• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

AMD's Answer to GeForce GTX 700 Series: Volcanic Islands

Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,555 (0.67/day)
Likes
1,459
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name Eternal WIP ][ HP ProLiant server blade
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4/4.1 GHz ][ 2x Intel Xeon L5520 @ 2.27GHz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z ][ -
Cooling Corsair H55 ][ Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston HyperX Genesis @ 1866MHz ][ 4x4 GiB Hynix @ 1333 MHz; ECC on
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU II OC ][ None
Storage 1TB WD Black + 1.5TB WD Green + 750GB Samsung + 64GB OCZ Agility 4 ][ 3x 1 TB Hitachi
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H ][ None
Case Antec Nine Hundred ][ it's a server blade, lol
Audio Device(s) Supreme FX II (Integrated); Using optical S/PDIF output ][ none
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i ][ [stock]
Software Gentoo Linux ][ Linux Mint 16
Benchmark Scores 65970 BogoMIPS. Ha. Ha. Ha. >=|
[...] here is a more clear image with text you can actually read on the specs:
It's nice and all, but too bad this was already posted 26 posts ago (post #74).
Here, have a cookie.
 
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
614 (0.14/day)
Likes
76
Location
New Sewickley, PA
System Name six pack
Processor Phenom II X6 1090T BE
Motherboard ASRock 890FX Deluxe3
Cooling Cool-it ECO ALC Water cooler
Memory 4GB G-Skill Flares CL7
Video Card(s) 1GB HIS HD4890 930core / 1025mem 4100mhz effective
Storage 320Gb Seagate Barracuda (w/perpendiular recording) and 750GB Western Digital Caviar Black
Display(s) Acer B273HU 2048 x 1152 native resolution
Case Xoxide X-Sentric Professional Series w/250mm Fan
Audio Device(s) SB Audigy 2 Value
Power Supply 750 Watt Apevia Warlock
Software Windows Vista Home Premium 64bit (w/dreamscene patch)/Windows 7 Pro 64bit
Benchmark Scores 3DMark06:10,516 3Dmark Vantage: P8537
It's nice and all, but too bad this was already posted 26 posts ago (post #74).
Here, have a cookie.
I'm sorry. I didn't notice. Like I said I tend to only cruise the news articles here these days and didn't see all 100+ replies (only the first page or so of replies ends up on the news article).
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
It's nice and all, but too bad this was already posted 26 posts ago (post #74).
Here, have a cookie.
Cool story bro... and you're trolling him... why?
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
1,024 (0.50/day)
Likes
170
Location
New Jersey, USA
System Name Current Rig
Processor Intel i7 920 oc to 3.5ghz
Motherboard MSI x58 Platinum
Cooling Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Memory G.Skill 6gb ddr3 1333mhz 7-7-7-18
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 670 OC WindForce 3X GV-N670OC-2GD
Storage Samsung EVO SSD
Display(s) Viewsonic 1440x900 5ms
Case CoolMaster HAF 932
Power Supply Coolmax 950w
Software Win 7 64bit
"The fab set Q4 as its tentative bulk manufacturing date for the process."

So consumers will be able to purchase limited quantities in Q4 2013 and open availability in Q1 2014? If so, then what will AMD launch between now and then?
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Go blow that smoke somewhere else. When you look at power usage in actual gaming and average the usage over those the GTX680 vs the 7970 is only using 3-4% more watts and was more often 5-7% off the GTX 680 performance. Now true the Ghz versions on synthetic tests went higher on power usage (not much fun playing synthetic tests), but looking at gaming the GHz version actual came in lower the a GTX 680 by 7 watts. In real world gaming a Ghz will in no way change what you pay in your power bill, it might by these dare I say cost you less...
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/03/22/nvidia_kepler_gpu_geforce_gtx_680_video_card_review/13
http://www.hardocp.com/article/2012/10/30/xfx_double_d_hd_7970_ghz_edition_video_card_review/10
Well, something must have happened between those old tests and the newer ones at [H]OCP...


I don't doubt that the power usage cost is negligible for the likely user bases of the cards, but I don't see the 7970GE being more frugal in power consumption than the 680 either...except in a very small minority of games.

Anyhow, I'd say all bets are off with any new architectures on new processes. I'm pretty sure that no one would have predicted the perf-per-watt difference between Fermi and Kepler, so there is no reason why the same can't be said for SI > VI
 
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
4,977 (1.76/day)
Likes
1,547
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
Well, something must have happened between those old tests and the newer ones at [H]OCP...
http://www.hardocp.com/images/articles/1361915444mQwWwGD0oO_9_1.png

I don't doubt that the power usage cost is negligible for the likely user bases of the cards, but I don't see the 7970GE being more frugal in power consumption than the 680 either...except in a very small minority of games.

Anyhow, I'd say all bets are off with any new architectures on new processes. I'm pretty sure that no one would have predicted the perf-per-watt difference between Fermi and Kepler, so there is no reason why the same can't be said for SI > VI
The slight efficiency your claiming for kepler over fermi whilst real is in part due to the lack of compute power and its advanced clock and power gateing but isn't that special if you understand the tech and the way nvidia aimed gk104 so specifically at gaming and isn't out of amds reach at all.
 
