• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT Tested on Z490 Platform With Resizable BAR (AMD's SAM) Enabled

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
3,658 (1.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 MAG TOMAHAWK
Cooling Lian Li Galahad 360mm AIO
Memory 32 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3733 (4x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3070 Ti
Storage Boot: Transcend MTE220S 2TB, Kintson A2000 1TB, Seagate Firewolf Pro 14 TB
Display(s) Acer Nitro VG270UP (1440p 144 Hz IPS)
Case Lian Li O11DX Dynamic White
Audio Device(s) iFi Audio Zen DAC
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ 750 W
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
AMD's recently-introduced SAM (Smart Access memory) feature enables users pairing an RX 6000 series graphics card with a Ryzen 5000 series CPU to take advantage of a long-lost PCIe feature in the form of its Resizable Bar. However, AMD currently only markets this technology for that particular component combination, even though the base technology isn't AMD's own, but is rather included in the PCIe specification. It's only a matter of time until NVIDIA enables the feature for its graphics cards, and there shouldn't be any technical problem on enabling it within Intel's platform as well. Now, we have results (coming from ASCII.jp) from an Intel Z490 motherboard (ASUS ROG Maximus XII EXTREME) with firmware 1002, from November 27th, paired with AMD's RX 6800 XT. And SAM does work independently of actual platform.

Paired with an Intel Core i9-10900K, AMD's RX 6800 XT shows performance increases across the board throughout the test games - which are games AMD themselves have confirmed SAM is working with. This means testing was done with Assassin's Creed Valhalla, Forza Horizon 4, Red Dead Redemption 2, and Rainbow Six Siege. The results speak for themselves (SAM results are the top ones in the charts). There are sometimes massive improvements in minimum framerates, considerable gains in average framerates, and almost no change in the maximum framerates reported for these games on this given system. Do note that the chart for Forza Horizon 4 has an error, and the tested resolution is actually 1440p, not 1080p.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,851 (1.85/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
Those are some great increases in minimum frame rates, I wonder what this will do to reviews in the next few months as it rolls out?
 
Joined
Nov 18, 2010
Messages
5,632 (1.39/day)
Location
Rīga, Latvia
System Name HELLSTAR
Processor AMD RYZEN 5950X
Motherboard ASUS Strix X570-E
Cooling Custom Loop. Two 360ies + 280 rad. 8x Nidec Servo Gentle Typhoons. EK-Quantum Momentum monoblock.
Memory 4x8GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3000MHz 15-15-15-36 CR1[16-18-18-32-50;TRFC560@3200MHz]]
Video Card(s) ASUS 1080 Ti FE + water block
Storage Optane 900P + Samsung PM981 NVMe 1TB + 750 EVO 500GB
Display(s) Philips PHL BDM3270 + Acer XV242Y
Case Phanteks Enthoo Evolv ATX Tempered Glass
Audio Device(s) Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Fractal Design Newton R3 1000W
Mouse Razer Basilisk
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow V3 - Yellow Switch
Software Windows 11 insider
Red Dead min FPS increase is spectacular.
 
Joined
Feb 21, 2006
Messages
1,295 (0.22/day)
Location
Toronto, Ontario
System Name The Expanse
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-Pro BIOS 4021 AM4 AGESA V2 PI 1.2.0.3 Patch C
Cooling Corsair H150i Pro
Memory 32GB Gskill Trident RGB DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34-1T
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT 16GB
Storage Corsair MP600 1TB PCIe 4 / Samsung 860Evo 1TB x2 Raid 0 / Asus NAS AS1004T V2 14TB
Display(s) LG 34GP83A-B 34 Inch 21: 9 UltraGear Curved QHD (3440 x 1440) 1ms Nano IPS 160Hz
Case Fractal Design Meshify S2
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi + Logitech Z-5500
Power Supply Corsair AX850 Titanium
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RGB
Keyboard Logitech G810
Software Windows 10 Pro x64 21H2
Benchmark Scores 3800X https://valid.x86.fr/1zr4a5 5800X https://valid.x86.fr/2dey9c
This looks good.

