• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD tapes out its Bulldozer CPU architecture

CDdude55

Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
8,178 (1.34/day)
Location
Virginia
System Name CDdude's Rig!
Processor AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s) XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s) ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s) Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
2,186 (0.43/day)
Location
England


Back on track though...



Any price point heard of for these new line-ups?
 

wolf

Performance Enthusiast
Joined
May 7, 2007
Messages
7,726 (1.25/day)
System Name MightyX
Processor Ryzen 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 I Aorus Pro WiFi
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 32GB DDR4 3600 CL16
Video Card(s) Asus TUF RTX3080 Deshrouded
Storage WD Black SN850X 2TB
Display(s) LG 42C2 4K OLED
Case Coolermaster NR200P
Audio Device(s) LG SN5Y / Focal Clear
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Corsair Dark Core RBG Pro SE
Keyboard Glorious GMMK Compact w/pudding
VR HMD Meta Quest 3
Software case populated with Artic P12's
Benchmark Scores 4k120 OLED Gsync bliss
I want to see stock clocked chips at 4+ ghz, even just 4 cores, I have no need for more than that, just give me sheer speed already.

Having said that I really doubt AMD will be the first to throw a 4ghz stock clocker on the table, at least at the mainstream consumer grade.
 

TheMailMan78

Big Member
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,599 (3.68/day)
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2666 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
Watercooling accident if anything.

Well at least he went with honor! My condolences. Here in honor of your friend have a beer on me!

 
Joined
Mar 23, 2005
Messages
4,054 (0.58/day)
Location
Ancient Greece, Acropolis (Time Lord)
System Name RiseZEN Gaming PC
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ Auto
Motherboard Asus ROG Strix X570-E Gaming ATX Motherboard
Cooling Corsair H115i Elite Capellix AIO, 280mm Radiator, Dual RGB 140mm ML Series PWM Fans
Memory G.Skill TridentZ 64GB (4 x 16GB) DDR4 3200
Video Card(s) ASUS DUAL RX 6700 XT DUAL-RX6700XT-12G
Storage Corsair Force MP500 480GB M.2 & MP510 480GB M.2 - 2 x WD_BLACK 1TB SN850X NVMe 1TB
Display(s) ASUS ROG Strix 34” XG349C 180Hz 1440p + Asus ROG 27" MG278Q 144Hz WQHD 1440p
Case Corsair Obsidian Series 450D Gaming Case
Audio Device(s) SteelSeries 5Hv2 w/ Sound Blaster Z SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750x Power Supply
Mouse Razer Death-Adder + Viper 8K HZ Ambidextrous Gaming Mouse - Ergonomic Left Hand Edition
Keyboard Logitech G910 Orion Spectrum RGB Gaming Keyboard
Software Windows 11 Pro - 64-Bit Edition
Benchmark Scores I'm the Doctor, Doctor Who. The Definition of Gaming is PC Gaming...
If they actually make a CPU that beats my i7 this time and it's at a good price, i shall be switching over.:)
Bulldozer is meant to complete with Intel's next gen or some may call it Nehalen 2. So obviously if Bulldozer does not beat Core i7 then AMD has major issues. Bring it on SandyBridge, we need competition to help drive prices down into the dirt. :toast:
 

DrPepper

The Doctor is in the house
Joined
Jan 16, 2008
Messages
7,482 (1.26/day)
Location
Scotland (It rains alot)
System Name Rusky
Processor Intel Core i7 D0 3.8Ghz
Motherboard Asus P6T
Cooling Thermaltake Dark Knight
Memory 12GB Patriot Viper's 1866mhz 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) GTX470 1280MB
Storage OCZ Summit 60GB + Samsung 1TB + Samsung 2TB
Display(s) Sharp Aquos L32X20E 1920 x 1080
Case Silverstone Raven RV01
Power Supply Corsair 650 Watt
Software Windows 7 x64
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06 - 18064 http://img.techpowerup.org/090720/Capture002.jpg
Joined
Jul 30, 2007
Messages
6,560 (1.08/day)
System Name Vintage
Processor i7 - 3770K @ Stock
Cooling Scythe Zipang II
Memory 2x4GB Crucial DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970
Storage M4 124GB SSD// WD Black 640GB// WD Black 1TB//Samsung F3 1.5TB
Display(s) Samsung SM223BW 21.6"
Case Generic
Power Supply Corsair HX 520W
Software Windows 7

