• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD to Launch Triple-core Phenom Processors in March 2008

malware

New Member
Joined
Nov 7, 2004
Messages
5,422 (1.13/day)
Likes
954
Location
Bulgaria
Processor Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 VID: 1.2125
Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-P35-DS3P rev.2.0
Cooling Thermalright Ultra-120 eXtreme + Noctua NF-S12 Fan
Memory 4x1 GB PQI DDR2 PC2-6400
Video Card(s) Colorful iGame Radeon HD 4890 1 GB GDDR5
Storage 2x 500 GB Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 32 MB RAID0
Display(s) BenQ G2400W 24-inch WideScreen LCD
Case Cooler Master COSMOS RC-1000 (sold), Cooler Master HAF-932 (delivered)
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic + Logitech Z-5500 Digital THX
Power Supply Chieftec CFT-1000G-DF 1kW
Software Laptop: Lenovo 3000 N200 C2DT2310/3GB/120GB/GF7300/15.4"/Razer
#1
AMD has recently adjusted its triple-core CPU model numbers and launch dates. AMD will launch two B2 stepping triple-core CPUs, Phenom 8600 and 8400 in March of next year, while in the second quarter, the company will launch three more models, Phenom 8700, 8650 and 8450. The Phenom 8400 and 8600 will feature core frequencies of 2.1GHz and 2.3GHz, respectively, while the Phenom 8700 will clock at 2.4GHz. Phenom 8650 and 8450 will be based on B3 stepping cores, and will have frequencies of 2.3GHz and 2.1GHz, respectively. All five CPUs will have a 95W TDP. AMD declined to comment on unannounced products, but noted that the triple-core CPUs provide consumers with more choices and will extend the market's acceptance of multi-core technology.

Show full news post
 

Weer

New Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2007
Messages
1,417 (0.38/day)
Likes
93
Location
New York / Israel
System Name //////////////////////////////////////Crunching/Folding Builds\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
Processor Q8400@ 4.0Ghz | Q6600 @ 3.6Ghz | E7300 @ 3.8Ghz | E5300 @ 4.3Ghz | E5300 @ 3.9Ghz | E2180 @ 2.0Ghz |
Motherboard ASUS P5Q-E | Asus P5Q Pro | Gigabyte EG45-DS2H | Gigabyte EP35-DS3H | Gigabyte NV73 | E-Sonic P35-G
Cooling TRUE [Lapped] | TRUE | Thermalright SI-128 | Stock | Stock | Stock
Memory G.Skill 8192MB @ 1066Mhz | G.Skill 4096MB | OCZ 2048MB | G.Skill 2048MB | PNY 2048MB | OCZ 1024MB
Video Card(s) GTX 280 + 8800 GTS 512 | 9800 GX2 + 8800 GTS 512 | 6600 GT | 8800 GS | 9600 GSO 512
Storage G.Skill 64GB SSD (OS) | Segate 750GB [Downloads] | 5TB JBOD [Movies] | 3TB JBOD [Else] | 1.5TB [Ex]
Display(s) QUAD Monitors: Dell 2007FP [20"] + Dell 3007WFP-HC [30"] + Dell 2007FP [20"] | Dell 2407WFP-HC [24"]
Case Antec P190 | Antec Three-Hundred | Antec NSK2400 | Thermaltake Strike MX | HEC 6T10 | HEC 8K01
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi XtremeGamer PCI + [Audiophile HD600] + [Creative G500 + Logitech X-530 = 10 speakers]
Power Supply OCZ 750w [62A] | OCZ 750w [62A] | Antec 380w [31A] | Antec 650w [54A] | OCZ 400w [33A] | GeN [20A]
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit + Windows XP 64-bit | Windows Vista SP2 64-bit | Windows 7 RTM 64-bit
Benchmark Scores ////////////////////////////////66,666 [Crunching] + 45,455 [Folding]\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\
#2
How is this supposed to compete with the Q9450?
 
