• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD GPUs Show Strong DirectX 12 Performance on "Ashes of the Singularity"

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
35,263 (8.95/day)
Likes
17,897
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Crypto-plague Survival Kit
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 2x 8GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB + Intel SSD320 120GB + Patriot WildFire 120GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
#1
Stardock's "Ashes of the Singularity" may not be particularly pathbreaking as an RTS, in the Starcraft era, but has the distinction of being the first game to the market with a DirectX 12 renderer, in addition to its default DirectX 11 one. This gave gamers the first peak at API to API comparisons, to test the tall bare-metal optimizations of DirectX 12, and as it turns out, AMD GPUs do seem to benefit big.

In a GeForce GTX 980 vs. Radeon R9 390X comparison by PC Perspective, the game seems to perform rather poorly on its default DirectX 11 renderer for the R9 390X, which when switched to DirectX 12, not only takes a big leap (in excess of 30%) in frame-rates, but also outperforms the GTX 980. A skeptical way of looking at these results would be that the R9 390X isn't optimized for the D3D 11 renderer to begin with, and merely returns to its expected performance vs. the GTX 980, with the D3D 12 renderer.



Comparing the two GPUs on CPU-intensive resolutions (900p and 1080p), across various CPUs (including the i7-5960X, i7-6700K, i3-4330 dual-core, FX-8350, FX-6300, reveals that the R9 390X has a narrow performance drop with fewer CPU cores, and has slight performance gains with increasing number of cores. Find the full insightful review in the source link below.

Source: PC Perspective
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
22,085 (6.19/day)
Likes
11,153
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#2
It just brings the AMD up to where it should be though, yeah? It's not like Fury X is going to curb stomp Titan X on DX12, amiright?
 
Joined
Jan 11, 2005
Messages
1,125 (0.23/day)
Likes
392
Location
66 feet from the ground
System Name 2nd AMD puppy
Processor Phenom II x4 BE 970-3.6 Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-UD3
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper TX2
Memory 16 Gb DDR3:8GB Kingston HyperX Beast + 8Gb G.Skill Sniper(by courtesy of tabascosauz &TPU)
Video Card(s) MSI HD6850 Cyclone;860/1100 Mhz
Storage SSD-840 pro 128 Gb;Seagate 500Gb;WD-1Tb
Display(s) Samsung 2032BW
Case NZXT 820 PHANTOM
Audio Device(s) Audigy SE with Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Cooleer Master RP M520
Mouse Razer copperhead / Gamdias zeus (by courtesy of sneekypeet & TPU)
Keyboard MS Sidewinder x4
Software win7 64bit sp1
Benchmark Scores irrelevant for me
#3
so AMD is again ahead with hardware and lack software .....is not the 1st time they do this and seems nothing was learned from past...
 

MxPhenom 216

Corsair Fanboy
Joined
Aug 31, 2010
Messages
12,169 (4.22/day)
Likes
3,718
Location
Seattle, WA
System Name The Battlestation
Processor Intel Core i7 4770k @ 4.2GHZ 1.275v
Motherboard MSi Z97 Gaming 5
Cooling EK Supremacy w/ EK Coolstream PE360
Memory G. Skill Trident X 16Gb (4x4GB) 2400mhz @ 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSi GTX1070 Gaming X 8GB @ 2GHz
Storage Samsung 830 128GB SSD, Crucial MX200 500GB, Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2x 1TB Partitions)
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 27" 2560 x 1440 PLS @ 100hz
Case Phantek Enthoo Evolv ATX TG
Audio Device(s) MSi Gaming AudioBoost ALC1150 w/ Sennheiser Game Ones
Power Supply Seasonic Flagship Prime Platinum 850
Mouse Steelseries Rival 600 w/ Hyper X Mat
Keyboard Corsair K70 w/ MX Browns and Red Backlit
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-Bit
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 15439
#4
So AMD cards shine in DX12, and Nvidia cards stay about the same.
 
