1. Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Readying Phenom II X4 965

Discussion in 'News' started by btarunr, Jun 27, 2009.

Page 1 of 5
  1. Jun 27, 2009 at 10:34 AM #1
    btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    32,476 (9.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,387
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    Following its roadmap, AMD is continuing with new processor releases based on the Deneb core with increases in the multiplier. The Phenom II X4 965 comes with a clock speed of 3.40 GHz, and an FSB multiplier of 17.0x, giving it a 200 MHz increase over the 955 Black Edition. It is not known if 965 comes in a Black Edition branding, one which could determine its pricing. If launched as a Black Edition (version with unlocked bus multiplier), It could either be priced above the 955, or could displace it and position itself at US $249.99. Without the BE branding it could be priced slightly lower. The new chip will be based on the AM3 package, supporting DDR3 1333 MHz and DDR2 1066 MHz. It comes at a time when AMD is releasing the RS880-based AMD 785G chipset. AMD will dispatch samples of the Phenom II X4 965 starting next week.

    Source: Tweaktown
     
  2. Jun 27, 2009 at 10:37 AM #2
    Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    45,251 (10.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,486
    Location:
    Australalalalalaia.
    3.4Ghz stock clocks is pretty impressive.
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  3. Jun 27, 2009 at 10:43 AM #3
    btarunr

    btarunr Editor & Senior Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2007
    Messages:
    32,476 (9.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    16,387
    Location:
    Hyderabad, India
    I'm hearing that the C2 revision-stepping of Deneb can allow making SKUs till 3.80 or even 4.00 GHz safely, maybe the higher clocked ones scraping the 140W TDP mark. I can't confirm this though.
     
    WarEagleAU says thanks.
  4. Jun 27, 2009 at 10:44 AM #4
    Mussels

    Mussels Moderprator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2004
    Messages:
    45,251 (10.34/day)
    Thanks Received:
    12,486
    Location:
    Australalalalalaia.
    AMD might well come ahead of intel here, at least until i5 comes out.... (i7 is too expensive, AM3 will definately have more bang per buck compared to that)
     
    10 Year Member at TPU
  5. Jun 27, 2009 at 10:56 AM #5
    Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,355 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    519
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
    I hope this is Black Edition. It looks positively tasty.
     
  6. Jun 27, 2009 at 11:07 AM #6

    lepra24 New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2007
    Messages:
    49 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    4
    Location:
    Romenia
    Yes Amd :pimp:
     
  7. Jun 27, 2009 at 11:16 AM #7
    MRCL

    MRCL

    Joined:
    May 31, 2008
    Messages:
    5,795 (1.90/day)
    Thanks Received:
    862
    Location:
    Switzerland, Heart of Europe
    Sounds good! AMD drags me more and more to their side.
     
  8. Jun 27, 2009 at 12:07 PM #8
    Mega-Japan

    Mega-Japan

    Joined:
    Jan 19, 2009
    Messages:
    313 (0.11/day)
    Thanks Received:
    27
    Location:
    New York, NY
    That's pretty fast... At this rate we'll probably get the 4.0GHz Phenom II before year's end >.>
     
  9. Jun 27, 2009 at 12:08 PM #9
    Duncan1

    Duncan1 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2009
    Messages:
    92 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    13
    Location:
    greece
    It seems that its indeed Black Edition branded, according to a table from asrock website (first cpu on the list)
     
  10. Jun 27, 2009 at 12:19 PM #10
    1Kurgan1

    1Kurgan1 The Knife in your Back

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2008
    Messages:
    10,401 (3.65/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,410
    Location:
    Duluth, Minnesota
    I'm sure it's going to come up, so I might as well bring it up before the other camp gets here. If you can't beat them in performance per clock, I say clock it too the moon, but it's working, looks to be a beasty proc.
     
  11. Jun 27, 2009 at 12:27 PM #11
    Yukikaze

    Yukikaze

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    2,355 (0.80/day)
    Thanks Received:
    519
    Location:
    Hillsboro, Oregon, USA
    Ironically, though, it reminds me of a time in the past where efficiency per clock worked somewhat in reverse.
     
  12. Jun 27, 2009 at 12:54 PM #12
    legends84

    legends84

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2009
    Messages:
    347 (0.12/day)
    Thanks Received:
    19
    Location:
    Jitra, Kedah, Malaysia
    lol... i just got my PII 955 BE.. should've wait for this:ohwell:
     
  13. Jun 27, 2009 at 1:14 PM #13
    Easo

    Easo

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,012 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Location:
    Latvia
    Nice, nice...
     