Joined
Nov 29, 2007
Messages
964 (0.26/day)
Likes
55
Location
hoorn, Netherlands
Processor i5 6600k
Motherboard MSI B150 Gaming pro AC
Cooling Cooler master hyper 212
Memory 16 GB crucial ballistix sport
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970
Storage 500GB Crucial MX200 2x 2tb WD green
Display(s) BenQ XL2730Z 27" 2560x1440 144hz
Case Bitfenix prodigy ITX
Software Windows 10 pro
#3
this is where if bin waiting for:rockout::rockout:
 

regan1985

New Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2006
Messages
1,450 (0.34/day)
Likes
23
Location
Coventry UNI England
Processor yorkfield core 2 quad Q8200 3.2ghz 1.26v
Motherboard asus p5Q SE
Cooling akasa ak965
Memory Kingston 1066 2x2gb 1104mhz 2.2v
Video Card(s) SAPPHIRE HD 2600 XT DDR3 857/1078
Storage 2X Samsung spinpoint 500GB 7200 4x 1tb samsung eco 5400
Display(s) 2xSamsung P2270 22" Widescreen
Case NZXT Hush Quiet Case in Black
Power Supply OCZ StealthXStream 500w Silent Power Supply
Software windows 7 64
#4
why are amd wasting there time with that, the q6600 will be even cheaper by then and will out perform it by a stupid amout!! why are they going back rather then forward?
 

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
17,145 (4.41/day)
Likes
5,290
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Rapture X Mk.VI {Still....MoonPig Edition}
Processor Intel 3930k@4.5Ghz
Motherboard Asus P9X79 PRO
Cooling Corsair H105 {2x Corsair ML 120 Pro}|VRM: Antec Spotcool 100
Memory 32GB DDR3 Kingston HyperX Beast 2400Mhz {8x4GB}
Video Card(s) MSI 1070 Gaming X (Samsung)
Storage 512GB Samsung 850 Pro (Boot)|1x 512GB Crucial MX100|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27"
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1x140mm NB PK-3, 2x Corsair AF140}
Audio Device(s) Creative SB Z {Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 }
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 7 7600 x64
Benchmark Scores ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)
#5
its shame that AMD are stuck in a rut not being able to move forward n only backswards....

maybe they are hoping to downsize their production so much that they can go into the 'budget' market instead of being so enthusiast orientated & just slowly work its way back to the top.

but that said its gonna have a hard climb as Intel really slashed its prices. & of course with all the talk of the C2D being so overclockable & efficient etc which realy pushes AMD into the dirt to produce something decent & still make a profit.

the way i see it since AMD have mentioned going back into single core production & now this that they are 'scraping the barrel' theres nothing more they can do but hope to sell their gear at a loss & 'hope' that people will pick it up. unlike intel their CPU's are so cheap i bet their profit is made up of the sheer numbers bought/sold/produced.


Unlucky AMD - just dont take ATi with you when you dissapear into the deep sea....
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#6
This is a boon for those looking for a sub-$150 processor but isn't March 2008 a little too late for comfort?
 

CDdude55

Crazy 4 TPU!!!
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
8,178 (2.15/day)
Likes
1,269
Location
Virginia
System Name CDdude's Rig!
Processor AMD Athlon II X4 620
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3
Cooling Corsair H70
Memory 8GB Corsair Vengence @1600mhz
Video Card(s) XFX HD 6970 2GB
Storage OCZ Agility 3 60GB SSD/WD Velociraptor 300GB
Display(s) ASUS VH232H 23" 1920x1080
Case Cooler Master CM690 (w/ side window)
Audio Device(s) Onboard (It sounds fine)
Power Supply Corsair 850TX
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64bit SP1
#7
Why the hell do we need a tri core CPU if Intel has the Q6600 out? AMD has to stop pushing a step back from Intel.:shadedshu
 