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
715 (0.38/day)
Likes
501
Location
Nykoebing Mors, Denmark
System Name the little fart
Processor Intel I7-5820K
Motherboard MSI X99S Gaming 7
Cooling Polimatech Megahelem push/pull bitfenix Spectre 120mm pro
Memory 16 GB Crucial Sport 2400Mhz DDR 4
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 290 Tri-x OC
Storage 1 Crucial MX100 512GB SSD,1 Seagate Momentus XT 500GB, 1 1,5TB WD Black Caviar, 1 4TB WD RED HD
Display(s) IIyama E2607WSD
Case Custom Lian-Li PC-50R
Audio Device(s) Audio boost 2(realtek)
Power Supply Thermaltake DPS G 1050 watt Digital PSU
Software windows 10 64 bit
#5
The way I see it, is that why optimize for dx11 anymore ?

Win 10 has been DL more than 50 million times allready including dx12 which makes dx11 a thing of the past.
Move on and forget, just keep dx11 where it allready is, thats good enough and start developing dx12 right away.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,731 (1.20/day)
Likes
1,619
#6
So AMD cards shine in DX12, and Nvidia cards stay about the same.
It looses performance on fast CPUs beyond 1080p "Low" Average settings


In Heavy "Low" seams to gain performance where "High" you loose.


1080p "Low" looks to be consistent outcome where DX12 is faster then DX11 on Nvidia using a powerful CPU.

The more interesting or FUN part of it is probably the spat between OXIDE and Nvidia right now...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 5, 2014
Messages
533 (0.39/day)
Likes
209
#7
Colour me skeptical but is this really a case of DX12 offering much better FPS than DX11 when paired with a decent CPU, or is it more a case of a game in alpha offering much better FPS now it's launch API has been implemented rather than it's placeholder API?
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.11/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#8
The way I see it, is that why optimize for dx11 anymore ?
Not everyone will upgrade to Win10. There are plenty of people - for whatever reasons (although they seem to include technophobia, making a stand against subscription models, abhorrence of "apps", world Government conspiracy theories among others), that will only give up their Win7 serials when they're prised from their cold, dead hands.
I'm also pretty sure that HD 6000 card series owners aren't keen to have their gaming marginalized any further than it already is.
So AMD cards shine in DX12, and Nvidia cards stay about the same.
In this instance yes...although this instance seems to be an alpha build from a game engine, and a developer and game engine very closely allied with AMD. No doubt given the range of DX12 /DX11.3 feature and hardware coding options, you'll see game engines and individual games vary wildly depending upon what is implemented, and what is not.
One thing seems certain from the PC Per graphs Xzibit posted. AMD really need to pour some of those optimizations into CPUs.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
22,085 (6.19/day)
Likes
11,153
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#9
Most people I know that aren't upgrading to Windows 10 are staying with what they are on because of Windows Media Center. If you don't have an Xbox One and you rely on Windows Media Center, you're basically stuck.
 
Joined
Oct 4, 2013
Messages
86 (0.05/day)
Likes
16
#10
Most people I know that aren't upgrading to Windows 10 are staying with what they are on because of Windows Media Center. If you don't have an Xbox One and you rely on Windows Media Center, you're basically stuck.
I know a lot of people running around with donkeys instead of using some modern kind of transportation,
but those people who are "stuck" there is also xbmc, far superior than anything out there.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
3,701 (1.28/day)
Likes
2,052
System Name kom pu tor
Processor Core i9 7900X
Motherboard Asus X299-A
Cooling Antec K240 WC
Memory HyperX Predator RGB 2933Mhz 32GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 1080 Jetstream
Storage Intel 900p 280GB boot, 760p 512GB data
Case Corsair Air 540
Power Supply Antec Egde 750W
Mouse Cougar Revenger S
Keyboard Cougar 600K
#11
This is one game, a game that its devs been petted by AMD since it was announced.
By this time after all we've been through in this dirty market, i would totally believe that these great numbers on DX12 are either because DX11 got purposely butchered or becuase they are genuinely so well-optimized for AMD that no-one actually bothered to suite this thing to NVIDIA cards.