  14. Jun 27, 2009 at 1:31 PM #14
    Melvis

    Melvis

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    3,912 (1.25/day)
    Thanks Received:
    675
    Location:
    Australia
    That is impressive, maybe the 4.0GHz Phenom FX's roomers was not fake after all?
     
  15. Jun 27, 2009 at 2:25 PM #15
    wiak

    wiak

    Joined:
    Sep 5, 2004
    Messages:
    1,824 (0.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    231
    Location:
    The Kingdom of Norway
    10 Year Member at TPU
  16. Jun 27, 2009 at 2:51 PM #16

    lococol New Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    26 (0.01/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Location:
    london
    thats a tasty cpu , for me it would require a new motherboard and ram , would it be better than i7-920 in games , i don't care about anything else
     
  17. Jun 27, 2009 at 2:57 PM #17
    farlex85

    farlex85 New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2007
    Messages:
    4,829 (1.39/day)
    Thanks Received:
    637
    It would be for all intents and purposes the same. i7 would be a bit faster in games if you measured it most likely, but in game you won't tell much. If it would require a new cpu and mb though, i7 would likely be roughly the same price, and perhaps even a bit cheaper if you do it right (at least upon 965 release, though a couple of weeks after it will probably drop to lower than i7).
     
    lococol says thanks.
  18. Jun 27, 2009 at 3:09 PM #18
    SystemViper

    SystemViper

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2007
    Messages:
    2,547 (0.79/day)
    Thanks Received:
    527
    Location:
    House built when George Washington was Alive
    i have been thinking of test driving a amd setup, this looks like a good starting poiint~
     
  19. Jun 27, 2009 at 3:11 PM #19

    soryuuha New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2008
    Messages:
    95 (0.03/day)
    Thanks Received:
    6
    I hope this is not just simply clock bump, better binned please :rockout:
     
  20. Jun 27, 2009 at 3:14 PM #20

    Kitkat New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2009
    Messages:
    768 (0.28/day)
    Thanks Received:
    77
    great i can put this in my crosshair and ebay may slightly used 955 :)

    Yeah me too. This might be the one with the lowered twp? (ofcourse its higher now) But it was anounced they got it back down again, and that anoucment was about 2 months ago? so maybe.
     
    Last edited: Jun 27, 2009
  21. Jun 27, 2009 at 3:24 PM #21

    n-ster

    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2009
    Messages:
    9,002 (3.19/day)
    Thanks Received:
    1,453
    agreed... too many people still think you have to buy an i7 for 300$ another 250~300$ mobo and some 150$ RAM... this is not the case anymore...

    If you work at bestbuy or walmart or you have a friend that does, you can sign up for the retailedge program from intel and get an i7 920 + windows + windows 7 voucher or something for 129$! A good used mobo should be 150$, or NIB from Newegg with the current 10% off (15$ max) 170~175$... then 80~85$ for 6gb of great RAM... CPU cooler (+ TIM perhaps) if you don't have one will be 40$ NIB... Totals 380~420$...


    I wonder how good the new chipset will be... Perhaps 4ghz will become easy to do with this chip now?
     
  22. Jun 27, 2009 at 5:52 PM #22
    Polarman

    Polarman New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,627 (0.54/day)
    Thanks Received:
    292
    Location:
    Rimouski
    965 = 3.4
    975 = 3.6
    985 = 3.8
    995 = 4.0

    Yeah! :rockout:
     
    Easo says thanks.
  23. Jun 27, 2009 at 6:05 PM #23
    eidairaman1

    eidairaman1

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 2007
    Messages:
    14,910 (4.41/day)
    Thanks Received:
    2,360
    im not sure about this, AMD may decide to look at what worked for the Athlon XP, they were able to get more IPC using lower clocks overall than intel at the time. Clock Speed is one thing but IPC has benefits.
     
  24. Jun 27, 2009 at 6:10 PM #24
    Easo

    Easo

    Joined:
    May 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,012 (0.38/day)
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Location:
    Latvia
    Dreams, dreams... :respect:
     
  25. Jun 27, 2009 at 6:35 PM #25
    r9

    r9

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    2,148 (0.72/day)
    Thanks Received:
    289
    Great now we wont see 940 mature in to 4 GHz overclockers those one are called 955 965. I just can`t see the greatness.
     
Page 1 of 5

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guest)