• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Ryzen 9 3900X

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
19,274 (3.48/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
The flagship of AMD's new Ryzen 3000 lineup is the Ryzen 9 3900X, which is a 12-core, 24-thread monster. Never before have we seen such power on a desktop platform. Priced at $500, this processor is very strong competition for Intel's Core i9-9900, which only has eight cores.

Show full review
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 1, 2018
Messages
403 (1.55/day)
Location
NL
System Name Serenity
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x (Matisse)
Motherboard ASUS Prime X370-Pro
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism RGB (stock)
Memory Corsair CMK16GX 3000 CL15 (@CL14) - SK Hynix dies.
Video Card(s) Zotac GTX 1080 AMP!
Storage Rubbish M.2 SATA boot drive + 2x Crucial MX500 1TB Raid0
Display(s) ASUS ROG PG348Q, DELL U2713HM, 2x DELL U2414H
Case Fractal Design Define R6 Black TG
Audio Device(s) Sony WH-1000X m2, microlab SOLO7C (Gen1)
Power Supply SuperFlower Gold 800W
Mouse SteelSeries RIVAL 600
Keyboard SteelSeries APEX M750
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Over 9000!
Here we goooo....
Start your reading engines and defog those glasses !

---
Edit: After reading the parts which interest me, one thing is clear:
This is my next CPU (will skip the 16-core, it's too much and from the cost difference I can get a nice 1TB PCIe 4.0 SSD)

Video encoding results are astonishing for the price !
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
10,333 (2.06/day)
System Name MoFo 2
Processor AMD PhenomII 1100T @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair IV
Cooling Swiftec 655 pump, Apogee GT,, MCR360mm Rad, 1/2 loop.
Memory 8GB DDR3-2133 @ 1900 8.9.9.24 1T
Video Card(s) HD7970 1250/1750
Storage Agility 3 SSD 6TB RAID 0 on RAID Card
Display(s) 46" 1080P Toshiba LCD
Case Rosewill R6A34-BK modded (thanks to MKmods)
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Power Supply 750W PC Power & Cooling modded (thanks to MKmods)
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
The most energy efficient per workload, and manages to kick Intel in Dez Nuts at essentially everything within a few percent.

Good work AMD.
 

r9

Joined
Jul 28, 2008
Messages
2,591 (0.65/day)
System Name Desktop | Poweredge r410
Processor i5 6500 4.5GHz@1.275V | 2 x E5620 @2.4GHz
Motherboard ASRock Fatal1ty Gaming | Intel 5500
Memory 16GB DDR4 2400MHz | 32GB ECC DDR3
Video Card(s) RX480 8GB |On-Board
Storage 250GB SSD + 512GB SSD|4x320GB
Display(s) 27" Dell + 2 x 24" LCD Setup
Case Fractal Design Define Nano S
Software Windows 10 | Server 2012 r2
It's definitely and improvement but I was expecting more to be honest.
 
Joined
Mar 30, 2010
Messages
822 (0.24/day)
Location
Edmonton, AB, Canada
System Name Project Neverending
Processor i9 9900K @ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus Maximus Formula XI
Cooling Corsair HX 150i Pro, Corsair ML 120/ML140 fans
Memory 32 GB Corsair Vengeance Pro RGB 3200
Video Card(s) Asus RTX 2080Ti
Storage Samsung 970 Evo NVMe, 2 Samsung 860 Evo 1TB
Display(s) Acer Predator X34 (3440X1440), Samsung U28D590 (3840X2160)
Case Corsair 500D SE RGB
Audio Device(s) Supreme FX X-Fi, Logitech 5.1 speaker system
Power Supply Corsair HX 1000i
Mouse Logitech G703
Keyboard Logitech G105
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Updates coming soon ®
Hopefully this isn't typical for overclocking levels. Was hoping for better results.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
757 (0.86/day)
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) aune x1s
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Qpad MK80
Nothing incredible to see here, i honestly was hoping for a better overclocking ability, and power consumption wasn't supposed to be far lower than intel and temps too?
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
181 (1.55/day)
Location
Denmark - Aarhus
System Name Iglo
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz OC to 4000 mhz (Ivy Brigde)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 9 Socket 1155 LGA
Cooling 240 mm water
Memory 16 gb 2600 mhz ddr3
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC2 GAMING
Storage Ssd ´s in raid.
Display(s) BenQ XL2420Z
Case corsair obsidian 650d
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z-2300 THX-Certified 2.1 Speaker
Power Supply XFX Pro 750
Mouse G900
Keyboard Hyper x
Software win 10
Benchmark Scores Super-PI 1M Time : 9,265 sec CPU-Z scores Version 2017.1 (x64) S-T 395 M-T 1945
And the king is still 9700k/9900k, you can pick the one you prefer even.
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
181 (1.55/day)
Location
Denmark - Aarhus
System Name Iglo
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz OC to 4000 mhz (Ivy Brigde)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 9 Socket 1155 LGA
Cooling 240 mm water
Memory 16 gb 2600 mhz ddr3
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC2 GAMING
Storage Ssd ´s in raid.
Display(s) BenQ XL2420Z
Case corsair obsidian 650d
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z-2300 THX-Certified 2.1 Speaker
Power Supply XFX Pro 750
Mouse G900
Keyboard Hyper x
Software win 10
Benchmark Scores Super-PI 1M Time : 9,265 sec CPU-Z scores Version 2017.1 (x64) S-T 395 M-T 1945
The 9900K is now obsolete unless it gets a heavy price cut.