They wanna please their red friends. Those get to sell cards, and those get to sell there 0-PR driven game by having posts like these.
Imma wait fo UE4 to make the transission to DX12 (not this half-ported test thing)
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
2,731 (1.20/day)
Likes
1,619
#12
This is one game, a game that its devs been petted by AMD since it was announced.
By this time after all we've been through in this dirty market, i would totally believe that these great numbers on DX12 are either because DX11 got purposely butchered or becuase they are genuinely so well-optimized for AMD that no-one actually bothered to suite this thing to NVIDIA cards.

They wanna please their red friends. Those get to sell cards, and those get to sell there 0-PR driven game by having posts like these.
Imma wait fo UE4 to make the transission to DX12 (not this half-ported test thing)
Did you read the article, watch the video or read Ryans comments on it.

PCPerspective Ryan Shrout said:
NVIDIA has had source code access for a year. There are no excuses then.


 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,264 (0.71/day)
Likes
628
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming/Internet/HTPC
Processor AMD Phenom II 1075T @ 3.7GHz, undervolted @ 1.32V/Intel i5 4460/Athlon X4 760K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3/ASRock Z97 Extreme6/ASUS FM2+
Cooling Zalman CNPS9500 (Nvidia version)/Noctua U12S/Asetek Microchill
Memory 16GB Adata 2133MHz/16GB Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8GB Kingston 2400MHz (DDR3)
Video Card(s) ASUS HD7850 2GB /Intel 4600/Gigabyte GT620
Storage OCZ ARC 100 120GB + HDDs/KINGSTON 240G + HDDs/OCZ Agility 3 120GB
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected)/LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12/Sharkoon Rebel 9/Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply 850W Chieftec/560W Cheieftec/400W
Mouse CoolerMaster/Rapoo/Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster/Microsoft/Logitech
Software Windows
#13
Nvidia didn't lose the chance of it's usual marketing stunt. They publish the usual "Game Ready" driver to show that, for every new game, they are ready. Then they followed with their advice to not consider the benchmark results important. Maybe even ignore them completely. If this was AMD, if AMD had come out with a very specific driver for one specific game and then failed at those benchmarks, this thread would be flooded with mocking and derogatory comments for AMD, even hate.

Anyway, "Ashes of the Singularity" shows two things about drivers. First, Nvidia's DX11 are miles ahead of AMD's. Second, AMD's DX12 drivers start from a more concrete base. If AMD's DX11 drivers where started with the wrong foot and latter there was no programmers or money to fix it, at least with DX12 AMD starts from a better position. Let's hope they don't mess up down the road. If they think that with DX12 they have the upper hand, Nvidia does have the resources and the talent, to show them that they are wrong.

Two last things. I was saying in the past that Mantle was made to fix the pathetic Bulldozer's performance in games compared to Intel CPUs and not so to improve AMD's GPUs performance. Seeing the results on PCPerspective's CPU tests and how bad FX processors score, I can say that I was completely wrong. FX is something that can not be saved. At least based on this specific test. The last thing is the results of Radeon R7 370. As we can see here the 370(265, 7850) does not gain much. There could be two reasons for this. GCN 1.0 and 2GB of RAM. I would like to remind here that Mantle was NOT performing well with cards that had less than 3GBs of RAM. It seems that DX12 has the same problem. We might have to consider 3GBs of RAM as the minimum in the future for DX12 performance.
 
Joined
Jun 18, 2015
Messages
90 (0.08/day)
Likes
29
#15
This is one game, a game that its devs been petted by AMD since it was announced.
By this time after all we've been through in this dirty market, i would totally believe that these great numbers on DX12 are either because DX11 got purposely butchered or becuase they are genuinely so well-optimized for AMD that no-one actually bothered to suite this thing to NVIDIA cards.

