• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon Pro Vega Graphics Coming to MacBook Pro Next Month

Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
84 (0.11/day)
Today Apple has introduced its new iPad Pro and has resurrected both the MacBook Air, now with Retina display, and the Mac mini. In addition to all these new announcements, there's another one the company didn't talk about at the event: an update for the MacBook Pro that will now feature AMD Radeon Pro Vega graphics chips. According to Apple, this will allow a 60% improvement in performance over the Radeon Pro 560X, the most powerful GPUs available to date for the MacBook Pro.

These professional-oriented chips are manufactured on a 14 nm process, this is not the 7 nanometer Vega 20 that's expected to be released later this year for the enterprise space. The GPU is codenamed "Vega 12" and comes with HBM2 memory, which helps reduce space requirements in a notebook, compared to traditional GDDR5 memory. Vega Pro 20 in the MacBook Pro has 20 CUs (1,280 shaders), Vega Pro 16 has 16 CUs (1,024 shaders). Both MacBook Pro configurations will be available on November 14th at a price yet to be determined.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Dec 12, 2016
Messages
152 (0.11/day)
You do know that the Radeon Vega Pro 20 is not the same as Vega 20 right? The Radeon Vega Pro 20 is 20x64 Stream processors (1280 total). Just like the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 64 in the iMac Pro are 3564 (56x64) and 4096 (64x64) stream processors. The Vega 20 at 7 nm is the full 4096 workstation class version with 32 GB of HBM2 that AMD has been teasing and is not in any Apple product yet.

I'm thinking the Radeon Vega Pro 20 with 1280 stream processors in this MBP upgrade has a 30-40 W TDP.

Edit: Oh and the Radeon Vega Pro 20 is probably a 12 nm FinFet process.
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2009
Messages
826 (0.19/day)
Processor Ryzen 9 3900X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 GB Ballistix Elite DDR4-3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 5700 XT Special Edition
Storage Sabrent Rocket NVMe 4.0 1TB
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q
Case Corsair Carbide 600Q
Power Supply Seasonic Prime 750W Titanium
Software Windows 10 Pro 64
So much for the story the other day claiming "Vega 20" would be the first 7 nm GPU, with a launch at the end of Q1.
 
Joined
May 3, 2016
Messages
88 (0.05/day)
These professional-oriented chips are manufactured on a 7 nm process
This is not true. You're confusing it with Vega 20 die codename for machine learning, the first 7nm GPU that will come to maker later this year as Lisa Su specified a few days ago.

This is Vega 20 SKU for consumers which is built on 14nm as it's specified on AMD's website. This was announced/teased as CES 2018.
 
Joined
Jan 13, 2018
Messages
156 (0.15/day)
System Name N/A
Processor Intel Core i5 3570
Motherboard Gigabyte B75
Cooling Coolermaster Hyper TX3
Memory 12 GB DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) MSI Gaming Z RTX 2060
Storage SSD
Display(s) Samsung 4K HDR 60 Hz TV
Case Eagle Warrior Gaming
Audio Device(s) N/A
Power Supply Coolermaster Elite 460W
Mouse Vorago KM500
Keyboard Vorago KM500
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores N/A
Wait what!? Vega 20 on Apple laptops!?
Then I read the comments... Now it makes sense
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
21,234 (3.52/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
Fixed
 

T4C Fantasy

CPU & GPU DB Maintainer
Staff member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
2,460 (0.79/day)
Location
Rhode Island
System Name Whaaaat Kiiiiiiid!
Processor Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z390 AORUS Ultra
Cooling Corsair H150i AIO Cooler
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum 32GB DDR4-3200
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce RTX 2080 Ti Triple Fan @ 2040MHz
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 512GB + Crucial MX300 512GB + OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
Display(s) 27" LG 27MU67-B 4K, + 27" Acer Predator XB271HU 1440P
Case Thermaltake Core X9 Snow
Audio Device(s) Logitech G935 Headset
Power Supply SeaSonic Platinum 1050W Snow Silent
Mouse Logitech G903 Lightspeed
Keyboard Logitech G915
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores FFXV: 19329
You do know that the Radeon Vega Pro 20 is not the same as Vega 20 right? The Radeon Vega Pro 20 is 20x64 Stream processors (1280 total). Just like the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 64 in the iMac Pro are 3564 (56x64) and 4096 (64x64) stream processors. The Vega 20 at 7 nm is the full 4096 workstation class version with 32 GB of HBM2 that AMD has been teasing and is not in any Apple product yet.

I'm thinking the Radeon Vega Pro 20 with 1280 stream processors in this MBP upgrade has a 30-40 W TDP.

