• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Gives Itself Massive Cost-cutting Headroom with the Chiplet Design

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,268 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Monolithic is better for gaming at 1080P. You can usually get higher clocks with that and reduced latency.
Both architectures have pros and cons, there's no need to keep bringing that up.
I doubt clocks are influenced by the number of chips, but latency is.

Still, I'm a little surprised no one is mentioning what looks to me like the #1 space saving measure AMD took: not wasting 30% die space on an IGP.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
4,816 (4.10/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
@Vya Domus none of these processors possibly with the exception of 64-core EPYC are physically impossible to build. Financially not viable... probably :)
No, they really were impossible to build on that process in a monolithic format. For instance the thermals would have likely been unmanageable due to density so clocks would have been lower. Not to mention that the yields would have been so bad that there was no way they could have accumulated any real volume of chips irrespective of the cost. A year after Rome is out and there are still no large chips on TSMC's first generation 7nm process, that's not a coincidence.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
2,214 (2.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Both architectures have pros and cons, there's no need to keep bringing that up.
I doubt clocks are influenced by the number of chips, but latency is.

Still, I'm a little surprised no one is mentioning what looks to me like the #1 space saving measure AMD took: not wasting 30% die space on an IGP.
I was objectively responding to the question. I should have specified a single core.

That actually confirms my hope that they could make an 8/16 core APU.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
2,214 (2.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Intel is quick because of ringbus+unified scheduler. AMD dilates those for better multitasking.
Which is monolithic in design. Which is MCM. As Bug said though there are pros and cons to both. New generations basically make it a moot point anyway.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
784 (0.22/day)
Which is monolithic in design. Which is MCM. As Bug said though there are pros and cons to both. New generations basically make it a moot point anyway.
AMD was faster in previous generations also, eventhough there wasn't competition in that regard in between bulldozer vs sandybridge. Any monolithic chip comparison is the same, it is a confounder classification. Fact is, you can increase L3 if you displace it to the io chip.
Such things improve task switching performance. If you have united scheduler you load back the program runtime, afaik. There isn't any seperate second thread discretization.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,158 (1.88/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Fact is, you can increase L3 if you displace it to the io chip.
No, you can't. The primary reason for Ryzen 3000's increased memory latency is chiplet design and having to go over IF to IOD for memory controller. This adds 7-8 ns of latency (compared to Ryzen 2000, not Intel) to memory access. L3 cache access latency is in the tune of 10 ns...
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
2,214 (2.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
AMD was faster in previous generations also, eventhough there wasn't competition in that regard in between bulldozer vs sandybridge. Any monolithic chip comparison is the same, it is a confounder classification. Fact is, you can increase L3 if you displace it to the io chip.
Such things improve task switching performance. If you have united scheduler you load back the program runtime, afaik. There isn't any seperate second thread discretization.
Yes both Intel and AMD used monolithic designs until Bulldozer which was the first iteration of multi chip design (rudimentary and latency ridden) but showed the potential of multi core as even Bulldozer was faster than Sandybridge in multi threaded apps. With Zen AMD went even further down the MCM rabbit hole and found a way to make it viable (Thanks Jim Keller). Don't be surprised if we see 128 Core consumer CPUs as a result, as the node shrinks and more chiplets can be added.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
784 (0.22/day)
No, you can't. The primary reason for Ryzen 3000's increased memory latency is chiplet design and having to go over IF to IOD for memory controller. This adds 7-8 ms of latency (compared to Ryzen 2000, not Intel) to memory access. L3 cache access latency is in the tune of 10 seconds...
There are tags and associativeness dividers to that search latency. Besides, you get successively better ST from that L3 increase, so it pays itself out. Same ordeal, ST vs MT performance. Ryzen is a dilation to that monolithiasis constipation.
 
Joined
Feb 3, 2017
Messages
2,158 (1.88/day)
Processor i5-8400
Motherboard ASUS ROG STRIX Z370-I GAMING
Cooling Alpenföhn Black Ridge
Memory 2*16GB DDR4-3200 CL16
Video Card(s) Gainward GeForce RTX 2080 Phoenix
Storage 1TB Samsung 970 Pro, 2TB Intel 660p
Display(s) ASUS PG279Q, Eizo EV2736W
Case Dan Cases A4-SFX
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse Logitech G700
Keyboard Corsair K60
Besides, you get successively better ST from that L3 increase, so it pays itself out.
Do you get better ST from that L3 cache increase? We should see when Ryzen 4000 APUs get tested.

