• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to Detail Zen 2, Navi Architectures Come Hot Chips in August

Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,655 (2.19/day)
Talk about Drama , it's now the loudest fan in a pc, if they're going to that quite extreme ,a bit more effort would be nothing.
Yes, the small high rpm fans tend to be louder than larger low rpm ones. How can you not know this?
Doesn't intels latest hedt feature fans on the Vrms , dya think that's noisey.
I have no idea. And I can't say I care very much about Intel HEDT). If you have a lot of money and you spend it on a PC, it's your choice (conscious, I hope).
I've mentioned earlier that a chipset fan is something that shouldn't happen in consumer PCs, i.e. be forced on buyers who don't care about benchmarks.

If similar fans will appear on lower AM4 chipsets, it'll make this platform even less interesting in the mass market.
And if they don't (despite PCIe4.0 support), it'll mean it wasn't the controller but X570 design/tuning after all. :)
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2011
Messages
1,423 (0.46/day)
Location
Greece
Processor AMD FX-8350 4GHz@1.3V
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-970A UD3 Rev3.0
Cooling Zalman CNPS5X Performa
Memory 2*4GB Patriot Venom RED DDR3 1600MHz CL9
Video Card(s) XFX RX580 GTS 4GB
Storage Sandisk SSD 120GB, 2 Samsung F1 & F3 (1TB)
Display(s) LG IPS235
Case Zalman Neo Z9 Black
Audio Device(s) Via 7.1 onboard
Power Supply OCZ Z550
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Trust GXT280
Software Win 7 sp1 64bit
Benchmark Scores CB R15 64bit: single core 99p, multicore 647p WPrime 1.55 (8 cores): 9.0 secs
But the people that mock the offtopic haven't really tried to discuss Zen2. So maybe no one is interested in Zen anymore? Maybe our fan fun gave this topic a life?

And yes, chipset is part of the Zen2 platform. If Zen2 forces fans on chipsets in any way (could be technical, could be simply not giving mobo makers enough time), then we are entitled to discuss this in "Zen2 architecture" topic.
We all know that apart from some X570 motherboards that will be the only ones to support PCIE4 and the top TDP Zen2 cpus, the rest will have the same basic design as the previous 2 gens fro Ryzen cpus. You just pretend to be ignorant of this info just to troll AMD as usual... :rolleyes:
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
6,758 (1.92/day)
Location
Manchester uk
System Name RyzenGtEvo
Processor Amd R7 3800X@4.350/525
Motherboard Crosshair hero7 @bios 2703
Cooling 360EK extreme rad+ 360$EK slim all push, cpu Monoblock Gpu full cover all EK
Memory Corsair Vengeance Rgb pro 3600cas14 16Gb in two sticks.
Video Card(s) Sapphire refference Rx vega 64 EK waterblocked
Storage Samsung Nvme Pg981, silicon power 1Tb samsung 840 basic as a primocache drive for, WD2Tbgrn +3Tbgrn,
Display(s) Samsung UAE28"850R 4k freesync, LG 49" 4K 60hz ,Oculus
Case Lianli p0-11 dynamic
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup, corsair void pro headset
Power Supply corsair 1200Hxi
Mouse Roccat Kova
Keyboard Roccat Iksu force fx
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 8726 vega 3dmark timespy
Yes, the small high rpm fans tend to be louder than larger low rpm ones. How can you not know this?

I have no idea. And I can't say I care very much about Intel HEDT). If you have a lot of money and you spend it on a PC, it's your choice (conscious, I hope).
I've mentioned earlier that a chipset fan is something that shouldn't happen in consumer PCs, i.e. be forced on buyers who don't care about benchmarks.

If similar fans will appear on lower AM4 chipsets, it'll make this platform even less interesting in the mass market.
And if they don't (despite PCIe4.0 support), it'll mean it wasn't the controller but X570 design/tuning after all. :)
I said bye ages ago , your just re typeing the same shit over and over , without any proof THIS fan is anything like you say, total bullshit.
Your not interested in buying Amd , you troll every thread ,sat at a total shitter i wouldn't game on.
That could just about play CsGo.
You know f all about tech yet spend hours on forums chatting ball's.


