• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD to Steer Motherboard Partners Away from Intel WLAN, Toward MediaTek Co-branded Ones

Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,085 (0.70/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3200G
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Noctua L12S + Kryonaut
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / 860 Evo SATA 250GB
Display(s) 24G2U
Mouse G703
Keyboard Apex m500 (red)
Software W10
Considering what garbage Intel's AX 200 is on my board, I welcome this with open arms.
 
Joined
Dec 26, 2006
Messages
1,190 (0.22/day)
Location
Northern Ontario Canada
System Name Just another PC
Processor Ryzen 1700
Motherboard Gigabyte GA-AX370-K3
Cooling Noctua NH-C12P SE14
Memory DDR4-2133 2x16GB
Video Card(s) XFX RX480 8GB
Storage 960 EVO 500GB OS, 1TB SSD Steam & 2TB WD Blue SSD Storage
Display(s) LG 27UL550-W
Case Be Quiet Pure Base 600 (no window)
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 550W
Mouse Mionix Naos 8200
Keyboard Corsair Strafe with browns
Software W10 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores Starts when push power button!!
If mediatek is equal or better than Realtek for the same price then whatevs
 
Joined
Feb 26, 2016
Messages
438 (0.20/day)
Location
Texas
System Name O-Clock
Processor Intel Core i9-9900K @ 5.1 GHz
Motherboard ASUS Maximus XI Hero (Wi=Fi AC)
Cooling Enermax Liqmax II 240 push/pull w/ ICD thermal compound
Memory Crucial Ballistix Sport LT 32GB (2x16GB) + SK Hynix ECC Unbuffered 32GB (2x16) @3200 MHz CL18
Video Card(s) Asus GTX 1650 Super TUF OC, PNY Quadro M4000
Storage Samsung 860 PRO 256GB 2.5" SSD, Samsung PM863a 2TB 2.5" SSD, Samsung 870 Evo 500GB 2.5" SSD
Display(s) Asus VG279QM, Dell P2314H
Case Corsair SPEC-02 (modded)
Audio Device(s) HyperX Cloud II
Power Supply EVGA 1200 P2
Mouse Logitech G403
Keyboard Logitech G910 Stickerbombed + Corsair K55
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Benchmark Scores https://hwbot.org/search/submissions/permalink?userId=92615&cpuId=5773
From my personal experience across several different Realtek and Intel LAN adapters, Intel has had higher performance, and usually does not break with a driver update. Realtek on the other hand, has worse performance at best. Sure you could say that maybe it's just my network setup that's "built different", but I have also been to other friends' houses and helped them with their PC setups too; it's not just my setup, Intel's LAN adapters are just better because they have are always downloadable from Intel's website, whereas with Realtek adapters, usually you are supposed to use the one that is on your motherboard's support page, and I believe this is where the issue stems from. Since you always have customized drivers from the motherboard manufacturers, every manufacturer is making custom driver changes, that increases the variability of successful operation with all Realtek adapters. Not to mention Intel's LAN adapters have much more [useful] settings than Realtek.

Now back on topic, I have no experience with MediaTek, and I have not heard of that company prior to reading this article. RANT: I mean AMD really could just use Intel's LAN adapters and not be stubborn about it but, okay I guess they want to do their best to ensure competition even if it means the consumers will have a shit experience, as was the case with the infamous USB dropout on Ryzen, and I bet you they even will attempt to deny all allegations of LAN problems at the beginning of the launch.

Considering what garbage Intel's AX 200 is on my board, I welcome this with open arms.
Have you installed the from the motherboard manufacturer? Or from Intel? Also check your wifi card's antenna connections (internal and external), even a loose connection will cause problems, and in most cases it's a loose connection on the internal side.

I simply stated that there's nothing wrong with their products. Take it or leave it. Instead you're accusing me of things that didn't happen.
And with that statement, you are trying to set the law of the land. Not everyone's experience is the same as yours, it is absolutely possible that you had a seamless experience while someone else who did everything right is having problems left and right. Because there are logic components on a wifi card, yes there can be faulty cards as well. I could go on and on, but unless you can prove that every single product made by Realtek is free from defects (100% not true btw), you can't just state that and try to write it in stone.

No, it means that 16GB on the Radeon RX 6800 XT will make sure the Radeon will perform better and for much longer period of time than the 10GB GeForce RTX 3080 lol
Why not just have consistent performance from the beginning then? Why would you have to wait years to finally get better performance than its competitor (generalized statement)? There are multiple ways to look at this of course, but from my viewpoint, AMD has a lot of untapped performance on their GPUs because they don't have optimizations from the start. Personally I will never get an AMD GPU as their GPU encoder is straight trash for streaming, but that's a niche thing I guess...
 
Last edited:
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
2,015 (0.61/day)
From my personal experience across several different Realtek and Intel LAN adapters, Intel has had higher performance, and usually does not break with a driver update. Realtek on the other hand, has worse performance at best. Sure you could say that maybe it's just my network setup that's "built different", but I have also been to other friends' houses and helped them with their PC setups too; it's not just my setup, Intel's LAN adapters are just better because they have are always downloadable from Intel's website, whereas with Realtek adapters, usually you are supposed to use the one that is on your motherboard's support page, and I believe this is where the issue stems from. Since you always have customized drivers from the motherboard manufacturers, every manufacturer is making custom driver changes, that increases the variability of successful operation with all Realtek adapters. Not to mention Intel's LAN adapters have much more [useful] settings than Realtek.

Now back on topic, I have no experience with MediaTek, and I have not heard of that company prior to reading this article. RANT: I mean AMD really could just use Intel's LAN adapters and not be stubborn about it but, okay I guess they want to do their best to ensure competition even if it means the consumers will have a shit experience, as was the case with the infamous USB dropout on Ryzen, and I bet you they even will attempt to deny all allegations of LAN problems at the beginning of the launch.


Have you installed the from the motherboard manufacturer? Or from Intel? Also check your wifi card's antenna connections (internal and external), even a loose connection will cause problems, and in most cases it's a loose connection on the internal side.


And with that statement, you are trying to set the law of the land. Not everyone's experience is the same as yours, it is absolutely possible that you had a seamless experience while someone else who did everything right is having problems left and right. Because there are logic components on a wifi card, yes there can be faulty cards as well. I could go on and on, but unless you can prove that every single product made by Realtek is free from defects (100% not true btw), you can't just state that and try to write it in stone.


Why not just have consistent performance from the beginning then? Why would you have to wait years to finally get better performance than its competitor (generalized statement)? There are multiple ways to look at this of course, but from my viewpoint, AMD has a lot of untapped performance on their GPUs because they don't have optimizations from the start. Personally I will never get an AMD GPU as their GPU encoder is straight trash for streaming, but that's a niche thing I guess...
Mediatek is a chinese company most well known for making the chips you find in dirt cheap tablets and phones, like the sub $100 stuff, and is also well known for abandoning product drivers within 1-2 years. Once its on the shelf they move on.

I wouldnt touch a mediatek product.
 

Tigger

I'm the only one
Supporter
Joined
Mar 20, 2006
Messages
13,678 (2.37/day)
System Name Dirty Fecker
Processor Intel I7 12700K 5ghz-P 3.9ghz-E 1.25vcore
Motherboard Asus Rog Strix Z690-A WiFi D4
Cooling EK 360 PE+EK 280 CE, FLT 240 D5, EK supremacy classic, Generic GPU block
Memory Teamgroup 8 Pack Edition T-Force Dark Pro 2x16gb 3800 16-16-16-38 Bdie
Video Card(s) MSI GTX980TI Gaming 6gb, 1475/8000 water cooled
Storage Silicon Power Gen3x4 256gb M.2, WD SN850 1TB M.2 NVME Gen4x4
Display(s) MSI 32" Optix AG32CV 1080p 165hz 1ms
Case Lian Li o11 Dynamic XL Rog
Audio Device(s) onboard/Logitech Z4
Power Supply Corsair TX750M 80% Gold
Mouse Razer Viper
Keyboard Anne pro II
Software Win 11 Pro x64
Benchmark Scores do they matter
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,014 (1.60/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
From my personal experience across several different Realtek and Intel LAN adapters, Intel has had higher performance, and usually does not break with a driver update. Realtek on the other hand, has worse performance at best. Sure you could say that maybe it's just my network setup that's "built different", but I have also been to other friends' houses and helped them with their PC setups too; it's not just my setup, Intel's LAN adapters are just better because they have are always downloadable from Intel's website, whereas with Realtek adapters, usually you are supposed to use the one that is on your motherboard's support page, and I believe this is where the issue stems from. Since you always have customized drivers from the motherboard manufacturers, every manufacturer is making custom driver changes, that increases the variability of successful operation with all Realtek adapters. Not to mention Intel's LAN adapters have much more [useful] settings than Realtek.

Now back on topic, I have no experience with MediaTek, and I have not heard of that company prior to reading this article. RANT: I mean AMD really could just use Intel's LAN adapters and not be stubborn about it but, okay I guess they want to do their best to ensure competition even if it means the consumers will have a shit experience, as was the case with the infamous USB dropout on Ryzen, and I bet you they even will attempt to deny all allegations of LAN problems at the beginning of the launch.


Have you installed the from the motherboard manufacturer? Or from Intel? Also check your wifi card's antenna connections (internal and external), even a loose connection will cause problems, and in most cases it's a loose connection on the internal side.


And with that statement, you are trying to set the law of the land. Not everyone's experience is the same as yours, it is absolutely possible that you had a seamless experience while someone else who did everything right is having problems left and right. Because there are logic components on a wifi card, yes there can be faulty cards as well. I could go on and on, but unless you can prove that every single product made by Realtek is free from defects (100% not true btw), you can't just state that and try to write it in stone.


Why not just have consistent performance from the beginning then? Why would you have to wait years to finally get better performance than its competitor (generalized statement)? There are multiple ways to look at this of course, but from my viewpoint, AMD has a lot of untapped performance on their GPUs because they don't have optimizations from the start. Personally I will never get an AMD GPU as their GPU encoder is straight trash for streaming, but that's a niche thing I guess...
And your expertise in this matter is?
I never said Realtek was the best out there, but your opinion here doesn't count for much if you've never heard of Mediatek.

Also, Realtek offer up to date LAN drivers for Windows on it's website, but I guess you never bothered to look?

Best of all, if you don't like what's going on, you can still stick to Intel, as no-one is forcing you to buy any of this.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
1,019 (0.33/day)
Yeah, nice work there AMD. It would actually put me off buying a board with cheap crap components with awful drivers.

Anyone still having fun waiting for working drivers for the Realtek 2.5GB LAN?

Intel LAN/WLAN/BT are the gold standard for both hardware and software.
I must be supremely lucky then to have one of the worlds rarest Realtek 2,5G LAN on my X570 Aorus Master (v1.0) that has no problems.
As opposed to Intel's 1G LAN that has had DPC latency issues with every new driver or AX200 BT that is unable to detect my S10e. Yeah. Gold standard my ass.
Sorry, but the constantly disconnecting Realtek 2.5GB LAN chip in my Ryzen Asus motherboard would like to heavily disagree with you. It would also like to tell you that if you think this is a one-off problem, with a one-off person who maybe (in your eyes) does not know how to build a computer and install it, is somehow responsible for the problem, then a few thousand more would like to add their little silicon voices to the choir via google search.

I also hear stories about their audio drivers and software being so bad, that Realtek support tells people to use the standard Microsoft driver...
Clearly a motherboard speific problem. Im using their audio drivers that are miles better than Creatve stuff for their expensive soundcards.
Happens on all boards that used this particular chip. Google search backs this up.
No it does not.
Mediatek makes decent chipsets for routers. The only job here - not screw up with drivers.
Mediatek makes the hardware and AMD will provide the drivers.
have realtek added basic features like interrupt moderation to their 2.5 gbit nics?

all my realtek lans still dont have the feature
See the attachment. It's there along with host of other features.
 

Attachments

  • Clipboard.jpg
    Clipboard.jpg
    76.1 KB · Views: 20
Joined
Aug 20, 2007
Messages
16,780 (3.19/day)
System Name Pioneer
Processor Ryzen R9 5950X
Motherboard GIGABYTE X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua NH-D15 + A whole lotta Sunon and Corsair Maglev blower fans...
Memory G.SKILL TridentZ 32GB (4 x 8GB) @ DDR4-3600 (Samsung B-Die)
Video Card(s) EVGA GeForce RTX 3070 FTW3 (non-LHR)
Storage 2x Mushkin Pilot-E 2TB PCIe 3.0 NVMe SSDs
Display(s) 55" LG 55" B9 OLED 4K Display
Case Thermaltake Core X31
Audio Device(s) VGA HDMI->LG B9 OLED/Schiit Modi MB/Asgard 2 DAC/Amp to AKG Pro K712 Headphones
Power Supply EVGA SuperNova T2 Titanium 850W
Mouse Razer Deathadder v2
Keyboard WASD CODE v3 w/ Cherry Green Keyswitches & aftermarket PBT keycaps
Software Windows 11 Enterprise (yes, it's legit)
I could go on, but I think I have proved my point.
I only know my addin card works fine. Wasn't denying your point beyond that. Maybe the mobos use some differnt realtek chip. *shrugs*
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,014 (1.60/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
There are at least 3 distinct 2.5Gbit/s Realtek chip variants with 2 separate firmware blobs supported by the mainline Linux driver.
They have at least two PHYs, two PCIe options and three USB 3.x options, which would explain that.
 
Joined
May 19, 2009
Messages
1,514 (0.33/day)
Location
Latvia
System Name Personal \\ Work - HP EliteBook 840 G3
Processor i7-4790K \\ i7-6500U
Motherboard MSI Z97 Gaming 7
Cooling Noctua DH-15
Memory Corsair Vengeance Pro 32GB 2400 MHz \\ 16GB DDR4-2133
Video Card(s) ASUS RoG Strix 1070 Ti\\ Intel 520 HD
Storage Samsung 850 Pro 512GB, WD Black 2 TB, Samsung 970 Pro 512GB \\ Samsung 256GB SSD
Display(s) BenQ XL2411Z \\ FullHD + 2x HP Z24i external screens via docking station
Case Fractal Design Define Arc Midi R2 with window
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150 with Logitech Z323
Power Supply Corsair AX860i
Software Windows 10
Intel is de facto standard in networking. I am not entirely sure this is a good idea.
 
Joined
Jun 29, 2018
Messages
203 (0.16/day)
Intel is de facto standard in networking. I am not entirely sure this is a good idea.
It's not as bad, at least not with 25/40/100+GBit/s. I've seen more (NVIDIA) Mellanox and Broadcom than Intel in those products. But again, just my anecdotal experience ;)
 
Joined
May 2, 2017
Messages
5,566 (3.23/day)
Location
Norway, currently in Lund, Sweden
System Name Hotbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
Motherboard ASRock Phantom Gaming B550 ITX/ax
Cooling Aquanaut + Laing DDC 1T Plus PWM + Corsair XR5 280mm + 2x Arctic P14
Memory 32GB G.Skill FlareX 3200c14
Video Card(s) PowerColor Radeon 6900XT Liquid Devil Ultimate, UV@950mV/2050MHz/180W
Storage 2TB Adata SX8200 Pro
Display(s) Dell U2711 main, AOC 24P2C secondary
Case SSUPD Meshlicious
Audio Device(s) Optoma Nuforce μDAC 3
Power Supply Corsair SF750 Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Cooler Master MasterKeys Pro M w/DSA profile caps
Software Windows 10 Pro
I really don't care at this point. I used to own a 5700 XT, had lots of issues, saw many people have issues => AMD bad. What's worse is nobody actually tried to help. They all made it seem like I was imagining things or that something else in my PC was broken so they recommended every trick in the book despite me telling them that my system is fine. They kept insisting that there's no way AMD did something wrong.
Who did? That's pretty weird as a response, but then these issues have AFAIK never been fixed or even had their source conclusively identified, which points towards a hardware or firmware bug. The problem was that it seemed to be extremely selective in which other hardware it had to be combined with to appear at all, which made even replicating the errors really hard. I think AMD messed up pretty substantially with that particular GPU, but going from that to "AMD bad" is just poor reasoning still.
 
Joined
Oct 2, 2015
Messages
2,820 (1.23/day)
Location
Argentina
System Name Ciel / Yukino
Processor AMD Ryzen R5 5600X / Intel Core i3 5005U
Motherboard Asus Tuf Gaming B550 Plus / HP 240 G5
Cooling ID-Cooling 224-XT Basic
Memory 2x 8GB Geil Orion AMD Edition 3600MHz@3800MHz
Video Card(s) Dell 1660 SUPER + Sentey RX 550 2GB
Storage SSD ADATA FALCON 512GB PCIe3.0 + HDD WD 4TB
Display(s) Samsung S22F350
Case Cougar MX410 Mesh-G
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC S1200A
Power Supply Aerocool KCAS-500W
Mouse Logitech G203
Keyboard VSG Alnilam
Software Windows 10 x64 / Manjaro x64
Good, better Joy-Con pairing :toast:.
For those that don't know, if you pair Nintendo controllers via Bluetooth on an Intel WiFi+BT chipset, the pairing is weak, you need to disable WiFi to get it working fine. Generic USB dongles don't face this.
 
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
2,085 (0.70/day)
Location
Serbia
Processor Ryzen 3200G
Motherboard X570 I Aorus Pro
Cooling Noctua L12S + Kryonaut
Memory HyperX Fury 2 x 8GB 3200 CL16
Video Card(s) RX 470 Nitro+ 4GB
Storage SX8200 Pro 512 / 860 Evo SATA 250GB
Display(s) 24G2U
Mouse G703
Keyboard Apex m500 (red)
Software W10
Have you installed the from the motherboard manufacturer? Or from Intel? Also check your wifi card's antenna connections (internal and external), even a loose connection will cause problems, and in most cases it's a loose connection on the internal side.
Yes. I have tried almost everything. Drivers from Intel, drivers from gigabyte. Oldest drivers, newest drivers, drivers in between. Two different ISPs in two different homes (both work fine on a wired conn). Tried changing the protocol from AX to AC, didn't help. Tried a bunch of "fixes" from the official Intel community support, and nothing. And a lot of people are having this same issue so it's not the antenna connectors. Gave up after a couple of months, used cable ever since.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
1,381 (0.34/day)
Intel has been pretty reliable when it comes to networking. I hope this RZ660 will be just as good.

Stop.

I had a fairly expensive board (X470-F) on which the Intel onboard NIC just blew out. It started "erratic" meaning it dropped packets and what more all along, at some point the NIC did'nt function anymore. It was even gone from within the BIOS. And weeks later the complete board died. Now a 570 with a Realtek and zero to none issues for more then a year.

I was'nt the only one appearantly. More people with Intel NIC's had these issues. There is or was a faulty batch along the way. Same as with these Atom CPU's that would die one day without any notification.
 

ARF

Joined
Jan 28, 2020
Messages
1,602 (2.23/day)
Location
The country of the absurds
Intel is de facto standard in networking. I am not entirely sure this is a good idea.

If we want progress, then we must abandon the old standards and move on to some new and better ;)

Intel is corruption, greed and bribes - there should be sanctions against their bad business practices.
 
Joined
Oct 1, 2006
Messages
4,709 (0.84/day)
Location
Hong Kong
Processor Core i7-12700k
Motherboard Z690 Aero G D4
Cooling Custom loop water, 3x 420 Rad
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2080 Ti
Storage Plextor M10P 2TB
Display(s) Samsung C27HG70
Case Thermaltake Level 20 XT
Audio Device(s) Soundblaster AE-5 Plus
Power Supply FSP Aurum PT 1200W
Software Windows 11 Pro 64-bit
Intel has been pretty reliable when it comes to networking. I hope this RZ660 will be just as good.
Tell that to the dreadful i225-V 2.5G Ethernet that I am constantly struggling with.
It sometimes refuse to start on a reboot and requires a power cycle.
I have the (3) revision that is supposedly "fixed".

Yeah, nice work there AMD. It would actually put me off buying a board with cheap crap components with awful drivers.

Anyone still having fun waiting for working drivers for the Realtek 2.5GB LAN?

Intel LAN/WLAN/BT are the gold standard for both hardware and software.
Apperently not so gold after all.
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2016
Messages
107 (0.06/day)
System Name The old timer
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Asus P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Noctua NH15
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance PRO 2400mhz CL10 (4x4gb)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX 5700XT 50th Anniversary Edition
Storage Samsung 512GB SATA | 2x 1TB 2.5" Hitachi 7200rpm | 2TB 2.5" Toshiba USB 3.0
Display(s) Samsung Odyssey G5 32" + LG 24MP59G 24"
Case Cooler Master HAF XB Evo
Audio Device(s) Creative X-Fi Extreme Audio PCI-E (SB1040)
Power Supply Corsair RM1000X
Mouse Razer Basilisk X Hyperspeed
Keyboard Razer Ornata Chroma
Software Win10 x64 PRO
Benchmark Scores Mobile: Asus Strix Advantage G713QY | Ryzen 7 5900HX | 16GB Micron 3200MHz CL21 | RX 6800M 12GB |
This is in no way a good move... My old Asus FX506IV came with a Realtek wifi card and it had connectivity issues... It would disconnect randomly from my vodafone provided cisco router, as well as my TP-Link router. It was worse with the TP-Link, since I sometimes had to reboot the laptop to get wifi back. In some cases the card would disappear from device manager altogether or show up with an exclamation mark. I've since replaced it with an Intel AC9260 wifi card and had no issues ever since.

My current G713QY has a Mediatek wifi card, and while speed and wifi signal seem to be superior to intel cards I've used so far, it's slow to pick up wifi networks and can take up to 5 minutes after boot to register a network although it says it's connected (connected, no internet).
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
10,014 (1.60/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
This is in no way a good move... My old Asus FX506IV came with a Realtek wifi card and it had connectivity issues... It would disconnect randomly from my vodafone provided cisco router, as well as my TP-Link router. It was worse with the TP-Link, since I sometimes had to reboot the laptop to get wifi back. In some cases the card would disappear from device manager altogether or show up with an exclamation mark. I've since replaced it with an Intel AC9260 wifi card and had no issues ever since.

My current G713QY has a Mediatek wifi card, and while speed and wifi signal seem to be superior to intel cards I've used so far, it's slow to pick up wifi networks and can take up to 5 minutes after boot to register a network although it says it's connected (connected, no internet).
With WiFi it actually matters a lot in terms of what chip there is in the router too.
Intel has a known bug in some of its cards that prevent proper operation with some Broadcom solutions and it has never been fixed.

It's possible that Realtek has some similar issues with whatever chips were in your routers. I've used crappy WiFi products from Realtek and I've used ones that work great and the same applies to MTK, Intel, Broadcom and Qualcomm. Asus made a Broadcom based PCIe card that never worked properly, so they simply made a new version and dropped support for the old one. Qualcomm screwed up their first 802.11ac router chipset, told customers that they were SOL, made a new revision and moved on. Yet the old revision ended up in at least three or four products that were on sale.

On top of this, all the WiFi chip makers implement their own "enhancements" to their products that work great if all your products use their chips, but sometimes causes issues in a mixed environment, something that's much more common.

My router and my two APs are all based on Qualcomm hardware and I have zero issues "roaming" between them, something that I know isn't always the case if you have a mix of different solutions. The big problem here is that it's not easy to know what hardware is in your device, which means most consumers just buys whatever they like/can afford and call it a day. Then when there's issues, they blame the manufacturer of the device.

Yes, WiFi should be interoperable between brands, but it's far from perfect.
 

T_Zel

New Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2021
Messages
9 (0.04/day)
I really don't care at this point. I used to own a 5700 XT, had lots of issues, saw many people have issues => AMD bad. What's worse is nobody actually tried to help. They all made it seem like I was imagining things or that something else in my PC was broken so they recommended every trick in the book despite me telling them that my system is fine. They kept insisting that there's no way AMD did something wrong.
Anecdotally, my 5700 XT issues were entirely caused by the Zen 2 BIOS update for B450 boards (and other chipsets like X470 were also affected). The first BIOS version to support the then-new Ryzen 3000 series accidentally unlocked PCIe 4.0 on the board, which the 5700 XT defaulted to utilising. Of course, PCIe 4.0 wasn't stable on B450 so I would get frequent game crashes and BSODs.

Disabling auto PCIe in the BIOS and manually setting 3.0 solved all my problems, and later BIOS revisions removed PCIe 4.0 as an option. I'm certainly not the only person to have encountered this either, as Steve from Hardware Unboxed has also mentioned fixing a friend's 5700 XT issues by manually setting PCIe 3.0 in the BIOS. But I imagine there are an awful lot of people out there who didn't update their BIOS after the first Zen 2 version and never worked out the PCIe issue. I think of this every time I hear a story about someone RMAing 5 "faulty" 5700 XTs before switching to an Nvidia card.
 
D

Deleted member 215115

Guest
Anecdotally, my 5700 XT issues were entirely caused by the Zen 2 BIOS update for B450 boards (and other chipsets like X470 were also affected). The first BIOS version to support the then-new Ryzen 3000 series accidentally unlocked PCIe 4.0 on the board, which the 5700 XT defaulted to utilising. Of course, PCIe 4.0 wasn't stable on B450 so I would get frequent game crashes and BSODs.

Disabling auto PCIe in the BIOS and manually setting 3.0 solved all my problems, and later BIOS revisions removed PCIe 4.0 as an option. I'm certainly not the only person to have encountered this either, as Steve from Hardware Unboxed has also mentioned fixing a friend's 5700 XT issues by manually setting PCIe 3.0 in the BIOS. But I imagine there are an awful lot of people out there who didn't update their BIOS after the first Zen 2 version and never worked out the PCIe issue. I think of this every time I hear a story about someone RMAing 5 "faulty" 5700 XTs before switching to an Nvidia card.
I tried everything. And I mean EVERYTHING. I wish it was that easy to fix...
 
Joined
Feb 24, 2020
Messages
48 (0.07/day)
Location
3rd world sh1thole, AKA italy
System Name AMDream v1.8.0
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 5600X+Alphacool Eisblock XPX Clear
Motherboard Asus Prime B550-Plus
Cooling CPU+GPU custom loop, 2x240 slim rads, 4xEK Vardar Evo RGB+1x Arctic P12 PWM fans
Memory 2x8GB Crucial Ballistix Red RGB DDR4 3600@3866 15-18-13-35-59 1T
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 reference+EK block, OC/UV: 1065mV core,1100MHz@1030mV HBM
Storage 1TB Western Digital SN850+Eluteng NVMe heatsink
Display(s) LG 24ML600S+Dell VESA base
Case Aerocool Aero-800 White
Audio Device(s) Creative Inspire P380
Power Supply EVGA 650GQ
Mouse Steelseries Rival original (white), Steelseries Qck+ mousepad
Keyboard Arealer Roarer with white pudding keycaps (Long Hua blue switches)
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores 11150-1520 Cineb.R23, 4993 Superposition
just my experience:
I switched from an Intel I211-V to a Realtek Gigabit when upgrading my rig from an Asus Prime X470 to a B550, and there’s ZERO difference between the two.
But, looking at earlier posts, I’m glad I only have a Gigabit NIC
 
Joined
Feb 1, 2019
Messages
410 (0.38/day)
Location
UK, Leicester
System Name Main PC
Processor 9900k@4.8ghz
Motherboard Asrock Fatality K6 Z370
Cooling Noctua NH-D15S
Memory 32 Gig 3200CL14
Video Card(s) 3080 RTX FE
Storage 970 EVO 1TB
Display(s) LG 27GL850
Case Fractal Define R4
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar D2X
Power Supply Antec HCG 750
It's possible that Realtek has some similar issues with whatever chips were in your routers. I've used crappy WiFi products from Realtek and I've used ones that work great and the same applies to MTK, Intel, Broadcom and Qualcomm. Asus made a Broadcom based PCIe card that never worked properly, so they simply made a new version and dropped support for the old one. Qualcomm screwed up their first 802.11ac router chipset, told customers that they were SOL, made a new revision and moved on. Yet the old revision ended up in at least three or four products that were on sale.
Yeah not good practice, that's effectively what happened to me with my MX500 SSD, was just told tough luck, even though the newer revision probably has it fixed.

So not surprised from both Qualcomm and Asus there, its immoral but seems to be standard practice as no one likes doing product recalls or even attempted software fixes.

Luckily I have had few issues with wifi on client devices, replacing a WAP is far cheaper than client devices, consider e.g. laptops often have whitelisted wifi devices so hard to upgrade unless via wifi dongle, and replacing a phone is another example of a expensive upgrade. My Asus RTAC68 was a a bit problematic but thankfully only £20 to replace it with something that works.
 
Top