• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Raven Ridge Ryzen 5 2500U with Vega Graphics APU Geekbench Scores Surface

Raevenlord

News Editor
Staff member
Joined
Aug 12, 2016
Messages
2,646 (2.48/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name The Ryzening
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7 GHz
Motherboard MSI X370 Gaming Pro Carbon
Cooling Arctic Cooling Liquid Freezer 120
Memory 16 GB G.Skill Trident Z F4-3200 (2x 8 GB)
Video Card(s) TPU's Awesome MSI GTX 1070 Gaming X
Storage Boot: Crucial MX100 128GB; Gaming: Crucial MX 300 525GB; Storage: Samsung 1TB HDD, Toshiba 2TB HDD
Display(s) LG 29UM68P (21:9 2560x1080 FreeSync Ultrawide)
Case NOX Hummer MC Black
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DX
Power Supply Seasonic M12II Evo 620W 80+
Mouse Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Keyboard Cooler Master Masterkeys Lite L
Software Windows 10 x64
A Geekbench page has just surfaced for AMD's upcoming Raven Ridge APUs, which bring both Vega graphics and Ryzen CPU cores to AMD's old "the future is Fusion" mantra. The APU in question is being tagged as AMD's Raven Ridge-based Ryzen 5 2500U, which leverages 4 Zen cores and 8 threads (via SMT) running at 2.0 GHz with AMD's Vega graphics.

According to Geekbench, the Ryzen APU scores 3,561 points in the single-core score, and 9,421 points in the multi-core score. Compared to AMD's A12-9800, which also leverages 4 cores (albeit being limited to 4 threads) running at almost double the frequency of this Ryzen 5 2500U (3.8 GHz vs the Ryzen's 2 GHz), that's 36% better single-core performance and 48% better multi-core performance. These results are really fantastic, and just show how much AMD has managed to improve their CPU (and in this case, APU) design over their Bulldozer-based iterations.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
1,805 (0.59/day)
Still waiting for Ryzen equivalent of E-450 APU. It'll probably come last I'm suspecting... But it'll probably be well worth the waiting.
maybe we will see Ryzen 3 APUs at some point filling the niche of E-450 for entry level notebooks.
 
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
7,311 (2.09/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
System Name New Ho'Ryzen
Processor Ryzen 1700X @ 3.82Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling TR Le Grand Macho & custom GPU loop
Memory 16Gb G.Skill 3200 RGB
Video Card(s) RTX 2080ti MSI Duke @2Ghz ish
Storage Samsumg 960 Pro m2. 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Lian Li PC-V33WX
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic Prime TItanium 850
Software W10
Benchmark Scores Look, it's a Ryzen on air........ What's the point?
How does the APU's Vega core compare with past APU's? Can it run demanding 1080p games at 30fps?

If so, that'd be pretty cool.
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2016
Messages
645 (0.67/day)
System Name Unimatrix
Processor Intel i9-9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard ASRock x390 Taichi Ultimate
Cooling Custom Loop
Memory 32GB GSkill TridentZ RGB DDR4 @ 3400MHz 14-14-14-32
Video Card(s) EVGA 2080 with Heatkiller Water Block
Storage 2x Samsung 960 Pro 512GB M.2 SSD in RAID 0, 1x WD Blue 1TB M.2 SSD
Display(s) Alienware 34" Ultrawide 3440x1440
Case CoolerMaster P500M Mesh
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850W
Keyboard Corsair K75
Benchmark Scores Really Really High
What about compared to Intel Iris?
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
1,562 (0.80/day)
How does the APU's Vega core compare with past APU's? Can it run demanding 1080p games at 30fps?

If so, that'd be pretty cool.
Which Ryzen APU do you mean? These are mobile apus thus they will be power constrained. GFXBench has some preliminary Opengl numbers, but then again are they from final product or something else.
 
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
1,154 (0.48/day)
How does the APU's Vega core compare with past APU's? Can it run demanding 1080p games at 30fps?

If so, that'd be pretty cool.
Considering nobody has seen the core, nobody knows.

