• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Gives Bulldozer 6-core a Speed-Bump with FX-6200

Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
Your reasoning is flawed. World of Warcraft does not suddenly become optimised for AMD FX when you run it in Windows 8. The game is the same. As such, the game's being optimised for Intel does not explain the performance gap between Windows 7 with BD and Windows 8 with BD. Furthermore, you do nothing to refute the generally accepted explanation for this phenomenon. That said, if you can provide a valid argument, or better still a credible source boasting one, I'd be very interested.
Your ideology is flawed

Two modules has a peak throughput of sixteen macro-ops much more than the eight macro-ops of one module

When two modules are used you have a higher throughput thus seemingly higher FPS but you then get blockade by the slowest cache

Until then, I think we're better off with the generally accepted explanation, which is that in treating BD CPUs as "normal" 8-cores, Windows 7 isn't (yet) understanding the Bulldozer architecture properly.
Windows 7 sees Bulldozer correctly it has 8 normal cores

Windows 8 will just fix the problem of legacy programs show when a new architecture is introduced that changes the number of decoders

A normal core is registers to ALU clusters
Bulldozer has 8 individual registers to 8 ALU Clusters thus can be called 8 physical cores
Sandy Bridge has 8 registers that have pairs shared to 4 ALU Clusters thus can be called 4 physical cores

Other than that you can go by Database licensing which concludes the amount of cores being the amount of logical cores thus Bulldozer is 8 cores and Sandy Bridge is 8 cores
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Your ideology is flawed
Lol what? What exactly do you think my ideology is? How is this relevant?

In case you're confused, here's the relevant OED definition of "ideology":

"A systematic scheme of ideas, usually relating to politics, economics, or society and forming the basis of action or policy; a set of beliefs governing conduct."

When two modules are used you have a higher throughput thus seemingly higher FPS but you then get blockade by the slowest cache
So do you get higher FPS, or not?

Windows 7 sees Bulldozer correctly it has 8 normal cores
It has 8 "normal" cores, split into modules of two, with each module sharing a large number of resources, such that two cores from two modules have better performance in many applications than two cores from one module. Agree or disagree?

Windows 8 will just fix the problem of legacy programs show when a new architecture is introduced that changes the number of decoders
Source? If so, we'd see the same performance gain from Windows 8 with Phenom II as we do with Bulldozer (when using legacy applications). Incidentally, I wouldn't describe some of the applications in which BD gets a performance boost in Windows 8 as legacy.

Also, just to zoom out a little here, is your main point that Bulldozer is just a conventional 8 core processor? If so, why does it scale so terribly in some multithreaded tasks? Everyone else's answer is shared resources between cores bottlenecking the modules, and this is backed up by AMD's own accounts of their own architecture.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
So do you get higher FPS, or not?
You get higher FPS but you won't get stability if you have other modules requiring L3 Cache space, when you have two cores being used in the same module you probably won't have instability as they will only use up to the L2 cache


It has 8 "normal" cores, split into modules of two, with each module sharing a large number of resources, such that two cores from two modules have better performance in many applications than two cores from one module. Agree or disagree?
Disagree

Only 20% of resources are being shared the only problem that can occur is from the code of the program not having alignment to the instruction fetch and instruction decode which will cause problems

2(New apps) vs 3(Legacy apps)
You have bleed with World of Warcraft but instant the bleed is fixed you will see higher FPS with a module vs 2 modules

Source? If so, we'd see the same performance gain from Windows 8 with Phenom II as we do with Bulldozer (when using legacy applications). Incidentally, I wouldn't describe some of the applications in which BD gets a performance boost in Windows 8 as legacy.
Only applications that are legacy will see the boost...

Source still thinks Bulldozer is K10 which has 3 decoders just like Sandy Bridge pretty much
and that is what AMD is using to show of Windows 8 improvements...legacy applications..
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
It doesn't matter what % of resources are being shared if they're causing the holdup.

Furthermore, you respond to very few of my questions in a satisfactory manner - perhaps because English isn't your first language, in which case that isn't something I'd hold against you.

