• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD Officially but Silently Downgrades Radeon RX 560 with an 896 SP Variant

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,333 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
The phenomenon of Radeon RX 560 graphics cards with 896 stream processors is more widespread than earlier thought. It looks like RX 560 cards with 896 stream processors will be more widely available than the previously thought Greater China region; with AMD silently editing the specifications of the SKU to have either 896 or 1,024 stream processors, as opposed to the 1,024 it originally launched with. There are no clear labeling guidelines or SKU names to distinguish cards with 896 stream processors from those with 1,024.

Show full news post
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
1,676 (4.94/day)
Likes
886
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD FX-6300 - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - 4x4GB A-DATA 1866 Mhz (OC)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x 1 Tb Seagate something or other
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#2
They did have a separate name for the 896 shaders variant though and virtually none of the manufacturers used it. So the fault lies in both.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
12,355 (2.56/day)
Likes
5,814
Location
Europe\Slovenia
System Name Dark Silence 2
Processor Intel Core i7 5820K @ 4.5 GHz (1.15V)
Motherboard MSI X99A Gaming 7
Cooling Cooler Master Nepton 120XL
Memory 32 GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury 2400 MHz @ 2666 MHz 15-15-15-32 1T (1.25V)
Video Card(s) AORUS GeForce GTX 1080Ti 11GB (1950/11000 OC Mode)
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 2TB SSD (3D V-NAND)
Display(s) ASUS VG248QE 144Hz 1ms (DisplayPort)
Case Corsair Carbide 330R Titanium
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 + Altec Lansing MX5021 (HiFi capacitors and OPAMP upgrade)
Power Supply BeQuiet! Dark Power Pro 11 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry Stream XT Black
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Fall Creators Update)
#3
Didn't they also upgrade RX 560 into more shaders from RX 460? So, they are just downgrading it back to RX 460 shader count again?
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
275 (0.26/day)
Likes
67
System Name Marmo / Kanon
Processor Intel Core i5 4690K / Intel Core i5 6600K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-Z97X-UD5H / Gigabyte GA-Z270X-Gaming 5
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper 212+ / Thermalright TRUE Spirit 120M
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LP 12800C9 / 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 21300C16
Video Card(s) Palit GTX980 Super Jetstream / MSI GTX1080 Gaming+ X 11Gbps
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB, Toshiba 1TB / Samsung 850 Pro 256GB, WD Black 1TB
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp U2414H / Dell UltraSharp U2715H
Case Lian-Li PC-60FN / Lian-Li PC-9F
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Elite Pro / Creative SB ZxR
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 660W / SeaSonic X 750W
Mouse Logitech G1
Software MS Windows 7 Professional SP1 / MS Windows 8.1 Pro
#5
There were probably too many Polaris 11 dies which didn't pass the QA.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#6
I think it was supposed to be a 560D?

But....for whatever reason, that never happenend. This feels like a more misleading move than the gtx 970 memory issue.. :(
 

Tatty_One

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 18, 2006
Messages
19,749 (4.54/day)
Likes
6,015
Location
Worcestershire, UK
Processor Skylake Core i7 6700k @ 4.6gig
Motherboard MSI Z170A Tomahawk
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 240V AIO/Viper140's
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000mhz CL14
Video Card(s) Sapphire 4gb R9 290X VaporX @1150mhz
Storage SkHynix SL308 120GB/CrucialM4/1TB WD Black
Display(s) LG 29inch 2560x1080 Curved Ultrawide IPS
Case Phanteks Enthoo Pro M Windowed - Gunmetal
Audio Device(s) Xifi Elite Pro 7.1/VideoLogic ZXR550's
Power Supply XFX Pro Black Edition 750W Gold modular
Keyboard CM Storm Octane Combo
Software Win 10 Home x64
#7
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#8
Yeah, cant say the word 'Evo' does anything to discern that its actually an a lot slower card.

At least for oem's it was supposed to be called 560d.
 