Yes both Intel and AMD used monolithic designs until Bulldozer which was the first iteration of multi chip design (rudimentary and latency ridden) but showed the potential of multi core as even Bulldozer was faster than Sandybridge in multi threaded apps.
- Bulldozer was completely monolithic.
- Contemporary multi-chip design first probably goes to Pentium D.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
316 (5.27/day)
System Name ARF System 1
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4400+ X2
Motherboard ASRock 939A790GMH 790GX
Cooling Arctic Freezer 13
Memory 4 x 1 GB DDR400
Video Card(s) Radeon ASUS EAH4670/DI/512MD3
Storage ADATA XPG SX900 128 GB
Display(s) LG 24UD58-B
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus
Software Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit, all updates installed
But then how would we help AMD force price corrections for Intel and Nvidia products? That money will go into R&D (They are a tech company afterall). It will be interesting to see where AMD does in both the GPU and CPU space now that they are positive in terms of cash flow and revenue.
Well, but this R&D money....... since 2015 AMD hasn't launched a top GPU (R9 Fury X was the last one), and between 2011 and 2017 they hadn't been competitive in the CPU space either.

So, don't give them too much credit and trust that they use the money in a proper way.

Still waiting for RTX 2080 Ti competitor that was launched back in 2018, soon to be 2 years already.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,268 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Well, but this R&D money....... since 2015 AMD hasn't launched a top GPU (R9 Fury X was the last one), and between 2011 and 2017 they hadn't been competitive in the CPU space either.

So, don't give them too much credit and trust that they use the money in a proper way.

Still waiting for RTX 2080 Ti competitor that was launched back in 2018, soon to be 2 years already.
The past is past. These days AMD seems to be doing things right. They're now competitive enough on the desktop and in the server space. They still have to win mobile and GPU, let's just wait and see which one they focus on first. Cause they will ;)
 

ppn

Joined
Aug 18, 2015
Messages
642 (0.38/day)
The second flag is we know they can produce at least 251mm2 chips, and 430 on 7nm+, that results 48 cores+IMC, by cutting the L3 cache in half they can fit the memory controller on the same die as the cores and lower the latency significantly. the price will go up, as opposed to what, making this chiplet thing with 128 CCXs and L3 copy in every die that doesnt need to exist and causes tremendous latencies all over the place. 64 core that can be replaced by 48core single CCX + single L3 +imc at half the size and still perform as good.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
540 (0.10/day)
Yes both Intel and AMD used monolithic designs until Bulldozer which was the first iteration of multi chip design..
What..

To name a few, Intel Smithfield (2005), Kentsfield (2006), Clarkdale (2010) and desktop Broadwell (2015) are MCM, although not in the same way as Ryzen 3000.

AMD Bulldozer, Piledriver, Ryzen 1000, Ryzen 2000 are all single die
 
Last edited:

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,268 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Yes both Intel and AMD used monolithic designs until Bulldozer which was the first iteration of multi chip design (rudimentary and latency ridden)
You must have missed Pentium D ;)
Back then AMD mocked Intel for not using true multi-core, but "gluing together" CPUs instead. Tbh, Pentium D was horrible.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
540 (0.10/day)
Back then AMD mocked Intel for not using true multi-core, but "gluing together" CPUs instead. Tbh, Pentium D was horrible.
Nobody complained about Core 2 Quad, also not true multi-core.. not even AMD. :D
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,268 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Nobody complained about Core 2 Quad, also not true multi-core.. not even AMD. :D
Yeah, well, probably because Core 2 Quad was far from terrible? ;)
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
2,214 (2.15/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
Do you get better ST from that L3 cache increase? We should see when Ryzen 4000 APUs get tested.