CDdude55

Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
8,178 (1.34/day)
Location
Virginia
System Name CDdude's Rig!
Processor AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s) XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s) ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s) Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1
Bulldozer is meant to complete with Intel's next gen or some may call it Nehalen 2. So obviously if Bulldozer does not beat Core i7 then AMD has major issues. Bring it on SandyBridge, we need competition to help drive prices down into the dirt. :toast:

I agree.;)
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,812 (1.67/day)
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Pandemic 2020
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 "Gen 2" 2600X
Motherboard AsRock X470 Killer Promontory
Cooling CoolerMaster 240 RGB Master Cooler (Newegg Eggxpert)
Memory 32 GB Geil EVO Portenza DDR4 3200 MHz
Video Card(s) ASUS Radeon RX 580 DirectX 12 DUAL-RX580-O8G 8GB 256-Bit GDDR5 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video C
Storage WD 250 M.2, Corsair P500 M.2, OCZ Trion 500, WD Black 1TB, Assorted others.
Display(s) ASUS MG24UQ Gaming Monitor - 23.6" 4K UHD (3840x2160) , IPS, Adaptive Sync, DisplayWidget
Case Fractal Define R6 C
Audio Device(s) Realtek 5.1 Onboard
Power Supply Corsair RMX 850 Platinum PSU (Newegg Eggxpert)
Mouse Razer Death Adder
Keyboard Corsair K95 Mechanical & Corsair K65 Wired, Wireless, Bluetooth)
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Wow, about time, been speculating on this with a tPU member or two and some personal friends. Cant wait to see what the prices and yields are. I would love to see just about most software now come out with at least dual cores in mind (if not quad cores). That would benefit greatly. Wonder if Windows 7 is optimized for Dual cores. Anyone know?
 
Joined
Jan 2, 2009
Messages
9,899 (1.78/day)
Location
Essex, England
System Name My pc
Processor Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Rog b450-f
Cooling Cooler master 120mm aio
Memory 16gb ddr4 3200mhz
Video Card(s) MSI Ventus 3x 3070
Storage 2tb intel nvme and 2tb generic ssd
Display(s) Generic dell 1080p overclocked to 75hz
Case Phanteks enthoo
Power Supply 650w of borderline fire hazard
Mouse Some wierd Chinese vertical mouse
Keyboard Generic mechanical keyboard
Software Windows ten
Bah, waiting for tomorrow for news!

Looking forward to this chip, if its decent price/performance I'm getting an AMD platform next year.

Well unless their graphics turn out crappy next year.

And vice versa <_< or both.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Performance: We release benchmarks at launch, so don’t expect too much detail there anytime soon. From a performance standpoint, if you compare our 16-core Interlagos to our current 12-core AMD Opteron™ 6100 Series processors (code named “Magny Cours”) we estimate that customers will see up to 50% more performance from 33% more cores. This means we expect the per core performance to go in the right direction — up. That is all I will say until launch.

http://blogs.amd.com/work/2010/08/02/what-is-bulldozer/


For those unaware, there is TONNES of info on the AMD website about these upcoming processors. When I said speculation is pointless, I really meant it.

We can extrapolate on the info I posted here form AMD, and suggest that each new Bulldozer core will offer about 4% more performance, clock-for-clock. Hardly what people are looking for, and hardly an i7 killer. Again, I said it's two years too late, and I stand by that comment.
 
Joined
Nov 4, 2005
Messages
11,655 (1.73/day)
System Name Compy 386
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard Asus
Cooling Air for now.....
Memory 64 GB DDR5 6400Mhz
Video Card(s) 7900XTX 310 Merc
Storage Samsung 990 2TB, 2 SP 2TB SSDs and over 10TB spinning
Display(s) 56" Samsung 4K HDR
Audio Device(s) ATI HDMI
Mouse Logitech MX518
Keyboard Razer
Software A lot.
Benchmark Scores Its fast. Enough.
we estimate that customers will see up to 50% more performance from 33% more cores.