Because of this and because you're so massively out of kilter with what every other expert is saying (notice how I generously offer you an implied compliment there), I'm going to wait for you to back all this up with a credible source.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
It doesn't matter what % of resources are being shared if they're causing the holdup.
They aren't causing a hold up...they are working properly

Furthermore, you respond to very few of my questions in a satisfactory manner - perhaps because English isn't your first language, in which case that isn't something I'd hold against you.
English is my first language... This forum isn't important so I type fast and pretty much leave after thirty mins and I just finished walking the dog, doing my workout, taking out the trash, and vacuuming my house...so my arms are hurting right now

Because of this and because you're so massively out of kilter with what every other expert is saying (notice how I generously offer you an implied compliment there), I'm going to wait for you to back all this up with a credible source.
http://www.amdzone.com , http://www.semiaccurate.com .

and thanks for the implied compliment

Well first off if you are getting 70 fps @ 2560x1600 .... and Windows 8 only gives you 9 fps you probably won't be able to see it since the monitor is 60Hz....

If you are waiting for Windows 8 you might as well wait for Piledriver which will have up to ~8 IPC uplift and up to ~8 Clockrate uplift(per core)
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
They aren't causing a hold up...they are working properly


I said credible :p Besides, you could at least link the actual articles you think disprove the Bulldozer module bottleneck theory.

Well first off if you are getting 70 fps @ 2560x1600 .... and Windows 8 only gives you 9 fps you probably won't be able to see it since the monitor is 60Hz....
This isn't really the point, is it? As explained above, the point is not WoW performance, the point is that one setup is faster than another under certain (common) conditions.

If you are waiting for Windows 8 you might as well wait for Piledriver which will have up to ~8 IPC uplift and up to ~8 Clockrate uplift(per core)
Me? Hell, I'm not in the market for a CPU or an operating system. Even if I was, I'd probably be looking at an i3 - in the absence of a 32nm K10 or equivalent.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
I said credible :p Besides, you could at least link the actual articles you think disprove the Bulldozer module bottleneck theory.
You have to look at the forums and look for several dudes they usually post past me and before me...

This isn't really the point, is it? As explained above, the point is not WoW performance, the point is that one setup is faster than another under certain (common) conditions.
Well again completing something in 20 seconds(2M/2C) or completing something in 22 seconds(1M/2C) is relatively unimportant when the guy making the application which has something complete in 20 seconds or 22 seconds to optimize his application for Bulldozer and make the unknown but common workload complete in 18 seconds(1M/2C) is more worth while than saying because CMT is a balanced design we have to go back to CMP which is a over provisioned design and will run slightly better than a balanced design because there is more resources in a over provisioned design.

Me? Hell, I'm not in the market for a CPU or an operating system. Even if I was, I'd probably be looking at an i3 - in the absence of a 32nm K10 or equivalent.
32nm K10 is Llano...and it has a better GPU than the i3....
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
32nm K10 is Llano...and it has a better GPU than the i3....
Aye, but it's not really a good successor to the Phenom II - it's aimed at a different market, and you can see that from the platform, too.

Also, I don't want to pay more than I have to for an integrated GPU I'll never use.

What I really meant is a Phenom II 32nm for the AM3+ platform.

As it happens, I run a C2D and an HD6850 (I won both or I'd have older hardware), and I play all the new games I want to maxed out at 2048*1152, and that's the only demanding thing my PC ever does. So, if I was to be forced to replace it, I'd just want a PC that does all the same as cheaply as possible (idle power consumption being a factor in cost). That probably means picking up an £80 GTX460 or equivalent and an i3, atm. This post is seriously off topic, though :p
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
What I really meant is a Phenom II 32nm for the AM3+ platform.
Well Phenom II 32nm 8C on the AM3+ will be 2x slower than Sandy Bridge 4C in single thread workloads and 2x slower than Sandy Bridge-E 8C in multithread

Orochi-FX at least gets near the 4C in single thread I think it is more around 1.3-1.5x and multithread is about 1.6-1.75x

