• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD Radeon R9 295 X2 8192 MB

Joined
Apr 4, 2008
Messages
4,659 (1.32/day)
Likes
1,009
System Name Obelisc
Processor i7 3770k @ 4.8 GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z77-V
Cooling H110
Memory 16GB(4x4) @ 2400 MHz 9-11-11-31
Video Card(s) GTX 780 Ti
Storage 850 EVO 1TB, 2x 5TB Toshiba
Case T81
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium HD
Power Supply EVGA 850 T2 80+ TITANIUM
Software Win10 64bit

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,546 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,908
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
Only one slot on mITX boards... and this is the only way to get Crossfire 290 in that form-factor. So yeah, just one. VGA will cost more than the rest of the rig combined. :p
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10

UaVaj

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
10 (0.01/day)
Likes
0
was recently posted in the wrong subforum and someone got soft. was told to repost here to get the answer.

this a 690 question regarding this review. NOT a question about - 295x2 nor 290x.

Review - 04/08/14 - AMD Radeon R9 295x2 8gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/9.html

*** shows 690 with 335.23 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 36.3 fps


Review - 03/04/14 - PowerColor r9 290x PCS+ 4gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_290X_PCS_Plus/9.html

*** shows 690 with 331.82 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 26.1 fps


what cause this 39% boost? typo error for 26.3fps?
what happen here? what is the correct value?
 
Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
2,817 (0.80/day)
Likes
604
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard Asrock Taichi
Cooling NH-C14
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 2 * Samsung 1 TB HD103UJ
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Corsair Obsidian 650D
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Logitech Performance MX
Software Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
was recently posted in the wrong subforum and someone got soft. was told to repost here to get the answer.

this a 690 question regarding this review. NOT a question about - 295x2 nor 290x.

Review - 04/08/14 - AMD Radeon R9 295x2 8gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/9.html

*** shows 690 with 335.23 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 36.3 fps


Review - 03/04/14 - PowerColor r9 290x PCS+ 4gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_290X_PCS_Plus/9.html

*** shows 690 with 331.82 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 26.1 fps


what cause this 39% boost? typo error for 26.3fps?
what happen here? what is the correct value?
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_290X_PCS_Plus/5.html
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/5.html

Notice the differences in the test setup for both reviews: that's the reason.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,150 (2.30/day)
Likes
3,813
Processor i5-3570K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 2TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Carbide 500R
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Windows 7 Ultimate
was recently posted in the wrong subforum and someone got soft. was told to repost here to get the answer.

this a 690 question regarding this review. NOT a question about - 295x2 nor 290x.

Review - 04/08/14 - AMD Radeon R9 295x2 8gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/9.html

*** shows 690 with 335.23 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 36.3 fps


Review - 03/04/14 - PowerColor r9 290x PCS+ 4gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_290X_PCS_Plus/9.html

*** shows 690 with 331.82 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 26.1 fps


what cause this 39% boost? typo error for 26.3fps?
what happen here? what is the correct value?
I had a couple of thoughts that I was going to pose to you yesterday.

What CPU are you using? The reason I ask is because BF4 is well known to be CPU intensive also. W1zzard used a i7 4770k @4.2 GHz. Perhaps in addition to the improved Nvidia drivers between tests there was also some further optimizations from Dice on the CPU side as well.

Another thing is, did you record your FPS in the exact same part of the game as W1zzard did in the 3/4 and 4/8 benchmarks? Dice could have done some tweaks in that area of the game that factored into these tests.

It's not possible to go back and rerun the benchmarks from 3/4 even with rolling back the drivers because we can't undo any optimizations that Dice has made since then and even if you could get W1zzard to rerun both benchmarks what difference would it make? I sense that you are frustrated with the performance of BF4 which is understandable because so many players are based on the posts all over the internet but getting W1zzard to say he made a typo, if he did, isn't going to alleviate your frustration. Right?
 

UaVaj

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
10 (0.01/day)
Likes
0
I have already jump ship. 290x x3 (the lesser evil) is on route and one of the 680 x3 is already sold. 780ti x3 was first choice but ruled out cause it is a stutter fest in BF4.
cannot say the same for other BF4 players who is less fortunate without the financial backing to also jump ship. do share their pain of not being able to enjoy BF4 like it was intended.

