• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD Readies Radeon R7 250X to Seal the Gap Between R7 250 and R7 260X

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,335 (9.22/day)
Likes
17,427
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#1
AMD is working on a new SKU to seal the price-performance gap between the Radeon R7 250 and the R7 260. Called the Radeon R7 250X, the chip is said to be based on the 28 nm "Oland" silicon, and could feature a stream processor count of 640, with 40 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and a 128-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, holding 1 GB or 2 GB of memory. The GPU is said to be clocked around 1.00 GHz, and memory around 4.50 GHz (72 GB/s). VideoCardz scored pictures of two of the first R7 250X graphics cards, branded by Sapphire and ASUS. AMD will slip the R7 250X into the channel rather quietly. It's already showing up on European retailers for around €90 (incl. VAT).

Show full news post
 
Joined
Sep 6, 2013
Messages
1,185 (0.76/day)
Likes
572
Location
Athens, Greece
System Name 3 systems: Gaming/Internet/HTPC
Processor 1075T @ 3.7GHz, undervolted @ 1.32V /1055T @ 3.5GHz, undervolted @ 1.27V/A6 5400K
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990XA-UD3/ASRock 970 Extreme3 R2.0/ASUS FM2+
Cooling CoolerMaster TX3 (2fans)/Zalman CNPS9500 (Nvidia version)/CoolerMaster
Memory 16GB Adata 2133MHz/16GB DDR3 Kingston 2400MHz/8GB Corsair 1600MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS HD7850 2GB /Gigabyte GT620/FM2 iGPU
Storage OCZ ARC 100 + HDDs/Samsung 840 EVO + HDDs/OCZ Agility 3
Display(s) Samsung LE32D550 32'' TV(2 systems connected)/LG 42''
Case Sharkoon Rebel 12/Sharkoon Rebel 9/Xigmatek Midguard
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply 850W Chieftec/560W Cheieftec/400W
Mouse CoolerMaster/Rapoo/Logitech
Keyboard CoolerMaster/Microsoft/Logitech
Software Windows 10 64bit TP + Windows 7 64bit + Windows XP (triple boot,stupidity all over the drives)
#3
The gap wasn't there when 77X0 cards where in the market. But noooooooooooooooooo. ONCE MORE TIME that AMD had an advantage in a market decided to eliminate that advantage by replacing 77X0 series with 240 and 250 that where more expensive and worst performing. MORONS.
 
Joined
Feb 2, 2011
Messages
533 (0.21/day)
Likes
246
System Name Salamander
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.9ghz 1.418v
Motherboard Asrock X370 Taichi
Cooling EK Supremacy Evo | Black Ice Nemesis 360GTS XFlow | 120 GTS | P/P Cougar Vortex - Noiseblockers
Memory Team T-Force Xtreem 2x8GB DDR4 3733 @ 3400mhz 14-14-14-30-52 1T
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 Mini 8GB GDDR5X @ stock
Storage Galax Gamer L 240GB SSD | Crucial M4 128GB SSD | WD Blue 1TB HDD
Display(s) LG 27MP68VQ 27" 1920x1080 75hz IPS Freesync monitor
Case Fractal Design Define C
Audio Device(s) onboard
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Gold 650w
Mouse Steelseries Kana White
Keyboard Steelseries 6GV2 Cherry MX Black
Software Windows 10 Pro N
#4
can this possibly work in tandem with the A10-7850k in dual crossfire mode?
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
378 (0.16/day)
Likes
79
#5
can this possibly work in tandem with the A10-7850k in dual crossfire mode?
It would, but uneven crossfire setups are only double the speed of the weaker of the two cards. Example: if you crossfire an r9 270 and 270x, it would basically run like 2 r9 270 cards. Here, the a10 would be the slower card. A crossfire with a 240 or 250 would make more sense considering those have closer stream processor numbers.
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
420 (0.13/day)
Likes
121
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#6
640 GCN cores at 28nm. So, a 7770 then?
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
20 (0.01/day)
Likes
0
#7
Please change the title to :

AMD Readies Radeon R7 250X out of fear of the new GTX 750 Ti and GTX 750
 
Joined
Nov 1, 2008
Messages
420 (0.13/day)
Likes
121
System Name It does stuff
Processor AMD FX-8320
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A-DS3
Cooling Antec Kuhler 620 + Fans Everywhere
Memory 16GB Crucial 1600Mhz DDR3
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 580 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, Seagate Barracuda 3TB
Display(s) Viewsonic VX2757, AOC 2243W
Case Antec Three Hundred Version Two
Audio Device(s) ASUS Xonar DG PCI / Sony MDR-XB500s
Power Supply EVGA 600W
Mouse Redragon Phoenix
Keyboard Steelseries Apex Raw
Software Win10 64 Professional
#8
Please change the title to :

AMD Readies Radeon R7 250X out of fear of the new GTX 750 Ti and GTX 750
Are you 14?
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
378 (0.16/day)
Likes
79
#9
haha no kidding, AMD has dominated low and med end GPU market for the last several years. I don't think they have anything to "fear" Besides, most people on these forums think the 750 will be a dud and a bad replacement for the 650ti boost.
 