What Is known in that bulldozer APUs sucked HARD. Bristol ridge barely gets over 11GB/s bandwidth from 2400MHz memory, which is hypothetically capable of 34GB/s. this had to feed both the CPU and GPU. Their CPU cores were also unable to keep near full boost, meaning CPU performance was pathetic. The current bristol ridge APU is twice as fast as a 620 equipped intel CPU, yet it is also known that the GPU is running at less then half capacity. A 384 core 64 bit GCN chip is 40-60% faster then a 512 core desktop APU right now.

So assuming that AMD keeps the 512 core design, but uses ryzen CPU and memory controller, expect big boosts. Even a 256 core ryzen APU would be faster then AMDs current 512 core parts. Hypothetically, they have a 704 core GPU in the works for APUs.

My guess would be 512 core at 15 watt and 704 core for 35 watt and desktop parts.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,328 (2.06/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.

MirXD

New Member
Joined
Sep 14, 2017
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
a mobile soc that beats the current gen Desktop APU. damn.
 
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
656 (0.44/day)
Location
Renton, WA
Intel graphics suck, no matter how hard they try, they suck.

Intel sucks at video rendering, upscaling, enhancements. Intel sucks at 3D graphics, great processors for the longest time, but their graphics suck as well.

http://www.anandtech.com/show/11538/the-microsoft-surface-pro-2017-review-evolution/5

Essentially any 7 year old midrange card or 5 year old entry level discreet card will kick it's ass.

That's also a mobile variant in a 15W ultra low-power dual-core... Not really giving a fair shake to look at a throttled mobile chip and compare it to discrete options with 5x the power envelope.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,186 (1.58/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R3 1200 @ 3900MHz / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard MSI B350M PRO-VDH / HP 240 G5
Cooling Wraith Stealth / Stock
Memory 2x 4GB Corsair Ballistix Sport DDR4 2400MHz @ 3000MHz / 2x 4GB Hynix + Kingston DDR3L 1600MHz
Video Card(s) Sapphire R9 270X Toxic 2GB / Intel HD 5500
Storage SSD WD Green 240GB M.2 / SSD Kingston A400 120GB SATA
Display(s) HP w17e 1440x900 @ 75 Hz / Integrated 1366x768 @ 94Hz
Case Generic / Stock
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892 / Realtek ALC282
Power Supply Sentey XPP 525W / Power Brick
Mouse Banghó MOUSE-PRO-1600 / Elan Touchpad
Keyboard Generic / Stock
Software Windows 10 LTSC x64 + Arch Linux
Benchmark Scores Time Spy: 2200
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,328 (2.06/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
That's also a mobile variant in a 15W ultra low-power dual-core... Not really giving a fair shake to look at a throttled mobile chip and compare it to discrete options with 5x the power envelope.

The Pro 4 shown with a 930M chip has *somewhat* higher graphical performance with the same normalized battery life and thus close to the same exact power consumption from a two year older setup. Try again?
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
656 (0.44/day)
Location
Renton, WA
The Pro 4 shown with a 930M chip has much higher graphical performance with the same normalized battery life and thus close to the same exact power consumption from a two year older setup. Try again?
The 930M is also a 33W (2x the afforded power envelope) chip, thus capable of higher performance flags? Measuring battery life doesn't tell you how much power the GPU is using since it's almost never running into a scenario to turbo, but the higher power envelope reinforces the idea that the 930M is less restricted than the Iris Plus 640.

This would be a more level comparison. With 35-45W to play with Intel can pack a much more potent iGPU.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
15,783 (3.23/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Cherry MX-Board 3.0
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
Intel graphics suck, no matter how hard they try, they suck.
Eh, the Iris Pro is the fastest IGP avaliable. The problem is that it's only avaliable in $400 CPUs.

.

What Is known in that bulldozer APUs sucked HARD.
Honestly I don't think they did, depending on the model. The problem was they were almost exclusively used in power starved laptops with gimped memory so everyone has a bad experience from them. Yeah the CPU side was miles behind Intel but there was compelling APUs that would offer good all around performance ... if anyone would base a system around them. You could make decent small machines with some of their FM2+ APUs.