- Bulldozer was completely monolithic.
- Contemporary multi-chip design first probably goes to Pentium D.
You must have missed Pentium D ;)
Back then AMD mocked Intel for not using true multi-core, but "gluing together" CPUs instead. Tbh, Pentium D was horrible.
:toast: That is funny considering Intel said the same thing about Zen.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
316 (5.27/day)
System Name ARF System 1
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4400+ X2
Motherboard ASRock 939A790GMH 790GX
Cooling Arctic Freezer 13
Memory 4 x 1 GB DDR400
Video Card(s) Radeon ASUS EAH4670/DI/512MD3
Storage ADATA XPG SX900 128 GB
Display(s) LG 24UD58-B
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus
Software Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit, all updates installed
You must have missed Pentium D ;)
Back then AMD mocked Intel for not using true multi-core, but "gluing together" CPUs instead. Tbh, Pentium D was horrible.
I use an Athlon 64 X2 to this moment and for normal everyday use, it's adequate - office things, movies, even some gaming FarCry, Crysis original...
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,268 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
I use an Athlon 64 X2 to this moment and for normal everyday use, it's adequate - office things, movies, even some gaming FarCry, Crysis original...
Honestly, I feel any 2GHz CPU is good enough to browse the web and edit documents, even if you go back to a single core AthlonXP. Just look at how many people still use really, really old laptops to accomplish those tasks.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
784 (0.22/day)
Do you get better ST from that L3 cache increase? We should see when Ryzen 4000 APUs get tested.
It is all about cache hit rate. Higher ranks run slower and using less power to do the same job. After a set level, latency to do a full associative test becomes faster in a higher and slower more associative cache.
I had this under wraps in the Broadwell era Iris Pro lineup. Did you know Broadwell G was as quick as 7700k in ST? Considering one is hof material, the clock frequency difference between them pronounce this notion.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
316 (5.27/day)
System Name ARF System 1
Processor AMD Athlon 64 4400+ X2
Motherboard ASRock 939A790GMH 790GX
Cooling Arctic Freezer 13
Memory 4 x 1 GB DDR400
Video Card(s) Radeon ASUS EAH4670/DI/512MD3
Storage ADATA XPG SX900 128 GB
Display(s) LG 24UD58-B
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus
Software Windows 7 Ultimate SP1 64-bit, all updates installed
Honestly, I feel any 2GHz CPU is good enough to browse the web and edit documents, even if you go back to a single core AthlonXP. Just look at how many people still use really, really old laptops to accomplish those tasks.
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is a serious CPU, though. It's 2.2 GHz across the cores and has 2MB L2 cache.

It's like a dual core 4.4 GHz Pentium 4 X2.

Slower dual cores like Core 2 Duo at 1.5 GHz will be horrible for browsing.

You have heavy sites like Facebook, YouTube which even if for a moment during the initial loading of the contents, use all the available resources of your CPU.
You can 100% stress an 8-core Ryzen 7 or Core i9.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
904 (0.27/day)
So, does this mean 4000 series will be priced cheaper than current 3000 prices already or they will also discount the 3000 series further down? I was thinking about getting 3600 and moving my trusty 6700k to htpc, but if the prices will get even better, I don’t mind to hold on a bit.
Its just showing on how the MCM approach is cheaper for AMD to fabricate then the monolithic design of one big chip.

Cheaper production means more margin and thus more profit. Good for shareholders, good for consumers or enterprises, because if Intel attempts a price cut AMD can pretty much answer that and still make profit.
 

bug

Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
7,268 (4.10/day)
Processor Intel i5-6600k (AMD Ryzen5 3600 in a box, waiting for a mobo)
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x16GB DDR4 3600 G.Skill Ripjaws V (@3200)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 500GB Samsung 970 EVO, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 1TB Crucial MX300 and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Raijintek Thetis
Audio Device(s) Audioquest Dragonfly Red :D
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
Keyboard G.Skill KM780R
Software Arch Linux + Win10
Athlon 64 X2 4400+ is a serious CPU, though. It's 2.2 GHz across the cores and has 2MB L2 cache.
It's like a dual core 4.4 GHz Pentium 4 X2.
You don't have to tell me that, I used to rock an 4200+ ;)
Slower dual cores like Core 2 Duo at 1.5 GHz will be horrible for browsing.
If you're not talking mobile, I'm pretty sure a C2D@1.5GHz will beat an X2 @~2GHz. Core was about IPC, first and foremost.
You have heavy sites like Facebook, YouTube which even if for a moment during the initial loading of the contents, use all the available resources of your CPU.
You can 100% stress an 8-core Ryzen 7 or Core i9.
Well, yeah, an ancient CPU will not give a first class experience. But throw in a script blocker (e.g. NoScript) so not everyone and their grandma will run scripts in your browser and the web becomes bearable again ;)
 
Top