• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon R9 Nano Review by TPU...Not

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
37,216 (8.59/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame GTX 1070 Ti Vulcan X
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590 28-inch 4K UHD
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Antec EarthWatts Pro Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Abyssus
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
There won't be a Radeon R9 Nano review on TechPowerUp. AMD says that it has too few review samples for the press. When AMD first held up the Radeon R9 Nano at its "Fiji" GPU unveil, to us it came across as the most promising product based on the chip, even more than the R9 Fury series, its dual-GPU variant, and the food-processor-shaped SFF gaming desktop thing. The prospect of "faster than R9 290X at 175W" is what excited us the most, as that would disrupt NVIDIA's GM204 based products. Unfortunately, the most exciting product by AMD also has the least amount of excitement by AMD itself.

The first signs of that are, AMD making it prohibitively expensive at $650, and not putting it in the hands of the press, for a launch-day review. We're not getting one, and nor do some of our friends on either sides of the Atlantic. AMD is making some of its tallest claims with this product, and it's important (for AMD) that some of those claims are put to the test. A validated product could maybe even convince some to reach for their wallets, to pull out $650.



Are we sourgraping? You tell us. We're one of the few sites that give you noise testing by some really expensive and broad-ranged noise-testing equipment, and more importantly, card-only power-draw. Our reviews also grill graphics cards through 22 real-world tests across four resolutions, each, and offer price-performance graphs. When NVIDIA didn't send us a GeForce GTX TITAN-Z sample, we didn't care. We didn't make an announcement like this. At $2,999, it was just a terrible product and we never wished it was part of our graphs. Its competing R9 295X2 could be had under $700, and so it continues to top our performance charts.

The R9 Nano, on the other hand, has the potential for greatness. Never mind the compact board design and its SFF credentials. Pull out this ASIC, put it on a normal 20-25 cm PCB, price it around $350, and dual-slot cooling that can turn its fans off in idle, and AMD could have had a GM204-killing product. Sadly, there's no way for us to test that, either. We can't emulate an R9 Nano on an R9 Fury X. The Nano appears to have a unique power/temperature based throttling algorithm that we can't copy.

"Fiji" is a good piece of technology, but apparently, very little effort is being made to put it into the hands of as many people as possible (and by that we mean consumers). This is an incoherence between what AMD CEO stated at the "Fiji" unveil, and what her company is doing. It's also great disservice to the people who probably stayed up many nights to get the interposer design right, or sailing through uncharted territory with HBM. Oh well.

View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 10, 2015
Messages
230 (0.16/day)
Location
Sol system, ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
System Name The Yellow Box
Processor AMD K5 100
Motherboard Intel 5DVX0130
Cooling A snazzy stock cooler
Memory 64MB EDO SIMM
Video Card(s) ATI Mach 64 4MB + Creative Voodoo 8MB
Storage IBM 1.6GB IDE + IBM 3.2GB IDE
Display(s) 15" AOC CRT (Terrible, terrible POS)
Case Cheapo Yellow Box
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster
Power Supply No name 200W
Mouse Microsoft IntelliMouse
Keyboard Cherry G80
Software Windows 98Se
So let me get this straight. They don't even have enough cards for reviews and at the same time expect us to believe we will be able to buy them shortly!? Sound a lot like a bunch of BS.

I’m having less and less of faith in anything AMD related. :(
 
Joined
Oct 8, 2012
Messages
1,373 (0.55/day)
Location
Canada
Processor Intel Core i5 3570K @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77X UD5H
Cooling Antec H20 920
Memory Corsair Dominator Platinum DDR3 4x4GB 2000mhz 9-11-10-24 CR-1
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 970 SC
Storage Crucial M500 240Gb/Seagate Barracuda 2TB
Display(s) LG 29UM67 2560x1080 75hz IPS
Case Coolermaster Masterbox 5
Audio Device(s) Creative X-FI Titanium + Sennheiser GSP500
Power Supply Corsair TX850
Mouse Logitech G502 Proteus Spectrum
Keyboard Logitech G513 Tactile
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Lisa Su needs to be replaced ASAP, AMD's decent has only been accelerated by her appointment.
 