Joined
Dec 3, 2009
Messages
1,205 (0.41/day)
Likes
364
Location
The Netherlands
System Name PC || Laptop
Processor AMD FX-8350 @ 4,8GHz || i7 6700HQ
Motherboard Asus Sabertooth 990FX || default
Cooling Corsair H100i Push-Pull|| Stock
Memory Samsung 30nm 4x4GB @ 1930MHz|| 2x8GB LVDDR3 @ 1600MHz
Video Card(s) AMD R9 290 @ 1060MHz / 1600MHz || Nvidia Geforce 960M
Display(s) Samsung S23A750D 120Hz + others|| 15,6" 1080P
Case Corsair 500R Fans Galore ||
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DX/XD ||
Power Supply Corsair AX860i || 120Watt 19V OEM adaptor
Software Win 10 64bit || Win 10 64bit
imho, a big part of keplers efficiency is the result of their new powertuning, which can keep the voltage a lot closer to the optimum than previous generations, resulting in a lower voltage needed for specific clocks, and thus lower powerconsumption and heat.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
The slight efficiency your claiming for kepler over fermi whilst real is in part due to the lack of compute power and its advanced clock and power gateing but isn't that special if you understand the tech and the way nvidia aimed gk104 so specifically at gaming and isn't out of amds reach at all.
Really?
I was comparing apples to apples, GF100/GF110 to GK 110.

GK 110 is Kepler µarchitecture isn't it ?
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,543 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,907
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
Well, something must have happened between those old tests and the newer ones at [H]OCP...
http://www.hardocp.com/images/articles/1361915444mQwWwGD0oO_9_1.png

I don't doubt that the power usage cost is negligible for the likely user bases of the cards, but I don't see the 7970GE being more frugal in power consumption than the 680 either...except in a very small minority of games.

Anyhow, I'd say all bets are off with any new architectures on new processes. I'm pretty sure that no one would have predicted the perf-per-watt difference between Fermi and Kepler, so there is no reason why the same can't be said for SI > VI
My ASUS 7970 Matrix @ 1200/1650 pulls less than 250W @ gaming. In Furmark, those numbers might be possible, but otherwise, those seem incredibly high to me. My 7950's don't pull over 200W, too. More like 150W.

I also doubt their full system, minus VGA pulled only 63W as they report. Just saying. Feel free to check ANY of my motherboard reviews to find more realistic numbers for system power consumption. I'd almost say that [H]ardOCP's reviewer there didn't test anything, really.

Test setup is listed as a 2500k @ 4.8 GHz. Average power consumption of such a CPU is around 150W in prime95, and about 90W in gaming. Impossible to be 63W only for CPU, fans, drives. Just saying. Their numbers are 1000% false. I'd minus at least 75W from each of those listed numbers. Even the NVidia numbers are suspect.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 10, 2010
Messages
4,977 (1.76/day)
Likes
1,547
Location
Manchester uk
System Name Quad GT evo V
Processor FX8350 @ 4.8ghz1.525c NB2.64ghz Ht2.84ghz
Motherboard Gigabyte 990X Gaming
Cooling 360EK extreme 360Tt rad all push/pull, cpu,NB/Vrm blocks all EK
Memory Corsair vengeance 32Gb @1333 cas9
Video Card(s) Rx vega 64 waterblockedEK + Rx580 waterblockedEK
Storage samsung 840(250), WD 1Tb+2Tb +3Tbgrn 1tb hybrid
Display(s) Samsung uea28"850R 4k freesync, samsung 40" 1080p
Case Custom(modded) thermaltake Kandalf
Audio Device(s) Xfi creative 7.1 on board ,Yamaha dts av setup
Power Supply corsair 1000Rmx
Mouse CM optane
Keyboard CM optane
Software Win 10 Pro
Benchmark Scores 15.69K best overall sandra so far
Really?
I was comparing apples to apples, GF100/GF110 to GK 110.
GK 110 is Kepler µarchitecture isn't it ?
Yea yeah gk110s power efficiency is way beyond amd not imho am I missing your point here ?.
 
