• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD Stock Broke All-Time Record for the Company, Peaked at $49.10 per Share

Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
473 (0.09/day)
AMD - first to dual core, AMD64, IMC, HyperTransport, IF, taking IMC off die for MCM etc.

You can add other achievements, but these are the major ones that come to mind.
First dual core is not true. Intel beat AMD to it and launched Pentium D one week earlier. The fact that Pentium D was hot running and inferior doesn't change that.. :D
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2015
Messages
2,535 (1.42/day)
System Name Wut?
Processor 3900X
Motherboard ASRock Taichi X570
Cooling Water
Memory 32GB GSkill CL16 3600mhz
Video Card(s) Vega 56
Storage 2 x AData XPG 8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) 3440 x 1440
Case Thermaltake Tower 900
Power Supply Seasonic Prime Ultra Platinum
I sold my stock at 42.71 to help get us in line to buy a house, I've held off buying any more simply because I'm weary how hard the stock market will tank once the next recession hits.
If you are worried about a recession, dumping money into real estate isn't exactly the best idea.
 

division2Ubisoft

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
4 (0.17/day)
First dual core is not true. Intel beat AMD to it and launched Pentium D one week earlier. The fact that Pentium D was hot running and inferior doesn't change that.. :D
intel website says that pentium D 820 has 2 cores and 2 threads , but if i remember , D was singlecore with hyperthreading, maybe i am wrong.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,813 (1.13/day)
That's what I remember as well, but tbf I didn't even have a PC at that time so no idea about the launch dates.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
473 (0.09/day)
intel website says that pentium D 820 has 2 cores and 2 threads , but if i remember , D was singlecore with hyperthreading, maybe i am wrong.
That's some of the Pentium Northwood a couple of years earlier, maybe those with 800 FSB, not sure.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
1,011 (0.30/day)
That's what I remember as well, but tbf I didn't even have a PC at that time so no idea about the launch dates.
2005AMD released their first dual-core processor, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (2.0 GHz, 512 KB L2 cache per core), on April 21, 2005.


No to fakes!
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
473 (0.09/day)
first real dualcores was Core2 , is that right? then D was fake like whole intel.
Pentium D was utter crap, but I'm not sure that they were fake dual cores because of that. Someone might call Ryzen 3950 fake just because it doesn't have all the cores on one die.
Hypocrisy. :banghead: :roll:

2005AMD released their first dual-core processor, the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ (2.0 GHz, 512 KB L2 cache per core), on April 21, 2005.




No to fakes!
I do remember *Anandtech reviewing the PD first, and they pointed out that Intel was first. Can't find it now tho.

Other sites show different dates, with the 25th for PD, and the 31st for X2.

X2: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2005/05/31/amd_athlon_64_x2/
X2: https://www.computerworld.com/article/2556702/amd-launches-dual-core-athlon-64-x2.html

PD: https://www.extremetech.com/extreme/75294-intels-pentium-d-price-half-that-of-amds-x2
 
Last edited:

division2Ubisoft

New Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2020
Messages
4 (0.17/day)
That's some of the Pentium Northwood a couple of years earlier, maybe those with 800 FSB, not sure.
ok. no matter what. but core2 was big imprevement in cpu architecture. and ryzen too. for few hundred bucks 8core 16 threads with great IPC.
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2006
Messages
473 (0.09/day)
ok. no matter what. but core2 was big imprevement in cpu architecture. and ryzen too. for few hundred bucks 8core 16 threads with great IPC.
Yeah for sure. Intel was on a roll back then, with Core (1), Core 2, and 45 nm Core 2 being launched within 15 months or so, and with the Core 2 Quad following only six months later (and then no more cores for ten years..).
The situation is pretty much the opposite now with AMD's new models.
 
Joined
Mar 20, 2019
Messages
204 (0.65/day)
Location
Australia
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Motherboard MSI B450 Gaming Plus
Cooling Cryorig H7
Memory Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4 3200MHz 2x8GB
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 8GB Dual-fan OC Edition
Storage Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 512GB NVMe SSD
Case NZXT H500
Power Supply Corsair RM650x Gold 650W
Mouse HyperX Pulsefire FPS Pro
Keyboard HyperX Alloy FPS Cherry MX Blue
Software Kubuntu
This strange alternate dimension we seemed to slip into around 2016 has had some positives! :laugh:
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,813 (1.13/day)
Joined
Mar 6, 2017
Messages
1,792 (1.70/day)
Location
North East Ohio, USA
System Name My Super Computer
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
Cooling Corsair H55 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Crucial/Micron Ballistix Sport DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) ASUS GeForce GTX1060 6GB
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 500 GB NVMe SSD (System Drive), Samsung 860 EVO 500 GB SATA SSD (Game Drive)
Display(s) HP 2311x and Acer G206HQL
Case CoolerMaster MasterBox Lite 5 RGB
Audio Device(s) On-Board Sound
Power Supply EVGA Supernova 650 G3 Gold
Mouse Logitech M705
Keyboard Logitech Wave K350
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/liwjs3
Wasn't the Pentium D simply two Prescott Pentium 4's glued together?
 