---
I forgot to mention this but FX-6100 -> FX-6200 is completely going to bug me out...(one day seronx will check newegg and see 6200 PILEDRIVER OUT NOW?! oh wait it is just that processor...)
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Given that Phenom II 45nm wasn't even outperformed by 100% by SB, I don't see how you can say that Phenom II 32nm would be (I'm assuming that the jump to 32nm would yield higher clock speeds or at least better power efficiency). Current FX processors are even further behind SB in single threaded workloads (and some multi-threaded workloads) than the Phenom X6 was.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/362?vs=288

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/203?vs=434

The first link shows the top Phenom II 4C being outperformed by less than 100% by the top SB 4C/4T.

The second link shows the top Phenom II 6C outperforming Bulldozer in a few single threaded tasks and very much holding its own in many multithreaded tasks. Take a look at single threaded Cinebench, for example.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
Given that Phenom II 45nm wasn't even outperformed by 100% by SB, I don't see how you can say that Phenom II 32nm would be (I'm assuming that the jump to 32nm would yield higher clock speeds or at least better power efficiency). Current FX processors are even further behind SB in single threaded workloads (and some multi-threaded workloads) than the Phenom X6 was.

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/362?vs=288

http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/203?vs=434

The first link shows the top Phenom II 4C being outperformed by less than 100% by the top SB 4C/4T.

The second link shows the top Phenom II 6C outperforming Bulldozer in a few single threaded tasks and very much holding its own in many multithreaded tasks. Take a look at single threaded Cinebench, for example.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/88?vs=363

It isn't always 2x but majority of the time you will be near 2x

Fallout 3 near 2x
WinRAR near 2x
Par2 near 2x
Blender near 2x
FLV Creation near 2x
R10 ST/MT near 2x
Adobe CS4 near 2x

Other than a lot of programs don't support FMA4/AVX/XOP "-march:bdver1" thus you aren't really seeing full IPC with Bulldozer while alot of programs show support for AVX for SB "-QxAVX"
While plenty of programs show support for /archSSE3 and /marchSSE3

Full SB, Full K10, Half BD isn't really fair game
 
Joined
Mar 4, 2011
Messages
134 (0.04/day)
Location
Israel
System Name Negra5
Processor i5 6500
Motherboard ASUS Z170M-Plus
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Memory Kingston HyperX 16GB DDR4
Video Card(s) PNY GTX-1070, ASUS GTX970, XFX RX480
Storage Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB, WD 1TB HDD, WD 1TB HDD.
Display(s) SPELER 21" FullHD
Case GAMING EAGLE WARRIOR CG-06R1
Audio Device(s) Onboard RealTek HD Audio
Power Supply Corsair GS800W 80 Plus Bronze
Mouse Cooler Master Devastator MS2k
Keyboard Cooler Master Devastator MB24
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit
Benchmark Scores Pfft
I wont upgrade my PhenomII 810 to ShitDoZer untill AMD hits 4Ghz without Turbo and TDP lowers just a bit.
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
http://www.anandtech.com/bench/Product/88?vs=363

It isn't always 2x but majority of the time you will be near 2x

Fallout 3 near 2x
WinRAR near 2x
Par2 near 2x
Blender near 2x
FLV Creation near 2x
R10 ST/MT near 2x
Adobe CS4 near 2x
In most of those, if you look at the numbers, it's closer to 1.5x. Huge difference between that and 2x. And those are the most extreme examples. Actually, some of what you list is closer to 1.3x.

Other than a lot of programs don't support FMA4/AVX/XOP "-march:bdver1" thus you aren't really seeing full IPC with Bulldozer while alot of programs show support for AVX for SB "-QxAVX"
While plenty of programs show support for /archSSE3 and /marchSSE3

Full SB, Full K10, Half BD isn't really fair game
Well it is fair game if those are the applications that you're going to use. If my CPU is slow because software doesn't take full advantage of it, my CPU is still slow.
 