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
2,320 (2.48/day)
Likes
816
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 (G.Skill, I think)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 500GB and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
#9
They did have a separate name for the 896 shaders variant though and virtually none of the manufacturers used it. So the fault lies in both.
You're probably referring to 560D, which has never made an appearance on the official site. amd.com simply lists 560 as having "896/1024" shaders. And no 560D.
Though truth be told, whoever buys this low end isn't very likely to care about specs at all.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
12,355 (2.56/day)
Likes
5,814
Location
Europe\Slovenia
System Name Dark Silence 2
Processor Intel Core i7 5820K @ 4.5 GHz (1.15V)
Motherboard MSI X99A Gaming 7
Cooling Cooler Master Nepton 120XL
Memory 32 GB DDR4 Kingston HyperX Fury 2400 MHz @ 2666 MHz 15-15-15-32 1T (1.25V)
Video Card(s) AORUS GeForce GTX 1080Ti 11GB (1950/11000 OC Mode)
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 2TB SSD (3D V-NAND)
Display(s) ASUS VG248QE 144Hz 1ms (DisplayPort)
Case Corsair Carbide 330R Titanium
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound BlasterX AE-5 + Altec Lansing MX5021 (HiFi capacitors and OPAMP upgrade)
Power Supply BeQuiet! Dark Power Pro 11 750W
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Cherry Stream XT Black
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit (Fall Creators Update)
#10
I don't get it why can't they just use the "Lite" or "LE" naming scheme. We all know what it means.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#11
You're probably referring to 560D, which has never made an appearance on the official site. amd.com simply lists 560 as having "896/1024" shaders. And no 560D.
Though truth be told, whoever buys this low end isn't very likely to care about specs at all.
The 560d was supposed to be a low cost variant in asia as well as for mining.

And while many users who buy these cards wont know specs (do many anyway, really?), they will surely believe 560 is better than 460 as, generally, this is how it works.

This is not good. We can blame the board partners, but it seems there is a lack of 'institutional control' in that 560D name not making it out. If amd doesnt discern between the cards in their website, i can understand why partners didnt change it either.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2005
Messages
1,258 (0.27/day)
Likes
604
Location
South Africa
System Name Firelance
Processor i5-3570K @ 4.6GHz / 1.19V
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X-UD5H @ F16h mod BIOS
Cooling Corsair H105 + 4x Gentle Typhoon 1850
Memory 2x 8GB Crucial Ballistix Sport DDR3-1600 CL9 @ CL7
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC @ 2000 core / 2300 mem
Storage 2x 256GB Samsung 840 Pro (RAID-0) + Hitachi Deskstar 7K3000 (3TB)
Display(s) Dell U2713HM (25x14) + Acer P243W (19x12)
Case Fractal Design ARC XL
Audio Device(s) Logitech G930
Power Supply Seasonic M12-II Bronze Evo Edition 750W
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard Logitech G19
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 Service Pack 1
#12
I can't see any good reason for AMD to do this. Do they want a lawsuit? Just name the 896SP variant "RX 550" FFS, problem solved.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
1,676 (4.94/day)
Likes
886
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD FX-6300 - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - 4x4GB A-DATA 1866 Mhz (OC)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x 1 Tb Seagate something or other
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#13
Yet again AMD is blamed for the greed of AIBs and their piss poor marketing and naming schemes.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#14
I mean, when its their fault...they dont even discern between the two on their website. How is this the board partners fault (only)? And why would we rely on them for being a moral compass??

Its like a damn loot crate!!! Never know what you'll get!
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
1,676 (4.94/day)
Likes
886
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD FX-6300 - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - 4x4GB A-DATA 1866 Mhz (OC)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x 1 Tb Seagate something or other
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#15
How is this the board partners fault (only)?
Because this happened before with the 470 and that went fine since they didn't really make their way outside Asia with the exception of those mining versions. You really think AMD has full control over to where these cards are sold ? You can just buy them bulk and sell them off Amazon/Ebay.

AIBs obviously knew this happens and they still didn't make a clear distinction between them.
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2012
Messages
1,595 (0.84/day)
Likes
636
Location
Jacksonhole Florida
System Name DEVIL'S ABYSS
Processor i7-4790K@4.6 GHz
Motherboard Asus Z97-Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H110 (2 x 140mm)(3 x 140mm case fans)
Memory 16GB Adata XPG V2 2400MHz
Video Card(s) EVGA 780 Ti Classified
Storage Intel 750 Series 400GB (AIC), Plextor M6e 256GB (M.2), 13 TB storage
Display(s) Crossover 27QW (27"@ 2560x1440)
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Cooler Master V1000
Mouse Ttsports Talon Blu
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 version 1709
Benchmark Scores Passmark CPU score = 13080
#16
Yet again AMD is blamed for the greed of AIBs and their piss poor marketing and naming schemes.
Maybe because their own website product page is ambiguous about shader counts? Could THAT be the reason AMD is getting blame? If AMD themselves won't differentiate, why would the partners? This whole fiasco smells bad...
Screenshot (25).png
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#17
AIBs are at fault too, but, agaun, AMD didnt call it something else themselves. The OP shows the amd website. What about when buying reference cards not named different? Is that the AIBs fault too?