So for a example we will say the 12 core system can execute 1000 standard complex threads in one second. 1000/12= 83.33 per core. So now we have a standardized core work number.

So they say that the new processor will do 1500 standard complex threads in once second. 1500/16=93.75 threads per core per second, or a 12.5 clock efficiency increase per core.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
we estimate that customers will see up to 50% more performance from 33% more cores.

So for a example we will say the 12 core system can execute 1000 standard complex threads in one second. 1000/12= 83.33 per core. So now we have a standardized core work number.

So they say that the new processor will do 1500 standard complex threads in once second. 1500/16=93.75 threads per core per second, or a 12.5 clock efficiency increase per core.

Flawed logic. Try your math again. Your numbers are not correct. Uh, let's start with 93.75-83.33....reversing the math give 151+%.



I look at it this way... we added 33% more cores, but got 50% more performance. that leaves 17% extra performance, spread across 16 cores...;) I see your logic as interpreting the increase from only those extra 4 cores....
 
Last edited:
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,792 (0.40/day)
Location
Tre, Suomi Finland
System Name Ladpot ◦◦◦ Desktop
Processor R7 5800H ◦◦◦ i7 4770K, watercooled
Motherboard HP 88D2 ◦◦◦ Asus Z87-C2 Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Mixed gases ◦◦◦ Fuzion V1, MCW60/R2, DDC1/DDCT-01s top, PA120.3, EK200, D12SL-12, liq.metal TIM
Memory 2× 8GB DDR4-3200 ◦◦◦ 2× 8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 ◦◦◦ heaps of dead GPUs in the garage
Storage Samsung 980 PRO 2TB ◦◦◦ Samsung 840Pro 256@178GB + 4× WD Red 2TB in RAID10 + LaCie Blade Runner 4TB
Display(s) HP ZR30w 30" 2560×1600 (WQXGA) H2-IPS
Case Lian Li PC-A16B
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S / Contour RollerMouse Red+
Keyboard Logitech Elite Keyboard from 2006 / Contour Balance Keyboard / Logitech diNovo Edge
Software W11 x64 ◦◦◦ W10 x64
Benchmark Scores It does boot up? I think.
that leaves 17% extra performance, spread across 16 cores
[rhetorical question]
If a quad core processor "A" is 17% faster than quad core processor "B", then how much faster is processor "A" per core?
[/rhetorical question]

That's right. 17% increase per core would be really nice if you ask me.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
[rhetorical question]
If a quad core processor "A" is 17% faster than quad core processor "B", then how much faster is processor "A" per core?
[/rhetorical question]

That's right. 17% increase per core would be really nice if you ask me.

No doubt. I am expecting AT MOST 4& per clock...mind you, this core is so very different, that may be completely off-base.

So, if we look at Steevo's numbers, he says 12.5, but really, he gets "12" and not "1.2" by using a 1000-base number for the calculation instead of 100-base.

Anyway, it's more like 1.03% increase per core.
 
Joined
May 6, 2005
Messages
2,792 (0.40/day)
Location
Tre, Suomi Finland
System Name Ladpot ◦◦◦ Desktop
Processor R7 5800H ◦◦◦ i7 4770K, watercooled
Motherboard HP 88D2 ◦◦◦ Asus Z87-C2 Maximus VI Formula
Cooling Mixed gases ◦◦◦ Fuzion V1, MCW60/R2, DDC1/DDCT-01s top, PA120.3, EK200, D12SL-12, liq.metal TIM
Memory 2× 8GB DDR4-3200 ◦◦◦ 2× 8GB Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) RTX 3070 ◦◦◦ heaps of dead GPUs in the garage
Storage Samsung 980 PRO 2TB ◦◦◦ Samsung 840Pro 256@178GB + 4× WD Red 2TB in RAID10 + LaCie Blade Runner 4TB
Display(s) HP ZR30w 30" 2560×1600 (WQXGA) H2-IPS
Case Lian Li PC-A16B
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Mouse Logitech MX Master 2S / Contour RollerMouse Red+
Keyboard Logitech Elite Keyboard from 2006 / Contour Balance Keyboard / Logitech diNovo Edge
Software W11 x64 ◦◦◦ W10 x64
Benchmark Scores It does boot up? I think.
I reeeaaallly don't see why you're expecting that 4%.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Hoping. That is all.:laugh: If that's the case though, I'd be swapping out my server farm. I REALLY want to do this, so I gotta hope.
 