JustaTinkerer

New Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2011
Messages
271 (0.09/day)
Location
Scotland
System Name Just need to tidy it up now
Processor FX-8120
Motherboard Asus M5A99X EVO 990X
Cooling Custom Water
Memory Corsair Vengeance 8GB
Video Card(s) BFG GTX 280 H2OC
Storage OCZ ocz vertex plus(60GB), 2TB hdd
Display(s) 1x ACER x19ws ( need new one)
Case Custom
Power Supply (GOT) OCZ GameXStream 1010 Watt
Software LOL
Benchmark Scores Soon, very very soon, just need to tidy it up.
I am honesty sick BD bashing....though i keep reading, anyone running windows 8 full time?
No....oh why is that i hear the folks calling....!
Cos its not retail and it doesnt fix s**t, BD is what it is right now live with it

I picked up my FX-8120 for £125 on sale here, no longer on sale (look hard enough) because of the reviews and bad press no doubt.
Anyone able to tell me if I can get an Intel for the same cash that does the same job.
I recode, game, compress, jeez a bit of everything?

I don't care about AMD vs Intel (last processor was a Intel) all anyone who call's themselves an overclocker should care about is price vs performance.

FX owners that adopted early I do feel for.

Windows 8 is not the FX fix, its just a pipe dream, if you think windows 8 will fix everything like a fairy godmother then you are mistaken.
By the time it comes out retail Intel will have stepped the game up 2 levels....is FX going to "come in to its own" .....we can only wish...well cinders did get to the ball i suppose :D
 
Joined
Oct 10, 2009
Messages
868 (0.23/day)
Location
London, UK
System Name The one under the desk / Media Centre
Processor Xeon X3730@3.6GHZ / Phenom II X4 805E
Motherboard Gigabyte P55M-UD4 / Asus Crosshair III
Cooling Corsair H70 + 2*PWM fan / Arctic Alpine 11
Memory 16GB DRR3-1333 9-9-9-27 / 4GB Crucial DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) Asus DirectCU GTX 680 / Gigabyte 560TI
Storage Kingston V200 128GB, WD6400AAKS, 1TB Seagate 7.2kRPM SSHD / Kingston V200 128GB
Display(s) Samsung 2343BW + Dell Ultrasharp 1600*1200 / 32" TV
Case C'M' Silencio 550 / Some ancient SilverStone brushed aluminium media centre
Audio Device(s) No.
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower XT 675W / EVGA 430W
Mouse Mionix Naos 3200 / Generic PS2
Keyboard Roccat Ryos TKL Pro / Evoluent Mouse Friendly Keyboard (Logitech OEM)
Software Windows 7 Ult x64
Benchmark Scores Nah.
Windows 8 is not the FX fix, its just a pipe dream, if you think windows 8 will fix everything like a fairy godmother then you are mistaken.
Afaik nobody thinks that.

Also, grats on the bargain. Asking others to match that is a little harsh, though.

There are Phenom II x6s and socket 1366 i7s in that price range very occasionally, both of which are comparable on performance.
 
Joined
Jul 10, 2010
Messages
1,157 (0.33/day)
Location
USA, Arizona
System Name SolarwindMobile
Processor AMD FX-9800P RADEON R7, 12 COMPUTE CORES 4C+8G
Motherboard Acer Wasp_BR
Cooling It's Copper.
Memory 2 x 8GB SK Hynix/HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF
Video Card(s) ATI/AMD Radeon R7 Series (Bristol Ridge FP4) [ACER]
Storage TOSHIBA MQ01ABD100 1TB + KINGSTON RBU-SNS8152S3128GG2 128 GB
Display(s) ViewSonic XG2401 SERIES
Case Acer Aspire E5-553G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC255
Power Supply PANASONIC AS16A5K
Mouse SteelSeries Rival
Keyboard Ducky Channel Shine 3
Software Windows 10 Home 64-bit (Version 1607, Build 14393.969)
In most of those, if you look at the numbers, it's closer to 1.5x. Huge difference between that and 2x. And those are the most extreme examples. Actually, some of what you list is closer to 1.3x.
You have input the Intel CPU has a longer pipeline and wins most of the time... pushing it even more towards 2x


