So 25% improvement and now beating intel by 5% in games. So the math is that Ryzen 2 was 20% behind Inter, that's not the impression I had for sure.
I have to see the 5600 reviews for sure but right now I think for $299 I would rather pick i7 10700 over Ryzen 5600. And that is really strange to me finding better value with Intel, especially when looking at new CPU that is not even out yet. And full credit to AMD even if you are Intel fan you can't deny that without their pressure you could get something like i7 10700 for $299 from Intel.
So competition is healthy people.
Hope AMD finally brings some competition to NVIDIA as well.
And I hope that we can get few cards to pick from and some healthy supply as well as I can't stand looking at Marketplace right now people still asking $500 for used 2070 and 1080ti.
Desperate implies that Big Navi will blow out of the water RTX 3080/3090 and that will never happen.
The very best we can hope for is for 6900xt to match RTX 3080 and even if that happens NVIDIA will play the 3080ti card and that's that.
There is nothing desperate here, what you seeing is NVIDIA finally have to think about competitively pricing a product as they didn't have competition in a very very long time.
And you can't say NVIDIA counters anything as that implies that they are responding to something that is already out and that's no true either.
Also if you read between the lines AMD haven't released much information and that's only because there is not much to brag about not to mention Lisa's quote "It bill be the most powerful GPU "
we" every made".
NVDIA product is already out there is no reason to withhold any information, if anything AMD would benefit as it would give reason to potential NVIDIA customers to hold off on buying RTX.
So nothing I've seen so far seen screams that Big Navi will be this great success or anything NVIDIA should be concerned about.
Right now I'll settle with being competitive with 3080 and keep NVIDIA honest.
I think 6900xt will be slower than 3080, maybe match in some games that suits it better but that will be about it, offer more VRAM which will be the main selling point for AMD.
But honest to God I don't know what's the peoples fixation of amount of VRAM as the only valid metric is FPS.
Don't try to sell me that futureproof bs as never ever in history of GPUs extra vram was proven to get you more FPS down the line.
And so much unknowns like what the performance impact would be when enable Raytracing, how does the AMD Raytracing quality compares to NVDIA's, will AMD introduce something to compete with DLS 2.0, does the games will have to have separate implementation for each.
Personally I'm not too big of a fan of the current state of Raytracing as you pay a hefty performance penalty for something that most times it just looks different but you can't tell if it looks better or not.
And I don't dispute that Raytracing is the way to go it's just I don' think was worth it before when looking at 2080ti price.
As far as DLS 2.0 that's pure awesomeness, the opposite of Raytracing getting hefty performance boost but you barely notice difference in quality.
Redesigning the cache system was genius. AMD shows how to innovate again and again.
Looking forward to a Ryzen 7 - 5700x to replace my Ryzen 7 - 1700x. 3 Generations later sounds like a sound upgrade.
Many people underestimate RDNA2, including Nvidia themselves. The RTX 3080 was in fact a desperation by Nvidia. When was the last time Nvidia launched a product that had so many issues? I can't recall at the moment. The key to RDNA2 is the rumored Infinity Cache that is suppose to play a huge role in performance by allowing AMD to utilize a smaller 256-bit memory bus (takes up less space) all while maintaining or exceeding performance if having a 512-bit memory bus - For Example!