They wanna please their red friends. Those get to sell cards, and those get to sell there 0-PR driven game by having posts like these.
Imma wait fo UE4 to make the transission to DX12 (not this half-ported test thing)
Hahha Dirty market? It wasnt dirty market when nVidia made the the big Dx10 lie with Crysis, and fooled millions of people with a dx9.0c game, nVidia has been cheating since ages
If AMD is doing something wrong now you have to blame nvidia for it, because nvidia started it or invented it
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
22,085 (6.19/day)
Likes
11,153
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#16
I know a lot of people running around with donkeys instead of using some modern kind of transportation,
but those people who are "stuck" there is also xbmc, far superior than anything out there.
It's inferior to Windows Media Center. Kodi's DVR and EPG (in USA) features leave a lot to be desired; moreover, Kodi's DLNA support is horrendous. Xbox One functions as a DVR, obtains EPG, and functions as a DLNA server. A $400 Xbox One, $200 for an external HDD, and $50 for a Hauppauge USB TV tuner for Windows 10 isn't exactly appealing next to a $100 Tuner and Windows Media Center.

Figures why AMD dropped Mantle for DX12. They knew they'd kill nVidia at this
Mantle code is in Direct3D 12 and Vulkan. There's no sense in AMD continuing to develop a proprietary API when it is becoming the standard.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.37/day)
Likes
69
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
#17
so AMD is again ahead with hardware and lack software .....is not the 1st time they do this and seems nothing was learned from past...
Hmm, I don't know how exactly to read these results.
Perhaps, nvidia lacks software optimisation at all in DX12 ?!
Obviously, these results are not very promising, if they do not reveal performance gains everywhere and with everyone.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.11/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
#18
If AMD is doing something wrong now you have to blame nvidia for it, because nvidia started it or invented it
No, I really, really, really wouldn't go there.
For some of us who have been 3D graphics enthusiasts for a while, we can remember when ATI outed the "all new" Rage Pro Turbo...with supposedly "40% more performance" than the outgoing Rage Pro in February 1998. The 40% improvement was only driver optimization for Winbench 98. As this review shows, real world gains were nil. The Pro Turbo eventually added some performance for actual games, but by then it had been overtaken by a whole swathe of newer cards including those of ATI itself.

If you're going to make a statement of fact, it should actually be factual.
Most of the graphics vendors indulged in benchmark shenanigans at one time or another - Nvidia included - but ATI's deliberate optimization for a single benchmark actually set the tone.
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
22,085 (6.19/day)
Likes
11,153
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) PowerColor PCS+ 390 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate 6 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
#19
Hmm, I don't know how exactly to read these results.
Perhaps, nvidia lacks software optimisation at all in DX12 ?!
Obviously, these results are not very promising, if they do not reveal performance gains everywhere and with everyone.
AMD has major CPU bottlenecks on low settings on DX11. Those CPU bottlenecks are gone in DX12 so AMD cards perform like NVIDIA cards in DX12 when they're pretty far behind in DX11.

I think it shows that AMD put all of their effort into Mantle/DX12/Vulkan over DX11 which really shouldn't surprise anyone.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
408 (0.08/day)
Likes
76
System Name Octopussy
Processor 1x Intel Core-i7 3930K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Full water cooling, mostly Aqua Computer and EKWB stuff!
Memory 4x 4GB Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2133 9-11-10-27-1T
Video Card(s) 2x Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage 8x Hitachi 5K3000 3TB RAID-6 (Adaptec 5805); 1x 512GB Samsung 950Pro (Angelbird Wings PX1)
Display(s) PLP: Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT + Dell U3011 30" TFT + Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT
Case CaseLabs TH10A
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-1000XP
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M800
Software MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores A lot.
#20
All I read out from this is that AMDs drivers are crap and with DX12 this doesn't matter as much as it did with DX11.

