AMD Ryzen 5 5600X Benchmarked, Conquers Intel Core i5-10600K

[mechtech]

I will wait for TPU's analysis on the hype train.

 

[Bones]

Intel is now using AMD Glue in a Bottle.

And still not doing as well.
I don't know what glue Intel was sniffing back when they came up with about gluing cores together but the same glue they sniffed back then is clearly not working......
On us.
On them it seems to be a different matter.

 

[Colddecked]

10600k is a 6700k from 2015 with 6 cores, made on a 2014 process, 14nm.
I know this is what Intel has now and it is basically all-a-foot in deep s**t, but comparing the 5600x with 10600k and saying wow, what a performance boost, is a bit...yeah, sad.
If 5600x was 2x10600k, yeah, then I would be wow, AMD has actually managed to double the performance of Intel's 6 core CPU from 2015 in 5 years.
But they have 7nm, they have the best process manufacturer there is, they have 3 iterations of their magic Zen uarch and all we get is 30% improvement.
Sure, performance per watt has improved a lot, but core to core wise, the improvement is not that stellar.

Yeah the architecture is the same but intel has done alot of work getting the cores to run much faster than when skylake was introduced. 6700k usually didn't get past 4.6 without delidding. 10600k can do 4.6 in its sleep straight from the factory.

 

[Dave65]

Intel you about to get your ass kicked soooo bad

 

[Dux]

OMG. Not so long ago people were laughing at AMD. What happened? Lisa Su came back. She Was in AMD as well back when they released Athlon and were kicking ass with it. Amazing how much a competent or incompetent person in charge can do to a company.

 

[Zach_01]

If only there were a way we could get benchmark results for a ZEN2 CPU!


As for everybody else, man, those goalposts are moving real fast!
It used to be "Intel is better for gaming"
Now it's "Nobody needs high framrates", and "It's only 1080p."

Ya'll better cover up, your fanboy is showing.

I really hope you are not calling me Intel fanboy....
Cause last time I bought a new Intel system it was 2000... A Pentium3 1.0GHz...

 

[ixi]

LOLZERS!

You sir, take my vote.

 

[yotano211]

I'm excited! I haven't build an all AMD system since socket 939!

Same here, my last desktop was socket 939, AMD Athlon 64 3500+, 130nm processor. I tried to upgrade to Athlon 64 3600+ x2 but fried the motherboard.

 

[Minus Infinity]

I can't wait to finally ditch my i5 3570K and GTX 1070 for an all new 5900X + Navi 21, rocking 64GB. Why 64GB becuase I do a lot of numerical simulations and heavy photo editing and want to get into 4K video editing.

 

[ViperXTR]

but where is the 5700X? -__-

 

[hardcore_gamer]

Gaming is no longer considered as a "real world" benchmark, I guess. Only AVX-512 performance matters for most people. /s

 

[Turmania]

It is expected and rightly deserved by AMD, I expect this tike around both their CPU & GPU are both fully matured and we wont see the bios and software issues that happened last year at least not in that scale. However, when it comes to power consumption i do not believe the 65w. It will consume just as much as i5 10600k.

 

[Zach_01]

However, when it comes to power consumption i do not believe the 65w. It will consume just as much as i5 10600k.

Why not?
ZEN family has grown step by step to a very nice perf/watt ratio.
The humble R5 3600nonX at 65W was really close (less than 10% behind) to all core relative perf to the 10600K and a 2~10% (depending resolution) behind in gaming.
Comparing the R5s 3600 vs 5600X within the same exact power envelope the latter has +20% IPC =(+20 perf on same freq) and another +20% perf/watt improvement =(around +20%** more freq).

**Probably it wouldnt be that much for allcore boost.

The 5600X could actually be +30% up to +35~40% faster across everything vs the 3600nonX without a single watt more... and that can place it +15 up to +30% above 10600K depending the workload, again... with that 65W TDP.

Intel Core i5-10600K Review - All You Need for Gaming

The Core i5-10600K is Intel's biggest upgrade in the mid-range for years. Driven by strong competition from AMD, Intel is now giving us a 6c/12t CPU with 125 W TDP and the full compliment of 12 MB cache. Our Core i5-10600K benchmarks show it to be a formidable performer, especially in gaming.

www.techpowerup.com

FYI the 65W parts of ZEN2 (3600, 3700X) have a total max power draw (sustained) of 88W PPT (Package Power Tracking).