Joined
Jan 27, 2015
Messages
12 (0.01/day)
Long term, the formula is the same: AMD will be reaching the end of the Zen product stack in a year, Intel is recovering from their 14nm+++++++ (+?) era, and there are rumors about Keller's new stacked/ultra-dense designs swirling around. Intel will want a replay of 2006 in 2021 (and I feel very old saying that).

View attachment 141184
You guys are comparing Apples to Oranges and coming up with a Bannana.

In 2006 AMD was like Intel. It not only did its own chip design, it had its own Fabs. Even after GloFlo split off, AMD was locked into using their process nodes. A big part of the reason AMD faltered was due to falling behind in fab process technology. No more.

AMD focus' almost entirely on chip design now. TSMC, Samsung, and GloFlo have to worry about the process tech not AMD. These companies are not flyweights. Samsung overall has 3x Intel's revenue (~$210B). TSMC, more than half of Intel's revenue (> 35B). TSMC is far more focused on a particular service than Intel , Samsung much less so. Other much larger companies have vested interest in the success of partners like TSMC (see Apple).

You have mobile / ARM SoCs which continue to pour money and resources into these fabs. They are not in the slightest dependent on AMD, Nvidia, or any other single customer.

This is an entirely different landscape and Intel hasn't shown any capability for quite some time, not only failing in execution (process fab) but in strategy. Core was a derivative of the Pentium-M, which was downplayed vs NetBurst until it became obvious that NetBurst was a failure. Then they sort of dug up Pentium-M and reworked it into Core. It wasn't strategy, they just bumbled into something good that saved their tails.

Highly unlikely that'll happen again.
 
Joined
Dec 22, 2011
Messages
3,025 (1.02/day)
System Name Zimmer Frame Rates
Processor Intel i7 920 @ Stock speeds baby
Motherboard EVGA X58 3X SLI
Cooling True 120
Memory Corsair Vengeance 12GB
Video Card(s) Palit GTX 980 Ti Super JetStream
Storage Of course
Display(s) Crossover 27Q 27" 2560x1440
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Don't be silly
Power Supply XFX 650W Core
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Logitech UltraX
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores Epic
Bingo... "Real men have fabs" until they can't afford them anymore.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2010
Messages
530 (0.15/day)
Against the farewell wishes of the OP, I would like to add I hope they don't drink and drive. Because that is how Sanitarium begins...
 
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
1,111 (0.45/day)
System Name Some computer stuff
Processor Mostly Intel or AMD
Motherboard ATX or mATX
Cooling Bong Cooler
Memory DDR2-4
Video Card(s) A few
Storage Plenty Platters or SSDs or USBs
Display(s) Samsung 23"
Case 5 on the floor
Audio Device(s) There's one for my M7 Gene, Oh I have 3-4 PCI 5.1 ones.Sabrent! lol
Power Supply 750-1000W
Mouse cheap
Keyboard Used ps2 from garage sales
Software Yeah
Benchmark Scores http://hwbot.org/user/schmuckley/#Hardware_Library http://valid.canardpc.com/rbjpbg
If only I had the money to buy when it was $2 a share. It was not that long ago, and I knew they would come through.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,488 (0.92/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Wasn't the Pentium D simply two Prescott Pentium 4's glued together?
Yes they were.
Glue together desktop dies, according to Intel own marketing slides should be completely useless :laugh:
What is even more ironic is the 28-core XCC dies are technically HEDT dies now,
so Intel also glued together 2 of them to make the 56-core Xeon 9200 series.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
7,727 (1.73/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name _
Processor 8700K @ 5.1 Ghz
Motherboard MSI Z370-A PRO
Cooling 120mm Custom Liquid
Memory 32 GB 3600 Mhz DDR4 16-16-16-36-380 trfc - 2T
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 2080 Ti Windforce (Undervolted OC 1905MHz)
Storage 3x1TB SSDs
Display(s) Alienware 34" 3440x1440 120hz, G-Sync
Case Jonsbo U4
Audio Device(s) Bose Solo
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse silent click gaming mouse
Keyboard tenkeyless
Software Windows 10 64 Bit
You guys are comparing Apples to Oranges and coming up with a Bannana.

In 2006 AMD was like Intel. It not only did its own chip design, it had its own Fabs. Even after GloFlo split off, AMD was locked into using their process nodes. A big part of the reason AMD faltered was due to falling behind in fab process technology. No more.

AMD focus' almost entirely on chip design now. TSMC, Samsung, and GloFlo have to worry about the process tech not AMD. These companies are not flyweights. Samsung overall has 3x Intel's revenue (~$210B). TSMC, more than half of Intel's revenue (> 35B). TSMC is far more focused on a particular service than Intel , Samsung much less so. Other much larger companies have vested interest in the success of partners like TSMC (see Apple).

You have mobile / ARM SoCs which continue to pour money and resources into these fabs. They are not in the slightest dependent on AMD, Nvidia, or any other single customer.