This offers basically the same gaming performance as the 9900K in 1440p and up, consumes less power despite two extra cores, and demolishes it in productivity :)
No matter your reasons for buying amd or intel, you cant say the new AMD beats intels in gaming.
only reason to go AMD is if you want pcie4.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
757 (0.86/day)
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) aune x1s
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Qpad MK80
The 9900K is now obsolete unless it gets a heavy price cut.

This offers basically the same gaming performance as the 9900K in 1440p and up, consumes less power despite two extra cores, and demolishes it in productivity :)
9900K was already obsolete, but still up there in charts, most of the times it's ahead in gaming, other times it's on par, and it's 4 extra cores, and no it doesn't consume less power https://www.techpowerup.com/review/amd-ryzen-9-3900x/18.html

Hell even the 3700X consumes more (most of the times), and it's got the same amount of cores/threads.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
38 (0.37/day)
The 9900K is now obsolete unless it gets a heavy price cut.

This offers basically the same gaming performance as the 9900K in 1440p and up, consumes less power despite two extra cores, and demolishes it in productivity :)
Maybe I'm an idiot, but the power graphs seemed to show the exact opposite. It uses more power than any other chip tested.
 
Low quality post by La Menthe
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
57 (0.04/day)
Don't worry, AMD won't allow themselves to be beaten by 8700K and even 9700K in gaming. They'll have a 5 GHz part coming out to prove that, as we know they have one according to the reputable TheLostSwede. He has evidence (I know, the evidence has zero relation whatsoever to anything about Zen 5 GHz parts, but who cares? It'S eVidENcE!!).
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2017
Messages
400 (0.45/day)
And the king is still 9700k/9900k, you can pick the one you prefer even.
Hahahaha, poor guy. Since Zen+, AMD has been outselling Intel 2 to 1. It will outsell it at least by 3 to 1 with Zen2.
No matter your reasons for buying amd or intel, you cant say the new AMD beats intels in gaming.
only reason to go AMD is if you want pcie4.
Who said AMD would bet Intel in gaming? Even graphs in the AMD event showed that it's near to the best Intels (in some games it was faster, in some it was a bit slower). And it's really near them: with the strongest GPU on the market, Intel has 5% lead on FHD. With a $1200 GPU. :D

The 9900K is now obsolete unless it gets a heavy price cut.

This offers basically the same gaming performance as the 9900K in 1440p and up, consumes less power despite two extra cores, and demolishes it in productivity :)
It offers the same performance in FHD too. Just realize that the difference is 5% with a 2080Ti on FHD. That's absolutely marginal in terms of high fps. Plus if you "only" use a 1080Ti or 2080, this difference lowers to 0.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Apr 8, 2019
Messages
38 (0.37/day)
Hahahaha, poor guy. Since Zen+, AMD has been outselling Intel 2 to 1. It will outsell it at least by 3 to 1 with Zen2.
Are we really going to continue to use the sales from a single web shop in Germany as a representation of the entire CPU market? I know it may be hard to believe, but the majority of CPU sales are not made to enthusiasts.