Joined
Dec 10, 2007
Messages
7,185 (1.97/day)
Likes
769
Location
Adelaide Australia
System Name Becca 2
Processor AMD A10 4600m quad core @ 2.3 ghz
Motherboard dunno
Cooling Logitech alto connect
Memory 16 Gig ddr3 1600mhz
Video Card(s) Ati HD 7660G + & 7470M
Storage 1 TB
Audio Device(s) onboard crap
Software Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bit with sp1
#8
For Amd to somehow compete with intel they need a miracle of biblecal proportions this aint it.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#9
More than that. They need a processor that's 0.75x the price of Intel's best CPU, that performs 1.25x better than it.
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2006
Messages
1,335 (0.33/day)
Likes
90
Processor e8200 3.93mhz@1.264v
Motherboard P5E3 Pro
Cooling Scythe Infinity
Memory 4gb of G.Skill Ripjaw 6-7-7-18@1404 and 1.62v
Video Card(s) HIS 5770 v2 940/1275mhz stock volts
Storage 1TB Hitachi
Display(s) Acer 22" Widescreen LCD
Case Blue Cooler Master Centurion
Audio Device(s) Onboard audio :(, and Klipsch 5.1 Pro Media's
Power Supply 650 Watt BFG
Software Vista 64 Ultimate
#10
I think AMD needs to just focus on what they have working good right now (low energy x2's), chipsets, and g-cards. Get stabilized and then come back. They keep making rash decisions that are driving them down.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
796 (0.18/day)
Likes
37
System Name Current
Processor Core i5 2500k
Motherboard Z77MA-G45
Cooling Cooler Master Tx3
Memory 8gb DDR3 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 960 4GB GDDR5
Storage (1) SAMSUNG 850 EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS PB278Q 27" WQHD 2560x1440 IPS
Case Fractal Core 1000
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply 430 Watt Corsair
Mouse Logitech g602
Keyboard K70 LUX Mech LB, Red LED, Cherry MX Brown
Software Windows 10 + Hackintosh
#11
None of you have seen the tri-core processors, don't talk about their performance when you have absolutely no data to back your words. Im actually pretty interested in seeing how they perform. I actually think Tri-core is a good market, dual core is decent, but quad is stupidly overkill and a waste of power. So Tri-core makes perfect sense. I think its quite funny, before Core2 came out everyone was and AMD fanboy, now the tide has turned and everyone is a Intel Fanboy. And look at this you guys are making judgment calls on unreleased products because theirs 3 instead of 4 cores. Quite funny. Well See another 1-2 processor generations after this before AMD will "disappear" if that even happens, IT TAKES MUCH MORE THAN ONE BAD LINE to kill a company. Anyone else remember Intel pre-Core 2, yeah . . . If you ask me now is the time to invest in AMD.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#12
It's not that we were rogued AMD fanboys. Just that at that time, AMD gave us more what what we paid, now Intel is giving us more for what we pay, and why shouldn't we encourage the use of Intel processors? That makes us smart-buyers and not fanboys. Investing in AMD is as profitable as giving all your money off to some Somalia relief charity....AMD is in that big losses, if you've an appetite for losses, that's you.
 
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
2,481 (0.63/day)
Likes
340
Location
Your house.
System Name Jupiter-2
Processor Intel i3-6100
Motherboard H170I-PLUS D3
Cooling Stock
Memory 8GB Mushkin DDR3L-1600
Video Card(s) EVGA GTX 1050ti
Storage 512GB Corsair SSD
Display(s) BENQ 24in
Case Lian Li PC-Q01B Mini ITX
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 450W
Mouse Logitech Trackball
Keyboard Custom bamboo job
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores Finished Super PI on legendary mode in only 13 hours.
#13
It's not that we were rogued AMD fanboys. Just that at that time, AMD gave us more what what we paid, now Intel is giving us more for what we pay, and why shouldn't we encourage the use of Intel processors? That makes us smart-buyers and not fanboys. Investing in AMD is as profitable as giving all your money off to some Somalia relief charity....AMD is in that big losses, if you've an appetite for losses, that's you.
You're quite right -- Intel is a better "bang for your buck" right now. But you must realize how important it is that somebody continue to buy AMD processors -- do you really want Intel controlling the market completely?