I bet the CPU usage under DX12 with AMD is a lot higher than it is with nVidia. Not that this is necessaryly a bad thing. But it also isn't more efficient per se. The 5960x just has enough crunching power to not be the bottleneck here.

I hope AMD doesn't take their DX12 superiority for granted and stop developing and optimizing their DX12 drivers any further.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,264 (2.05/day)
Likes
3,939
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING (Waiting on 1180 Ti)
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q (Waiting on 1180 Ti for 4K)
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
#21
What does this article tell us? That Ashes of Singularity runs better on AMD than Nvidia. There are games that run better on AMD or Nvidia. It is common. One company or the other works closer with the developer and gains an edge. It doesn't mean much that Nvidia chose not to for whatever reason if that is what happened. imo we can't look at the performance increase in one DX12 game and extrapolate that to most DX12 games.

If it works out that AMD has the edge in most DX12 games then it's time to go red but how long will it be before it's clear which company has the best offerings? It may be years possibly before there are a good selection of DX12 games.
 
Joined
Jun 4, 2004
Messages
408 (0.08/day)
Likes
76
System Name Octopussy
Processor 1x Intel Core-i7 3930K @ 4.8GHz
Motherboard ASUS Rampage IV Extreme
Cooling Full water cooling, mostly Aqua Computer and EKWB stuff!
Memory 4x 4GB Corsair Dominator GT DDR3-2133 9-11-10-27-1T
Video Card(s) 2x Gigabyte GTX 980Ti G1 Gaming in SLI
Storage 8x Hitachi 5K3000 3TB RAID-6 (Adaptec 5805); 1x 512GB Samsung 950Pro (Angelbird Wings PX1)
Display(s) PLP: Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT + Dell U3011 30" TFT + Dell 2007FBb 20" TFT
Case CaseLabs TH10A
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar Phoebus
Power Supply SeaSonic SS-1000XP
Mouse Logitech MX Master
Keyboard SteelSeries Apex M800
Software MS Windows 10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores A lot.
#22
AMD has major CPU bottlenecks on low settings on DX11. Those CPU bottlenecks are gone in DX12 so AMD cards perform like NVIDIA cards in DX12 when they're pretty far behind in DX11.
I think due to the multithreaded nature of DX12, those bottlenecks (or inefficiencies) are better hidden, but they are still there. :)
 
Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,664 (1.24/day)
Likes
1,013
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit
#23
There's all sorts of wonkiness going on with all sides of this chart. The only take away from this test is that we need more tests.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
5,250 (3.74/day)
Likes
4,225
Location
Duiven, Netherlands
Processor i7 8700k 4.8Ghz @ 1.31v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
#24
What does this article tell us? That Ashes of Singularity runs better on AMD than Nvidia. There are games that run better on AMD or Nvidia. It is common. One company or the other works closer with the developer and gains an edge. It doesn't mean much that Nvidia chose not to for whatever reason if that is what happened. imo we can't look at the performance increase in one DX12 game and extrapolate that to most DX12 games.

If it works out that AMD has the edge in most DX12 games then it's time to go red but how long will it be before it's clear which company has the best offerings? It may be years possibly before there are a good selection of DX12 games.
This. Overall, this is not news, this is just a stir in the AMD-Nvidia fanrage bowl, with a game that nobody really plays or even heard of.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2008
Messages
757 (0.20/day)
Likes
112
System Name Raptor
Processor Core i7 3930K@4.0Ghz
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 4*4GB Gskil RipjawsDDR3 @2133MHz 1.6v
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX980 SC
Storage Vertex 3 SSD 120GB + 250GB SSD samsung +1TB seagate
Display(s) ACER-H243HX 24"
Case HAF-X
Audio Device(s) on board Realtek
Power Supply Corsair 850HX
Software Windows 10 & 7 dual boot .
#25
It's better to say AMD catching up in dx12.
 
Top