The source of this problem is AMD. Because their partners went along with it doesnt absolve AMD of creating the problem in the first place.

Again.. 560s are now loot crates. Scary.
 
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
2,320 (2.48/day)
Likes
816
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 (G.Skill, I think)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 500GB and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
#18
The 560d was supposed to be a low cost variant in asia as well as for mining.

And while many users who buy these cards wont know specs (do many anyway, really?), they will surely believe 560 is better than 460 as, generally, this is how it works.

This is not good. We can blame the board partners, but it seems there is a lack of 'institutional control' in that 560D name not making it out. If amd doesnt discern between the cards in their website, i can understand why partners didnt change it either.
I don't think this is confusing at all. Isn't 580 a rebrand of 480?
Hell, looking back at AMD's history, I thik they may actually have more rebrands than new releases altogether.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
1,676 (4.94/day)
Likes
886
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD FX-6300 - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - 4x4GB A-DATA 1866 Mhz (OC)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x 1 Tb Seagate something or other
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#19
AMD didnt call it something else themselves.
Yes they are , just how there's a 470D they named this one 560D.

http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/vga/introduction.php?S_ID=236

How could Biostar specify this a 470D but others can't do the same for the 560 ? It's AMD at fault ?

You know , it's funny I just remembered how there are 2 1060s on the market with the exact same name as well but somehow anything associated with Nvidia gets a pass while similar happenings turn AMD into a shady ass company . :)
 
Joined
May 22, 2015
Messages
2,320 (2.48/day)
Likes
816
Processor Intel i5-6600k
Motherboard ASRock Z170 Extreme7+
Cooling Arctic Cooling Freezer i11
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 2400 (G.Skill, I think)
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1060 SC
Storage 128 and 256GB OCZ Vertex4, 500GB Samsung 850 EVO, 500GB and 3TB Seagate
Display(s) HP ZR24w
Case Chieftec BX01
Power Supply Seasonic 620W M12
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Core
#20
Yes they are , just how there's a 470D they named this one 560D.

http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/vga/introduction.php?S_ID=236

How could Biostar specify this a 470D but others can't do the same for the 560 ? It's AMD at fault ?

You know , it's funny I just remembered how there are 2 1060s on the market with the exact same name as well but somehow anything associated with Nvidia gets a pass while similar happenings turn AMD into a shady ass company . :)
Lol, you're arguing that AMD made a clear distinction with a link to Biostar's website? That's rich.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#21
Yes they are , just how there's a 470D they named this one 560D.

http://www.biostar.com.tw/app/en/vga/introduction.php?S_ID=236

How could Biostar specify this a 470D but others can't do the same for the 560 ? It's AMD at fault ?

You know , it's funny I just remembered how there are 2 1060s on the market with the exact same name as well but somehow anything associated with Nvidia gets a pass while similar happenings turn AMD into a shady ass company . :)
Sorry Vya, we are talking 560 here bud. Kudos to Biostar though on that last gen card. As well as AMD for actually putting out an explicit specification and name of the 470D, unlike this situation. That supports my point though... if AMD names it properly AIBs will follow... or at least Biostar. Not sure if anyone else put out a 470D.... ;)

I never heard of the 470D in the past, because, well, it wasn't released in the states. It IS a different card with a different name. In the case of the, 570D AMD didn't seem to specify (see the first post, see post 16), and consequently, neither did the AIBs. So we have a problem. These seem to be in more places than that now(?)...

As far as the 1060's, no idea on that outside of a 3GB and 6GB version. But let's stop using straw man tactics and stick to the point....NVIDIA and their shady practices are not the issue here.

The point:

AMD did not discern between these distinctly different models. Because of this, both AMD in their reference/oem cards and the AIBs with their cards, we have what I am coining as "loot crate" GPUs. EVERYONE could have been better in this situation, I certainly agree. However its more than clear where this started and it isn't with the AIBs.
 