trickson

OH, I have such a headache
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
7,595 (1.08/day)
Location
Planet Earth.
System Name Ryzen TUF.
Processor AMD Ryzen7 3700X
Motherboard Asus TUF X570 Gaming Plus
Cooling Noctua
Memory Gskill RipJaws 3466MHz
Video Card(s) Asus TUF 1650 Super Clocked.
Storage CB 1T M.2 Drive.
Display(s) 73" Soney 4K.
Case Antech LanAir Pro.
Audio Device(s) Denon AVR-S750H
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Optical
Keyboard K120 Logitech
Software Windows 10 64 bit Home OEM
Looks like AMD may have some thing to finally bring to the table . Still I do not see myself getting a new system for another 3 years as well the Quad I have should be just fine for many more years to come . It would be nice to see AMD on top again but till I see some real chips tested no one can say for sure what Bulldozer will be able to do .
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
Looks like AMD may have some thing to finally bring to the table . Still I do not see myself getting a new system for another 3 years as well the Quad I have should be just fine for many more years to come . It would be nice to see AMD on top again but till I see some real chips tested no one can say for sure what Bulldozer will be able to do .

Yeah, and AMD is last presenter tomorrow @ HotChips. So the info is most likely NOT gonna be known until long after that. We need yeild info, and that is too far off..we won't get real performance until launch, next year some time. Would be nice to see a pre-holiday launch, but I think that's more wishfull thinking on my part.
 
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
2,186 (0.43/day)
Location
England
Yeah, and AMD is last presenter tomorrow @ HotChips. So the info is most likely NOT gonna be known until long after that. We need yeild info, and that is too far off..we won't get real performance until launch, next year some time. Would be nice to see a pre-holiday launch, but I think that's more wishfull thinking on my part.

No, not just on your part... seem's like pretty much all of us in this thread are wanting to see some results quicker than AMD can make them. :(
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
1,007 (0.15/day)
Processor 2500K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair A70
Memory 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1600 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) eVGA GTX 470
Storage Crucial m4 128GB + Seagate RAID 1 (1TB x 2)
Display(s) Dell 22" 1680x1050 nothing special
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W
Software Windows 7 64bit Pro
Flawed logic. Try your math again. Your numbers are not correct. Uh, let's start with 93.75-83.33....reversing the math give 151+%.



I look at it this way... we added 33% more cores, but got 50% more performance. that leaves 17% extra performance, spread across 16 cores...;) I see your logic as interpreting the increase from only those extra 4 cores....

I've got to agree with Steevo and his math on this one, well since it's right...

Just clarifying his numbers using the 1000 threads per second example

33% more cores: so 12 cores * 1.333333..... = 16 cores
50% more performance: 1000 * 1.5 = 1500 threads per second

So the old 12 core proc. would do 1000 threads per second while the new 16 core will do 1500 per second (threads of whatever, not relavent here... just some AMD spec'd performance numbers):
that means old did 1000/12=83.33 threads per second per core
new will do 1500/16=93.75 threads per second per core

so that's 93.75 for the new and 83.33 for the old. To find the percentage increase that's 93.75/83.33=12.5% faster per core than the old architecture.