Well it is fair game if those are the applications that you're going to use. If my CPU is slow because software doesn't take full advantage of it, my CPU is still slow.
Most applications don't care about ISAs but most benchmarks do

In most cases in the native environment some of these applications won't exist
(x87, MMX, 3dnow!, SSE(64bit) can't exist in x86-64, in x86-64 you have to use SSE2,SSE3,SSE4,SSE5(AVX+FMA+AVX2+Gather+XOP)

In most music conversion you see MMX and SSE being most used...while in 64bit applications of music conversions you see SSE4 being used the 64bit music converter is faster than the 32bit music converter but the 32bit version is still being more used...

Consumers = Relatively Stupid....in these cases

Smart Consumers like myself know to wait for applications to use the new ISAs before jumping boat or listening to non-important reviewers trying to persuade unsmart consumers in making dumb decisions
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
47,535 (8.46/day)
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Big Fella
Processor Ryzen R7 2700X (stock/XFR OC)
Motherboard Asus B450-i ITX
Cooling Corsair H110 W/ Corsair ML RGB fans
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS mod to Gaming Z) w/ Corsair H55 AIO
Storage 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000 Pro NVME
Display(s) Phillips 328m6fjrmb (32" 1440p 144hz curved) + Sony KD-55X8500F (55" 4K HDR)
Case Fractal Design Nano S
Audio Device(s) Razer Leviathan + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G903 + PowerPlay mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
What you need to consider is that everything 96W and up must be marked with the 125W TDP envelope.
thank you for pointing that out. people always think these wattage numbers are set in stone, when really its just what envelope they fit into.
 
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
554 (0.13/day)
System Name Epsilon
Processor A12-9800E 35watts
Motherboard MSI Grenade AM4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x4GB DDR4 2400 Kingston Hyper X
Video Card(s) Radeon R7 (IGP / APU)
Storage Samsung Spinpoint F1
Display(s) AOC 29" Ultra wide
Case Generic
Power Supply Antec Earthwatts 380w
Software Windows 10
What you need to consider is that everything 96W and up must be marked with the 125W TDP envelope.
So we really don't know how much more power does it use with a ~15% clock increase.
So until a full review is up we won't know if there are any improvements.
Except llano, 100W

I am honesty sick BD bashing....though i keep reading, anyone running windows 8 full time?
No....oh why is that i hear the folks calling....!
Cos its not retail and it doesnt fix s**t, BD is what it is right now live with it

I picked up my FX-8120 for £125 on sale here, no longer on sale (look hard enough) because of the reviews and bad press no doubt.
Anyone able to tell me if I can get an Intel for the same cash that does the same job.
I recode, game, compress, jeez a bit of everything?
The thing isn't bad, it just sells well anyway. I'm also sick of BD bashing, but hey, you have to be honest, we expected more. I actually expected to be comparable with i7, but hey its not far. Also guess what? You could get a G34 board and put a 16 core bulldozer or 12 core bulldozer, yeah, the ones appeared in newegg, 6 modules way cheaper than the 8 modules one, I'm planning building one for myself to make a heavy multitasker on the cheap. Also if the board is dual G34 you don't have to fill both sockets to make the thing run, and this is great.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
47,535 (8.46/day)
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Big Fella
Processor Ryzen R7 2700X (stock/XFR OC)
Motherboard Asus B450-i ITX
Cooling Corsair H110 W/ Corsair ML RGB fans
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS mod to Gaming Z) w/ Corsair H55 AIO
Storage 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 1TB Intel 6000 Pro NVME
Display(s) Phillips 328m6fjrmb (32" 1440p 144hz curved) + Sony KD-55X8500F (55" 4K HDR)
Case Fractal Design Nano S
Audio Device(s) Razer Leviathan + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G903 + PowerPlay mousepad
Keyboard Corsair K65 Rapidfire
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Laptops: i7-4510U + 840M 2GB (touchscreen) 275GB SSD + 16GB i7-2630QM + GT 540M + 8GB
Except llano, 100W
the power envelopes are set per socket. llano is FM1, bulldozer is AM3+