We are no longer debating , we disagree ,we went over it all twice,now stfu unless you have actual proof on THESE board's precisely.
And do not speak to me regarding this shit again.
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.65/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
I said bye ages ago , your just re typeing the same shit over and over , without any proof THIS fan is anything like you say, total bullshit.
Your not interested in buying Amd , you troll every thread ,sat at a total shitter i wouldn't game on.
That could just about play CsGo.
You know f all about tech yet spend hours on forums chatting ball's.


We are no longer debating , we disagree ,we went over it all twice,now stfu unless you have actual proof on THESE board's precisely.
And do not speak to me regarding this shit again.
Don't be dragged down, just report it, he's a professional troll
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
633 (2.62/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 3200 CL16 @ 3466 CL 14
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 6GB SSC
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) BenQ BL2411PT
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 300
Keyboard Generic Dell

AMD has chipset fan, OMG! Impossibru! We're back to 2007! OMG!

Oh wait...
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
10,101 (5.42/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
You know the TDP of X570?

As I've tried to point out earlier in this thread, the chipset gets really hot when NVMe is used in RAID, hence the "need" for fans.



Just ignore him, he can't even tell the difference between mm and cm and someone that ignorant is't worth seeing in the forums.
So it has a purpose beyond shoddy engineering and is used situationally. Sounds exactly like most other boards that use a small fan. I think we can move on :)
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
4,317 (0.79/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/ztiub6
So it has a purpose beyond shoddy engineering and is used situationally. Sounds exactly like most other boards that use a small fan. I think we can move on :)
X570 should have 16 PCIe 4.0 lanes for peripherals, plus SATA and USB 3.1 Gen 2... It's not possible to make a cool running chipset unless you move to a more advanced manufacturing node and it's something AMD didn't do for whatever reason, be it cost, time, resources, something else... Unfortunately this means that those that want an X570 board, has to suffer with a bit hotter running chipset. However, from my understanding of what I know so far, the chipset only gets really hot when NVMe RAID is enabled or if you do a lot of high-speed data transfers over the PCIe bus. My guess is that the fans won't kick in unless the chipset goes over a certain temperature threshold.
 
Joined
Feb 11, 2009
Messages
2,228 (0.57/day)
System Name Cyberline
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k
Motherboard Asus P8P67 LE Rev 3.0
Cooling Arctic Freezer Pro 7
Memory Corsair (4x2) 8gb 1600mhz
Video Card(s) AMD RX480
Storage Kingstone 60gb SSD + WD 1tb x 2 + WD 2tb
Display(s) Philips 32inch LPF5605H (television)
Case antec 600
Audio Device(s) Focusrite 2i4 (USB)
Power Supply Seasonic 620watt 80+ Platinum
Mouse Elecom EX-G
Keyboard Rapoo V700
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
Mods...seriously, I dont want to tell you how to do your job but you can see the bait fanboy reactions going on in every threat right?
Care to do anything about this?
 
Joined
Apr 21, 2010
Messages
5,731 (1.65/day)
Location
West Midlands. UK.
System Name Ryzen Reynolds
Processor Ryzen 1600 - 4.0Ghz 1.415v - SMT disabled
Motherboard mATX Asrock AB350m AM4
Cooling Raijintek Leto Pro
Memory Vulcan T-Force 16GB DDR4 3000 16.18.18 @3200Mhz 14.17.17
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ 4GB RX 580 - 1450/2000 BIOS mod 8-)
Storage Seagate B'cuda 1TB/Sandisk 128GB SSD
Display(s) Acer ED242QR 75hz Freesync
Case Corsair Carbide Series SPEC-01
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair VS 550w
Mouse Zalman ZM-M401R
Keyboard Razor Lycosa
Software Windows 10 x64
Benchmark Scores https://www.3dmark.com/spy/6220813
Mods...seriously, I dont want to tell you how to do your job but you can see the bait fanboy reactions going on in every threat right?
Care to do anything about this?
No they won't, they rather wait until someone finally reacts and then infract them instead, going by personnel experience. And yes this happens in every related thread with the same usual suspects every time repeating the same stuff over and over.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,655 (2.19/day)
We all know that apart from some X570 motherboards that will be the only ones to support PCIE4 and the top TDP Zen2 cpus, the rest will have the same basic design as the previous 2 gens fro Ryzen cpus. You just pretend to be ignorant of this info just to troll AMD as usual... :rolleyes:
To be honest, I didn't know that has been confirmed. I'm not surprised at all, but it would erode the platform attractiveness even further.
X570 motherboards will be very expensive because of OC/gaming features. Do I really need a X570 mobo for Zen2 PC used for rendering or scientific computing?

