element of [1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 ... 1000]
Where a CPU would excel at something like adding all of those elements, or doing something that reduces those values, as opposed to transforming it to a set of the same size as the input.

GPUs can only process independent vertices and fragments, but can process many of them in parallel. This is especially effective when the programmer wants to process many vertices or fragments in the same way. In this sense, GPUs are stream processors – processors that can operate in parallel by running one kernel on many records in a stream at once.

A stream is simply a set of records that require similar computation. Streams provide data parallelism. Kernels are the functions that are applied to each element in the stream. In the GPUs, vertices and fragments are the elements in streams and vertex and fragment shaders are the kernels to be run on them. Since GPUs process elements independently there is no way to have shared or static data. For each element we can only read from the input, perform operations on it, and write to the output. It is permissible to have multiple inputs and multiple outputs, but never a piece of memory that is both readable and writable.[vague]

Arithmetic intensity is defined as the number of operations performed per word of memory transferred. It is important for GPGPU applications to have high arithmetic intensity else the memory access latency will limit computational speedup.[11]

Ideal GPGPU applications have large data sets, high parallelism, and minimal dependency between data elements.
See Stream Processing on Wikipedia.