• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon HD 6850 Specs, Pricing Surfaces

Joined
Nov 6, 2009
Messages
1,299 (0.28/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Vegnagun
Processor Ryzen 5950x
Motherboard Asus B550 Gaming-E
Cooling Noctua NH-U14
Memory 4x8 G. Skill 3800mhz CL14
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3080 FTW3
Storage WD SN850 2tb
Display(s) Viotek 1080p 120hz
Case Fractal Design Define 7
Power Supply Corsair AX850
Mouse Logitech
Keyboard Logitech 815 tactile
Software Windows 10 Education
Benchmark Scores top 1% in the world for weekly score in Killzone 2 :)
Ohhhh Noes my "troll" sensor has just gone off :rolleyes:

mine broke as soon as I entered this thread. I wasn't even to this page and it hit with such force that the needle cut my hand on its way back around :cry:
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,960 (0.40/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name penguin
Processor R5 2400G
Motherboard Asrock B450M Pro4
Cooling Box
Memory 4 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Fury 2666MHz
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) 27' LG
Case Zalman
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Seasonic SS-620GM
Software win10
Firstly, there is nothing logical about the change. Secondly, not everyone is an enthusiast: a lot of these cards will be put into pre-built systems and in the face of a deliberate attempt to deceive, placing the onus on the consumer is misguided at best. There is little justification for the number change and whilst it's not something that I'll lose any sleep over, I have no problem drawing attention to underhand marketing practices, irrespective of the company in question.

Actually if you think about it, there's a lot more logic behind the new change. Just like with the evergreen series, two new chips are introduced at the top - Cayman at the very top and Barts right behind it.These two chips will represent the entire performance and enthusiast sector. I can bet that marketing did a ton of research and simply deducted that the old XXX0x2 nomenclature was not optimal nor the one after it where they marketed the same chip in two different segments.Hemlock was nothing more than two Cypress cores on the same pcb. In the long term both of these strategies would bring confusion with pricing, shipping and supply and possibly even legal issues under extreme consequences.

That is why they have decided to have all the cards using the same cores under the same nomenclature. So at the very top of performance the 6900 series will consist of the Cayman pro - 6950, Cayman XT - 6970 and Cayman x2 - 6990. Logic dictates that Barts should be next represented by the Barts pro - 6850, Barts XT - 6870 and possibly Barts x2 - 6890

This streamlines the naming scheme and could simplify distribution and advertising.

/end wall of text
 
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
120 (0.03/day)
Location
El Salvador
System Name The K6 Killer III
Processor Intel Core i9 9900K
Motherboard ASUS TUF Z390 Plus Gaming (Wi-Fi)
Cooling Cougar Helor 360
Memory 2x 8GB Patriot Viper DDR4-3866
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3080 Ti
Storage 1TB Samsung M.2 970 EVO Plus + 1TB Samsung SSD 840 EVO
Display(s) Samsung 43RU7100
Case Cougar Panzer EVO RGB
Power Supply XPG Core Reactor 850W
Mouse Cougar Minos XT
Keyboard Cougar Ultimus RGB
Software Windows 11 Pro
As I see it, this year nVidia filled the gaps between AMD offerings; this time around AMD is striking back matching those gaps exactly.

I don’t expect a big jump in performance; I think 6800 series isn’t meant for that anyway.
If 6850 will be the substitute for 5750, the shaders count will only be increased in 11% (800 vs. 720), taking into account more TU’s, ROP’s and memory bandwidth, the logic dictates that those specs would put 6850 between 5770 and 5830. However I believe this is not the case, AMD might have improved the performance of the shading units so a 6850 will be sit between 5830 and 5850 to compete against GTX460 in the US$200 range.