As a result, aren't you worried about top Zen2 power consumption? Why would they not be supported on lower motherboards if they're good enough for 8C Zen+ (95W TDP). Just how much more will a 12C Zen2 pull? I think most AMD fans hoped it'll be at least similar.
It's not possible to make a cool running chipset unless you move to a more advanced manufacturing node and it's something AMD didn't do for whatever reason, be it cost, time, resources, something else...
So isn't this the right topic to discuss this after all?
AMD put everything in the part that's benchmarked: R&D money, new node supply etc.
Zen2 may be a good CPU, but if the platform is weak, it will struggle to compete with Intel's more robust approach.
Unfortunately this means that those that want an X570 board, has to suffer with a bit hotter running chipset. However, from my understanding of what I know so far, the chipset only gets really hot when NVMe RAID is enabled or if you do a lot of high-speed data transfers over the PCIe bus. My guess is that the fans won't kick in unless the chipset goes over a certain temperature threshold.
As I mentioned earlier: this is a problem since most airflow in the case is driven by CPU, which may be almost idle when chipset is under full load. Hence the need for more robust cooling. It's just a pity they didn't focus on this a bit more and just went for a fan.

That said, I understand PCIe4.0 support will also appear in cheaper chipsets and cheaper motherboards - if not this year then the next for sure. If AMD doesn't deliver cooler chipsets, we'll see fans in the whole AMD lineup. And while I'm very skeptical whether X570 fans will be of high quality (Noctua-level), the ones put in future $50 motherboards certainly won't be.

I said bye ages ago , your just re typeing the same shit over and over , without any proof THIS fan is anything like you say, total bullshit.
That's the thing about discussing rumors. There are no proofs. Do you have a proof that Zen2 Ryzen will appear at all? Maybe AMD will change their mind and become a console maker?
Your not interested in buying Amd , you troll every thread ,sat at a total shitter i wouldn't game on.
That could just about play CsGo.
I think this argument is really old by now. Don't you have something new? I don't game on a PC (literally not even a minute this year, just occasionally earlier). For example: I haven't played CS, ever.

And you, repeatedly mocking people for having cheaper PC parts than you do, is rather shameful. But maybe my expectations for this forum are too high.
You know f all about tech yet spend hours on forums chatting ball's.
I know more about tech than you do - that's for sure. :)
Having an expensive PC is neither necessary nor a guarantee of extensive computer knowledge.
Just like living in UK hasn't (clearly) made you learn proper English.
And do not speak to me regarding this shit again.
You have no power to force that, just like I have no power to make you behave properly. Life is rough.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 31, 2009
Messages
15,463 (4.32/day)
but if the platform is weak,
I think we'll see a rehash of bulldozer/piledriver. Remember many low-end/midrange on down boards could barely cope with overclocking (some at stock) the big chips.

It's going to take higher-end x470 and x570 to drive these puppies or more likely, be heat limited and possibly first depending on the setup.

I'd imagine sticking to the cpu compatibility list is going to be paramount with the higher core count/TDP chips.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
399 (0.18/day)
Fans, fans, fans. Problem with PCH 'radiators' is that those aren't radiators at all. Often it is just square slab of aluminium which has basically no thermal conductivity. Even worse, many have PCB inserts with LEDs which acts as an additional insulator and adds extra heat when lighting is on.

For radiator to be A Radiator it must have fins, and tons of it. Of course you can't put RGB on fins. :peace:

Take for example Zenith Extreme PCH (v1 not the Alpha). There is thin (~7mm) piece of aluminium on PCH. It comes in two parts. When you unscrew the top cover (which is about 3mm) you're left with remaining 4. Underneath the shroud is M.2 port. Now any NVMe drive plugged there will be cooking itself to death (I know I'm using it) because pocket in the shroud traps hot air and not transfers it away - no fins on top. So after a while, removed the top shroud, unpluged the RGB piece of PCB and now running M.2 drive with beefy heatsink, but for PCH there is absolutely no difference in temperature with or without top shroud. On warm day 65C no problem. Especially when I trash the system like doing sculpting in ZBrush, there is plenty of I/O access with PCH.