Even if the improvement was only in Minimum frame rates that matters the most as you feel that over avg and the high fps.
 
Joined
Jul 12, 2017
Messages
11 (0.01/day)
Location
North of the Wall
It'd be ironic if the feature were to be unlocked on Intel motherboards without the user having to own a 5000 series AMD CPU.

Hopefully this will "encourage" AMD to unlock the feature on relevant motherboards, regardless of CPU installed.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Messages
804 (1.15/day)
Location
Maryland, USA
Processor Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling CPU: bequiet! Dark Rock 4. Case fans: 2x bequiet Silent Wings 3 140s, 2x Silent Wings 3 120s
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000 C15
Video Card(s) Sapphire NITRO+ RX 5700 XT
Storage 500 GB Samsung 860 Evo, 1 TB WD Blue 3D M.2, 1 TB Inland Professional
Display(s) MSI Optix MAG271CQR 1440p 144Hz, MSI Optix MAG241C 1080p 144Hz
Case Fractal Design Meshify C Black
Audio Device(s) Philips SHP9500 + V-Moda BoomPro
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 80+ Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Mamba Wireless
Keyboard CoolerMaster Masterkeys Pro S - Cherry MX Browns
Hopefully this will "encourage" AMD to unlock the feature on relevant motherboards, regardless of CPU installed.
This. If it's part of the PCIe spec, why is it being limited to only the most recent hardware? I'd like a boost for my 2600/5700XT
 
D

Deleted member 197223

Guest
I would love for someone to compare wattage usage to before and after. Because I too can unlock more performance for "free" by increasing the power limit to 110% on my GPU.

All I can find on PCIe 4.0 is that as quoted from pretty much the same source across the board that "The increased power limit instead refers to the total power draw of expansion cards. PCIe 3.0 cards were limited to a total power draw of 300 watts (75 watts from the motherboard slot, and 225 watts from external PCIe power cables). The PCIe 4.0 specification will raise this limit above 300 watts, allowing expansion cards to draw more than 225 watts from external cables."

I can't find any real evidence if PCIe 4.0 allows you to pull more than 75 watts from the slot or not. Anyone please prove me I'm wrong and people aren't just remaining things in order to avoid being sued.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
1,027 (0.32/day)
System Name Gentoo64 /w Cold Coffee
Processor 9900K 5.2GHz 1.304v Raystorm Pro
Motherboard EVGA Z370 mATX
Cooling GTX360 + MCR120-XP, EK-XRES
Memory 2x16GB TridentZ 3900-C15-2T 1.45v
Video Card(s) RTX 3080 Bykski Eagle
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 500GB, 860 QVO 2TB
Display(s) CU34G2X UW-QHD, Predator XB1 QHD
Case FT03-T mATX
Audio Device(s) SBz
Power Supply SS-850KM3
Mouse G502
Keyboard G710+
Software Gentoo/Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Always only ever very fast
I like consistency.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
1,129 (0.21/day)
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
System Name Just another PC
Processor Ryzen 1700
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-AX370-K3
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14
Memory DDR4-2133 2x16GB
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 8GB
Storage Samy 960 EVO 500GB m.2, 1TB SSD & a 2TB spinner
Display(s) LG 27UL550-W
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 (no window)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 550W
Mouse Mionix Naos 8200
Keyboard Corsair Strafe with browns
Software W10 Pro x64 v2004
Benchmark Scores Wife says it's fast
Red Dead min FPS increase is spectacular.

Indeed. It’s in Vulcan though so would DX be the same? Also does that indicate there might be something not optimized in Vulcan or a driver??
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
712 (0.39/day)
Red Dead min FPS increase is spectacular.

It's impossible for the gains to be so high. This has to be an measuring error (possibly a single dip during the test). Probably the test was only performed once per graph, which is a big "no no" when benchmarking ...