I don’t agree with the “new” branding scheme, it might be seen as a deceiving practice against less-informed customers. A lot of people out there will think a 6850 is more powerful than a 5850… well it wouldn’t be the first time this occurs.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2010
Messages
1,348 (0.30/day)
Processor Core i7 920
Motherboard Asus P6T v2
Cooling Noctua D-14
Memory OCZ Gold 1600
Video Card(s) Powercolor PCS+ 5870
Storage Samsung SpinPoint F3 1 TB
Display(s) Samsung LE-B530 37" TV
Case Lian Li PC-B25F
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Thermaltake Toughpower 700w
Software Windows 7 64-bit
Actually if you think about it, there's a lot more logic behind the new change. Just like with the evergreen series, two new chips are introduced at the top - Cayman at the very top and Barts right behind it.These two chips will represent the entire performance and enthusiast sector. I can bet that marketing did a ton of research and simply deducted that the old XXX0x2 nomenclature was not optimal nor the one after it where they marketed the same chip in two different segments.Hemlock was nothing more than two Cypress cores on the same pcb. In the long term both of these strategies would bring confusion with pricing, shipping and supply and possibly even legal issues under extreme consequences.

That is why they have decided to have all the cards using the same cores under the same nomenclature. So at the very top of performance the 6900 series will consist of the Cayman pro - 6950, Cayman XT - 6970 and Cayman x2 - 6990. Logic dictates that Barts should be next represented by the Barts pro - 6850, Barts XT - 6870 and possibly Barts x2 - 6890

This streamlines the naming scheme and could simplify distribution and advertising.

/end wall of text

I don't want to make an issue out of this, particularly as we have no performance figures, but everything points to 68xx's being the replacements of 57xx's. If that is the case, there is absolutely no logical reason why the cards shouldn't have been branded 67xx. It may be advantageous for ATI as a company to change the numbering in this manner, but it most certainly does no benefit the consumer in any form: on the contrary, it appears to deliberately provoke confusion.

There is no need to highlight this particular aspect of the new generation, given that the important elements are pricing and performance, but by the same token there is no need to gloss over this issue just because it's ATI and such marketing practices are normally associated with Nvidia.

Again, we have no performance figures and I do not feel that the rebranding issue should occupy the limelight or become excessively exaggerated, but we shouldn't seek to ignore or justify it either.

I've stated my piece and I won't become embroiled in any more debate in relation to this matter as it would be both repetitive and a clear invitation to steer the thread into waters that are better left uncharted.
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.35/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
I still want to know how they can be called replacements if the 5770/50 are going to be rebranded as 6770/50, to me it sounds more like they are not intended to replace anything they just sound like an odd addition untill there is some numbers to show where they stand
 
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,960 (0.40/day)
Location
Bulgaria
System Name penguin
Processor R5 2400G
Motherboard Asrock B450M Pro4
Cooling Box
Memory 4 x 8GB Kingston HyperX Fury 2666MHz
Video Card(s) IGP
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) 27' LG
Case Zalman
Audio Device(s) stock
Power Supply Seasonic SS-620GM
Software win10

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.35/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W

Not exactly what i would consider accurate :p from that it looks like barts is a tiny bit more powerful than a g460 but then that gives me the idea that it's not that much more powerful than an overclocked 5770 thus the new shader design has not really done much for performance and i really hope thats totaly wrong.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,210 (2.86/day)
Not exactly what i would consider accurate :p from that it looks like barts is a tiny bit more powerful than a g460 but then that gives me the idea that it's not that much more powerful than an overclocked 5770 thus the new shader design has not really done much for performance and i really hope thats totaly wrong.

NO, it's right.


Right now, GTX460 is kinda stomping all over 5870, and most importantly, it continues to do so @ high-res(5760x1080, etc).

Cypress is EOL. Alot of the gpu is idle most of the time, from having so many shaders, and the shader removal has a very small impact on performance...in fact, the loss of shaders makes the gpu FASTER, because there's less data for the dispatch engine to manage(ie, this gpu is far more efficient). Juniper, fortuantely, becuase it has so much elss shaders, still works well, and saved them from ahving to design another low-end gpu. I wouldn't be surprised to see Barts, and maybe even Cayman, re-used in the next gen after this one...that's really good usage of R&D dollars, anyway.
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.35/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
NO, it's right.


Right now, GTX460 is kinda stomping all over 5870, and most importnantly, it continues to do so @ high-res(5760x1080, etc).

Cypress is EOL. alot fo the gpu is idle most of the time, from having so many shaders, and the shader removal has a very small impact on performance...in fact, the loss of shaders makes the gpu FASTER, because there's less data for the dispatch engine to manage(ie, this gpu is far more efficient).