SLI is simply broken in BF4. I clearly did not see that 39% boost nor any amount of boost in any part of BF4.
39% is not exactly a testing margin of error. that is huge.

hence here asking if W1zzard made a typo.


cpu is a i7-3770k oc to 4.7GHz
 
Joined
Aug 26, 2013
Messages
954 (0.61/day)
Likes
385
Location
Cumberland Plateau
System Name EVGA-FX | Lenny (Lenovo Y480)
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.5GHz 1.416v | i7 3610qm
Motherboard Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE
Memory 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance @ 1600 | 8gb DDR3 @ 1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX780 Classified @ 1228MHz 1.615v | GT640m LE
Storage Crucial M500 480GB, WD Caviar Blue 500GB, WD Scorpio Blue 750GB | Samsung 250GB 840
Display(s) Qnix QX2710 1440p | 42" Vizio 3D LCD TV 1080p
Case CoolerMaster HAF XB Evo
Power Supply Seasonic G-650
Software Windows 6.3.9600
was recently posted in the wrong subforum and someone got soft. was told to repost here to get the answer.

this a 690 question regarding this review. NOT a question about - 295x2 nor 290x.

Review - 04/08/14 - AMD Radeon R9 295x2 8gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/AMD/R9_295_X2/9.html

*** shows 690 with 335.23 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 36.3 fps


Review - 03/04/14 - PowerColor r9 290x PCS+ 4gb
http://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/Powercolor/R9_290X_PCS_Plus/9.html

*** shows 690 with 331.82 with BF4 at 5760x1080 4xAA to be 26.1 fps


what cause this 39% boost? typo error for 26.3fps?
what happen here? what is the correct value?
Many patches and many driver updates have happened. They are both correct for the time in which they were published.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,150 (2.30/day)
Likes
3,813
Processor i5-3570K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 2TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Carbide 500R
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Windows 7 Ultimate
Patches have been updated. No doubt that you have noticed the improvement yourself as FX-GMC has pointed out. :D
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,150 (2.30/day)
Likes
3,813
Processor i5-3570K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB G.SKILL Ripjaws X
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 2TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Carbide 500R
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair HX750
Software Windows 7 Ultimate
I have already jump ship. 290x x3 (the lesser evil) is on route and one of the 680 x3 is already sold. 780ti x3 was first choice but ruled out cause it is a stutter fest in BF4.
cannot say the same for other BF4 players who is less fortunate without the financial backing to also jump ship. do share their pain of not being able to enjoy BF4 like it was intended.

SLI is simply broken in BF4. I clearly did not see that 39% boost nor any amount of boost in any part of BF4.
39% is not exactly a testing margin of error. that is huge.

hence here asking if W1zzard made a typo.


cpu is a i7-3770k oc to 4.7GHz
Well, post back here if you want to. There are a lot of BF4 players here that could possibly benefit from your experience. Maybe not 3X R9 290 crossfire. That's exotic...but interesting.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2010
Messages
132 (0.05/day)
Likes
15
Why the shitty frames in Diablo 3 ?
I was looking to upgrading my Videocard, and i was waiting for the dual AMD card for what is like 2 years now, only to find it lacks major time in the game i play the most.
Crossfire 290x seems to scale ok. Is this suppose to be fixed, or what is really wrong ?

How is diablo 3 really tested, can anyone clarify ?
 

Bitech

New Member
Joined
Apr 19, 2014
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Likes
1
Efficiency Drop.png
The reviewer kinda screwed up somewhere on measuring the power consumption of these cards. The lack of consistency of the games used in measuring performance and power consumption caused some of these cards' efficiency bars to go all over the place.

The patches might not be part of the problem; notice how to GTX 760, 780 and Titan greatly improved in efficiency, but the 770 and 780 Ti stayed the same.

And either half of the AMD cards have either improved slightly or severely dropped in efficiency.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
View attachment 56158
The reviewer kinda screwed up somewhere on measuring the power consumption of these cards. The lack of consistency of the games used in measuring performance and power consumption caused some of these cards' efficiency bars to go all over the place.
What also could have changed the paradigm:
Thief was part of the benchmark suite in one graph, and wasn't used in the other
Diablo III:RoS was part of the benchmark suite in one graph, and wasn't used in the other
Call of Juarez: Gunslinger was part of the benchmark suite in one graph, and wasn't used in the other
16 games were benchmarked in one graph, 15 in the other.
Driver improvements - Case in point, BF4 from both of the reviews you're pinpointing. Not huge framerate increases for some cards (GTX 690's SLI config excepted), but in marked in percentage to those cards that don't benefit.
 