Edit: Oh and the Radeon Vega Pro 20 is probably a 12 nm FinFet process.
its 14nm
 
Joined
Dec 27, 2013
Messages
887 (0.35/day)
Location
somewhere
So this is that baby Vega chip with a single stack of HBM2 memory, that was originally advertised as 'Vega Mobile'? Huh.
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,379 (1.16/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Didn't the macbook have overheating issues? Now it is gonna be even hotter thanks to Vega.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
8,107 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name _
Processor 8700K @ 5.1 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling 120mm Custom Liquid
Memory 32 GB 4000 Mhz DDR4 17-18-18-36-400 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s) GTX 2080 Ti (Undervolted OC 1925MHz)
Storage 3x1TB SSDs
Display(s) LG 49NANO85 - 49" 4K 120HZ NanoIPS
Case Jonsbo U4
Audio Device(s) Bose Solo
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Logitech GPro Wired
Keyboard Penclic C3
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
Didn't the macbook have overheating issues? Now it is gonna be even hotter thanks to Vega.
They've had massive throttling issues since Haswell - the last d gpu enabled mbp that didn't constantly throttle both the cpu and gpu was the Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge with the Nvidia 650/750m cards.

ever since then they've just been cramming hotter components in them (6 core gpu, higher wattage AMD gpus) and making the chassis slimmer with less airflow. I imagine these don't perform anywhere near spec.

I really feel sorry for the people that get to learn that after spending a few grand on one of these.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,113 (2.39/day)
Location
Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
So much for the story the other day claiming "Vega 20" would be the first 7 nm GPU, with a launch at the end of Q1.
You're (understandably, but still) confusing two different chips. Vega 20 is the rumored code name for an upcoming 7nm workstation/server/HPC focused full-fat desktop/server Vega die design, rumored to have at least 64CUs/4096SPs and four stacks of HBM2. This, the Vega Pro 20, is the marketing name (not code name) for a 20CU/1280SP product based on the Vega Mobile chip shown off at CES 2018. Similar names, but that's due to different naming conventions being in use. Apple seems to like the "count the CUs" naming scheme, while AMD gives chips code names from the arch name+XY, where X is the "generation" within the architecture and Y enumerates the order the chips were designed in (supposedly, though this seems a bit random - this seems to be codenamed Vega 12, so where is 11?).
 
Joined
Dec 5, 2017
Messages
64 (0.06/day)
Good design win for AMD. I wonder if this chip really only has 20 CUs. Seems kind of skimped, but I wouldn't be surprised if it performs exactly the same as the 24CU GPU in KBL-G given that this is actually legit Vega.

They've had massive throttling issues since Haswell - the last d gpu enabled mbp that didn't constantly throttle both the cpu and gpu was the Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge with the Nvidia 650/750m cards.

ever since then they've just been cramming hotter components in them (6 core gpu, higher wattage AMD gpus) and making the chassis slimmer with less airflow. I imagine these don't perform anywhere near spec.

I really feel sorry for the people that get to learn that after spending a few grand on one of these.
Yeah, apparently the new 6-core model is slower than the previous quad-core one, runs at 2.2GHz under full load. LOL

You're (understandably, but still) confusing two different chips. Vega 20 is the rumored code name for an upcoming 7nm workstation/server/HPC focused full-fat desktop/server Vega die design, rumored to have at least 64CUs/4096SPs and four stacks of HBM2. This, the Vega Pro 20, is the marketing name (not code name) for a 20CU/1280SP product based on the Vega Mobile chip shown off at CES 2018. Similar names, but that's due to different naming conventions being in use. Apple seems to like the "count the CUs" naming scheme, while AMD gives chips code names from the arch name+XY, where X is the "generation" within the architecture and Y enumerates the order the chips were designed in (supposedly, though this seems a bit random - this seems to be codenamed Vega 12, so where is 11?).
Vega 11 is Raven Ridge.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,113 (2.39/day)
Location
Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
Vega 11 is Raven Ridge.
Isn't that based on CU count, i.e. a marketing name?

Yeah, apparently the new 6-core model is slower than the previous quad-core one, runs at 2.2GHz under full load. LOL
Apparently they largely fixed the throttling issues of the latest generation through a firmware update. Still quite tragic that it launched in a barely-working state, but supposedly the throttling is not really an issue any longer.
 
D

Deleted member 158293

Guest
Indeed, Vega is extremely power efficient at lower clocks. It's actually a perfect fit in this "case" :laugh:
 
Joined
Sep 25, 2018
Messages
84 (0.11/day)
You're (understandably, but still) confusing two different chips. Vega 20 is the rumored code name for an upcoming 7nm workstation/server/HPC focused full-fat desktop/server Vega die design, rumored to have at least 64CUs/4096SPs and four stacks of HBM2. This, the Vega Pro 20, is the marketing name (not code name) for a 20CU/1280SP product based on the Vega Mobile chip shown off at CES 2018. Similar names, but that's due to different naming conventions being in use. Apple seems to like the "count the CUs" naming scheme, while AMD gives chips code names from the arch name+XY, where X is the "generation" within the architecture and Y enumerates the order the chips were designed in (supposedly, though this seems a bit random - this seems to be codenamed Vega 12, so where is 11?).
Thanks for the clarification, fixed now ;)

You do know that the Radeon Vega Pro 20 is not the same as Vega 20 right? The Radeon Vega Pro 20 is 20x64 Stream processors (1280 total). Just like the Radeon Pro Vega 56 and 64 in the iMac Pro are 3564 (56x64) and 4096 (64x64) stream processors. The Vega 20 at 7 nm is the full 4096 workstation class version with 32 GB of HBM2 that AMD has been teasing and is not in any Apple product yet.