// edit: yeah, I should definitely had read the source - they performed the test 3 times. The last sentence is incorrect, but I'm standing behind everything else I have written.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
5,820 (2.15/day)
Location
SE Michigan
System Name Dumbass
Processor AMD-9370BE @4.6
Motherboard ASUS SABERTOOTH 990FX R2.0 +SB950
Cooling CM Nepton 280L
Memory G.Skill Sniper 16gb DDR3 2400
Video Card(s) GreenTeam 1080 Gaming X 8GB
Storage C:\SSD (240GB), D:\Seagate (2TB), E:\Western Digital (1TB)
Display(s) 1x Nixeus NX_EDG27, 2x Dell S2440L (16:9)
Case Phanteks Enthoo Primo w/8 140mm SP Fans
Audio Device(s) onboard (realtek?) SPKRS:Logitech Z623 200w 2.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1000i
Mouse Logitech G604
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spark
Software windows 10
Benchmark Scores https://i.imgur.com/aoz3vWY.jpg?2
a long-lost PCIe feature

This was too funny.

"did you see my keys anywhere?"
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
9,658 (1.55/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
I would love for someone to compare wattage usage to before and after. Because I too can unlock more performance for "free" by increasing the power limit to 110% on my GPU.

All I can find on PCIe 4.0 is that as quoted from pretty much the same source across the board that "The increased power limit instead refers to the total power draw of expansion cards. PCIe 3.0 cards were limited to a total power draw of 300 watts (75 watts from the motherboard slot, and 225 watts from external PCIe power cables). The PCIe 4.0 specification will raise this limit above 300 watts, allowing expansion cards to draw more than 225 watts from external cables."

I can't find any real evidence if PCIe 4.0 allows you to pull more than 75 watts from the slot or not. Anyone please prove me I'm wrong and people aren't just remaining things in order to avoid being sued.

Do you even understand how this works? It has nothing to do with extra power. Also how would the card know that the slot can deliver more power than the PCIe spec? And In this case, we're looking at a PCIe 3.0 motherboard with a PCIe 3.0 CPU, so can you please explain your flawed logic here?
This works by allowing the CPU to utilize the full amount of memory on the GPU, rather than just having access to a limited part of it. As such, more data can be shuffled between the two, which leads to increased performance.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
1,129 (0.21/day)
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
System Name Just another PC
Processor Ryzen 1700
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-AX370-K3
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14
Memory DDR4-2133 2x16GB
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 8GB
Storage Samy 960 EVO 500GB m.2, 1TB SSD & a 2TB spinner
Display(s) LG 27UL550-W
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 (no window)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 550W
Mouse Mionix Naos 8200
Keyboard Corsair Strafe with browns
Software W10 Pro x64 v2004
Benchmark Scores Wife says it's fast
I would love for someone to compare wattage usage to before and after. Because I too can unlock more performance for "free" by increasing the power limit to 110% on my GPU.

All I can find on PCIe 4.0 is that as quoted from pretty much the same source across the board that "The increased power limit instead refers to the total power draw of expansion cards. PCIe 3.0 cards were limited to a total power draw of 300 watts (75 watts from the motherboard slot, and 225 watts from external PCIe power cables). The PCIe 4.0 specification will raise this limit above 300 watts, allowing expansion cards to draw more than 225 watts from external cables."

I can't find any real evidence if PCIe 4.0 allows you to pull more than 75 watts from the slot or not. Anyone please prove me I'm wrong and people aren't just remaining things in order to avoid being sued.