AM3+ follows the same wattage envelops as AM2/2+/3, which is 65, 95, 125.

if its 96W or above, it has to be specified as 125W.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
5,614 (1.50/day)
Location
San Diego, CA
System Name White Boy
Processor Core i7 3770k @4.6 Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-I Deluxe
Cooling CORSAIR H100
Memory CORSAIR Vengeance 16GB @ 2177
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 680 CLASSIEFIED @ 1250 Core
Storage 2 Samsung 830 256 GB (Raid 0) 1 Hitachi 4 TB
Display(s) 1 Dell 30U11 30"
Case BIT FENIX Prodigy
Audio Device(s) none
Power Supply SeaSonic X750 Gold 750W Modular
Software Windows Pro 7 64 bit || Ubuntu 64 Bit
Benchmark Scores 2017 Unigine Heaven :: P37239 3D Mark Vantage
seems rather pointless
 
Joined
Mar 2, 2009
Messages
5,028 (1.25/day)
System Name Acer Aspire VX 15
Processor Intel Core i5 7300HQ
Motherboard KBL Wish_KLS
Cooling Dual fan cooling system
Memory Hyundai Electronics 4GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Storage Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Acer 15.6"
Case Acer
Audio Device(s) Realtek onboard
Mouse Elephant ELE G7 wireless
Software Windows 10
seems rather pointless
Only in the sense of comparing them with other processor series, whether from AMD or Intel. It populates the Bulldozer line-up quite well however. It's when you go beyond them that things doesn't go "well", to put it mildly. :laugh:
 
Joined
Jan 20, 2010
Messages
868 (0.24/day)
Location
Toronto, ON. Canada
System Name Gamers PC
Processor AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE @ 3.80 GHz
Motherboard MSI 790FX-GD70 AM3
Cooling Corsair H50 Cooler
Memory Corsair XMS3 4GB (2x2GB) DDR3-1333
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 5770 1GB GDDR5
Storage 2 x WD Caviar Green 1TB SATA300 w/64MB Buffer (RAID 0)
Display(s) Samsung 2494SW 1080p 24" WS LCD HD
Case CM HAF 932 Full Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-FI TITANIUM -PCIE x 1
Power Supply Corsair TX Series CMPSU-650TX (650W)
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
Are we finaly done with the pissing contest. Now I should get myself a 8 core Dozer.
 
Joined
Aug 17, 2009
Messages
2,553 (0.66/day)
Location
United States
System Name Aluminum Mallard
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard MSI B350 PC MATE
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB
Video Card(s) ASUS Strix 1080Ti
Storage SSD
Case Corsair 700D
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Corsair CX750
Software Win10 Home
Benchmark Scores 31 FPS in Dalaran.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Jan 31, 2011
Messages
1,771 (0.53/day)
System Name TeraUltima 7
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K @4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Pro3-M
Cooling Cryorig H7
Memory Kingston Hyper X 16GB DDR3 1866
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce GTX 1070 Super JetStream 2Ghz
Storage Crucial MX100 256GB SSD + 1TB Seagate HDD
Display(s) LG 23MP68VQ-P IPS 75HZ 23" 1080p MONITOR
Case Aerocool Dead Silence Black Edition Cube
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek ALC892 7.1 HD Audio/Nvidia HD Audio
Power Supply OCZ Stealth X Stream II 600W
Mouse Logitech G400S | Wacom Intuos CTH-480
Keyboard A4Tech G800V Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit SP1
Benchmark Scores http://www.3dmark.com/fs/9470441
and i heard intel is outing the i5 2550K this christmas? >_>
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,490 (0.92/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
I wont upgrade my PhenomII 810 to ShitDoZer untill AMD hits 4Ghz without Turbo and TDP lowers just a bit.
The FX-4100 can easily go pass 4Ghz already, it is actually a decent upgrade for the PII 810 aka C2 Phenom IIs.
Not to mention memory performance is a crap load better. The IMC on the old 810 is bottle-necking even DDR3 1600.
 
Top