I'm thinking the Radeon Vega Pro 20 with 1280 stream processors in this MBP upgrade has a 30-40 W TDP.

Edit: Oh and the Radeon Vega Pro 20 is probably a 12 nm FinFet process.
You're absolutely right, thanks for the info @Mark Little

You are correct. dmartin has no idea what he is talking about in his post.
Yup, I got that wrong, my bad. Lesson learned!
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
8,107 (1.70/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name _
Processor 8700K @ 5.1 24/7
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling 120mm Custom Liquid
Memory 32 GB 4000 Mhz DDR4 17-18-18-36-400 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s) GTX 2080 Ti (Undervolted OC 1925MHz)
Storage 3x1TB SSDs
Display(s) LG 49NANO85 - 49" 4K 120HZ NanoIPS
Case Jonsbo U4
Audio Device(s) Bose Solo
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Logitech GPro Wired
Keyboard Penclic C3
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
Isn't that based on CU count, i.e. a marketing name?


Apparently they largely fixed the throttling issues of the latest generation through a firmware update. Still quite tragic that it launched in a barely-working state, but supposedly the throttling is not really an issue any longer.
It isn't throttling anymore under "normal load" as they capped the wattage to the processor / enabled the regulator chip but as soon as you actually push the machine (or run Cinebench) it's still well below the average score for that processor.

Adding the additional heat of the GPU to that design is irresponsible. I'm curious to see the reviews of the top end model.

1541002771237.png


1541002819901.png


That's the score drop off on consecutive tests of cinebench - within 1-2 mins you become heat saturated and lose 10-15% performance - not even pushing that 560x.
 
Last edited:

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
16,589 (3.08/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name Black MC in Tokyo
Processor Ryzen 5 2600x
Motherboard Asrock B450M-HDV
Cooling AMD Wraith Spire I think
Memory 2 x 8GB G-skill Aegis 3000 or somesuch
Video Card(s) Powercolor Radeon HD 7850 2GB
Storage Kingston A400 240GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2 | Toshiba P300 2TB
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case Antec dumpster find
Audio Device(s) Line6 UX1 + slightly repaired Sony DR-ZX302
Power Supply Fractal Design Effekt 400W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Dell Sk3205
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
They've had massive throttling issues since Haswell - the last d gpu enabled mbp that didn't constantly throttle both the cpu and gpu was the Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge with the Nvidia 650/750m cards.

ever since then they've just been cramming hotter components in them (6 core gpu, higher wattage AMD gpus) and making the chassis slimmer with less airflow. I imagine these don't perform anywhere near spec.

I really feel sorry for the people that get to learn that after spending a few grand on one of these.
You mean throttling as in dropping below base clocks or throttling as in not running max turbo at all times? I've looked around quickly and I can't find much about this.

Nvm saw this.

It isn't throttling anymore under "normal load" as they capped the wattage to the processor / enabled the regulator chip but as soon as you actually push the machine (or run Cinebench) it's still well below the average score for that processor.

Adding the additional heat of the GPU to that design is irresponsible. I'm curious to see the reviews of the top end model.

View attachment 109661

View attachment 109662

That's the score drop off on consecutive tests of cinebench - within 1-2 mins you become heat saturated and lose 10-15% performance - not even pushing that 560x.
All laptops drops in performance these days.
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
3,113 (2.39/day)
Location
Lund, Sweden
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Biostar X370GTN
Cooling Custom CPU+GPU water loop
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ DDR4-3200 C16
Video Card(s) AMD R9 Fury X
Storage 500GB 960 Evo (OS ++), 500GB 850 Evo (Games)
Display(s) Dell U2711
Case NZXT H200i
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Lenovo Compact Keyboard with Trackpoint
Software Windows 10 Pro
All laptops drops in performance these days.
Yep, that's the nature of modern turbo schemes. Seeing how the net result overall is increased performance in a smaller package with better battery life at idle, I'm all for it. The new 4-core "15W" Intel chips easily pull >50W when turboing on all cores. Can't beat physics, after all. Still, if those few seconds far beyond TDP gets the work done, that's all we really need. Nothing wrong with thin-and-lights having worse sustained performance than bigger laptops, as they used to simply have worse performance all the time instead. At least now they're sufficiently fast for pretty much everything.
 
Top