• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 7 2700X Rears Its Head On Geekbench

Joined
Jul 13, 2016
Messages
2,796 (0.99/day)
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard ASRock X670E Taichi
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 Chromax
Memory 32GB DDR5 6000 CL30
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 4090 Trio
Storage Too much
Display(s) Acer Predator XB3 27" 240 Hz
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Topping DX5, DCA Aeon II
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Titanium 850w
Mouse G305
Keyboard Wooting HE60
VR HMD Valve Index
Software Win 10
my 8700k at stock just got 5978 cpu single core and 24660 on multi in geekbench... and it only cost me $263 free ship on ebay during that presidents day sale they had... hmm well I will see you again next year AMD, hopefully one of these days you will win me over, but not today.

Not counting the CPU cooler, motherboard or RAM. But yeah I just picked a Ryzen 1700 up brand new for $150 off eBay during the 20% off sale. At the end of the day you paid more than double for 5% more performance, grats. I just love people who tout their "on up ism" attitues all the while support a shitty company. I guess the company reflects the buyer.
 
Joined
May 6, 2013
Messages
88 (0.02/day)
Location
Steam Servers
IPC is way higher than Sandybridge birdie. Ryzen is just a few percent behind in IPC if you look at reputable reviews. Their issue is with higher clocks. They win with more cores for the dollar and their SMT is more efficient than HT. ;)

It is slower in some titles, but, many can afford to lose a couple of FPS. That said, others, like you and birdie clearly (me as well), simply prefer not to lose anything on that front.
I like how your explanation is spot on.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,988 (0.96/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 16GB Kingston Fury 3600MHz@3933MHz
Video Card(s) Gainward Ghost 3060 Ti 8GB + Sapphire Pulse RX 6600 8GB
Storage NVMe Kingston KC3000 2TB + NVMe Toshiba KBG40ZNT256G + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) AOC Q27G3XMN + Samsung S22F350
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud Stinger Core 7.1 Wireless PC
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse EVGA X15
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 11
Package: Summit Ridge, not Pinnacle Ridge
hopefully, prices won't be higher than current Ryzens
AMD usually replaces the price-spot, so I don't think that should be a problem.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
my 8700k at stock just got 5978 cpu single core and 24660 on multi in geekbench... and it only cost me $263 free ship on ebay during that presidents day sale they had... hmm well I will see you again next year AMD, hopefully one of these days you will win me over, but not today.
At 1440p at which you are playing, the difference between Ryzen and Coffee Lake is 3% at best... With 2700X the difference would probably be even less...
 

Space Lynx

Astronaut
Joined
Oct 17, 2014
Messages
15,800 (4.58/day)
Location
Kepler-186f
You all seem to be forgetting he 8700k has better min frame rates at every resolution across the board than ryzen by about 5-10 fps depending on the game, and thats stock clocks... sorry but min fps is king, I like how you all only focus on max fps though Kappa
 
Joined
Jun 15, 2016
Messages
1,042 (0.37/day)
Location
Pristina
System Name My PC
Processor 4670K@4.4GHz
Motherboard Gryphon Z87
Cooling CM 212
Memory 2x8GB+2x4GB @2400GHz
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon RX 580 GTS Black Edition 1425MHz OC+, 8GB
Storage Intel 530 SSD 480GB + Intel 510 SSD 120GB + 2x500GB hdd raid 1
Display(s) HP envy 32 1440p
Case CM Mastercase 5
Audio Device(s) Sbz ZXR
Power Supply Antec 620W
Mouse G502
Keyboard G910
Software Win 10 pro
Here we go again "mine is bigger than yours"..
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,141 (0.56/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3600
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Deepcool AG400
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / NV2 512
Display(s) 24G2U
Case NR200P
Power Supply Ion SFX 650
Mouse G703
Keyboard Keychron V1 (Akko Matcha Green) / Apex m500 (gateron milky yellow)
Software W10
You all seem to be forgetting he 8700k has better min frame rates at every resolution across the board than ryzen by about 5-10 fps depending on the game, and thats stock clocks... sorry but min fps is king, I like how you all only focus on max fps though Kappa
Avg framerates and no stuttering is king. Min FPS means nothing if the gameplay is fluid during drops. You are not going to notice the difference between 70 and 80 FPS if it happens 5 times in 10 minutes.
The only perfect picture would be a graph with FPS over time, but that's rarely, if ever, done on a CPU test.
Also didn't see anyone mentioning max FPS, and I don't think anyone measures that anymore.
And this is not twitch.
 