This is an entirely different landscape and Intel hasn't shown any capability for quite some time, not only failing in execution (process fab) but in strategy. Core was a derivative of the Pentium-M, which was downplayed vs NetBurst until it became obvious that NetBurst was a failure. Then they sort of dug up Pentium-M and reworked it into Core. It wasn't strategy, they just bumbled into something good that saved their tails.

Highly unlikely that'll happen again.
Except they did it again with Nehalem, and then again with Sandy Bridge... Also, they have a guy working for them who is known to do these types of things, and was the guy that came up with Zen.

I don't really think it's as unlikely as you think it is... AMD was unlikely with Zen - that was a rabbit out of a hat; but again, the guy that did that has been at intel for the last 3 years.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2013
Messages
2,813 (1.13/day)
Except they did it again with Nehalem, and then again with Sandy Bridge... Also, they have a guy working for them who is known to do these types of things, and was the guy that came up with Zen.

I don't really think it's as unlikely as you think it is... AMD was unlikely with Zen - that was a rabbit out of a hat; but again, the guy that did that has been at intel for the last 3 years.
And again AMD was stuck with 90nm & then 65nm, before moving to 32nm for *dozer which in fact was going backwards for IPC. Yes Jim Keller did a lot of good work at AMD, but you'd be naive to think that he did wonders (all by himself) & that Zen is not a culmination of whatever AMD had cooking up from their experiences with FX, Cat cores.

Simply put don't expect miracles from the Man, while a double digit IPC is likely with one or both of the upcoming *coves but again you've also seen absolute frequency go down on 10nm & will likely go down further on 7nm. Intel & AMD will be fighting a bitter freq vs IPC battle as the nodes get smaller, so any potential rabbit out of the hats will be rarer still.
 

hat

Enthusiast
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
20,800 (4.32/day)
Location
Ohio
System Name Starlifter :: Dragonfly
Processor i7 2600k 4.4GHz :: Athlon II x4 630 3.5GHz
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Pro :: GIgabyte GA-770T-USB3
Cooling Corsair H70 :: Thermaltake Big Typhoon
Memory 2x4GB DDR3 1866 :: 2x1GB DDR3 1333
Video Card(s) 2x PNY GTX1070 :: none
Storage Plextor M5s 128GB, WDC Black 500GB :: Mushkin Enhanced 60GB SSD, WD RE3 1TB
Display(s) Acer P216HL HDMI :: None
Case Antec SOHO 1030B :: Old White Full Tower
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatal1ty Pro - iLive IT153B Soundbar (optical) :: None
Power Supply FSP Hydro GE 550w :: something
Software Windows 10 Pro - Plex Server on Dragonfly
Benchmark Scores >9000
Overall performance is what matters. Nobody cared that Core 2 was clocked slower than their predecessors when they saw how well it actually performed.
 
Joined
Dec 29, 2010
Messages
1,011 (0.30/day)
Except they did it again with Nehalem, and then again with Sandy Bridge... Also, they have a guy working for them who is known to do these types of things, and was the guy that came up with Zen.

I don't really think it's as unlikely as you think it is... AMD was unlikely with Zen - that was a rabbit out of a hat; but again, the guy that did that has been at intel for the last 3 years.
You know he wasn't the chief architect right and that there was a small team there specifically for Zen? Fyi, the chief architect is Michael Clark. Jim was the team leader. And Keller has been at Intel since 2018 so not 3 years. Keller does have a team that's more than double the team below. That's the Austin design team btw. I love Keller but he definitely wasn't the the chief behind Zen.

AR-304079789.jpg
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
305 (0.09/day)
Processor Intel Core i5 8400
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370N-Wifi
Cooling Silverstone AR05
Memory Micron Crucial 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 Gaming 8G
Storage Micron Crucial MX300 275GB
Display(s) Dell U2415
Case Silverstone RVZ02B
Power Supply Silverstone SSR-SX550
Keyboard Ducky One Red Switch
Software Windows 10 Pro 1903
Yes they were.
Glue together desktop dies, according to Intel own marketing slides should be completely useless :laugh:
What is even more ironic is the 28-core XCC dies are technically HEDT dies now,
so Intel also glued together 2 of them to make the 56-core Xeon 9200 series.
The Q6600 was also glued together wasn't it? I remembered all the hype of it being the first quad core :laugh:
But then the epic fail of that era was probably AMD Quad Platform which didn't even have the glue
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,488 (0.92/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard X399 Fatal1ty Professional Gaming
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Memory Team T-FORCE XCALIBUR RGB 4000 @3400 CL14
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Samsung 960 Evo 512GB 3-way Raid 0
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) EVGA Nu Audio
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
The Q6600 was also glued together wasn't it? I remembered all the hype of it being the first quad core :laugh:
But then the epic fail of that era was probably AMD Quad Platform which didn't even have the glue
Yes it was, and it was one of the best Intel product for its time.
It also overclocked like a champ.
The issue with how Intel did the Pentium D and Core 2 Quads were the 2 dies were connected via the external Northbridge.
So as you expect there would be a latency hit for doing that. Ironically the Zen 2 IO die is basically an internal Northbridge.
So we went from external to on die, then to off the die but still in the CPU package. o_O
 
Top