• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 7 5800X

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
21,288 (3.52/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is built using just one CCD, which eliminates a lot of latencies and bottlencks in the multi-core topology. We also saw it boost close to 5 GHz regularly, out of the box, without any overclocking. This one-two-punch combination helped it beat the 5900X in gaming and several other tests.

Show full review
 

phill

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jun 8, 2011
Messages
8,716 (2.52/day)
Location
Somerset, UK
System Name Not so complete or overkill
Processor Ryzen 3900X
Motherboard Asus Crosshair 8 Hero (Non Wi-Fi)
Cooling Air :(
Memory Patriot 3200MHz 64GB
Video Card(s) 2 x EVGA GTX 1080 Ti SC Black Edition
Storage 1 250GB Crucial SSD for OS/Programs, 2 500GB Crucial SSD for Steam and Epic stores
Display(s) 3 x 23" LG IPS panels (can't remember model!!)
Case 10mm thick MDF on plastic risers.. It's kinda a case??
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply EVGA P2 1200w
Mouse Corsair thingy
Keyboard Logitec K120......
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores I've actually never benched it!! Too busy with WCG and FAH and not gaming!! :( :(
Awesome work there @W1zzard !! :D :D Loving these new AMD CPUs... Now I just need to find a couple 5950X's and I'll be happy!! :D

Been waiting for these reviews for a while, it was sure worth the wait!! :D
 
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
72 (0.04/day)
Location
Sofia, Bulgaria
Processor Ryzen 5 3600 I Core i7 6700K
Video Card(s) RX 5700 XT Nitro+ I RTX 2070 Super Zotac Mini
Mouse Logitech G Pro
Keyboard Wooting Two Lekker Edition
There were games where Zen 2 was faster than Intel too. There never was a gaming King guys, at least not since Zen+ released (which had some id Tech 2-4 and mod wins).
Different games are different in the end.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,323 (0.66/day)
Location
VT
Processor Intel i7-10700k
Motherboard Gigabyte Aurorus Ultra z490
Cooling Corsair H100i RGB
Memory 32GB (4x8GB) Corsair Vengeance DDR4-3200MHz
Video Card(s) XFX 5700XT THIC III
Display(s) ASUS MG278Q / AOC G2590FX
Case Corsair X4000 iCue
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RM650x 650W Fully Modular
Software Windows 10
What's going on with that Temp chart? Possible issue with the CPU they sent you, or the Ryzen 7/9 seem to run shockingly hot?
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
21,288 (3.52/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
What's going on with that Temp chart? Possible issue with the CPU they sent you, or the Ryzen 7/9 seem to run shockingly hot?
Are we looking at the same chart?



Similar temps as last generation, much more perf
 
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
514 (0.17/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling cooler master masterliquid 240
Memory Gskill Aegis 2x 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) zotac amp GTX 1660 super
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /Samsung 960 evo 256 Gb/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG 25UM58
Case Ncase M1
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply bequiet SFX L power 500w
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 10 pro
Meanwhile in europe:

1604587012076.png


1604587178720.png
 
Joined
Apr 18, 2013
Messages
912 (0.33/day)
Everything as expected however I am not a fan that AMD has OC'ed their CPUs to the absolute limit this time around in order to beat Intel at 1080p by a few percent and by doing so worsened their thermals quite a lot. It would be nice to see all these CPUs with TDP being lowered by 5-20% - that could make them a lot more power efficient and cooler.

https://tpucdn.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-5800x/images/cpu-temperature.png (75C under load FFS).

Also, and I know I've repeated it a dozen times already but I don't understand why AMD has the right (and not only that people somehow find a justification for that) to increase their prices so much. Intel used to release new substantially faster CPU architectures without doing this: Sandy Bridge, Haswell, Sky Lake were all a lot faster than previous generation CPUs without price hikes and in certain cases even cost substantially less than their predecessors, e.g. the Intel Core i5-2500K was released for $216 while the Intel Core i7-920 cost $305.

People keep saying that $50 is practically nothing, only AMD has decided to start the lineup with the 5600X which costs $300, vs the 3600 which costs $200. It's not a $50 price hike, it's a $100/50%(!) price hike. Intel would have been decimated by the internet mob if they had ever attempted to be sneaky like this. I don't give a damn about the X suffix because it doesn't change anything and it's just a marketing differentiation. There's no 5600 CPU for $250.

Lastly, AMD is playing a monopoly card and it's just ugly. They force people to buy the 5900X/5950X CPUs because both the 3600/3700X were the most popular models for the Ryzen 3000 series, while for this generation, the 5800X is the worst (!) investment in terms of the bang for the buck. Margins decide everything not only for Intel and NVIDIA, as AMD has happily joined the "we'll rip you off because we are the fastest" club. I'm quite appalled by all of this.
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
60 (0.10/day)
Everything as expected however I am not a fan that AMD has OC'ed their CPUs to the absolute limit this time around in order to beat Intel at 1080p by a few percent and by doing so worsened their thermals quite a lot. It would be nice to see all these CPUs with TDP being lowered by 5-20% - that could make them a lot more power efficient and colder.

https://tpucdn.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-5800x/images/cpu-temperature.png (75C under load FFS).