Joined
Sep 15, 2007
Messages
3,944 (0.65/day)
Location
Police/Nanny State of America
Processor OCed 5800X3D
Motherboard Asucks C6H
Cooling Air
Memory 32GB
Video Card(s) OCed 6800XT
Storage NVMees
Display(s) 32" Dull curved 1440
Case Freebie glass idk
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser
Power Supply Don't even remember
Avg framerates and no stuttering is king. Min FPS means nothing if the gameplay is fluid during drops. You are not going to notice the difference between 70 and 80 FPS if it happens 5 times in 10 minutes.
The only perfect picture would be a graph with FPS over time, but that's rarely, if ever, done on a CPU test.
Also didn't see anyone mentioning max FPS, and I don't think anyone measures that anymore.
And this is not twitch.

I was told that a stuttering 7700K is better, b/c highest framerate XD
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,323 (1.51/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 16GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
I remember some reviews with new release of the 1800x and the first thing that the reviewer mentioned it was damn smooth. Forgot what card he was using during that time but it surely wasn't 1080 Ti so assuming some 1080's were involved. The response time was also great. I really think you people don't give enough credit to the Ryzen CPU's. It's not all about FPS count or single core speed or frequency.
 
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,151 (0.21/day)
Location
I live in Norway
Processor R9 5800x3d | R7 3900X | 4800H | 2x Xeon gold 6142
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 128gb | 32GB | 192gb
Video Card(s) RTX 4080 |Quadro P5000 | RTX2060M
Storage Many drives
Display(s) M32Q,AOC 27" 144hz something.
Case Jonsbo D41
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard G913 tkl
Software win11, proxmox
Benchmark Scores 33000FS, 16300 TS. Lappy, 7000 TS.
I was told that a stuttering 7700K is better, b/c highest framerate XD

I don't think a 7700K should stutter easily, maybe with me using the computer :p but this is only an issue to 4 thread and lower today.
A Mate with 7600K is not enjoying his computer life, close down everything then start a game.
7700K owners just make sure they're not doing anything heavy in the background.
me: whatever :D
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2004
Messages
13,791 (1.94/day)
I like the way how cores clock in Zen 2 depending on number of them under load and also other factors like temperature.
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
1,159 (0.28/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling Deepcool LS520 SE
Memory crucial ballistix 32Gb DDR4
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 FE
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /WD black sn750 1To/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG GL850
Case Dan A4 H2O
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply Corsair SF600
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 11 pro
This need to get reposted again apparently :
TLDR:
Ryzen is once again, fine for gaming, yes it's not as fast as intel, but it's not going to be really noticeable, and will not prevent you from enjoying a game, unless 144Hz is one of your absolute requirement.

At this point it really looks like lynx was bored and decided to start a fight by stating the obvious. (And talking about a deal that most people shopping for a cpu won't get, the 8700k is usualy at least 100€ higher than a 1700x).
Zen+ is just a refresh with a small clock bump, I don't think that people really expected it to be a 4.7Ghz stock messia.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I like the way how cores clock in Zen 2 depending on number of them under load and also other factors like temperature.
Zen2 wont be out until 2019+... Zen+ is coming out soon (weeks).

"Ryzen 2" is the product of the idiotic media (no amd slide/anything said ryzen 2)
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2005
Messages
1,080 (0.16/day)
Location
Look behind you!!
System Name NEW
Processor Intel 4770 non-K
Motherboard Gigabyte H81M-DS2V
Cooling CM Hyper 212 plus
Memory 16gb Muskin
Video Card(s) XFX 380X 4gb
Storage Sandisk 120gb plus WD blue 1tb
Display(s) AOC 23.5 LED bl
Case XIGMATEK
Audio Device(s) motherboard
Power Supply Cooler Master 500
So now geekbench has a STD now!!
 

