Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by FrankWest, Oct 2, 2013.
IF. That's IF this is true it scored better than a GTX TITAN when it was released on a similar spec system.
Graphic Score: 10882
Graphic Score: 9913
Graphic Score: 9487
The amount of memory doesn't make sense though; only 3GB when it should be 4GB?
Core clock is wrong as well as VRAM.
Unless this is a 290 and not a 290X.
But I will just assume this is another broken and wrong and altogether unsubstantiated benchmark leak.
Aaaaand another one. 800Mhz clock
Dafuq, Alienware motherboard? These all smell wrong to me.
some one playing with the bios again lol ?.
Its a upgraded Dell machine
Alienware 07JNH0 Motherboard Specifications
I know where its from. I'm just confused as to why somebody who "supposedly" scored a sample and benched it, is running it in an alienware system. I expected hardware enthusiasts to build PC's, not buy overpriced ones from Dell.
Maybe its a Employees kid. Parent brought home a R9 290(X) and hes try'n to show it off.
Well if and I mean if this is a 290X then looks like I will have to build another computer.
amd did say it would beat the titan. Maybe thats why they took so long to release a card. And 800mhz clocks might mean it will be sold for less?
8th oct will be an important day,..i bet w1zz has had one for a while now.
Typically reviewers get cards with this kind of hype around them a few weeks before the NDA lifts, so the review can go out instantly on zero hour. We're two weeks away, so I have no doubt he has.
Hmmm, Another useless piece of misinformation.
If someone is risking posting pics of results, they should have some balls and post a pic of the card in their damn PC - then we'd believe them.
Anyone can fabricate bench marks.
I'll await the reviews.
64 ROPs confirmed
Separate names with a comma.