Also, and I know I've repeated it a dozen times already but I don't understand why AMD has the right (and not only that people somehow find a justification for that) to increase their prices so much. Intel used to release new substantially faster CPU architectures without doing this: Sandy Bridge, Haswell, Sky Lake were all a lot faster than previous generation CPUs without price hikes and in certain cases even cost substantially less than their predecessors, e.g. the Intel Core i5-2500K was released for $216 while the Intel Core i7-920 cost $305.

People keep saying that $50 is practically nothing, only AMD has decided to start the lineup with the 5600X which costs $300, vs the 3600 which costs $200. It's not a $50 price hike, it's a $100/50%(!) price hike. Intel would have been decimated by the internet mob if they had ever attempted to be sneaky like this. I don't give a damn about the X suffix because it doesn't change anything and it's just a marketing differentiation. There's no 5600 CPU for $250.

Lastly, AMD is playing a monopoly card and it's just ugly. They force people to buy the 5900X/5950X CPUs because both the 3600/3700X were the most popular models for the Ryzen 3000 series, while for this generation, the 5800X is the worst (!) investment in terms of the bang for the buck. Margins decide everything not only for Intel and NVIDIA, as AMD has happily joined the "we'll rip you off because we are the fastest" club. I'm quite appalled by all of this.
If ryzen 1st gen was competitive in gaming the prices would have been much higher aswell.
 
Joined
Dec 18, 2018
Messages
16 (0.02/day)
System Name godzilla
Processor Intel Core i7-920
Cooling Air
Memory 12GB
Video Card(s) Nvidia Geforce 970
Storage Samsung 970 EVO
Display(s) LG OLED55C9
Audio Device(s) Sennheiser HD 800 S
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless
Keyboard Logitech G19
What's new, however, is that certain Ryzen 5000 series processor models can support DDR4-4000 with 1:1 fclk:mclk ratio, without having to engage a 1:2 divider.
Memory:
2x 8 GB G.SKILL Flare X DDR4
DDR4-3200 14-14-14-34​
Could this be why it performs underwhelming? What is IF running at, would it help with a faster memory?
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
104 (0.10/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard Asrock Taichi x370
Cooling Stock
Memory 32gb Trident Z @ 2933
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Vega 64
Storage 256 Sandisk Pro SSD, 1TB Mushkin Reactor SSD, 5TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Asus MG279Q
Case Phanteks Ethoo Evolv ATX
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2
So it's not the gaming king? :rolleyes:
Does... it need to be? It's within 2% of the 10900k @720p. Some games it will be faster, some games it will be slower. Civ 6, Rage 2, Sekiro & Wolfenstien 2 for example, the 5800x is faster than the 10900k @720p. It's also $100 less than the 10900k.
 

Mussels

Moderprator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 6, 2004
Messages
48,364 (8.20/day)
Location
Australalalalalaia.
System Name Big Fella
Processor Ryzen R7 5800X
Motherboard Asus x570 Gaming-F
Cooling GPU: Corsair H110 W/ 4x140 Corsair ML RGB fans CPU: EK 240mm RGB AIO
Memory 64GB DDR4 3600 Corsair Vengeance RGB
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X (BIOS mod to Gaming Z) (45C max load, H110 AIO)
Storage 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + 500GB 850 Evo
Display(s) Phillips 328m6fjrmb (32" 1440p 144hz curved)
Case Fractal Design R6
Audio Device(s) Razer Leviathan + Corsair Void pro RGB, Blue Yeti mic
Power Supply Corsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W)
Mouse Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL
Keyboard Razer Huntsman TE
Software Windows 10 pro x64 (all systems)
Benchmark Scores Lots of RGB, so you know it's fast.
I look forward to faster ram speed results, I bet DDR3 4000 would make a difference at 1080p gaming
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
5,386 (1.16/day)
System Name Virtual Reality / Bioinformatics
Processor Undead CPU
Motherboard Undead TUF X99
Cooling Noctua NH-D15
Memory GSkill 128GB DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 3090 FTW Ultra
Storage Samsung 960 Pro 1TB + 860 EVO 2TB + WD Black 5TB
Display(s) Acer K272HUL, HTC Vive
Case Fractal Design R5
Audio Device(s) BOSE 2.0
Power Supply Seasonic 850watt
Mouse Logitech Master MX
Keyboard Corsair K70 Cherry MX Blue
Software Windows 10 Professional/Linux Mint
Still not as good as Athlon64 versus Pentium4 days. Those days it was actually beating Intel in every single gaming benchmark by a wide margin.

This, feels just like finally something something same gaming performance.

Still impressive though
 
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
182 (0.78/day)
Guys calm down... Zen 3 prices will come down to Earth once 11th Gen Rocket Lake desktop CPU firmly retakes gaming crown back in Q1 2021. It's AMD's DIY desktop milking period and who can blame them? Zen 3 has on pair gaming performance and obliterates Intel in productivity benchmarks. They have every right to cash on FOMO consumers for a few months but milking won't last long. Intel has become very aggressive on pricing lately (to my big surprise).
 