Also there's managing expectations. Obviously a dedicated used GPU will be faster and probably cheaper, but still.
 
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
4,159 (1.10/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Fractured puke.
Processor Intel I7-8700k/G4400/AMD 2200g/Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard MSI z370 Gaming M5/h110/ AMD a320/ AMD B450-ASRock pro 4 atx
Cooling Corsair H110i/Intel/AMD/H60
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ 3200MHZ/8gb 2133mhz/8gb 2400mhz/8gb Viper 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 1070ti/integrated/apu/rx570
Storage 960 EVO 500gb/256gb WD Black 2280 M2/Patriot Ignite 480gb SSD/ Inland Pro 256gb SSD/Patriot Scorch-&
Display(s) AOC 32" QHD/Acer 32" QHD/ ViewSonic 24" FHD/ TV
Case Fractal Design Meshify-C/ Rosewill FBM-01/ Rosewill FBM-01/Sigma eclipse
Audio Device(s) creative audigy/nboard/ onboard/inboard
Power Supply Seasonic/TT/TT/Cooler Master white80+ 500w
Mouse Red Dragon/red dragon/Razer/Razer
Keyboard Razer Deatstalker/red dragon RGB/Red Dragon 502/Razer
Software Windows 10Pro x64///
I want the 7850k version of Zen and the V.

How does the APU's Vega core compare with past APU's? Can it run demanding 1080p games at 30fps?

If so, that'd be pretty cool.
Exactly...
The best I could do I was 1366x768 on high details on most games 30fps with a 7850k @4.4Ghz core 975Mhz gfx with DDR3 2.4Ghz

I would be extatic if they could do 1080p medium details @30fps.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
656 (0.44/day)
Location
Renton, WA
Honestly I don't think they did, depending on the model. The problem was they were almost exclusively used in power starved laptops with gimped memory so everyone has a bad experience from them. Yeah the CPU side was miles behind Intel but there was compelling APUs that would offer good all around performance ... if anyone would base a system around them. You could make decent small machines with some of their FM2+ APUs.
HP's ProBook 645 was one of a few good implementations. It had Richland series APUs and with the top configuration of an A10-5750M it was honestly a damn good 14-inch travel laptop with some gaming chops for older titles. Pulled about 56W from the wall and had between 4-6 hours battery life.

Support for dual-channel DDR3-1866 helped tremendously.
 

Frick

Fishfaced Nincompoop
Joined
Feb 27, 2006
Messages
15,783 (3.23/day)
Location
Piteå
System Name A dancer in your disco of fire
Processor i3 4130 3.4Ghz
Motherboard MSI B85M-E45
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Evo
Memory 4 x 4GB Crucial Ballistix Sport 1400Mhz
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 760 DCU2OC 2GB
Storage Crucial BX100 120GB | WD Blue 1TB x 2
Display(s) BenQ GL2450HT
Case AeroCool DS Cube White
Power Supply Cooler Master G550M
Mouse Intellimouse Explorer 3.0
Keyboard Cherry MX-Board 3.0
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores I once had +100 dorfs in DF, so yeah pretty great
Joined
Mar 14, 2009
Messages
4,159 (1.10/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Fractured puke.
Processor Intel I7-8700k/G4400/AMD 2200g/Ryzen 5 1600
Motherboard MSI z370 Gaming M5/h110/ AMD a320/ AMD B450-ASRock pro 4 atx
Cooling Corsair H110i/Intel/AMD/H60
Memory 16GB G.Skill TridentZ 3200MHZ/8gb 2133mhz/8gb 2400mhz/8gb Viper 3000mhz
Video Card(s) Nvidia GTX 1070ti/integrated/apu/rx570
Storage 960 EVO 500gb/256gb WD Black 2280 M2/Patriot Ignite 480gb SSD/ Inland Pro 256gb SSD/Patriot Scorch-&
Display(s) AOC 32" QHD/Acer 32" QHD/ ViewSonic 24" FHD/ TV
Case Fractal Design Meshify-C/ Rosewill FBM-01/ Rosewill FBM-01/Sigma eclipse
Audio Device(s) creative audigy/nboard/ onboard/inboard
Power Supply Seasonic/TT/TT/Cooler Master white80+ 500w
Mouse Red Dragon/red dragon/Razer/Razer
Keyboard Razer Deatstalker/red dragon RGB/Red Dragon 502/Razer
Software Windows 10Pro x64///
95 watts worth of Zen and Vega would be neat.
That's what my intentions were when I bought my current Mobo...
It's a MSI 350 gaming pro.
At least I hope they use AM4 for those APU's...
I kinda want my Ryzen 5 1400/ Vega APU...
 