Gerolf

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
9 (0.00/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 8600k @4.8
Motherboard MSI Z370 SLI PLUS
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V Gunmetal Gray DDR4 3200MHz 16GB Kit 2x8GB XMP
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 AMP Edition 3GB
Storage Transcend SSD370S Premium 256GB 2.5" SATA III MLC
Display(s) AOC I2460PXQU
Audio Device(s) AudioQuest Dragonfly DAC
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 10 500W
Benchmark Scores GeekBench 6187/24539, Cinebench 211/1210, CPU-Z 580/3225, PassMarkCPU: Single 2914 Multi 15745.
The first gen Ryzen was good at 2 things - raw multicore performance and great price for 6 core CPUs. Other things like single thread performance, intercore latencies, memory latency, overclocking potential were exellent if you compare to previous AMD cpus, but average if you compare to Intel 8 gen. And yes, Ryzen is ok for current gen GPUs, even the most powerfull ones, but most people will stay on same CPU for about 2-3 GPUs generation. And 720p CPU tests give us some understanding who is who when there's no GPU bottleneck.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I was about to like the post above, but 720p testing isnt good at showing 1080p bottlenecks with real settings. ;)
 
Joined
May 31, 2016
Messages
4,323 (1.51/day)
Location
Currently Norway
System Name Bro2
Processor Ryzen 5800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Corsair h115i pro rgb
Memory 16GB G.Skill Flare X 3200 CL14 @3800Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Powercolor 6900 XT Red Devil 1.1v@2400Mhz
Storage M.2 Samsung 970 Evo Plus 500MB/ Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) LG 27UD69 UHD / LG 27GN950
Case Fractal Design G
Audio Device(s) Realtec 5.1
Power Supply Seasonic 750W GOLD
Mouse Logitech G402
Keyboard Logitech slim
Software Windows 10 64 bit
Zen2 wont be out until 2019+... Zen+ is coming out soon (weeks).

"Ryzen 2" is the product of the idiotic media (no amd slide/anything said ryzen 2)
I think he meant Zen2 as a second Ryzen CPU release.
 

Gerolf

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
9 (0.00/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 8600k @4.8
Motherboard MSI Z370 SLI PLUS
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V Gunmetal Gray DDR4 3200MHz 16GB Kit 2x8GB XMP
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 AMP Edition 3GB
Storage Transcend SSD370S Premium 256GB 2.5" SATA III MLC
Display(s) AOC I2460PXQU
Audio Device(s) AudioQuest Dragonfly DAC
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 10 500W
Benchmark Scores GeekBench 6187/24539, Cinebench 211/1210, CPU-Z 580/3225, PassMarkCPU: Single 2914 Multi 15745.
but 720p testing isnt good at showing 1080p bottlenecks with real settings.
Can you explain why, please? As far as I know lower resolution just drastically reduces load on GPU.

Edit:
I found this explanation and it looks legit to me:

«It depends on the type of game.
If a higher res = more objects on screen, then it affects CPU usage. This is more the case with top-down view games.


Other games like FPS and such, don't have this. A higher res will strain the GPU more, resulting in less 'questions' asked by the GPU to the CPU and result in less CPU usage.»
 