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
19 (0.01/day)
Processor I7 4770k
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 16 gigs
Video Card(s) MSI 390x 8gb
Storage 1tb SSD, 2 512gb in raid 0
Display(s) ASUS MG279Q Black 27" IPS 144Hz
Power Supply 1000w
Mouse Death Adder
Keyboard Microsoft Gaming keyboard thingy
I haven't seen a review for this yet. They may actually be in that short of supply due to the fury, fury x, and the nano all using HBM. I wouldn't take it so personally that you weren't able to get one right away.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
11,290 (4.09/day)
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.5Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair H100i V2
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) Sapphire AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 SSD Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB, 1x512GB Samsung 960 Pro NVMe
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 18.04 (5.2.3 Mainline Kernel)
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
Are we sourgraping?
I think AMD's own rhetoric speaks for itself. No, I don't think you are. If AMD's yields are so bad that they can't even give TPU one for a review (something the AMD PR machine would typically be all over if the claims were true,) then there must only be enough to sell to the uninformed public. This tells me what I think I already knew before, that Fiji was not ready for production and isn't seemingly a huge leap over what already existed. Honestly, I see this as AMD back peddling and hoping to sell some of them before reviews can come out before people realize how slow the card really is in comparison to their claims.

You know, I like AMD's products (usually.) It's why I got a 390, and 6870s before it but, this rhetorical nonsense has to end and it ends with factual information and reviews provide that.

If they don't have enough GPUs for reviews, then they don't have enough to sell IMHO. This smells of desperation and it irritates me.
 
Joined
Mar 13, 2014
Messages
3,926 (1.98/day)
Processor i7 7700k
Motherboard MSI Z270 SLI Plus
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 980 Ti GAMING
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 250 GB and WD Black 4TB
Display(s) ASUS 27 inch 1440p PLS PB278Q
Case Corsair Obsidian 750D Airflow Edition
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova 850 W Gold
Mouse Logitech G502
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10
AMD doesn't have enough Nano for samples for even the larger sites to review? Horse shit. They do. I suspect they don't want them thoroughly tested and found to not be worth $650. They want to sell as many as possible before word gets out.
 
Joined
Apr 29, 2014
Messages
3,818 (1.97/day)
Location
Texas
System Name SnowFire / The Reinforcer / Portable?
Processor i7 8700K 5.0ghz (24/7) / 2x Intel Xeon X5670 / Intel i7 7700HQ
Motherboard Asus Z370 Prime-A / Dell Dual Socket (R710) / HP Omen Stock
Cooling RX 360mm + 140mm Custom Loop in Push Pull Config. / Dell Stock / HP Stock
Memory Corsair Vengeance RGB 16gb DDR4 3000 CL 16 / 1333mhz DDR3 96gb 12 x 8gb / 12gb DDR4 3 x 4gb
Video Card(s) GTX Titan XP (2025mhz) / Asus GTX 950 (No Power Connector) / RX 580
Storage Samsung 512gb SSD RAID 0 and 2tb HDD x4 RAID 5 / 300gb x8 RAID 5 / NVME 240gb SSD and 1tb HDD
Display(s) Acer XG270HU 1440p 144hz Freesync, Acer B286HK 4K UHD Monitor / 1080p 60hz Freesync display
Case Corsair Obsidian 800D / Dell Poweredge R710 Rack Mount Case / HP Omen 17
Audio Device(s) Realtec ALC1150 (On board)
Power Supply Rosewill Lightning 1300Watt
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G19S
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows Server 2008 R2 / Windows 10 Home
Wow, that few that they cannot even send out review samples (or at least one to TPU). That says they are in very short supply which could also mean they are making the Fury Nano a low priority. It could also be that they are not only having to deal with HBM yields, but the Fiji core yields that are at the level they are willing to use them on the Nano.
 

manofthem

WCG-TPU Team All-Star!
Joined
Jan 9, 2011
Messages
10,898 (3.47/day)
Location
Florida
System Name crunchBox | officeBox
Processor Ryzen 1600X @3.7 | i7 4770k @4.3
Motherboard AsRock X370 Taichi | MSI Z87 G45
Cooling Water | Water
Memory 16GB G Skill Ripjaws V 2800 | G Skill TridentX 8GB 2400
Video Card(s) GTX 980 SC ACX2.0 | R9 290
Storage ADATA SX700 512GB | 850 Evo 250GB
Display(s) LG 34UC88 & QNIX WX2710 | Shimian Achieva QH270-Lite
Case Fractal Design S | Corsair 900D
Audio Device(s) Siberia v2 | onboard
Power Supply SeaSonic 660XP2 | Corsair AX1200
Mouse Logitech G900 | M50 Division Zero
Keyboard Das Keyboard 4 Pro | Cougar Attack X3
Software Windows 10 Pro | Windows 10 Pro
That's just lame and horrible! :shadedshu:
 

Midgetguy

New Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2015
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
Bad choice IMO. With high-end GPU purchases on the rise again (slightly) and the progression of people wanting smaller but equally powerful rigs, AMD should be getting this thing out to EVERYONE. As much coverage as possible to show off how capable and complete of a rig someone can have using a mATX or Mini-ITX system powered by their new Nano.
 

