AMD Phenom 11 x4 965

[Montalva]

btw still running prime and it seems stable

 

[Montalva]

if it crash at lets say 2.7 2.6 then increase voltage to 1.3, it will show as RED warning to high voltage but trust mee its no problem it can take 1.4v
i read it on a overcklocking site from the testers them self that the phenom NB likes 1.3-1.4v

 

[Darkrix]

now im running 4230mhz and ht 2420 and nb 2420 mhz

 

[Darkrix]

trying to run 3d 2011

 

[Montalva]

now im running 4230mhz and ht 2420 and nb 2420 mhz

HT over 2200 can give negative performance

 

[Montalva]

1 hour prime and no crash, i think it finaly WORKS

 

[Darkrix]

looool NB oc dosent do a shit to my comp..
http://3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/1241408/3dm11/1238828
the higer score is without NB OC now i had NB 2624 and HT too dammit ok ill put the HT back auto and try again.. but if not any change then i say no need to OC the NB..

 

[Montalva]

looool NB oc dosent do a shit to my comp..
http://3dmark.com/compare/3dm11/1241408/3dm11/1238828
the higer score is without NB OC now i had NB 2624 and HT too dammit ok ill put the HT back auto and try again.. but if not any change then i say no need to OC the NB..

Its proven that NB oc gives performace you can check everywhere

 

[Darkrix]

Its proven that NB oc gives performace you can check everywhere

i think it was the HT clock that fuckked my points up now ht 2026 and nb 2634
everest noticed the NB change memory handling is much faster..
ill drive the 3d again..

 

[Darkrix]

yeah theretick it gave everst showed that memorys are workking much better but its seems that i need faster GPU to hadle what i can give to it beacause in 3d mark 2011 it dint make anydiffrence to me if i oc the NB or not but in every memory speed test it bummped up the score.. mem latency went from 47,2ns to 42,9ns mem write and read and copy speed went much faster.. so it does help
..ty for that info..

 

[cookiemonster]

Hi looking at what you are doing has completely blown my mind, I have got it down to 4 choices,

Coolermaster Hyper 212 plus
Thermaltake Frio
Coolermaster v8 (difficult to install)
Corsair H50

all ram slots are full
air flow front to back

and my mobo is a :Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H (rev 2.0)

 

[Darkrix]

Hi looking at what you are doing has completely blown my mind, I have got it down to 4 choices,

Coolermaster Hyper 212 plus
Thermaltake Frio
Coolermaster v8 (difficult to install)
Corsair H50

all ram slots are full
air flow front to back

and my mobo is a :Gigabyte 890GPA-UD3H (rev 2.0)

my wote goes for
Coolermaster Hyper 212 plus then all dimm slots are awailable and with two fans u get quiet but low temp system..

 

[Montalva]

i vote for the v8, and its not that hard to install

 

[neatfeatguy]

I'd vote for the Hyper 212+.

Having had the V8 and now the 212+, I've been able to get up to 3.69GHz on the 212+. Whereas I couldn't run stable on acceptable temps past 3.59 on the V8. The 212+ runs about 10% cooler for me then the V8 did.

I currently run my Phenom II x4 940 @ 3.52, 1.4375V - idles 37, load 53. Running at 3.69GHz, 1.5V - idle 39, load 59. The performance difference from 3.52 to 3.69 is about 5% in most apps and games, so I don't think it's worth it to run those speeds/temps.

Also, the V8 and the 212+ are pretty easy to install.