I say bollocks to such design of workstation class products.
Yep that's the problem. If manufacturer can't put RGB on it they won't use it these days.
Back in the day there used to be full copper finned heatsinks on VRM and NB/SB. Now that's expensive and heavy but black painted finned alu block would work pretty well. Too bad noone makes then out of the box. You really have to mod yourself these days to get the best temps.

I slapped a mammoth Morpheus II cooler on my GTX 1080 with two high pressure 120mm fans. Now it never exceeds 60c where as before it went to 93c despite dual 92mm fan heatpipe cooler (Zotac model).
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
4,685 (5.79/day)
Location
Poland
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
797 (0.81/day)
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) aune x1s
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Qpad MK80
Yea course you were with your amd never does anything wrong s/ comment, I believe you....
Well what i'm feeling in this forum is pretty much anyone being for some reason favoring AMD in every situation, and that's exactly why i posted that, since i'm no fanboy, intel produced much better products for the last 10 years or more, AMD was always very respectable, and sometimes they did come close to intel's level, and prior those 10 years they even manage to surpass them, after that, a continuous decrease in performance and quality, until bulldozer and piledriver, where they touched rock bottom, luckily after that ryzen came and changed everything for AMD, a very very competitive product, new architecture, new everything, thank god i'd say, but still, with a new everything they "only" managed to come close to intel in several fronts while staying above intel in one, which is price, where they always had a clear advantage, besides price AMD has nothing to teach intel as of now, since they're battling intel with they new shining architecture while intel is still with a ~ 10 years old architecture, and they're keeping ahead with only slight silicon optimizations. That's how facts are. Ryzen is an incredible product, especially when compared to what AMD had before that, they managed a miracle, but this miracle seems to be needing some more polishing and improving to surpass their competition, and honestly going back to fans on PCH isn't a good signal.


AMD has chipset fan, OMG! Impossibru! We're back to 2007! OMG!

Oh wait...
Look better sherlock, it clearly says m.2 cooler, so unless x570 has fans for the same reason, that has nothing to do with this mobo's m.2 cooler fan. Besides x299 is a HEDT platform, not mainstream unlike x570
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
4,685 (5.79/day)
Location
Poland
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
Look better sherlock, it clearly says m.2 cooler, so unless x570 has fans for the same reason, that has nothing to do with m.2 cooler fan.
pins on the cpu,fans on the chipset,no igpu,small things that we really moved from a decade ago.not dealbreakers but just annoying cause it makes you go why the hell?
I wouldn't worry about them as long as I was building a pc for sb else,for myself personally I'd rather not have that.
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2017
Messages
797 (0.81/day)
Location
Italy
Processor i7 2600K @4.5GHz
Motherboard Asus P8Z68-V PRO/Gen 3
Cooling ZeroTherm FZ120
Memory G.Skill Ripjaws 4x4GB DDR3
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 6G Gaming X
Storage Samsung 830 Pro 256GB + WD Caviar Blue 1TB
Display(s) Samsung PX2370 + Acer AL1717
Case Antec 1200 v1
Audio Device(s) aune x1s
Power Supply Enermax Modu87+ 800W
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Qpad MK80
pins on the cpu,fans on the chipset,no igpu,small things that we really moved from a decade ago.not dealbreakers but just annoying cause it makes you go why the hell?
I have no problem with fans, but why is the fan there? What's the problem? Is it needed for dissipating heat from the chipset? Why would the chipset need further dissipation? Could it be that it's not that well designed, and can't guarantee a steady throughput (underengineered)? I hope not, probably not, but then why is it there?
That's what i'm thinking at the moment.
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
633 (2.62/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling BeQuiet Dark Rock 4
Memory 2x8 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 3200 CL16 @ 3466 CL 14
Video Card(s) EVGA 1060 6GB SSC
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) BenQ BL2411PT
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse SteelSeries Rival 300
Keyboard Generic Dell
Look better sherlock, it clearly says m.2 cooler, so unless x570 has fans for the same reason, that has nothing to do with this mobo's m.2 cooler fan. Besides x299 is a HEDT platform, not mainstream unlike x570
Dear Watson, look at other x570 board designs (Biostar and Colorful) with the exact same style of M.2 covers next to the chipset fan.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
4,685 (5.79/day)
Location
Poland
Processor i7 5775c @4.3GHz/1.385v/EDRAM @2GHz
Motherboard Z97X Gaming 5
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory Crucial Ballistix Tactical LP 1600 CL8 @2133 9-9-9-27 1T
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128 (OS)/850 PRO 256+256+ 512,860 EVO 500,XPG SX950U 480,M9Pe(Y) 512 (games)/4TB HDDs (3+1)
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG dual monitor setup
Case Full tower
Audio Device(s) W830BT headphones
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
I have no problem with fans, but why is the fan there? What's the problem? Is it needed for dissipating heat from the chipset? Why would the chipset need further dissipation? Could it be that it's not that well designed, and can't guarantee a steady throughput? I hope not, probably not, but then why is it there?
That's what i'm thinking at the moment.
if it is there,it's probably cause it gets hot,and I don't wanna have to deal with the noise of a small,high rpm fan.
if it is there just for "in any case" scenario that'd piss me off a little too,unnecessary point of failure,plus you've got to be careful about that when handling the pc,those blades are super tiny.