TheGameTechnician

New Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2015
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
I haven't seen a review for this yet. They may actually be in that short of supply due to the fury, fury x, and the nano all using HBM. I wouldn't take it so personally that you weren't able to get one right away.
I would. AMD specifically told press they were using the buffer between the Nano reveal last week and the review embargo to "bulk up" on supply to prevent any shortages. If they can't even get a sample to TPU, that's a serious problem.

By the way, one major AIB only had 2 Fury samples to go around between the US and Canada. So I'm inclined to fear the worst unfortunately.
 

OneMoar

There is Always Moar
Joined
Apr 9, 2010
Messages
7,852 (2.30/day)
Location
Rochester area
System Name RPC MK2
Processor Intel Core i5 9600K@ 4.8Ghz 1.32V
Motherboard Asrock z390 phantom gaming 4
Cooling Enermax ets-t50
Memory CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 16GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 2060 XC ULTRA GAMING
Storage 512GB Intel 545s ssd 500GB ADATA SU800 ssd 1TB WD blue
Display(s) Cheap VA panel
Case Phanteks P300
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply HX 750i
Mouse M65 Pro RGB
Keyboard K70 RGB
Software Windows 10 +startisback
and yet people will still ride the hype train
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
25,117 (6.34/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire NITRO+ RX 590 Special Edition 8 GiB DVI + HDMI
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Samsung SyncMaster T240 24" LCD (1920x1200 HDMI) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW 19" LCD (1440x900 DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
:shadedshu:

^ picture is worth 1000 words.
 
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
911 (0.44/day)
System Name BlueKnight
Processor Intel Celeron G1610 @ 2.60GHz
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PH (rev. 1.0)
Memory 1x 4GB DDR3 @ 1333MHz (Kingston KVR13N9S8/4)
Video Card(s) Onboard
Storage 1x 160GB (Western Digital WD1600AAJS-75M0A0)
Display(s) 1x 20" 1600x900 (PHILIPS 200VW9FBJ/78)
Case μATX Case (Generic)
Power Supply 300W (Generic)
Software Debian GNU/Linux 8.7 (jessie)
Well, this is shocking. I thought reviewers bought each card with their own resources. :confused:

Anyway, I do not see a problem. The only problem I see is on AMD's side. :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
427 (0.11/day)
Location
You are here.
System Name Prometheus
Processor Intel i7 4930K
Motherboard Asus P9X79
Cooling Noctua NH-D14
Memory Crucial Ballistix Quad Channel 64GB DDR3 1.35V
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 970 4GB
Storage 2 x Intel 330 240GB + 4 x 2TB WD Green
Display(s) AMH A409U 4K
Case Intertech AP1
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster X-Fi Xtreme Audio PCIe
Power Supply Seasonic X660
Mouse Razer Death Adder 2013
Keyboard Vortexgear Race 3 (MX Brown)
Software Microsoft Windows 10 Pro x64
Naaah... they have enough cards for reviews. They just don't want unbiased reviews. AMD continues to amaze me. In a bad way. Fanboys to the rescue!
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,643 (0.69/day)
Location
KL, Malaysia
System Name Rainbow RTX 240
Processor Intel Core i5-7600K (stock)
Motherboard ASUS PRIME H270M-PLUS mATX
Cooling Corsair Hydro H55 AIO + 3 x HD120 RGB w/ Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 2400MHz (2 x 8GB kits, Black)
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 6GB Twin Fan (stock)
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD | Patriot Burst 960GB 2.5in SSD
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp U2417H 24-inch 1080p IPS
Case Corsair Carbide Air 240 SFF mATX (Black) + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (2)
Audio Device(s) ASUS XONAR DX PCIe Sound Card
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB (White) + MM800 Polaris RGB Mouse Mat
Keyboard Corsair STRAFE RGB Mechanical (Gen 1 Cherry MX RGB Red switches)
Software Windows 10 Professional x64 May Update. (v1903)
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Time Spy: 7294 (Graphics Score) 3DMark Fire Strike: 18104 (Graphics Score)
What is AMD afraid of anyways? Where's the sample unit for major reviewing sites like TPU? Are you (AMD) worry that unbiased benches & real world testing proved too much for your so-called "new GPU?"
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
1,875 (0.48/day)
System Name Computer
Processor 1700X
Motherboard CH6
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory G.Skill 32GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1070
Storage 500GB Samsung 850 Evo Msata
Display(s) LG 23" IPS
Power Supply Seasonic 760 Platinum
Software Windows 8.1 64-Bit
Designs GPU-Z but doesn't get video cards to review... :wtf:
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
586 (0.30/day)
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard AsRock 970 PRO3 R2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra120 eXtreme + 2 LED Green fans
Memory 2 x 4096 MB DDR3-1333 A-Data
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE 4096M R9 FURY X 4G D5
Storage ST1000VX000 • SV35.6 Series™ 1000 GB 7200 rpm
Display(s) Acer S277HK wmidpp 27" 4K (3840 x 2160) IPS
Case Cooler Master HAF 912 Plus Black + Red Lights
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek
Power Supply OCZ ProXStream 1000W
Mouse Genius NetScroll 100X
Keyboard Logitech Wave
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
TPU is mostly NEGATIVE to AMD. Just look at GPU-Z which is mostly dominated by nvidia-only features and look that W1zzard doesn't even care to add Boost support for AMD cards.

Those typos in AMD reviews don't help either.

I fully support AMD in this decision. It is perfectly just.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2013
Messages
1,643 (0.69/day)
Location
KL, Malaysia
System Name Rainbow RTX 240
Processor Intel Core i5-7600K (stock)
Motherboard ASUS PRIME H270M-PLUS mATX
Cooling Corsair Hydro H55 AIO + 3 x HD120 RGB w/ Commander PRO
Memory Corsair Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4 2400MHz (2 x 8GB kits, Black)
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX2060 6GB Twin Fan (stock)
Storage Samsung 960 EVO 250GB M.2 PCIe SSD | Patriot Burst 960GB 2.5in SSD
Display(s) Dell Ultrasharp U2417H 24-inch 1080p IPS
Case Corsair Carbide Air 240 SFF mATX (Black) + Lighting Node PRO RGB LED Strips (2)
Audio Device(s) ASUS XONAR DX PCIe Sound Card
Power Supply Corsair RM750x 80 Plus Gold Fully Modular
Mouse Corsair M65 RGB (White) + MM800 Polaris RGB Mouse Mat
Keyboard Corsair STRAFE RGB Mechanical (Gen 1 Cherry MX RGB Red switches)
Software Windows 10 Professional x64 May Update. (v1903)
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Time Spy: 7294 (Graphics Score) 3DMark Fire Strike: 18104 (Graphics Score)
1st of all, R9 Nano has an absurd price tag ($650), 2ndly, with that money, you can either buy a perfectly overclocked 980Ti with custom cooler, backplate & the ability to play 4K games without breaking a sweat OR 2 overclocked GTX970 in SLI to tackle 4K resolution for less. If TPU's testing methodology is proved as "100% unbiased, no BS", then something is holding AMD back. GPU-Z has nothing to do with being biased with Nvidia as AMD cards do not have shaders or a Boost profile as they're thermal-limited speeds unlike Nvidia, which as of GPU Boost 2.0 protocol, has a ceiling limit of 82C & will hit at ANY frequency so long it doesn't reach the ceiling limit, in which custom cooled cards can go more than 1.2GHz with stock settings. AMD cards however are thermally throttled based on temps, not loads so they do not have a proper/solid Boost profile. If your AMD card reaches 80C, it throttles down a lot to keep it cool, which is not good for consistent performance.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,347 (1.32/day)
TPU is mostly NEGATIVE to AMD. Just look at GPU-Z which is mostly dominated by nvidia-only features and look that W1zzard doesn't even care to add Boost support for AMD cards.

Those typos in AMD reviews don't help either.

I fully support AMD in this decision. It is perfectly just.
You're fully supporting knowing less about a product through a detailed review.

That's very clever. Just tell me why you decided to sign up to TPU again?
 
Top