Thalles Adorno

New Member
Joined
Jun 19, 2017
Messages
6 (0.01/day)
The 930M is also a 33W (2x the afforded power envelope) chip, thus capable of higher performance flags? Measuring battery life doesn't tell you how much power the GPU is using since it's almost never running into a scenario to turbo, but the higher power envelope reinforces the idea that the 930M is less restricted than the Iris Plus 640.

This would be a more level comparison. With 35-45W to play with Intel can pack a much more potent iGPU.
Well, I can give your answer. I have an i5 5675C with the iGPU Iris pro 6200. The difference is very low when running it at 12W versus running it at 30W (factory setting). I had major problems with temps and had to downclock it, not much of a difference
 
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
656 (0.44/day)
Location
Renton, WA
Well, I can give your answer. I have an i5 5675C with the iGPU Iris pro 6200. The difference is very low when running it at 12W versus running it at 30W (factory setting). I had major problems with temps and had to downclock it, not much of a difference
For the sake of pedantry, that iGPU is a different process and µarch. The iGPU in Skylake/Kaby is quite a bit better.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,328 (2.06/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
The 930M is also a 33W (2x the afforded power envelope) chip, thus capable of higher performance flags? Measuring battery life doesn't tell you how much power the GPU is using since it's almost never running into a scenario to turbo, but the higher power envelope reinforces the idea that the 930M is less restricted than the Iris Plus 640.

This would be a more level comparison. With 35-45W to play with Intel can pack a much more potent iGPU.
While I can't disagree that at very low resolutions and settings it seems to work fine, at 1080 it fell flat on its face consistantly compared to a 40W higher device the Zbox Magnus 970, which offered a minimum of 2X the performance at 1080 and usually much more than that. So are we talking about playing a game on a screen with terrible resolution and only basic settings? I have Iris in my new laptop Im posting this on, tried steam for a few games and hated it so much I went back to my phone.

My phone can play the games at 1080 (GTA3 for example) with HDMI interface to my TV or DLNA and offers the same performance in these light weight games, as do most tablets, again rendering the Intel graphics virtually pointless from a 3D standpoint.

The 640 vs the 930M the normalized power consumption shows very minor difference, and the only real difference was the size of batteries installed in the two devices.
 
Joined
Mar 16, 2017
Messages
499 (0.59/day)
Location
Tanagra
System Name Mac Pro 4,1 > 5,1
Processor Intel Xeon W3690
Memory 16GB DDR3 ECC
Video Card(s) MSI Radeon RX 580 Armor 8GB OC
Storage Kinston 480GB SSD
Display(s) LG 27UL500-W
Case Cheese Grater
Audio Device(s) My ears
Software Mojave
I am looking forward to what AMD can do with this next gen APU. The previous attempt was severely lacking in CPU performance, and even then the architecture liked as much memory bandwidth as you could give it. Between having a Ryzen base and DDR4 to work with, I expect good results at 1080P, especially from a 95W desktop version.
 
Joined
May 30, 2015
Messages
656 (0.44/day)
Location
Renton, WA
Broadwell, Skylake, Kaby Lake, and Coffee Lake are all 14 nm.
Right my mistake. Iris Pro 5200 is still built on 22nm, but Iris Pro 6200 is 14nm. They did update the µarch for Skylake's iGPU still.
 
Top