- Joined
- Jun 2, 2017
- Messages
- 7,936 (3.15/day)
System Name | Best AMD Computer |
---|---|
Processor | AMD 7900X3D |
Motherboard | Asus X670E E Strix |
Cooling | In Win SR36 |
Memory | GSKILL DDR5 32GB 5200 30 |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire Pulse 7900XT (Watercooled) |
Storage | Corsair MP 700, Seagate 530 2Tb, Adata SX8200 2TBx2, Kingston 2 TBx2, Micron 8 TB, WD AN 1500 |
Display(s) | GIGABYTE FV43U |
Case | Corsair 7000D Airflow |
Audio Device(s) | Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1 |
Power Supply | Deepcool 1000M |
Mouse | Logitech g7 gaming mouse |
Keyboard | Logitech G510 |
Software | Windows 11 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin |
Benchmark Scores | Firestrike: 46183 Time Spy: 25121 |
In your opinion. I am a Gamer and don't really make content other than using AMD software. All of those other programs are nice but I already have a career and Gaming is my hobby so if they release a GPU that pushes my current monitor to it's max then I am cool with it. All GPUs are overpriced but people still buy them and let's keep in mind that AMD also exhibits with these new cards what the consoles can look forward to. I can promise you I don't need RT to enjoy Spiderman but if I have a card that will gove me 200 FPS at 4K then why would I say no?Don't they perform already exceptionally in raster?
I mean why do you or everyone need more performance in raster? Even my 2080Ti provides enough raster performance for any game today.
Let alone the 6800/6950XTs.
The RT performance is the one that matters and the 3D V cache won't solve that problem.
I don't use Adobe, but engineering software from Autodesk, Leica Geosystems, Bentley etc.
And yes, there are no alternatives to that kind of software. And yes, most of them take advantage of CUDA cores.
I suppose it was the same with the nvenc. At least the 7900s support AV1.