I must admit i was under the impression that the 460 was stomping all over the 5770 and 5830, i thought it was more like 460 sli was stomping all over the 5870. I kinda stopped paying too much attetion to current gpu's as i want to compaire cypress to the 4xx cards then see what i want.

I just wish barts was out already and the real spec of caymen was leaked so we had a better idea of how well it could do.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,210 (2.86/day)
Maybe I am phrasing it wrong(but I did so intentionally).

GTX460 doesn't outright beat 5870, but it does make it look pretty bad, given the difference in potential. You are very right in you synopsis there.

Of course, this is made more evident by multi-gpu configs, but one big thing you need to factor in is cost.

The reason GTX460 excels is it's wonderfully efficient gpu, and cheap pricing. Barts addresses this problem.

Cayman is headed at GTX480/470, as is expected. They should exceed the competition, but not by a large margin...just enough so that cost is close, but performance makes 480 is useless buy(I consider GTX480 better than HD5870, not ignoring cost). this gpu should have a year of life in it, so needs to be truly competitive with GTX480...or else it's a failure.
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.35/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
Maybe I am phrasing it wrong(but I did so intentionally).

GTX460 doesn't outright beat 5870, but it does make it look pretty bad, given the difference in potential. You are very right in you synopsis there.

Of course, this is made more evident by multi-gpu configs, but one big thing you need to factor in is cost.

The reason GTX460 excels is it's wonderfully efficient gpu, and cheap pricing. Barts addresses this problem.

Cayman is headed at GTX480/470, as is expected. They should exceed the competition, but not by a large margin...just enough so that cost is close, but performance makes 480 is useless buy(I consider GTX480 better than HD5870, not ignoring cost). this gpu should have a year of life in it, so needs to be truly competitive with GTX480...or else it's a failure.

You are right though, i just took at look at a couple reviews and in many games a factory overclocked 460 beats the 5870, also the 480 may get a bit toasty and loves loads of power but it beats the 5870 in power.

My hope is that caymen beats the 480 while costing less and using less power... although i may be dreaming :laugh: i just hope i'm not.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
1,018 (0.20/day)
Location
New York
System Name Filtration tower
Processor i9 7900@4.4ghz
Motherboard ASRock X299 Taichi
Cooling Air
Memory 64g 3200 quad channel
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500gb Nvme, 200gb SSD, 1700gb HDD
Display(s) 34" Acer Predator 3440x1440
Case Thermaltake v71
Power Supply EVGA supernova 850 T2
so will the 6850 fall in sub $200 category?
_____________________________

Antec1200 filter project
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,210 (2.86/day)
so will the 6850 fall in sub $200 category?
I think 6850 @ $239 or so, 6870 @ $299 or so. Maybe I'm wrong, but I think that pricing would be awesome. I am also using 4-series intro pricing to reflect prices here, based on pcb design, etc. Cayman and Antilles will fill in those higher price points we see now...$379 for 6950, $439 for 6970 1GB, $499 6970 2GB and $579 for Antilles(6870x2).


I just made those numbers up, keep in mind.
 
Joined
May 30, 2007
Messages
9,019 (1.61/day)
System Name Black Panther
Processor i9 9900k
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO Wifi 1.0
Cooling NZXT Kraken X72 360mm
Memory 2 x 8GB Corsair Vengeance RGB Pro DDR4 3600Mhz
Video Card(s) Palit RTX2080 Ti Dual 11GB DDR6
Storage Samsung EVO 970 500GB SSD M.2 & 2TB Seagate Barracuda 7200rpm
Display(s) 32'' Gigabyte G32QC 2560x1440 165Hz
Case NZXT H710i Black
Audio Device(s) Razer Electra V2 & Z5500 Speakers
Power Supply Seasonic Focus GX-850 Gold 80+
Mouse Some Corsair lost the box forgot the model
Keyboard Motospeed
Software Windows 10
Joined
Jul 19, 2006
Messages
43,380 (7.32/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 5900x
Motherboard MSI x570s Carbon Max WiFi
Cooling Corsair AIO 360. Phantek T30 fans.
Memory 32GB G.Skill 3600Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 3070 Ti Trinity OC Watercooled
Storage SSD's
Display(s) MSI MAG322CQR
Case Lian Li PC 011 Dynamic
Audio Device(s) Schiit Modius DAC, SMSL SP200 amp. HiFiMan HE400i Headphones PreSonus Eris 4.5" monitors.
Power Supply Corsair H1000i
Mouse Razer Viper V2 Pro
Keyboard Fantech Maxfit 67
Software Windows 11
I think 6850 @ $239 or so, 6870 @ $299 or so.