For example, when I'm building computers for people I know or helping them purchase a new PC online, I always choose AMD for them -- I know for a fact that they won't know the difference, and it helps AMD stay in business.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#14
Yes, I was merely replying politely to that guy's declaration of us all being fanboys that switch sides. I own a machine that runs an X2 5400+. While it is vital for AMD to survive and provide competition to Intel....competition that fosters innovation, the one thing AMD badly needs now is aspirational value. It needs even people like you and me to look upto it and say "wow that's one Intel nut-kicker" which unfortunately it's not being. Intel is taking advantage of this and making products of whatever pricing, lesser innovation and basically fooling around with the market (eg: delay in launch of cheap Yorkfied chips). The day AMD devises a product that out-performs every Intel processor ever made, AMD will regain the face-value it lost. AMD should prioritise on high-performance segment at this point because you wouldn't want your customers telling "Intel makes the best processor there is, I'd want a Intel processor, come what may!"....If AMD delivers its goods well, the common man will begin to look upon it as a viable company that can bring the silicon giant Intel to its knees (which it did, with the K8...qualitatively if not quantitatively) Intel survived its lean period because it had a huge stash to fall back on, from the P4's success, AMD didn't pool in as much with its K8. Result? Rumors of IBM buying stakes of AMD to waive off its debts.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
796 (0.18/day)
Likes
37
System Name Current
Processor Core i5 2500k
Motherboard Z77MA-G45
Cooling Cooler Master Tx3
Memory 8gb DDR3 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 960 4GB GDDR5
Storage (1) SAMSUNG 850 EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS PB278Q 27" WQHD 2560x1440 IPS
Case Fractal Core 1000
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply 430 Watt Corsair
Mouse Logitech g602
Keyboard K70 LUX Mech LB, Red LED, Cherry MX Brown
Software Windows 10 + Hackintosh
#15
It's not that we were rogued AMD fanboys. Just that at that time, AMD gave us more what what we paid, now Intel is giving us more for what we pay, and why shouldn't we encourage the use of Intel processors? That makes us smart-buyers and not fanboys. Investing in AMD is as profitable as giving all your money off to some Somalia relief charity....AMD is in that big losses, if you've an appetite for losses, that's you.
I never called you fanboys, I was just saying its funny your slant on things. On how you can magically predict and talk about performance of tri-core cpu's when they havent hit the market. I'm certainly not saying to buy AMD processors right now I acknowledge Intel has the better processor. I'm just saying don't over speculate yourselves, thats what people did with conroe and they were dead wrong. Many of them where people who don't know SHIT about CPU architecture.

Also I'm gunna take a stab here, and say you haven't done much investing in stocks. Chances are AMD will eventually bounce back, you buy low and sell high. Thats how you profit on the stocks(In the most basic way, I could go more in depth, but its pointless). Also AMD/ATI does much more than just desktop processors and graphic cards for PCs.

Yes, I was merely replying politely to that guy's declaration of us all being fanboys that switch sides. I own a machine that runs an X2 5400+. While it is vital for AMD to survive and provide competition to Intel....competition that fosters innovation, the one thing AMD badly needs now is aspirational value. It needs even people like you and me to look upto it and say "wow that's one Intel nut-kicker" which unfortunately it's not being. Intel is taking advantage of this and making products of whatever pricing, lesser innovation and basically fooling around with the market (eg: delay in launch of cheap Yorkfied chips). The day AMD devises a product that out-performs every Intel processor ever made, AMD will regain the face-value it lost. AMD should prioritise on high-performance segment at this point because you wouldn't want your customers telling "Intel makes the best processor there is, I'd want a Intel processor, come what may!"....If AMD delivers its goods well, the common man will begin to look upon it as a viable company that can bring the silicon giant Intel to its knees (which it did, with the K8...qualitatively if not quantitatively) Intel survived its lean period because it had a huge stash to fall back on, from the P4's success, AMD didn't pool in as much with its K8. Result? Rumors of IBM buying stakes of AMD to waive off its debts.
My comments on the whole fanboy was referring to people always having bias against the company(AMD ATM) that battling against the company that is in ascendence(INTEL ATM) at the current moment in time. Like I said previously I was not calling you fanboys, I was just saying this is unjust speculation on a new type of desktop processor.
 