My clothes dryer uses 5500W. That’s all the plug can supply. ;)
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
9,658 (1.55/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
It's impossible for the gains to be so high. This has to be an measuring error (possibly a single dip during the test). Probably the test was only performed once per graph, which is a big "no no" when benchmarking ...
Why is it impossible? If you're going to make a claim like that, then you better back it up with some facts.
It's minimum FPS we're talking her, so say there's some kind of bug in the game, that gets a work around by enabling a wider "memory interface" between the CPU and GPU, why wouldn't we see a huge jump in performance for the minimum FPS?
Obviously I'm just speculating here, but you didn't even do that, you just said it's impossible or that the tester made a mistake. The latter is highly unlikely, as ASCii Japan doesn't do blunders like that, the journalists working there are not some n00bs.
Also, the average FPS is only up around 9fps, which seems to be in line with the other games tested. As such, I still believe that we're seeing som game related issues that got a workaround by enabling the resizable bar option.
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2009
Messages
3,505 (0.75/day)
System Name Money Hole
Processor Core i7 970
Motherboard Asus P6T6 WS Revolution
Cooling Noctua UH-D14
Memory 2133Mhz 12GB (3x4GB) Mushkin 998991
Video Card(s) Sapphire Tri-X OC R9 290X
Storage Samsung 1TB 850 Evo
Display(s) 3x Acer KG240A 144hz
Case CM HAF 932
Audio Device(s) ADI (onboard)
Power Supply Enermax Revolution 85+ 1050w
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Logitech G710+
Software Windows 10 Professional x64
Indeed. It’s in Vulcan though so would DX be the same? Also does that indicate there might be something not optimized in Vulcan or a driver??
It's impossible for the gains to be so high. This has to be an measuring error (possibly a single dip during the test). Probably the test was only performed once per graph, which is a big "no no" when benchmarking ...

It's because RDR2 will stutter every once in a while when playing in window borderless mode. In full screen, Vulkan does not have this issue and DX does not have this issue in either mode.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2020
Messages
804 (1.15/day)
Location
Maryland, USA
Processor Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC
Cooling CPU: bequiet! Dark Rock 4. Case fans: 2x bequiet Silent Wings 3 140s, 2x Silent Wings 3 120s
Memory 2 x 8 GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000 C15
Video Card(s) Sapphire NITRO+ RX 5700 XT
Storage 500 GB Samsung 860 Evo, 1 TB WD Blue 3D M.2, 1 TB Inland Professional
Display(s) MSI Optix MAG271CQR 1440p 144Hz, MSI Optix MAG241C 1080p 144Hz
Case Fractal Design Meshify C Black
Audio Device(s) Philips SHP9500 + V-Moda BoomPro
Power Supply EVGA SuperNOVA G3 80+ Gold 750W
Mouse Razer Mamba Wireless
Keyboard CoolerMaster Masterkeys Pro S - Cherry MX Browns
It's because RDR2 will stutter every once in a while when playing in window borderless mode. In full screen, Vulkan does not have this issue and DX does not have this issue in either mode.
So why would that be remedied with BAR enabled? Or are you suggesting that they ran the "SAM off" test in borderless and then the "SAM on" test in fullscreen?
 
D

Deleted member 197223

Guest
Do you even understand how this works? It has nothing to do with extra power. Also how would the card know that the slot can deliver more power than the PCIe spec? And In this case, we're looking at a PCIe 3.0 motherboard with a PCIe 3.0 CPU, so can you please explain your flawed logic here?
This works by allowing the CPU to utilize the full amount of memory on the GPU, rather than just having access to a limited part of it. As such, more data can be shuffled between the two, which leads to increased performance.

Ahh yes I completely forgot that the ASUS ROG Maximus XII EXTREME is a PCIe 3.0 board my bad. Same goes for the CPU. I'm sorry I forgot to take that into consideration, therefor making the board useless for Rocket Lake as well by not being able to utilize PCIE 4.0 either. Thank you for pointing that out. Now I can go back to making food. And once again, thank you for pointing out the flaw in my logic. Now I know that I won't be buying a ASUS ROG Maximus XII EXTREME because it'll never support PCIe 4.0.

My clothes dryer uses 5500W. That’s all the plug can supply. ;)

And I like potatoes. ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
802 (0.49/day)
System Name Blackbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Asus TUF B550-Plus WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill FlareX 3200Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 3060 Ti Gaming Z
Storage Kingston KC3000 1TB + WD SN550 1TB
Display(s) LG 27GP850-B
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G305
Keyboard MasterKeys Pro S White (MX Brown)
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores It plays games.
This is very interesting. And as this feature is neither limited to PCI4 or some magic in the CPU, I hope AMD goes back and enables this across the Zen range.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
9,658 (1.55/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Ahh yes I completely forgot that the ASUS ROG Maximus XII EXTREME is a PCIe 3.0 board my bad. Same goes for the CPU. I'm sorry I forgot to take that into consideration. Therefor making the board useless for Comet Lake as well by not being able to utilize PCIE 4.0 either. Thank you for pointing that out. Now I can go back to making food. And once again, thank you for pointing out the flaw in my logic. Now I know that I won't be buying a ASUS ROG Maximus XII EXTREME because it'll never support PCIe 4.0.