Joined
Nov 23, 2013
Messages
259 (0.18/day)
Likes
63
Processor Intel i7-4770k
Motherboard ASUS MAXIMUS VI HERO
Cooling Deepcool GAMMAXX S40
Memory Kingston HyperX Beast Black 8gb @ 1600 cl8
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 670 POWER EDITION
Storage Samsung 840 EVO 250GB / WD Caviar Black 500GB
Display(s) BenQ XL2420T
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar U3
Power Supply FSP 650w
Thanks for review :lovetpu: .The video from noise test is very cool!
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2013
Messages
165 (0.11/day)
Likes
101
Location
Cyberdyne CPU Sky Net
hi bros i just have a question is possible make one tri crossfire of 295x , so i do ear some over the new standard CrossFireX XDMA was possible make a cross with more of 4 GPUS .. cheers i just have that doubt
 
Joined
Oct 26, 2011
Messages
3,121 (1.39/day)
Likes
892
Processor Ci7 5960X
Motherboard RVE
Cooling Triple Aquacomputer AMS 840 with D5
Memory Some random DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 Ti
Storage 960 EVO
Display(s) Dell U3011 2560x1600 + Dell 2408WFP 1200x1920 (Portrait)
Case Dimastech Bench EasyXL
Audio Device(s) Essence STX
Power Supply AX 1500i
Software Win10
I wouldn't even imagine the load of issues you'd be running into.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
17,043 (3.44/day)
Likes
17,903
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
View attachment 56158
The reviewer kinda screwed up somewhere on measuring the power consumption of these cards. The lack of consistency of the games used in measuring performance and power consumption caused some of these cards' efficiency bars to go all over the place.

The patches might not be part of the problem; notice how to GTX 760, 780 and Titan greatly improved in efficiency, but the 770 and 780 Ti stayed the same.

And either half of the AMD cards have either improved slightly or severely dropped in efficiency.
We switched from using Crysis 2 to Metro Last Light for typical gaming power consumption, also the list of games has changed.
 

Rejkt

New Member
Joined
Oct 7, 2014
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Likes
0
Hi, i recently made a rookie mistake, i bought this gpu, and this PSU http://www.overclockers.co.uk/showproduct.php?prodid=CA-025-SS, i had heard that seasonic were one of the best makes, and that it was a high voltage high cost psu, that it would defiantly be compatible with this GPU, i've just read online that the psu for this card needs to be able to handle 28amps in a single rail and was unsure if this psu was able to, can anyone ease my mind and tell me if this is the case or if i have purchased a psu that won't work like a moron, thankyou.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
9,946 (2.25/day)
Likes
2,309
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
It will be fine.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2013
Messages
61 (0.04/day)
Likes
6
System Name Biostar
Processor Intel i5 3470
Motherboard BIOSTAR TZ77A
Cooling Stock Intel Cooler
Memory 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws 1600 DDR3
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC ACX 2.0 3.5GB + 512MB of very slow.
Storage 1x Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB / 2x Segate Barracuda 7200.10 250 GB
Display(s) HP 2009m
Case Thermaltake Versa H22
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Thermaltake SP-650P 650Watt.
Mouse Logitech M185
Keyboard Logitech K270
Software Windows 10 Enterprise LTSB 64
Benchmark Scores Why waste my hardware and wear it out for a stupid score similar to everyone else's?
If I was to go all out with money on a GPU this would be the card I would get! The Nvidia cards like the Titan for example is over $1000 and not even as good as a regular R9 290X. So the R9 295X2 for under $800 would be what I would get. For under $800 this GPU puts Nvidia to shame with their overpricing. Not to mention Nvidia has nothing yet to offer that outperforms the 295X2. So the R9 295X2 is currently the fastest GPU in the world! I also love the water cooling and I love how it runs well under 70c. That is impressive. Nvidia may have slightly better efficiency but AMD once again beats them in top performance. Do not get me wrong I have owned many Nvidia cards and I like Nvidia cards. But AMD has more logical prices. And I do not care if I get a card that runs a few degrees warmer or uses a few more watts. That is meaningless anyway! You are only going to save about a dollar a year in electricity so I do not understand why anyone would buy a GPU based on using less wattage. Besides you are supposed to have a good quality PSU anyway. Unless you are dumb enough to buy a Alienware PC, But then they never have cards like this one, They are a ridiculous set up like a i7 4790K with a OEM GTX 645 LOL and a crap Hipro built PSU that will destroy the system not long after it messes up the bios causing it to have to be constantly reset.