Joined
Oct 29, 2012
Messages
1,888 (1.01/day)
Likes
742
Location
CZ
System Name TITAN Slayer / CPUCannon / MassFX
Processor i7 5960X @ 4.6Ghz / i7 3960x @5.0Ghz / FX6350 @ 4.?Ghz
Motherboard Rampage V Extreme / Rampage IV Extreme / MSI 970 Gaming
Cooling Phanteks PHTC14PE 2.5K 145mm TRs / Custom waterloop / Phanteks PHTC14PE + 3K 140mm Noctuas
Memory Crucial 2666 11-13-13-25 1.45V / G.skill RipjawsX 2400 10-12-12-34 1.7V / Crucial 2133 9-9-9-27 1.7V
Video Card(s) 3 Fury X in CF / R9 Fury 3840 cores 1145/570 1.3V / Nothing ATM
Storage 500GB Crucial SSD and 3TB WD Black / WD 1TB Black(OS) + WD 3TB Green / WD 1TB Blue
Display(s) LG 29UM67 80Hz/Asus mx299q 2560x1080 @ 84Hz / Asus VX239 1920x1080 @60hz
Case Dismatech easy v3.0 / Xigmatek Alfar (Open side panel)
Audio Device(s) M-audio M-track / realtek ALC 1150
Power Supply EVGA G2 1600W / CoolerMaster V1000 / Seasonic 620 M12-II
Mouse Mouse in review process/Razer Naga Epic 2011/Razer Naga 2014
Keyboard Keyboard in review process / Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2014/Razer Blackwidow Ultimate 2011
Software Windows 7 Ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate / Windows 7 ultimate
Benchmark Scores cinebench 15.41 3960x @ 5.3ghz Wprime32m 3.352 3960x @ 5.25ghz Super PI 32m: 6m 42s 472ms @5.25ghz
#11
It would, but uneven crossfire setups are only double the speed of the weaker of the two cards. Example: if you crossfire an r9 270 and 270x, it would basically run like 2 r9 270 cards. Here, the a10 would be the slower card. A crossfire with a 240 or 250 would make more sense considering those have closer stream processor numbers.
Crossfire has 0 care about if the cards run at the same speed which is why it had such crap frame pacing because it let the cards run as fast as possible resulting in the stronger card pushing more frames than the weak one and getting an imbalanced frame time. The pacing is now fixed but the cards will still run as fast as possible.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
378 (0.16/day)
Likes
79
#12
What I was saying is that when crossfire is working well, having the better card will not help. In games that crossfire doesn't work well, obviously the better card will help.
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2011
Messages
378 (0.16/day)
Likes
79
#13
$130 for a 7850k + $100 for the 250x + $80 8GB ram + $50 for itx case with p/s + $80 mother board
+ $160 for HDD and blu-ray drive = $600 or less for a pc that is damn close to an xbox one especially with mantle.

not bad
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#14
It would, but uneven crossfire setups are only double the speed of the weaker of the two cards. Example: if you crossfire an r9 270 and 270x, it would basically run like 2 r9 270 cards. Here, the a10 would be the slower card. A crossfire with a 240 or 250 would make more sense considering those have closer stream processor numbers.
R7 250 = 7850K iGPU - 128 cores
R7 250X = 7850K iGPU + 128 cores...
So... !?

Anyway, I would have much liked a new card with 512 GCN 1.1 cores, 1-2GB 64bit @ 5GHz+ GDDR5, 720 to 1100MHz core clock, that would be more or less advertised and specifically enhanced in the drivers to work with a the (soon the release) A10-7800 and A10-7850K... AND and be a low-profile card AS REFERENCE But it seems AMD doesn't want to grasp the idea of having proper dual-graphics/hybrid CF soulutions...

I imagine such a setup (+ proper RAM and a good mATX/mITX board) would make a beastly HTPC/gaming box/SteamMachine, on the cheap.


Exactly a 7770, or a cut-down bitcairn die based on the GCN 1.1 arch.
Yeah, but the memory clock doesn't make much sense, it has almost twice the cores as R7 250 but 100MHz/1,2GB/s slower memory... WAT. Straight up rebrand?