You are reading my post wrong.You're reading/interpreting the graphs wrong. Smaller is better. First graph is how big the chunks of revenue are and the exposure is what % of their revenue stream did that junk represent. It hardly made a dent in MS/Intel revenue to the point they probably didn't notice.
So many obvious interpretations can be derived from those 2 graphs, something like
" Broadcom / Qualcomm lost trillions of dollars with serious exposure."
" Flex, the ultimate victim behind the Huawei ban with 5% of its revenues being exposed "
would better suit the graphs more since they are the huge bars underneath.
Yet the OP chose to focus on AMD, which barely made it through the top half of the chart.