Dear Watson, look at other x570 board designs (Biostar and Colorful) with the exact same style of M.2 covers next to the chipset fan.
on msi it's clrearly for the chipset
plus if the chipset really gets that hot I don't know if you wanna blow that air on nvme directly.
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
4,317 (0.79/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/ztiub6
To be honest, I didn't know that has been confirmed. I'm not surprised at all, but it would erode the platform attractiveness even further.
X570 motherboards will be very expensive because of OC/gaming features. Do I really need a X570 mobo for Zen2 PC used for rendering or scientific computing?

As a result, aren't you worried about top Zen2 power consumption? Why would they not be supported on lower motherboards if they're good enough for 8C Zen+ (95W TDP). Just how much more will a 12C Zen2 pull? I think most AMD fans hoped it'll be at least similar.

So isn't this the right topic to discuss this after all?
AMD put everything in the part that's benchmarked: R&D money, new node supply etc.
Zen2 may be a good CPU, but if the platform is weak, it will struggle to compete with Intel's more robust approach.

As I mentioned earlier: this is a problem since most airflow in the case is driven by CPU, which may be almost idle when chipset is under full load. Hence the need for more robust cooling. It's just a pity they didn't focus on this a bit more and just went for a fan.

That said, I understand PCIe4.0 support will also appear in cheaper chipsets and cheaper motherboards - if not this year then the next for sure. If AMD doesn't deliver cooler chipsets, we'll see fans in the whole AMD lineup. And while I'm very skeptical whether X570 fans will be of high quality (Noctua-level), the ones put in future $50 motherboards certainly won't be.
I never said the chipset was weak, I simply implied that it's made on the wrong fabrication node.
To my knowledge, it performs perfectly fine, it's just a tad on the hot side under certain circumstances.

I would not bet on the board designer keeping the same designs. This might be true for lower-end models, but not higher-end ones. Again, to my knowledge.

There have been no confirmations as to what PCIe standard the B550 will support. Obviously the top x16 slot can always support PCIe 4.0 as long as the PCB design is good enough, as the lanes are from the CPU. The same can apply to an M.2 slot from the CPU.

lol,you certanly made fanboys angry :laugh:
No charge for that one.