Joined
May 3, 2019
Messages
60 (0.10/day)
Still not as good as Athlon64 versus Pentium4 days. Those days it was actually beating Intel in every single gaming benchmark by a wide margin.

This, feels just like finally something something same gaming performance.

Still impressive though
And that's what I was expecting when Su was going all giddy in the launch vid :oops:
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
376 (0.10/day)
System Name Home PC
Processor Ryzen 1600X - 3950@1.3v
Motherboard Asus Prime X370 Pro
Cooling Thermaltake Contac Silent 12
Memory Dual channel G skill F4-3200C16-8GVKB
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 GTR - XFX Double Dissipation R9 290
Storage Samsung SSD Evo 120 - Adata SU80 256 - Seagate 2TB (ST2000VX003)
Display(s) AoC 931wx (19in, 1680x1050)
Case Green Magnum Evo
Power Supply Green 1200B-OC+
Thanks for review.@W1zzard
Can you do memory timing test ?
 
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
2 (0.00/day)
It might be better to update the test setup. In the reviews of other sites, the 5900x is winning over intel processors. They are cooler and winning up to 5% on average in games. Is using "Taichi" against "Maximus XII Extreme" a good idea?
 
Joined
May 17, 2016
Messages
289 (0.17/day)
System Name DUX
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X
Motherboard MSI X570 Gaming Plus
Cooling Fortron Windale 6 blue LED
Memory Crucial Balistix Sport 3800MHz CL16,19,19,39
Video Card(s) RTX 2080 Super
Storage ADATA 512GB M.2
Case Zalman Z1 NEO
Audio Device(s) Kingston HyperX Cloud II
Power Supply Corsair TX850 Gold
I think Lisa should marry Jensen. Because they're both full of shit when talking about performance of their upcoming products.
 
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
597 (0.43/day)
I mean cherry picking? I can do the same with Intel.
Su said in the launch vid tha this is the new gaming king yet they did the same schtick as with the 3000 series launch where they optimized their cpu's for certain games. I wanted to see it being faster/same as Intel yet Intel still leads in some games even by more than 5%
Not really: 11 game average on 1080p


And check all the other reviews: it is winning in nearly every review.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
104 (0.10/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard Asrock Taichi x370
Cooling Stock
Memory 32gb Trident Z @ 2933
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Vega 64
Storage 256 Sandisk Pro SSD, 1TB Mushkin Reactor SSD, 5TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Asus MG279Q
Case Phanteks Ethoo Evolv ATX
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2
Everything as expected however I am not a fan that AMD has OC'ed their CPUs to the absolute limit this time around in order to beat Intel at 1080p by a few percent and by doing so worsened their thermals quite a lot. It would be nice to see all these CPUs with TDP being lowered by 5-20% - that could make them a lot more power efficient and cooler.

https://tpucdn.com/review/amd-ryzen-7-5800x/images/cpu-temperature.png (75C under load FFS).

Also, and I know I've repeated it a dozen times already but I don't understand why AMD has the right (and not only that people somehow find a justification for that) to increase their prices so much. Intel used to release new substantially faster CPU architectures without doing this: Sandy Bridge, Haswell, Sky Lake were all a lot faster than previous generation CPUs without price hikes and in certain cases even cost substantially less than their predecessors, e.g. the Intel Core i5-2500K was released for $216 while the Intel Core i7-920 cost $305.

People keep saying that $50 is practically nothing, only AMD has decided to start the lineup with the 5600X which costs $300, vs the 3600 which costs $200. It's not a $50 price hike, it's a $100/50%(!) price hike. Intel would have been decimated by the internet mob if they had ever attempted to be sneaky like this. I don't give a damn about the X suffix because it doesn't change anything and it's just a marketing differentiation. There's no 5600 CPU for $250.

Lastly, AMD is playing a monopoly card and it's just ugly. They force people to buy the 5900X/5950X CPUs because both the 3600/3700X were the most popular models for the Ryzen 3000 series, while for this generation, the 5800X is the worst (!) investment in terms of the bang for the buck. Margins decide everything not only for Intel and NVIDIA, as AMD has happily joined the "we'll rip you off because we are the fastest" club. I'm quite appalled by all of this.
1. 5800X uses less power than the 10900k in gaming. It isn't "OC'd", it's just an efficient architecture with a good boost algorithm. The stock 5800X uses less power than even the 6/12 10600k in most power tests on TPU.
2. AMD can price their CPU's however they want to.
2(a). You're joking about Intel's 'a lot faster' generations since Sandy Bridge, right? It was around 5-7% every generation. It was not significant, and certainly not as significant as any AMD Zen generation leap.
2(b). 5600X is not a replacement for the 3600(non-x). The 5600(non-x) will be a replacement for the 3600. It is not out yet.
4. No one is forced to buy the 5950X/5900X/5600X. If you want a CPU under the 5600X's price, you can buy an Intel CPU, a last-gen AMD CPU, or wait for the 5600(non-x).

You can be disappointed that there is no 5600(non-x) currently, I imagine many of us are, but being appalled that there's not a low end release is a bit ridiculous.
 
Top