Yes, AMD has made great improvements and I personally would buy Zen 2 over any Intel right now, but please just stop with the nonsense.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2018
Messages
75 (0.14/day)
Processor Ryzen 7 1700 @ 3.7ghz
Motherboard Asrock Taichi x370
Cooling Stock
Memory 32gb Trident Z @ 2933
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Vega 64
Storage 256 Sandisk Pro SSD, 1TB Mushkin Reactor SSD, 5TB WD Black HDD
Display(s) Asus MG279Q
Case Phanteks Ethoo Evolv ATX
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2
And the king is still 9700k/9900k, you can pick the one you prefer even.
Alternatively, you could say the king is 3700x/3900x. 10% & 12% faster in CPU tests, only 9% & 7% slower in 720p gaming tests. Both while being better value. For the 3700x a massive 27% better value than the 9700k, and the 3900x being a respectable 8% better value than the 9900k.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 21, 2005
Messages
5,281 (1.05/day)
Location
USA
System Name Small ATX Desktop
Processor Intel i5 8600K @ 4.6 GHz Core & 4.3 GHz Cache @ 1.168V
Motherboard Asrock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE, MonoPlus, Fans: 2xThermalright TY143 / 2xCorsair SP-120L / 2xYate Loon D14BH-12
Memory G-Skill TridentZ 2X8GB DDR4 3200 CL14 F4-3200C14D-16GTZ @ 3200 14-14-14-34 2T @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) Zotac 1060 6GB Mini ZT-P10600A-10L with Arctic MonoPlus and Yate Loon D14BH-12 Fan
Storage OS Samsung 970 Pro 512GB NVMe, Games Phison E12 NVMe 1TB, Data WD10EZEX HDD 1TB
Display(s) 2x Asus PB258Q 2560x1440 25" IPS
Case Lian Li PC A05NB (Inverted Mobo)
Audio Device(s) Audiotechnica ATH M50X, Antlion Mod Mic 4, SYBA SD-CM-UAUD, Acoustic Research 2Ch Speakers
Power Supply Seasonic SS-660XP2 660 Watt Platinum
Mouse Zowie EC2A Mouse, Razer Naga Chroma '14, Corsair MM600, Inateck 900x300 XL pad, Tiger Gaming Skates.
Keyboard Filco Majestouch II Ninja TKL, Goldtouch GTC 0033 Ten Key, PS3 Controller
Software Win7 Pro 64 (Installed on Coffee Lake using AsRock's handy PS/2 Simulator in Bios)
Anandtech shows the Ryzen 3000 under full load using less power than the Intel parts, Techpowerup shows it using more. Maybe Anandtech isn't loading it hard enough.
 

W1zzard

Administrator
Staff member
Joined
May 14, 2004
Messages
19,274 (3.48/day)
Processor Core i7-4790K
Memory 16 GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080
Display(s) 30" 2560x1600 + 19" 1280x1024
Software Windows 7
Anandtech shows the Ryzen 3000 under full load using less power than the Intel parts, Techpowerup shows it using more. Maybe Anandtech isn't loading it hard enough.
Probably depends on the software used. I saw huge differences between Prime95's various stress test types
 
Joined
Mar 24, 2019
Messages
181 (1.55/day)
Location
Denmark - Aarhus
System Name Iglo
Processor Intel® Core™ i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz OC to 4000 mhz (Ivy Brigde)
Motherboard Asrock Z77 Extreme 9 Socket 1155 LGA
Cooling 240 mm water
Memory 16 gb 2600 mhz ddr3
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce GTX 1080 SC2 GAMING
Storage Ssd ´s in raid.
Display(s) BenQ XL2420Z
Case corsair obsidian 650d
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z-2300 THX-Certified 2.1 Speaker
Power Supply XFX Pro 750
Mouse G900
Keyboard Hyper x
Software win 10
Benchmark Scores Super-PI 1M Time : 9,265 sec CPU-Z scores Version 2017.1 (x64) S-T 395 M-T 1945
Alternatively, you could say the king is 3700x/3900x. 10% & 12% faster in CPU tests, only 9% & 7% in 720p gaming tests. Both while being better value. For the 3700x a massive 27% better value than the 9700k, and the 3900x being a respectable 8% better value than the 9900k.
That value goes into nothing if you buy a expensive 570x
 
Joined
Jul 19, 2016
Messages
194 (0.18/day)
Are we really going to continue to use the sales from a single web shop in Germany as a representation of the entire CPU market? I know it may be hard to believe, but the majority of CPU sales are not made to enthusiasts.

Yes, AMD has made great improvements and I personally would buy Zen 2 over any Intel right now, but please just stop with the nonsense.
It's not just from Mindfactory, it's everywhere you look. I just captured this from Amazon.com CPU best sellers. This list is absolutely representative of sales ratios because of the amount of PC hardware Amazon sells. If Ryzen 2000 looks better than 50/50 share, it's only going to get much worse. To be clear I'm talking about the DIY desktop marketshare only, but the same fate will befall other market segments eventually as there is no answer to these CPUs from Intel, only another 14nm refresh of a refresh of a refresh coming 2020.

126355
 
Joined
May 14, 2015
Messages
57 (0.04/day)
You AMD haters are trying so hard and getting very anxious :roll:

Lol I knew this guy was lying from the start, comes across more like an Intel employee, trying to create unrealistic expectations.
The most hilarious part of that is that by noting this very fact, and how people like him fabricate a situation of false hype, and therefore create a sense of disappointment for a fantastic product (because Zen 2 is great; I'm looking forward to finally put a high-end 8 core CPU in my ITX build, without having a jet engine-sounding fan, like Intel's offerings did), you become branded as an Intel fanboy.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 25, 2014
Messages
62 (0.03/day)
Just a question.

Do you always retest every number, in the latest win10 update, and driver enviroment, or are the other processor and vga results just taken over from older reviews?
 
Top