Last edited:

phill

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
15,861 (3.39/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill - There are others!! Just no room to put! :D
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
Motherboard Asus Zenith 2 Extreme Alpha
Cooling Lots!! Dual GTX 560 rads with D5 pumps for each rad. One rad for each component
Memory Viper Steel 4 x 16GB DDR4 3600MHz not sure on the timings... Probably still at 2667!! :(
Video Card(s) Asus Strix 3090 with front and rear active full cover water blocks
Storage I'm bound to forget something here - 250GB OS, 2 x 1TB NVME, 2 x 1TB SSD, 4TB SSD, 2 x 8TB HD etc...
Display(s) 3 x Dell 27" S2721DGFA @ 7680 x 1440P @ 144Hz or 165Hz - working on it!!
Case The big Thermaltake that looks like a Case Mods
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA 1600W T2
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Razer something or other....
VR HMD No headset yet
Software Windows 11 OS... Not a fan!!
Benchmark Scores I've actually never benched it!! Too busy with WCG and FAH and not gaming! :( :( Not OC'd it!! :(
I'm just waiting for the reviews and money shots... Geekbench and such is probably no more helpful than XTU for benching... Not something proven I'd say...
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
I think he meant Zen2 as a second Ryzen CPU release.
Ok... and as I said, Zen 2 isn't out for a year and some change. Zen+ is what we will see in the coming weeks.

Can you explain why, please? As far as I know lower resolution just drastically reduces load on GPU.

Edit:
I found this explanation and it looks legit to me:

«It depends on the type of game.
If a higher res = more objects on screen, then it affects CPU usage. This is more the case with top-down view games.


Other games like FPS and such, don't have this. A higher res will strain the GPU more, resulting in less 'questions' asked by the GPU to the CPU and result in less CPU usage.»
Honestly, my stance is controversial considering it goes against the grain... but here are my thoughts:

When testing at 720p, an unrealistic environment is created to exaggerate differences which are not found at higher resolutions and settings in game. Also, what many review sites do is to lower settings at that res to make sure the GPU doesn't have much to say about things. This testing would be great if it scaled as the resolution or settings go up, however, it does not. So in the end, users see a result of Hey CPU A is 10% faster than CPU B at 720p... But when we run 1080p and use high settings and use AA, the result isn't remotely the same. And when you are at 1440+, the CPU matters very little. In the end, its not like the 10% result holds true anywhere else and creating a specific exaggerated environment just to squeeze out a data set isn't the best way to go about it. Nobody runs at 1080+ at 720p with low settings.
 

Gerolf

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
9 (0.00/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 8600k @4.8
Motherboard MSI Z370 SLI PLUS
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V Gunmetal Gray DDR4 3200MHz 16GB Kit 2x8GB XMP
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 AMP Edition 3GB
Storage Transcend SSD370S Premium 256GB 2.5" SATA III MLC
Display(s) AOC I2460PXQU
Audio Device(s) AudioQuest Dragonfly DAC
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 10 500W
Benchmark Scores GeekBench 6187/24539, Cinebench 211/1210, CPU-Z 580/3225, PassMarkCPU: Single 2914 Multi 15745.
Nobody runs at 1080+ at 720p with low settings.
Nobody says that someone runs GTX 1080 at 720p settings, this is usually done to measure maximum CPU capabilities in given game. But at 1080p you can see similar differences in FPS if GPU load stays at moderate level and doesn't create bottleneck. And at 1440p nearly all games push GPU to it's limits so most CPUs will give similar FPS.
 

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,378 (2.37/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
Ok... and as I said, Zen 2 isn't out for a year and some change. Zen+ is what we will see in the coming weeks.

Honestly, my stance is controversial considering it goes against the grain... but here are my thoughts:

When testing at 720p, an unrealistic environment is created to exaggerate differences which are not found at higher resolutions and settings in game. Also, what many review sites do is to lower settings at that res to make sure the GPU doesn't have much to say about things. This testing would be great if it scaled as the resolution or settings go up, however, it does not. So in the end, users see a result of Hey CPU A is 10% faster than CPU B at 720p... But when we run 1080p and use high settings and use AA, the result isn't remotely the same. And when you are at 1440+, the CPU matters very little. In the end, its not like the 10% result holds true anywhere else and creating a specific exaggerated environment just to squeeze out a data set isn't the best way to go about it. Nobody runs at 1080+ at 720p with low settings.