Eh? Once the new CPUs are out next year, this board should support PCIe 4.0, but only for the x16 slot and possibly for one M.2 slot, depending on their design.
Also, I don't know what this has to do with anything, as the test that was performed was on PCIe 3.0 and that's what we're discussing here, if I'm not mistaken?
 
D

Deleted member 197223

Guest
Eh? Once the new CPUs are out next year, this board should support PCIe 4.0, but only for the x16 slot and possibly for one M.2 slot, depending on their design.
Also, I don't know what this has to do with anything, as the test that was performed was on PCIe 3.0 and that's what we're discussing here, if I'm not mistaken?
But you just said that it's a PCIe 3.0 motherboard so that's preposterous!
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
9,658 (1.55/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,851 (1.85/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
But you just said that it's a PCIe 3.0 motherboard so that's preposterous!


I don't know what you are on about, but it has NOTHING to do with the very relevant topic at hand, maybe have a snack or juice box and come back to it later. Let me try and spell out what this improvement does, and does NOT do.

1) SAM and PCIe 3 or4 spec has piss all to do with what you are suggesting.
2) SAM does NOT increase the power the GPU can use.
3) SAM DOES allow the CPU to push more data to the GPU at once instead of being limited by the prior frame buffer "window"

Imagine if the GPU needed 2Gb of data from the system memory, previously it had to be sent in lets say 32MB chunks, then the GPU had to manage moving it all around after it was there and mapped into the GPU memory address space. While the GPU waits for texture data that doesn't arrive in the first load its waiting, causing lag, lower frame rates, stutters.

PCIe spec allows for larger data chunks to be pushed, but no one implemented it, maybe it was overlooked, maybe drivers for GPUs and other devices would have faults if it were enabled, maybe the timing choice was made to ease CPU load and prevent buffer overflows.

Modern GPU's and CPU's are able to handle DMA transfers, and with the increased core counts maybe we have finally reached the point where the performance loss from larger transfers or GPU's being able to directly access the system memory and the driver running on the CPU managing it is providing the increased performance.

Maybe the balance between the driver checking to see if its faster meant that more coding for every scenario out there made it more difficult and could lead to unpredictable results.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
712 (0.39/day)
Why is it impossible? If you're going to make a claim like that, then you better back it up with some facts.
It's minimum FPS we're talking her, so say there's some kind of bug in the game, that gets a work around by enabling a wider "memory interface" between the CPU and GPU, why wouldn't we see a huge jump in performance for the minimum FPS?
Obviously I'm just speculating here, but you didn't even do that, you just said it's impossible or that the tester made a mistake. The latter is highly unlikely, as ASCii Japan doesn't do blunders like that, the journalists working there are not some n00bs.
Also, the average FPS is only up around 9fps, which seems to be in line with the other games tested. As such, I still believe that we're seeing som game related issues that got a workaround by enabling the resizable bar option.

You have multiple graphs where the difference is a few percentages and then one which increases three times - obviously this is a large red flag. If enabling Resizable BAR triggers something in the driver which makes it work correctly and FPS to be more stable, this doesn't mean that Resizable BAR improves the minimum FPS three times. First you wait for AMD to fix the drivers so they work properly, and then test again. If AMD can't fix the drivers, then your theory is obviously correct and resizable BAR can also fix game bugs.

Also, you don't just publish min FPS results for the obvious outlier, as this will raise questions (everyone that has ever done benchmarking will be skeptical of the results ...). You publish frametime graphs, which explain in detail what changed when Resizable BAR got turned on. Isn't it obvious? It doesn't seem to be for them ...
 
Last edited:
Top