The 10600K has a 125W TDP and a total power draw of
PL1: 125W (sustaind)
PL2: 182W (short term, can be altered by BIOS)

(PL=PowerLevel)

 

[xenocide]

That's a bold headline considering the benchmark in question is pretty notoriously bad at indicating actual performance. There's a reason no reviewers use that benchmark in their reviews--including this site itself. I'd also point out something doesn't add up between the Arithmetic scores and Multi-Media scores. The Arithmetic score is consistent with being slightly ahead of an i5-10600k (although I take issue with advertising the aggregate average score for the i5, oh well) but the Multi-Media score is closer to the i7-10700k. It would also represent an almost 50% improvement on that benchmark from the R5 3600X to the R5 5600X, and would actually put the R5 5600X comfortably ahead of the R7 3700X in that specific benchmark which doesn't seem right.

 

[DeathtoGnomes]

yeah it could also not, speculation is pointless, lets wait for some actual reviews.

true, speculation is pointless, but implying/implications is a bit different than speculation.

 

[biffzinker]

It would also represent an almost 50% improvement on that benchmark from the R5 3600X to the R5 5600X, and would actually put the R5 5600X comfortably ahead of the R7 3700X in that specific benchmark which doesn't seem right.

The Ryzen 5 3600 in some benchmark tests was faster than the eight core Ryzen 7 2700X. It doesn't seem unrealistic to me anyways.

 

[Gungar]

seems so now i'm really eager to so see what intel will say about these "glued" cpu's as it seems they still looking for the magic "glue" even is not there...

What does the glue has to do with anything? look at Star Citizen benchmark you will see how slow AMD is because of the glue. AMD is ahead because their cores are way more powerful that Intel cores not because its glued or not...

 

[mahirzukic2]

What does the glue has to do with anything? look at Star Citizen benchmark you will see how slow AMD is because of the glue. AMD is ahead because their cores are way more powerful that Intel cores not because its glued or not...

It seems that "glue" sarcasm has flown over your head.

 

[springs113]

It seems that "glue" sarcasm has flown over your head.

Yup miles over haha... this made my day thanks

 

[Chrispy_]

All these synthetic benchmark leaks are useless. Zen2 already wins against Intel outright in many of them, and if not it certainly takes a huge victory in performance/$ and performance/Watt.

Zen3 needs to do one thing to finally take Intel's crown and that's beat it in real-world gaming performance. That's pretty much the only victory Intel has retained over Zen2 in these last 15 months.

 

[mahirzukic2]

All these synthetic benchmark leaks are useless. Zen2 already wins against Intel outright in many of them, and if not it certainly takes a huge victory in performance/$ and performance/Watt.

Zen3 needs to do one thing to finally take Intel's crown and that's beat it in real-world gaming performance. That's pretty much the only victory Intel has retained over Zen2 in these last 15 months.

If we are to go by the stated IPC improvements, I think it's safe to assume that AMD has us covered even for that scenario as well, which is a good thing.

 

[Chrispy_]

If we are to go by the stated IPC improvements, I think it's safe to assume that AMD has us covered even for that scenario as well, which is a good thing.

Yes. I'm expecting boost clocks of the typical Zen3 chips to be in the 4.25 - 4.5GHz, given that 3-8 cores are going to be active for a system running most games. That's still 10% lower clocks than Intel's typical boost clocks under similar gaming loads but at 19% IPC improvement it means that AMD may finally beat Intel at gaming, and with more overclocking headroom too. Getting an i9 to 5.5GHz is a very big ask. Getting a Rzyen7 or Ryzen9 to 4.75GHz all-core actually seems like a realistic possibility with Zen 3. Possibly even on air.

Still, leaks and rumours are one thing; We have less than two weeks of waiting and then all this hypothesising and dubious benchmarks from shady sources can stop!

 

[dirtyferret]

That's pretty much the only victory Intel has retained over Zen2 in these last 15 months.

Nonsense, Intel beat AMD and a Bichon for best in show last year. Plus they are one Skylake refresh stamp away from a free foot long on the their subway club card, AMD is several stamps behind.

 

[phill]

Pass over the torch Intel, it's time

 

[thesmokingman]

It is expected and rightly deserved by AMD, I expect this tike around both their CPU & GPU are both fully matured and we wont see the bios and software issues that happened last year at least not in that scale. However, when it comes to power consumption i do not believe the 65w. It will consume just as much as i5 10600k.

It's best to refrain from adding your two cents when you clearly are either clueless to what you complain about or you are BSing us.