I agree (I would because I'm a total AMD fanboy, apart from the 1080ti). Thing is, a GPU is used for graphics, not the CPU. The point of a gfx card is to play the game at the best settings you can, or to meet the criteria you play at. Given monitor refresh rates languishing at 60Hz fo rmost, 144Hz for very, very few, the fps situation is null. Real world use of a Ryzen CPU wont be at 720p gaming.

Now, if you offered me a free system, one with an 8700k or a 1800x, I'd take the 8700k. I'm not a fool but when it comes to my money and (charity) I went AMD on Ryzen almost entirely to give them a chance. I knew they would be beaten by Intel but when I moved up from a 6 core 3930k (that cost £450 in the day) to an 8 core 1700X that cost <£400, I saw great improvements. Given how much an 8 core CPU from Intel was back when 1700X came out, I did well.

And we still have the existential argument, WWID (What Would Intel Do) if AMD hadn't released Ryzen? You think you'd have the 8700k for that price? No chance. For once in this crazy monopolistic world, IMO, Ryzen gave both AMD and Intel customers a better deal.
 
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
19,366 (3.72/day)
Benchmark Scores Faster than yours... I'd bet on it. :)
Nobody says that someone runs GTX 1080 at 720p settings, this is usually done to measure maximum CPU capabilities in given game. But at 1080p you can see similar differences in FPS if GPU load stays at moderate level and doesn't create bottleneck. And at 1440p nearly all games push GPU to it's limits so most CPUs will give similar FPS.
No, you can't... that is what I am trying to say... it DOES NOT SCALE. Also, your GPU should be running 100% in most titles regardless. Its only the jenky 720p low, 1080ti at 1080p playing CS:GO where it doesn't get a full load.

What is the point of knowing CPU A and CPU B difference is 20% at 720p with low settings, but a couple % at 1080p with 'normal' settings?? What use is that 720p dataset when its settings are fabricated to show an exaggerated difference?

Anyway, this isn't about 2700X... so I digress. You are welcome to reach out through PM though. ;)
 
Last edited:

Gerolf

New Member
Joined
Feb 8, 2018
Messages
9 (0.00/day)
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 8600k @4.8
Motherboard MSI Z370 SLI PLUS
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V Gunmetal Gray DDR4 3200MHz 16GB Kit 2x8GB XMP
Video Card(s) Zotac GeForce GTX 1060 AMP Edition 3GB
Storage Transcend SSD370S Premium 256GB 2.5" SATA III MLC
Display(s) AOC I2460PXQU
Audio Device(s) AudioQuest Dragonfly DAC
Power Supply be quiet! Pure Power 10 500W
Benchmark Scores GeekBench 6187/24539, Cinebench 211/1210, CPU-Z 580/3225, PassMarkCPU: Single 2914 Multi 15745.
I knew they would be beaten by Intel but when I moved up from a 6 core 3930k (that cost £450 in the day) to an 8 core 1700X that cost <£400, I saw great improvements.
Dude seriously what were you expecting when you compare 6 core Intel CPU from 2011 to 8 core Ryzen CPU from 2017? AMD beat Intel cpu 6 years later, wow.
 
Last edited:

the54thvoid

Intoxicated Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
12,378 (2.37/day)
Location
Glasgow - home of formal profanity
Processor Ryzen 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar B650 (wifi)
Cooling be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 4
Memory 32GB Kingston Fury
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX4070ti
Storage Seagate FireCuda 530 M.2 1TB / Samsumg 960 Pro M.2 512Gb
Display(s) LG 32" 165Hz 1440p GSYNC
Case Asus Prime AP201
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply be quiet! Pure POwer M12 850w Gold (ATX3.0)
Software W10
Dude seriously what were you expecting when you compare 6 core Intel CPU from 2011 to 8 core Ryzen CPU from 2017? It's bloody 6 years passed.

Yeah but I didnt upgrade from it because Intels chips were just marginally better each year. Tiny % increases in IPC and speeds (well, my cores were at 4.2-4.4Ghz) so the Intel route was a money pit for no real gain. Ryzen offered something different.

Also - you'd be amazed how many people think Ryzen is still Sandy-E level of performance.
 
Top