I have no problem with fans, but why is the fan there? What's the problem? Is it needed for dissipating heat from the chipset? Why would the chipset need further dissipation? Could it be that it's not that well designed, and can't guarantee a steady throughput (underengineered)? I hope not, probably not, but then why is it there?
That's what i'm thinking at the moment.
Please read my earlier replies instead of asking the same question over and over.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
399 (0.18/day)
Well what i'm feeling in this forum is pretty much anyone being for some reason favoring AMD in every situation, and that's exactly why i posted that, since i'm no fanboy, intel produced much better products for the last 10 years or more, AMD was always very respectable, and sometimes they did come close to intel's level, and prior those 10 years they even manage to surpass them, after that, a continuous decrease in performance and quality, until bulldozer and piledriver, where they touched rock bottom, luckily after that ryzen came and changed everything for AMD, a very very competitive product, new architecture, new everything, thank god i'd say, but still, with a new everything they "only" managed to come close to intel in several fronts while staying above intel in one, which is price, where they always had a clear advantage, besides price AMD has nothing to teach intel as of now, since they're battling intel with they new shining architecture while intel is still with a ~ 10 years old architecture, and they're keeping ahead with only slight silicon optimizations. That's how facts are. Ryzen is an incredible product, especially when compared to what AMD had before that, they managed a miracle, but this miracle seems to be needing some more polishing and improving to surpass their competition, and honestly going back to fans on PCH isn't a good signal.
People always mistakenly think lower price is AMD's only advantage. What about security? I don't hear Ryzen being plagued with holes every other month. Lower temperatures too. Upgradeability thanks to long term support for sockets and chipsets.

Yes Intel is faster except for specific use cases like tiled rendering (CineBench) and decompression. But that speed advantage comes at the cost of 30-100% higher depending on what products you compare. For some people it's worth it to get that extra 10-15% IPC on top even with higher temps and potential security issues.

Frankly i get the feeling that AMD is relegating both Intel and Nvidia more and more to the high end enthusiast market where buying 550$ CPU's and 1200$ GPU's is the norm.
Ryzen has already made everything below i7 models not worth it and done the same with APU's to graphics cards below the 125$ mark.
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,655 (2.19/day)
People always mistakenly think lower price is AMD's only advantage. What about security? I don't hear Ryzen being plagued with holes every other month.
This one is fairly simple. Because they aren't tested as much as Xeons.
Companies that exist thanks to servers (like Google) are spending huge amounts of cash on testing Xeons.
This is not true for EPYC yet, as the market share is fairly small.
Don't be so shocked by vulnerabilities being found in general. It is normal. There's just no way to make a product without holes and no way to test every possibility before launch. Hence, vulnerabilities have been found in CPUs since they got mainstream.

Don't be surprised that some vulnerabilities found in Xeons don't exist in AMD's products. They are different and they have different holes.

Most importantly: you shouldn't really believe that AMD's products are more secure in general. Why would they be? There's no physical or financial reason. AMD has lower R&D budget (something AMD fanboys love to mention), they're smaller, they have weaker support from the market.
 

HTC

Joined
Apr 1, 2008
Messages
3,721 (0.88/day)
Location
Portugal
System Name HTC's System
Processor Ryzen 5 2600X
Motherboard Asrock Taichi X370
Cooling NH-C14, with the AM4 mounting kit
Memory G.Skill Kit 16GB DDR4 F4 - 3200 C16D - 16 GTZB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ Radeon RX 480 OC 4 GB
Storage 1 Samsung NVMe 960 EVO 250 GB + 1 3.5" Seagate IronWolf Pro 6TB 7200RPM 256MB SATA III
Display(s) LG 27UD58
Case Fractal Design Define R6 USB-C
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair TX 850M 80+ Gold
Mouse Razer Deathadder Elite
Software Ubuntu 19.04 LTS
Complaining about aesthetics instead of function ... priorities ...

I'd complain if the fan turns out to be noisy but that's about it because, if it's required for the board to work properly, i have no problems with it being there.

Reminds me of the argument i had over with a superior @ work where he was complaining my green pen was bad (which writes great in an oily environment, something that usually kills most pens) and i should use a blue or black one instead, so he gave me a "proper color" pen and ... you couldn't understand about four words out of every five ... but it was the "proper color" ... so he complained when he couldn't read one of the "checks" we use to call for assistance when one of the machines we operate stops working properly, so he gave me another "proper color" pen which was better since you could actually understand half the words ... so he gave me another "proper color" pen that was somewhat in between the 1st two ... and then he gave up and told me to get my green pen back ...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
399 (0.18/day)
This one is fairly simple. Because they aren't tested as much as Xeons.
Companies that exist thanks to servers (like Google) are spending huge amounts of cash on testing Xeons.
This is not true for EPYC yet, as the market share is fairly small.
Don't be so shocked by vulnerabilities being found in general. It is normal. There's just no way to make a product without holes and no way to test every possibility before launch. Hence, vulnerabilities have been found in CPUs since they got mainstream.