I just made those numbers up, keep in mind.

I hope you are very, very wrong. That is a failure price point for cards that are supposed to "replace" a 5770 @ $175 (average) and a 5750 @ $137 (average)
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
1,018 (0.20/day)
Location
New York
System Name Filtration tower
Processor i9 7900@4.4ghz
Motherboard ASRock X299 Taichi
Cooling Air
Memory 64g 3200 quad channel
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 1080Ti
Storage 500gb Nvme, 200gb SSD, 1700gb HDD
Display(s) 34" Acer Predator 3440x1440
Case Thermaltake v71
Power Supply EVGA supernova 850 T2
thats what im thinking, got to be similar in price to 5700 series, here what's getting me excited, 2gb vram :0)
_____________________________

Antec1200 filter project
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,898 (1.97/day)
Location
Essex, England
System Name My pc
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory 16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage 2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s) Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply 650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard Generic mechanical keyboard
Software Windows ten
I wouldn't pay more than £150 for a 6870.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,210 (2.86/day)
I hope you are very, very wrong. That is a failure price point for cards that are supposed to "replace" a 5770 @ $175 (average) and a 5750 @ $137 (average)

I know. I hope I am wrong too. But my pricing makes sense at least a little, doesn't it? Like, let's ignore previous gen pricing.

And I think I am safe to say we can ignore the previous gen, because 5770 is going to stay in market. It is not possible to reduce it's current pricing much more, and hence it's positioning in the current lineup. Of course, if they have improved yields, it might be possible to reduce the cost down to $125 and $100, but it isn't going to go much lower than that. at that point, we might see 6850 slip into sub-$200 ranges.

IF they were introduced as 6770, instead of 6870, I'd hope for better, but the naming tells me something far different than most are expecting.

But heck, I'm using my own flawed logic here...:laugh:...I don't exactly have a great track record when it come to this sort of stuff as of late. :D
 

bear jesus

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2010
Messages
1,534 (0.35/day)
Location
Britland
System Name Gaming temp// HTPC
Processor AMD A6 5400k // A4 5300
Motherboard ASRock FM2A75 PRO4// ASRock FM2A55M-DGS
Cooling Xigmatek HDT-D1284 // stock phenom II HSF
Memory 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance // 4GB 1600mhz corsair vengeance low profile
Storage 64gb sandisk pulse SSD and 500gb HDD // 500gb HDD
Display(s) acer 22" 1680x1050
Power Supply Seasonic G-450 // Corsair CXM 430W
I know. I hope I am wrong too. But my pricing makes sense at least a little, doesn't it? Like, let's ignore previous gen pricing.

And I think I am safe to say we can ignore the previous gen, because 5770 is going to stay in market. It is not possible to reduce it's current pricing much more, and hence it's positioning in the current lineup. Of course, if they have improved yields, it might be possible to reduce the cost down to $125 and $100, but it isn't going to go much lower than that. at that point, we might see 6850 slip into sub-$200 ranges.

IF they were introduced as 6770, instead of 6870, I'd hope for better, but the naming tells me something far different than most are expecting.

But heck, I'm using my own flawed logic here...:laugh:...I don't exactly have a great track record when it come to this sort of stuff as of late. :D

:laugh: i do see your logic here but this is all getting so complicated, it looks like the 6870 is intended to beat our the 1gb 460 but i kinda think to beat it in sales it should cost about the same but perform better, not sure on the current 1gb 460 prices or what the prices were at launch, i would hope for the 6850 to be about the same as the 786mb 460 and the 6870 to be around the 1gb 460's launch prices... although i'm working on much more flawed logic as i dont have a clue what those prices were :laugh: darn 5am posting.
 
Top