jydie

New Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
209 (0.05/day)
Likes
3
Processor Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (socket 939)
Motherboard ASUS A8R-MVP Express200
Cooling Standard AMD CPU Heatsink/Fan
Memory 1GB Geil PC3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon X1900GT
Storage 2 Maxtor 7200 HDD (80GB)
Display(s) Samsung 19" LCD
Case Yellow Chieftech Dragon
Audio Device(s) integrated
Power Supply Thermaltake TT-420AD
Software Windows XP Home
#16
You're quite right -- Intel is a better "bang for your buck" right now. But you must realize how important it is that somebody continue to buy AMD processors -- do you really want Intel controlling the market completely?

For example, when I'm building computers for people I know or helping them purchase a new PC online, I always choose AMD for them -- I know for a fact that they won't know the difference, and it helps AMD stay in business.
I do the same thing for all PC's I put together for family and friends. AMD offers dual-core CPU's for well under $100... and they offer enough power for a majority of computer users (including myself). I always felt that AMD was the underdog in the CPU war... even during their BEST yeasr... because Intel has always had a majority of the CPU market. Just because AMD had a few great years, people expect them to produce the BEST CPU even though they have fewer resources then Intel. Then when AMD can not do that, they get ripped apart and slammed. :ohwell:
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#17
Also I'm gunna take a stab here, and say you haven't done much investing in stocks. Chances are AMD will eventually bounce back, you buy low and sell high. Thats how you profit on the stocks(In the most basic way, I could go more in depth, but its pointless). Also AMD/ATI does much more than just desktop processors and graphic cards for PCs.
How do you know about AMD bouncing back? Aren't you speculating too? "AMD bouncing back" sounds a lot more vague than the rumours doing rounds of IBM eating into AMD. Buying the stocks of a company that's on the verge of allegedly selling off to another company isn't the wisest....it's risky business. Buying NVidia's shares on the other hand guarantees returns because even if ATI/AMD zooms ahead of NV, it'll never eat into the huge customer base and potential-customer base that NV created.

Regarding Tri Core AMD, just as we can't predict it to be a flop, we can't predict it to be a hit either, Intel already seems to be working on a Core 2 Trio.


My comments on the whole fanboy was referring to people always having bias against the company(AMD ATM) that battling against the company that is in ascendence(INTEL ATM) at the current moment in time. Like I said previously I was not calling you fanboys, I was just saying this is unjust speculation on a new type of desktop processor.

We have a bitter feeling about AMD because it backstabbed our aspirations many a time. First it was the Barcelona Flop-show, then the Radeon HD2000 series, now Phenom. How much more can we "love" AMD and live in a dreamy world waiting for Dresden to roll out a magic chip? Something that would make me want to roll a dice to choose between Yorkfield and that "magic chip"? This is what made people like me, a lot of us from TPU lose hope on AMD to ever bounce back into the performance segment. I again reiterate: AMD needs to give out an Extreme performance product to give its overall outlook a positive makeover. The company's losses and non-competitive products have forced us to adapt the ideology we have now, at which you're lashing out at. AMD is a "once bright schoolkid now turned junkie"....catch my drift?
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,998 (0.62/day)
Likes
1,578
Location
Visalia, CA
System Name Crimson Titan 2.5
Processor Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme
Cooling CPU: Swiftech H220-X, RAM: Geil Cyclone 2, VGA: Custom EK water loop
Memory 8x4GBs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 XMP2 3000MHz @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX Titan X SCs in SLI under full cover EK water blocks
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Acer XB280HK 28" 4K G-Sync - 2x27" Acer HN274s 1920x1080 120Hz
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T - EK Pump/Reservoir, 360mm EK Radiator
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
#18
I never called you fanboys, I was just saying its funny your slant on things. On how you can magically predict and talk about performance of tri-core cpu's when they havent hit the market. I'm certainly not saying to buy AMD processors right now I acknowledge Intel has the better processor. I'm just saying don't over speculate yourselves, thats what people did with conroe and they were dead wrong. Many of them where people who don't know SHIT about CPU.
Reality check: AMD's quad core procs already are a dissapoinment in terms of performance when compared to current Intel quad core offerings, (not to mention against soon to be released proc from Intel) how come a defective quad core with a core disabled will change that?
 
Joined
Feb 17, 2007
Messages
1,238 (0.31/day)
Likes
168
Location
SoCal
Processor AMD Phenom II 1055T @ 3.6ghz 1.3V
Motherboard Asus M5A97 EVO
Cooling Xigmatek SD1284
Memory 2x4GB Patriot Sector 5 PC3-12800 @ 7-8-7-24-1T 1.7V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 7950 DD @ 1100/1350 1.185V
Storage OCZ Agility 3 120GB + 2x7200.12 500GB Raid1
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 27" LCD 1440p @ 120hz
Case Cooler Master 690M
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC892
Power Supply Enermax Liberty 620W Eco Edition
Software Windows 7 Professional x64 / Ubuntu 12.04 x64
#19
Why does everyone seem to think that because AMD doesn't have a competitor in the high end arena (and doesn't have any plans for one) that AMD is going out of business? How many prebuilt computers on the market even have quad core processors in them? Very few, it is still mostly dual and single core processors. This is were the real money lies for these chipmakers, not in selling the best performing chip to the likes of us (who are in a severe minority).

As for the Phenom, its price/perfomance ratio was terrible on launch with the q6600 noticeably outperforming it for just $20-30 more. Things have changed and now it costs $70-80 more and I think that AMD has very decent price/performance ratio on the 9500 (the 9600 is a total rip off- $50 more for 100mhz). However, the triple cores (quad core on a limp) will (should) be priced even lower, hopefully trying to compete with Intel's 45nm DUAL cores (not their quads). If they can price them equally, and give them near performance of a 45nm DUAL, yet show customers that there is an additional core available, then I think AMD will have done something right.
 

jydie

New Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
209 (0.05/day)
Likes
3
Processor Athlon 64 X2 4200+ (socket 939)
Motherboard ASUS A8R-MVP Express200
Cooling Standard AMD CPU Heatsink/Fan
Memory 1GB Geil PC3200
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon X1900GT
Storage 2 Maxtor 7200 HDD (80GB)
Display(s) Samsung 19" LCD
Case Yellow Chieftech Dragon
Audio Device(s) integrated
Power Supply Thermaltake TT-420AD
Software Windows XP Home
#20
Here is a portion of an article from 2006 that I found on the internet regarding CPU market share... just to point out that even at AMD's peak, they were still far behind Intel... yet, people expect them to beat Intel despite having less money for R&D and everything else that goes into producing new CPUs:

AMD has achieved its highest ever market share in the CPU market in the second quarter, according to data released by Mercury Research.

Despite processor shipments decreasing by 7% quarter-over-quarter, AMD managed to increase its market share to 22% at the expense of Intel.

Intel's share slipped to 73%, despite the chip giant aggressively cutting the prices on its Pentium 4 and Pentium D processors. With Intel's recently announced Core 2 processors, analysts expect the decline to slow and for Intel to gain market share in the desktop market.


As for these new 3-core CPUs... If they are priced under $100, I would definitely consider buying some.
 
Last edited:

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
34,328 (9.23/day)
Likes
17,426
Location
Hyderabad, India
System Name Long shelf-life potato
Processor Intel Core i7-4770K
Motherboard ASUS Z97-A
Cooling Xigmatek Aegir CPU Cooler
Memory 16GB Kingston HyperX Beast DDR3-1866
Video Card(s) 2x GeForce GTX 970 SLI
Storage ADATA SU800 512GB
Display(s) Samsung U28D590D 28-inch 4K
Case Cooler Master CM690 Window
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Corsair HX850W
Mouse Razer Abyssus 2014
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro Creators Update
#21
Why does everyone seem to think that because AMD doesn't have a competitor in the high end arena (and doesn't have any plans for one) that AMD is going out of business? How many prebuilt computers on the market even have quad core processors in them? Very few, it is still mostly dual and single core processors. This is were the real money lies for these chipmakers, not in selling the best performing chip to the likes of us (who are in a severe minority).

As for the Phenom, its price/perfomance ratio was terrible on launch with the q6600 noticeably outperforming it for just $20-30 more. Things have changed and now it costs $70-80 more and I think that AMD has very decent price/performance ratio on the 9500 (the 9600 is a total rip off- $50 more for 100mhz). However, the triple cores (quad core on a limp) will (should) be priced even lower, hopefully trying to compete with Intel's 45nm DUAL cores (not their quads). If they can price them equally, and give them near performance of a 45nm DUAL, yet show customers that there is an additional core available, then I think AMD will have done something right.
If Intel finds that these Triple-core Phenom chips are eating into its Core 2 Duo market-share they'll be the first to respond with a similarly priced tri-core processor. AMD must produce a high-performance chip not to earn profits but to uplift its face-value of being a competent company that has the potential to deliver the best.

Sure, OEM's don't come out with Quad-core chips but how many OEM's actually use an AMD processor in the first place? HP Pavillion----Intel processor Lenovo- business desktop 90% of its models use Intel.
 

WarEagleAU

Bird of Prey
Joined
Jul 9, 2006
Messages
10,809 (2.59/day)
Likes
529
Location
Gurley, AL
System Name Boddha Getta Boddha Getta Bah!
Processor AMD FX 6100 @ 4.432Ghz @1.382
Motherboard ASUS M5A99X EVO AMD 990X AMD SB950
Cooling Custom Water. EK 240MM Kit, Supreme HSF - Runs 35C
Memory 2 x 4GB Corsair Vengeance White LP @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) XFX Radeon HD 6870 980/1100
Storage WD Caviar Black 1.0TB, WD Caviar Green 1.0TB, WD 160GB
Display(s) Asus VH222/S 22: (21.5" Viewable) 1920x1080p HDMI LCD Monitor
Case NZXT White Switch 810
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek 5.1
Power Supply NZXT Hale 90 Gold Cert 750W Modular PSU
Software Windows 8.1 Profession 64 Bit
#22
They are taking the defective quad cores and turning them into useable chips. regardless of how you feel, its a damn smart move. This way, they save face and dont lose alot of money on non working chips. Intel made the smart move years back with a separate team dedicated to a new architecture. It worked in their favor. Now AMD is just playing stop gap. I suspect they are working on something better and taking all the good and replacing all the bad with more good. Thats what Id be doing if I were them. I dont need some high level proc to kill Intel. I dont care for them killing intel. I just want a good proc, for a decent price that ocs very well and gives me what I want. Ive yet to try out the phenoms to see if they do that.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2005
Messages
796 (0.18/day)
Likes
37
System Name Current
Processor Core i5 2500k
Motherboard Z77MA-G45
Cooling Cooler Master Tx3
Memory 8gb DDR3 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) Evga GTX 960 4GB GDDR5
Storage (1) SAMSUNG 850 EVO 500GB
Display(s) ASUS PB278Q 27" WQHD 2560x1440 IPS
Case Fractal Core 1000
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply 430 Watt Corsair
Mouse Logitech g602
Keyboard K70 LUX Mech LB, Red LED, Cherry MX Brown
Software Windows 10 + Hackintosh
#23
Reality check: AMD's quad core procs already are a dissapoinment in terms of performance when compared to current Intel quad core offerings, (not to mention against soon to be released proc from Intel) how come a defective quad core with a core disabled will change that?
New Stepping B2. This is a relatively new architecture will take time for AMD to smooth it out. Three core are rumored to rival Intels dual core prices. Id take 3 over 2 any day.More Power :laugh: Also I don't game anymore, so multitasking is where its at for me.


If Intel finds that these Triple-core Phenom chips are eating into its Core 2 Duo market-share they'll be the first to respond with a similarly priced tri-core processor. AMD must produce a high-performance chip not to earn profits but to uplift its face-value of being a competent company that has the potential to deliver the best.

Sure, OEM's don't come out with Quad-core chips but how many OEM's actually use an AMD processor in the first place? HP Pavillion----Intel processor Lenovo- business desktop 90% of its models use Intel.
First you must have a lot of free time, second many OEMS use AMD processors especially laptop providers which, I'm not sure if your up to date on are outselling desktops (Actually I think this has been happening since 2005). So you got Acer, Asus, Toshiba, Gateway(now owned by acer), and others.

Also I'm not sure if your aware of the swing between the two companies, it has been going back and forth for quite some time now. I don't feel like typing it up, but anyone who has been around for a while knows this.

This discussion is really starting to dumb down, and really your having too much fun twisting and playing with peoples words. My original jab was about the overall pattern, not fighting or "discussing" specifics.

If you want to see something interesting check this out.

http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=AMD&t=my
http://finance.yahoo.com/q/bc?s=INTC&t=my

Draw your own conclusions. Also look how the spikes line up with product launches. At 7.70 AMD is looking pretty good to purchase. And Acquisitions are not always bad if this ever did happen, which I highly doubt. Somone should go ask Jim Cramer, :laugh:
 
T

TechnicalFreak

Guest
#24
I don't know the price of either AMD or Intel cpu's where everyone else live, but let me give you an exampel from where I live:
AMD Phenom Quadcore 2.2Ghz = 1895:-SEK* (something around 200~£ or $)
Intel Core 2 QUAD Q6600 2.4GHz = 2 140:-SEK* (something around 220~£ or $).

First of all , for most people they would say something like "Well it's just a couple of hundred bucks in difference" - thoose are the one's who actually earn a lot of money. Someone like me has to say "Ok.. I think I'll buy the AMD since I can't afford the Intel".

Second , I heard from the salesman (who is selling both CPU's) that Cache level on the Intel does make a big difference,and you also pay for the technology inside it (whatever that might be?). Since I don't have either of them to even test it, I can't say "Yes, this one is faster than that one". Can anyone here verify this??


*SEK : Svensk Krona (Swedish currency).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

FreedomEclipse

~Technological Technocrat~
Joined
Apr 20, 2007
Messages
17,145 (4.41/day)
Likes
5,290
Location
London,UK
System Name Codename: Rapture X Mk.VI {Still....MoonPig Edition}
Processor Intel 3930k@4.5Ghz
Motherboard Asus P9X79 PRO
Cooling Corsair H105 {2x Corsair ML 120 Pro}|VRM: Antec Spotcool 100
Memory 32GB DDR3 Kingston HyperX Beast 2400Mhz {8x4GB}
Video Card(s) MSI 1070 Gaming X (Samsung)
Storage 512GB Samsung 850 Pro (Boot)|1x 512GB Crucial MX100|2x 3TB Toshiba DT01ACA300
Display(s) Asus PB278Q 27"
Case Corsair 760T (White) {1x140mm NB PK-3, 2x Corsair AF140}
Audio Device(s) Creative SB Z {Speakers: Logitech Z-5500 }
Power Supply Corsair AX760
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Duckyshine Dead LED(s) III
Software Windows 7 7600 x64
Benchmark Scores ( ͡°( ͡° ͜ʖ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)ʖ ͡°) ͡°)
#25
I agree that a lot of OEM companies are still using AMD chips, but you cant deny that AMD run OEM systems are in decline. sure they will continue to be sold as well as being widely available to all but at the same time with a little research people will find out that Intel is more favourable/popular & go with them because most laptop/Pc OEM vendors sell them at very fair prices.

im in no way desputing that OEM's dont but they dont sell as much as stuff thats run with Intel.

as much as AMD's been good to me in the past I have to look beyond brand names & go for whats best for their wallet. we all have to look beyond brand names. forget the big divide between AMD & Intel.

OEM's will continue to use AMD chips in their systems no doubt about it but they wont make as much out of them as they would an Intel chip. since Intel have been pretty agressive with their advertising its hard to wake up in the morning & say that we dont know what the fudge a Core 2 Duo is. Intel advertises as well as other retailers. ads will always say that the pc/laptop is powerd by Intel Centreno Core 2 Duo technology etc etc but you get my point.


AMD could go into so agressive advertising also but they have nothing of value to shout about. to put it in a way