Don't be surprised that some vulnerabilities found in Xeons don't exist in AMD's products. They are different and they have different holes.

Most importantly: you shouldn't really believe that AMD's products are more secure in general. Why would they be? There's no physical or financial reason. AMD has lower R&D budget (something AMD fanboys love to mention), they're smaller, they have weaker support from the market.
I doubt it's the lack of testing or market penetration. AMD themselves have always come out declaring they are not or do not believe they are vulnerable to latest thing affecting Intel.
Also i feel like much of Intel performance advantage was/is built on speculative execution. Every time a hole is patched they lose small amount of performance. Well not that small in some cases. Storage performance has also taken a hit on latest Intel platforms coming from an older platform.

Sure no product is truly secure and every company tries to downplay any issues that are disovered (AMD included). I just feel like people sometimes only see the price difference and assume that's the only advantage AMD has.
 
Joined
Nov 22, 2018
Messages
258 (0.77/day)
Location
PL, Krk (JPN, Tokyo)
System Name Nilin
Processor Ryzen 5 2600 @4Ghz 1.275V
Motherboard Asus Rog Crosshair VIII Hero Wifi
Cooling Noctua NH D15
Memory G. Skill Flare X 2x8gb 3200 Mhz CL14
Video Card(s) Msi GTX 1080 TI FE (Accelero Xtreme IV rev 2)
Storage Samsung Evo 960 250gb (System), Samsung Evo 860 500gb (Games), Adata XPG SX8200 Pro 1Tb (Games)
Display(s) LG 27" UHD IPS, LG24" FHD IPS
Case InWin 303 (+ 7x Fractal Prisma 120mm)
Power Supply Tt Toughpower Grand RGB 850W
Mouse Tt eSPORTS Saphira
Keyboard Logitech Pro Series
After all the bullshit MSI tried to pull with ryzen 3000 series, MSI --> no way. MSI is usually the last well known motherboard vendor I think when I buy motherboards. Asrock, Asus, Gigabyte and then MSI.

I'm not going to buy any motherboard with a fan and I think as far as I can remember, I never bought a motherboard with a fan, heat-sink is the way to go. They tried to add a fan on a monitor, bad idea too. Fans is only good for gpus, cpus and the sort. I remember they tried to normalize fans to memory too, pure bullshit, nobody went along with it.
I had only good experience with MSI boards though... had msi x58, msi 970, now msi x470 :) "it just works" lol
also tbh I dig that chipset fan. thats sooo x79ish. lovin it
 
Joined
Jun 28, 2016
Messages
2,655 (2.19/day)
Complaining about aesthetics instead of function ... priorities ...
It seems you don't understand the discussion. We are talking about function.
I'd complain if the fan turns out to be noisy but that's about it because, if it's required to work properly, i have no problems with it being there.
An argument that "a fan exists because it is required" is true, but why is it required? Aren't you interested? What if AMD platform required 7 fans? What if it required you to sacrifice a virgin during boot?

We haven't seen fans on consumer chipsets for a very long time. And as people interested in tech we are discussing this (quite worrying) situation.
And people who are only interested in fps in games, like @theoneandonlymrk , are mocking this discussion.
I doubt it's the lack of testing or market penetration. AMD themselves have always come out declaring they are not or do not believe they are vulnerable to latest thing affecting Intel.
As I said: they aren't vulnerable because they use different architecture. Most things found lately are specific to Intel, because they were searched for in Intel CPUs.
Also i feel like much of Intel performance advantage was/is built on speculative execution.
Yes, speculative execution is a great feature envisioned a long time ago. Intel knew how to implement it so they did.
Of course there was a change of a security problem, but for a very long time no one knew how to exploit it.

I feel like people think of "speculative execution" as something fundamentally bad. Is it because people don't like the word "speculative"?
Every time a hole is patched they lose small amount of performance.
Not exactly.
Every time a whole is quickly patched via software, they lose a bit of performance, because that quick patch usually disables some functionalities.
And that's the moment everyone watches and notes.
But as new patches come around (and hardware solutions in next generations) at least some of the lost performance comes back. But at that point no one cares anymore.
In some ways it's similar to Radeon fanboys demanding tests to be updated after driver updates.
 
Top