Last edited:

qubit

Overclocked quantum bit
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
14,551 (3.98/day)
Likes
8,058
Location
Quantum Well UK
System Name Quantumville™
Processor Intel Core i7-2700K at stock (hits 5 gees+ easily)
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/GEN3
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory 16GB (4 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 PC3-12800 C9 1600MHz)
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme Edition
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 256GB | WD Green 4TB
Display(s) BenQ XL2720Z | Asus VG278HE (both 27", 144Hz, 3D Vision 2, 1080p)
Case Cooler Master HAF 922
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Fatal1ty PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX 850W v1
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
#22
Shrinkflation. Just like at the supermarkets.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,796 (2.23/day)
Likes
3,785
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Working on it ;)
Processor I7-4790K
Motherboard MSI Z97
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) Intel IGP (Dedicated GPU TBD)
Storage WD 320 / 500KS / 500KS / 640KS / 640LS / 640LS / 640LS / 1TBFAEX and a NAS with 2x2Tb WD Black
Display(s) 24" DELL 2405FPW
Case Rosewill Challenger
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750 (love it)
Mouse Logitech G5
Software Win 7 Pro
#23
Disturbing. They should have called the original the Radeon RX 560 Ti :laugh:
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
1,676 (4.94/day)
Likes
886
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD FX-6300 - 4.5 Ghz
Motherboard ASRock 970M Pro3
Cooling Scythe Katana 4 - 3x 120mm case fans
Memory 16GB - 4x4GB A-DATA 1866 Mhz (OC)
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1060 Turbo 6GB ~ 2139 Mhz / 9.4 Gbps
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x 1 Tb Seagate something or other
Display(s) 1080p TV
Case Zalman R1
Power Supply 500W
#24
AMD did not discern between these distinctly different models.
Yes they do , come on man you realize how non nonsensical that is ? You think they ship these chips in surprise kinder eggs ? And the AIBs just randomly throw them on cards ?

Even TPU's database makes a clear distinction , not only between the name but also the actual core variant : Polaris 21 XL and Polaris 21 XT.

You just don't want to accept the fact that this has been done before in the exact same fashion with the only exception being that, now, AIBs didn't do their job properly (intentionally or not).

NVIDIA and their shady practices are not the issue here.
It never is , I know. ;)

But let's stop using straw man tactics and stick to the point...
Right , let's not focus on the same thing Nvidia and it's board partners did and focus instead on AMD , because somehow that's more important and relevant. Gotcha , I'm not gonna mention it again. :)
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
11,497 (3.96/day)
Likes
6,259
Location
Ohio
System Name Daily Driver
Processor 7900X 4.5GHz 10c/10t 1.15V.
Motherboard ASUS Prime X299 Deluxe
Cooling MCR320 + Kuplos Kryos NEXT CPU block
Memory GSkill Trident Z 4x8 GB DDR4 3600 MHz CL16
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1080 FTW3
Storage 512GB Patriot Hellfire, 512GB OCZ RD400, 640GB Caviar Black, 2TB Caviar Green
Display(s) Yamakasi 27" 2560x1440 IPS
Case Thermaltake P5
Power Supply EVGA 750W Supernova G2
Benchmark Scores Faster than most of you! Bet on it! :)
#25
Yes they do , come on man you realize how non nonsensical that is ? You think they ship these chips in surprise kinder eggs ? And the AIBs just randomly throw them on cards ?
They didn't do it on their website. TPUs database was likely based off the numerous articles posting about it way back in June/July timeframe. I mean, clearly it is NOT on the AMD website (as a 560D).

You just don't want to accept the fact that this has been done before in the exact same fashion with the only exception being that, now, AIBs didn't do their job properly (intentionally or not).
And you may have missed what I posted. AMD put up specifications for a 470D on the website... an AIB that made them, followed. This go around, there is NO DISTINCTION between a 560 and 560D. See the posts I referenced earlier which are directly from the AMD website.
It never is , I know. ;)
This isn't the place. This has NOTHING TO DO WITH NVIDIA.

Right , let's not focus on the same thing Nvidia and it's board partners did and focus instead on AMD
Right. This is about the 560 and has NOTHING to do with NVIDIA. Take your scarecrow out of the fields as it's not scaring anything away with bringing up a completely unrelated topic.

Understand, I am not the one who brought up the 470D which DOES IN FACT HAVE A CLEAR ENTRY ON AMD's website. So, the 470D isn't the issue here. They did that right. Here, they do NOT have an entry for the 560D. Its just a 560 with two different sets of specs. Because of this, the reference 560 and the AIBs apparent willingness to run with it, they are loot crate GPUs. Again, I am not absolving the AIBs part in this for propagating the issue, however, it is clear the source of the ambiguity is from AMD.
 
Last edited: