• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

AMD X570-successor to be Third-Party Sourced

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,427 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
AMD X570 chipset is the industry's first PC platform core-logic to support PCI-Express gen 4.0, but has proven to be expensive and hot. Its 600-series chipset successor will be third-party sourced much like its 400-series predecessor, according to a MyDrivers report citing sources in the motherboard industry. AMD is reportedly sourcing its 500-series mid-range chipset, the B550, from ASMedia. The B550 uses PCI-Express 3.0 x4 as its chipset bus, and puts out eight PCIe gen 3.0 downstream general purpose lanes, however, B550 motherboards could still feature PCI-Express 4.0 x16 slots from the socket AM4 SoC (provided a 3rd gen Ryzen processor is installed), and at least one of the M.2 NVMe slots on B550 motherboards could have PCI-Express 4.0 x4, since they're wired to the SoC instead of the chipset.

The MyDrivers report predicts that the successor to X570, the supposed "X670," could be sourced from a third-party firm, much like the B550, and implement PCI-Express gen 4.0, not just as chipset-bus, but also putting out PCI-Express gen 4.0 general purpose lanes. A possible design goal of the X670 could be to implement PCIe gen 4.0 switching fabric without running too hot, resulting in a cooler chipset than can make do with fanless cooling solutions, much like the X470. AMD will continue to make "chipsets" in the form of I/O controller dies for use in its MCM processors, although the relatively low-margin motherboard chipset business could be axed.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
618 (0.24/day)
If the “B550” is just PCIe 3.0, why is it taking so long to arrive?
Ask ASMedia why it's taking so long. Im glad AMD decided to produce X570 themselves. Otherwise we would not have PCI-E 4.0 for years.
As for the chipset cooling i feel like most manufacturers have gone overboard with their chipset fans on X570. Personally i see no reason for active cooling on X570 and tests by Der8auer for example have shown as much.

On my X570 Aorus Master i replaced the stock thermal pad with Kryonaout and unplugged the chipset fan cable. Never have i seen temps exceeding 45c.
 
Joined
Aug 13, 2010
Messages
4,686 (1.29/day)
X470 should have just been re-used, with one main PCIE 4.0 X16 slot and one PCIE 4.0 M.2 X4 slot routed from CPU as a feature across the chipsetboards.
Call it B550, call it whatever. It would have been great to have.
 
Joined
Nov 20, 2013
Messages
4,327 (1.77/day)
Location
Kiev, Ukraine
System Name WS#1337
Processor Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard Gigabyte x470 AORUS Ultra Gamin
Cooling Xigmatek Scylla 240 AIO
Memory 2x8GB Team T-Force Vulkan DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) MSI RTX 2060 Super Armor OC
Storage Adata SX8200 Pro 1TB
Display(s) Samsung U24E590D (4K/UHD)
Case Chieftec AL-01B-OP
Audio Device(s) ALC1220
Power Supply SeaSonic SSR-550FX (80+ GOLD)
Mouse Logitech G603
Keyboard Zalman K500 modded (Gateron brown)
Software Windows 10, Ubuntu 18.04 LTS
If the “B550” is just PCIe 3.0, why is it taking so long to arrive?
Just a speculation, but maybe the issue lies with AsMedia's 32nm manufacturing capabilities.

But realistically, there's no need for B550. In order to make it easier for OEMs and consumers, AMD pushed for "ryzen 3000 - ready" instead. Most of the stuff on shelves today is Zen2-compatible(B350/450, x370/470). AsRock even pushed as far as updating their A320 lineup and DeskMini A300 (which recently gave me a headache due to cut-down Bristol Ridge support).
 
Joined
Nov 11, 2004
Messages
6,384 (1.11/day)
Location
Formosa
System Name Overlord Mk MXVI
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3800X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Master
Cooling Corsair H115i Pro
Memory 32GB Viper Steel 3600 DDR4 @ 3800MHz 16-19-16-19-36
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 2080 Gaming OC 8G
Storage 1TB WD Black NVMe (2018), 2TB Viper VPN100, 1TB WD Blue 3D NAND
Display(s) Asus PG27AQ
Case Corsair Carbide 275Q
Audio Device(s) Corsair Virtuoso SE
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Mouse Logitech G500s
Keyboard Wooting Two
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores https://valid.x86.fr/33u9si
Just a speculation, but maybe the issue lies with AsMedia's 32nm manufacturing capabilities.

But realistically, there's no need for B550. In order to make it easier for OEMs and consumers, AMD pushed for "ryzen 3000 - ready" instead. Most of the stuff on shelves today is Zen2-compatible(B350/450, x370/470). AsRock even pushed as far as updating their A320 lineup and DeskMini A300 (which recently gave me a headache due to cut-down Bristol Ridge support).
ASMedia is a fabless company, but ok...
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (6.78/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
x570 is a fail from a price to value standpoint.
boards are super expensive,and only thing they offer is pci-e 4.0,which in turn also has a huge markup for the nvme drives and provides zero returns except for copying files between two such drives.

x470 was cheaper,if they upgraded it for the ability to run two 3.0 nvme drives at the same price point it'd be a hit.
 
Joined
Nov 24, 2017
Messages
748 (0.76/day)
Location
Asia
Processor Intel Core i5 4590
Motherboard Gigabyte Z97x Gaming 3
Cooling Intel Stock Cooler
Memory 8GB(2x4GB) DDR3-800MHz [1600MT/s]
Video Card(s) XFX RX 560 4GB
Storage Transcend SSD370S 128GB; Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB
Display(s) Samsung S20D300 20" 768p TN
Case Delux DLC-MV888
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150
Power Supply Corsair VS450
Mouse A4Tech N-70FX
Software Windows 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores BaseMark GPU : 250 Point in HD 4600
I highly doubt that AMD will outsource their flagship chipset. And also AMD still has to fulfil WSA with GoFlo.
 

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
39,427 (8.42/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
I highly doubt that AMD will outsource their flagship chipset. And also AMD still has to fulfil WSA with GoFlo.
WSA will be taken care of by growth in demand for Ryzen and EPYC (their I/O controller dies).

X470 should have just been re-used, with one main PCIE 4.0 X16 slot and one PCIE 4.0 M.2 X4 slot routed from CPU as a feature across the chipsetboards.
Call it B550, call it whatever. It would have been great to have.
The B550A chipset in some OEM desktops is essentially that (a rebranded B450). Rebranding Promontory-LP as B550 could have presented a PR problem (the SoC puts out gen 4.0 lanes, but the chipset is limited to gen 2). So they at least want gen 3 before they could roll out B550. Until then push 400-series chipsets.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2016
Messages
480 (0.30/day)
Seems kind of understandable while x570 isn't a flop it's not what people would deem as a ideal chipset at this point in time in the tech industry to run as hot as it does with cooling fan. It's not as huge a deal as it's made out to be by many, but it's still something people can, will, and do quip about and the yeah margins are low to begin with it's a bit of a waste of resources. On the other hand I see this also as AMD's way of signaling that they intend to integrate more chipset features to the CPU SoC itself negating the need for chipset eventually or reducing the dependence on it. I think eventually at least with APU's they might be able to integrate everything directly and still be able to cool it sufficiently. The advantage of that is pretty obvious as well obviously it's going to be more power efficient and lower latency with the shorter more direct traces right on the CPU, but not just that if they they can integrate everything directly and no longer need a bridge chipset on the motherboard itself it free's it up so they could in place of it.

I think x570 was ambitious, but not necessarily a ideal chipset at this point in time in the tech industry given how hot it runs requiring a cooling fan. It's not a huge deal, but just enough for people to quip about and if margins are already low to begin with it makes sense to kind of axe the custom motherboard chipset's. To me it seems like AMD's way of signaling they intend to integrate more chipset features directly to the CPU SoC itself which makes more sense for efficiency and latency. I think eventually at least with APU's they might be able to integrate everything directly and still be able to cool it sufficiently. Integrating everything to the CPU SoC itself also free's up the motherboard chipset area to both shrink down the board size for SFF PC cases and more enthusiast level ones with dual sockets perhaps with twin crossfire APU's or having a CPU SoC that's heavily multi-core and another CPU SoC on another socket that's more geared for single thread high performance high frequency scaling giving the best of both. It probably wouldn't cost a "abundance" more for a dual socket board if you axe out the motherboard chipset itself. At that point the difference might be negligible.

AMD could even use the vacant motherboard chipset space to place a I/O die to control discrete AMD Crossfire MCU-GPU's and tweak the I/O die itself further when they shrink it to 7nm. It's hard to say what AMD will do. Another thing I had thought of recently is AMD could utilize that extra die chip space on certain CPU SoC's and integrate a PCIe express microSD slot on it and just have a open slot in the heatspread to insert the microSD into it prior to installation though I'm not sure how worthwhile it would be though see it as a interesting option none the less.

I really feel AMD will continue to integrate more features to the CPU SoC itself over time freeing up the need for a motherboard chipset entirely or requiring a smaller more efficient one that occupies less motherboard space to further shrink the PCB size down.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2018
Messages
90 (0.13/day)
Location
Germany
Processor Ryzen 7 3700x
Motherboard AsRock X570M Pro4
Cooling Be Quiet Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 4 x 16 GB Crucial Ballistix Sport LT red 3000C15 @ 3800C16 Micron rev E
Video Card(s) Zotac RTX 2070 mini
Storage Corsair MP510 1.92TB
Display(s) Samsung U32J592UQU 31.5" UHD + Fujitsu P19-2 19" 1280x1024
Case Jonsbo U3 mATX
Audio Device(s) ATH-M50
Power Supply Corsair SF600 600W SFX [currently RMAed]
Mouse Logitech G500
Keyboard QPAD MK-50 mechanical
Software Win10Edu_64
implement PCI-Express gen 4.0, not just as chipset-bus, but also putting out PCI-Express gen 4.0 general purpose lanes
Considering this is how it is right now with X570, it would be weird if they went a step back, right? AMD went straight from PCIe 2.0 lanes downstream to 4.0 downstream with their chipsets. A B550 which isn't stingy with PCIe lanes and has 3.0 ones downstream was all I wanted. Ended up with an open box X570 was wasn't too expensive. B450 is really hindered in the age of NVME storage and 10G ethernet.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
12,737 (5.93/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
x570 is a fail from a price to value standpoint.
boards are super expensive,and only thing they offer is pci-e 4.0,which in turn also has a huge markup for the nvme drives and provides zero returns except for copying files between two such drives.

x470 was cheaper,if they upgraded it for the ability to run two 3.0 nvme drives at the same price point it'd be a hit.
Yeah its quite the irony to see nearly HEDT level pricing on those boards while the whole point for Ryzen is to bring HEDT-like performance to the mainstream... sans quad channel that is. Especially because there is absolutely no need to have gone extreme like this. In fact I (too) feel AMD is missing a mainstream performance bang/buck chipset. What we have now is bog standard or totally overboard (pun intended). They're now trying to cover that with B450, but it feels a bit meh if you want to be serious, while the jump to x570 is a big one.

Another irony is that now that AMD actually has good CPU progress to offer, the whole idea of keeping old boards and upgrade from there is starting to turn sour quickly. There's a pretty sudden progress in standards and features on these boards and we've already had reports of the necessity to upgrade a board regardless.

Oh well, can't have it all I guess.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
618 (0.24/day)
Yeah its quite the irony to see nearly HEDT level pricing on those boards while the whole point for Ryzen is to bring HEDT-like performance to the mainstream... Especially because there is absolutely no need to have gone extreme like this. In fact I feel AMD is missing a mainstream performance bang/buck chipset. What we have now is bog standard or totally overboard (pun intended).

Another irony is that now that AMD actually has good CPU progress to offer, the whole idea of keeping old boards and upgrade from there is starting to turn sour quickly. There's a pretty sudden progress in standards and features on these boards and we've already had reports of the necessity to upgrade a board regardless.

Oh well, can't have it all I guess.
Well since you can use Ryzen on a A320, B350, X370, B450 and X470 board then you can still have HEDT like performance in mainstream. So i fail to see how AMD does not have mainstream performance bang/buck chipset. That's what B450 is for. For around $100 MSI's B450 Mortar or Tomahawk MAX boards come with out of the box support for Ryzen 3000 and several good features + good VRM's.

And if you really want fast storage then X570 exists. For example ASUS TUF X570 costs around 200$ and is a decent X570 board according to many.
I have no problem with X570 pricing. People sometimes act like X570 starts at $500 or something.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
12,737 (5.93/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
Well since you can use Ryzen on a A320, B350, X370, B450 and X470 board then you can still have HEDT like performance in mainstream. So i fail to see how AMD does not have mainstream performance bang/buck chipset. That's what B450 is for. For around $100 MSI's B450 Mortar or Tomahawk MAX boards come with out of the box support for Ryzen 3000 and several good features + good VRM's.

And if you really want fast storage then X570 exists. For example ASUS TUF X570 costs around 200$ and is a decent X570 board according to many.
I have no problem with X570 pricing. People sometimes act like X570 starts at $500 or something.
What's missing is Intel's feature complete Z slot at 100-150 eur, really. Only a few B450's cover that, somewhat.

Its not a big miss, but could do with some offerings.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
2,615 (2.26/day)
System Name Best AMD Computer
Processor AMD TR4 1920X
Motherboard MSI X399 SLI Plus
Cooling Alphacool Eisbaer 420 x2 Noctua XPX Pro TR4 block
Memory Gskill RIpjaws 4 3000MHZ 48GB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Vega 64 Nitro, Gigabyte Vega 64 Gaming OC
Storage 6 x NVME 480 GB, 2 x SSD 2TB, 5TB HDD, 2 TB HDD, 2x 2TB SSHD
Display(s) Acer 49BQ0k 4K monitor
Case Thermaltake Core X9
Audio Device(s) Corsair Void Pro, Logitch Z523 5.1
Power Supply Corsair HX1200!
Mouse Logitech g7 gaming mouse
Keyboard Logitech G510
Software Windows 10 Pro 64 Steam. GOG, Uplay, Origin
Benchmark Scores Firestrike: 24955 Time Spy: 13500
x570 is a fail from a price to value standpoint.
boards are super expensive,and only thing they offer is pci-e 4.0,which in turn also has a huge markup for the nvme drives and provides zero returns except for copying files between two such drives.

x470 was cheaper,if they upgraded it for the ability to run two 3.0 nvme drives at the same price point it'd be a hit.
There was 1 X470 board that could do that. To be honest with you that is why I stuck with X399 or I should build and X399 build instead of X570. There are decently priced boards out there for X570. I think I will wait for the B550 boards to be released before I jump into AM4 again. By that time the 3600 should be under $200 Canadian.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
618 (0.24/day)
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
12,737 (5.93/day)
Location
Mars
Processor i7 8700k 4.7Ghz @ 1.26v
Motherboard AsRock Fatal1ty K6 Z370
Cooling beQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 3
Memory 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 3200/C16
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1080 Gaming X @ 2100/5500
Storage Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 830 256GB + Crucial BX100 250GB + Toshiba 1TB HDD
Display(s) Eizo Foris FG2421
Case Fractal Design Define C TG
Power Supply EVGA G2 750w
Mouse Logitech G502 Protheus Spectrum
Keyboard Sharkoon MK80 (Brown)
Software W10 x64
What features does Intel Z series offer that B450 does not?
I did find this article but it's out of date right now and does not consider Ryzen 3000 improved memory controller: https://www.tomshardware.com/news/amd-x470-intel-z390-showdown,38212.html
Generally you'd find more USB, more 'gamer' features, maybe more SATA (questionable use) and other storage features, x8/x8 PCIe, Wireless AC, but also generally a more premium feel board. That and the amount of choice available. The article does also point those out.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (6.78/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
There was 1 X470 board that could do that. To be honest with you that is why I stuck with X399 or I should build and X399 build instead of X570. There are decently priced boards out there for X570. I think I will wait for the B550 boards to be released before I jump into AM4 again. By that time the 3600 should be under $200 Canadian.
they're same price as x299,and while x299 does not offer 4.0 lanes,getting a 9800x with x299 is a better otption than 3800x and x570 to my mind.They're the same price,you get 44 3.0 lanes so you can run whatever gpus,audio devices,drives and expansion cards you desire plus it can take 4 high speed ram stick in quad channel no problem.
 
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
618 (0.24/day)
they're same price as x299,and while x299 does not offer 4.0 lanes,getting a 9800x with x299 is a better otption than 3800x and x570 to my mind.They're the same price,you get 44 3.0 lanes so you can run whatever gpus,audio devices,drives and expansion cards you desire plus it can take 4 high speed ram stick in quad channel no problem.
You also get worse IPC and future patches that further lower performance on X299. Sure it's a more mature platform and has quad channel RAM plus more PCI-E lanes but if you really need those things and don't care about IPC then i would say X399 is the way to go not X570.
 
Joined
Aug 6, 2017
Messages
7,412 (6.78/day)
Location
Poland
System Name Purple rain
Processor 10.5 thousand 4.2G 1.1v
Motherboard Zee 490 Aorus Elite
Cooling Noctua D15S
Memory 16GB 4133 CL16-16-16-31 Viper Steel
Video Card(s) RTX 2070 Super Gaming X Trio
Storage SU900 128,8200Pro 1TB,850 Pro 512+256+256,860 Evo 500,XPG950 480, Skyhawk 2TB
Display(s) Acer XB241YU+Dell S2716DG
Case P600S Silent w. Alpenfohn wing boost 3 ARGBT+ fans
Audio Device(s) K612 Pro w. FiiO E10k DAC,W830BT wireless
Power Supply Superflower Leadex Gold 850W
Mouse G903 lightspeed+powerplay,G403 wireless + Steelseries DeX + Roccat rest
Keyboard HyperX Alloy SilverSpeed (w.HyperX wrist rest),Razer Deathstalker
Software Windows 10
Benchmark Scores A LOT
You also get worse IPC and future patches that further lower performance on X299. Sure it's a more mature platform and has quad channel RAM plus more PCI-E lanes but if you really need those things and don't care about IPC then i would say X399 is the way to go not X570.
haven't seen any 9800x vs 3800x tests,link them please.
 
Joined
Dec 30, 2010
Messages
999 (0.29/day)
The X570 heat is caused by power delivery of the M2 NVME SSD's. Not by the actual chipset itself.
 
Top