Now I'm not sure if AMD's numbers are skewed and that 50% performance increase was more than likely on a specific test; however, going by those numbers they posted the math shows the new cores should be 12.5% faster per clock.
 

trickson

OH, I have such a headache
Joined
Dec 5, 2004
Messages
7,595 (1.08/day)
Location
Planet Earth.
System Name Ryzen TUF.
Processor AMD Ryzen7 3700X
Motherboard Asus TUF X570 Gaming Plus
Cooling Noctua
Memory Gskill RipJaws 3466MHz
Video Card(s) Asus TUF 1650 Super Clocked.
Storage CB 1T M.2 Drive.
Display(s) 73" Soney 4K.
Case Antech LanAir Pro.
Audio Device(s) Denon AVR-S750H
Power Supply Corsair TX750
Mouse Optical
Keyboard K120 Logitech
Software Windows 10 64 bit Home OEM
I just hope the AMD fanboys wont get all upsad if they are not what they expect . Nut I sure hope AMD finally gets it right . My hope is they are going to at the very least mach the core i7's . that is a tall order seeing as AMD has been trying for years now .
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
17,232 (2.63/day)
I've got to agree with Steevo and his math on this one, well since it's right...

Just clarifying his numbers using the 1000 threads per second example

33% more cores: so 12 cores * 1.333333..... = 16 cores
50% more performance: 1000 * 1.5 = 1500 threads per second

So the old 12 core proc. would do 1000 threads per second while the new 16 core will do 1500 per second (threads of whatever, not relavent here... just some AMD spec'd performance numbers):
that means old did 1000/12=83.33 threads per second per core
new will do 1500/16=93.75 threads per second per core

so that's 93.75 for the new and 83.33 for the old. To find the percentage increase that's 93.75/83.33=12.5% faster per core than the old architecture.

Now I'm not sure if AMD's numbers are skewed and that 50% performance increase was more than likely on a specific test; however, going by those numbers they posted the math shows the new cores should be 12.5% faster per clock.

Again, flawed equation. If each core was 12.5% faster, there'd be more than 50% increase. 12.5%, times 16 cores= what? 200%? and 12 cores is 150%?


Please. FIX. THAT. math.
 

CDdude55

Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
8,178 (1.34/day)
Location
Virginia
System Name CDdude's Rig!
Processor AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s) XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s) ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s) Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1
I just hope the AMD fanboys wont get all upsad if they are not what they expect . Nut I sure hope AMD finally gets it right . My hope is they are going to at the very least mach the core i7's . that is a tall order seeing as AMD has been trying for years now .

I agree on that, there past two lineups have yet to truly past an i7. I'm hoping we will see a good resurgence with this architecture. As a person who doesn't cum my pants over a particular company(aka a fanboy), i truly won't be heartbroken if these chips don't succeed.
 
Joined
Nov 15, 2005
Messages
1,007 (0.15/day)
Processor 2500K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard ASUS P8P67 Deluxe
Cooling Corsair A70
Memory 8GB (2x4GB) Corsair Vengeance 1600 9-9-9-24 1T
Video Card(s) eVGA GTX 470
Storage Crucial m4 128GB + Seagate RAID 1 (1TB x 2)
Display(s) Dell 22" 1680x1050 nothing special
Case Antec 300
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply PC Power & Cooling 750W
Software Windows 7 64bit Pro
Again, flawed equation. If each core was 12.5% faster, there'd be more than 50% increase. 12.5%, times 16 cores= what? 200%? and 12 cores is 150%?


Please. FIX. THAT. math.

Um, no there wouldn't. Simple math. Very simple in fact.

You have a 50% increase with 33% more resources.

You want to do it the easiest way:
the old cpu had 1.00 (100% resources), new has 1.33 (33% more or 133%)
old cpu did 1.00 work (100%), new does 1.50 (50% increase)

That's now 1.5/1.33 = 1.125 ish. So still your 12.5% increase per core. AMD didn't use number of cores do denote how much faster they are, just 33% more cores make a 50% increase. The 12 and 16 cores I'm assuming were just pulled out since they make that 33% more a very convenient whole number. But still, if you think about it as 50% more work is done with only 33% added resources you can see that they should more than 4% faster. They should be 1.5/1.33 faster.
 
Top