Joined
Sep 7, 2011
Messages
2,785 (1.22/day)
Likes
1,672
Location
New Zealand
System Name MoneySink
Processor 2600K @ 4.8
Motherboard P8Z77-V
Cooling AC NexXxos XT45 360, RayStorm, D5T+XSPC tank, Tygon R-3603, Bitspower
Memory 16GB Crucial Ballistix DDR3-1600C8
Video Card(s) GTX 780 SLI (EVGA SC ACX + Giga GHz Ed.)
Storage Kingston HyperX SSD (128) OS, WD RE4 (1TB), RE2 (1TB), Cav. Black (2 x 500GB), Red (4TB)
Display(s) Achieva Shimian QH270-IPSMS (2560x1440) S-IPS
Case NZXT Switch 810
Audio Device(s) onboard Realtek yawn edition
Power Supply Seasonic X-1050
Software Win8.1 Pro
Benchmark Scores 3.5 litres of Pale Ale in 18 minutes.
Yea yeah gk110s power efficiency is way beyond amd not imho am I missing your point here ?.
Yeah, you probably are. What I said earlier was:
I'm pretty sure that no one would have predicted the perf-per-watt difference between Fermi and Kepler, so there is no reason why the same can't be said for SI > VI
So, if Nvidia can improve on efficiency between one µarch and another, then the same holds true for AMD with SI (Southern Islands) to VI (Volcanic Islands). I made no comparison between the two vendors regarding what might/could eventuate. The only comparison was in the earlier part of the post- pointing out to Casecutter the vagaries of what passes for "power usage under load" even within tests carries out by the same site.
If I'm comparing µarch to µarch, then I would generally look to compare the analogue of each architectures GPUs. GF100/GF110 and GK110 are both similar in die size, placement within the product stack hierarchy, and feature set.
I also doubt their full system, minus VGA pulled only 63W as they report. Just saying. Feel free to check ANY of my motherboard reviews to find more realistic numbers for system power consumption. I'd almost say that [H]ardOCP's reviewer there didn't test anything, really.
I don't doubt that the [H]ardOCP figures aren't definitive either - they really can't be with the variance between tests conducted only a few months apart. I only used the [H]ardOCP result because Casecutter was using the same source for his initial argument.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
Yea yeah gk110s power efficiency is way beyond amd not imho am I missing your point here ?.
GK110 w/ 1 CU shut down still consumes at least 20W more than a 7970GHz and gets trashed by it in anything compute. And isn't that much faster in a good number of games, heck, slower in DiRT Showdown, Tomb Raider (under some circumstances) and some other titles.

...and that's considering they had more than a year to get it right (LMAO @ the people saying they didn't release it because GK104 was "good enough").

nVidia might have marginally better power consumption in the high end, but that is all, nothing special about it. Looking at the lower end chips, AMD actually has a wider advantage over nVidia the other way around at higher TDP cards.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,998 (0.62/day)
Likes
1,578
Location
Visalia, CA
System Name Crimson Titan 2.5
Processor Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme
Cooling CPU: Swiftech H220-X, RAM: Geil Cyclone 2, VGA: Custom EK water loop
Memory 8x4GBs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 XMP2 3000MHz @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX Titan X SCs in SLI under full cover EK water blocks
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Acer XB280HK 28" 4K G-Sync - 2x27" Acer HN274s 1920x1080 120Hz
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T - EK Pump/Reservoir, 360mm EK Radiator
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
GK110 w/ 1 CU shut down still consumes at least 20W more than a 7970GHz and gets trashed by it in anything compute. And isn't that much faster in a good number of games, heck, slower in DiRT Showdown, Tomb Raider (under some circumstances) and some other titles.

...and that's considering they had more than a year to get it right (LMAO @ the people saying they didn't release it because GK104 was "good enough").

nVidia might have marginally better power consumption in the high end, but that is all, nothing special about it. Looking at the lower end chips, AMD actually has a wider advantage over nVidia the other way around at higher TDP cards.
Why persist in spreading misinformation? This is from a previous thread about the GTX780:

From W1zzard's own GTX Titan review you can find in the TPU website:

Power consumption:












7970 GHz beat by Titan in terms of power consumption efficiency in every single scenario

Relative performance (average of every single 3D benchmark on every resolution):











GTX Titan beats the 7970GHz in every single resolution, now for Tomb Raider, this from W1zzard's review for the 7990:











The GTX Titan is faster than the 7970GHz in every resolution in that particular game, you may counter the 7990 is faster (and it is) but that's not even the point; dunno about DiRT showdown, but if what you say is true (W1zzard doesn't even test cards using that game) then it's probably the only scenario were the 7970GHz beats the Titan...

EDIT: Oh wait, I found these benchmarks using DiRT Showdown at Anand's:









Only in one scenario the 7970 "beats" Titan (if you call 0.9 FPS beating)

EDIT 2: as for the 7970 "trashing" Titan in compute performance, the theoretical max double precision performance (FP64) for 7970 is 1.08TFLOPs whereas Titan's is 1.3TFLOPs, but don't take it from me, this is (once again) from Anandtech, an analysis of Titan's compute performance by Rahul Garg, a Ph D. specializing in the field of parallel computing and GPGPU technology:













Out of all compute tests performed, only in SystemCompute benchmark Titan is beat by 7970GHz, in all other benchmarks Titan leaves 7970 in the dust... I exactly wouldn't call that "trashing"
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
I don't really care for your cherry-picked reviews TBH...

Also, I do want to remind everyone that TPH does not hold the absolute truth in regards to GPU reviews, you know?
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,555 (0.67/day)
Likes
1,459
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name Eternal WIP ][ HP ProLiant server blade
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4/4.1 GHz ][ 2x Intel Xeon L5520 @ 2.27GHz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z ][ -
Cooling Corsair H55 ][ Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston HyperX Genesis @ 1866MHz ][ 4x4 GiB Hynix @ 1333 MHz; ECC on
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU II OC ][ None
Storage 1TB WD Black + 1.5TB WD Green + 750GB Samsung + 64GB OCZ Agility 4 ][ 3x 1 TB Hitachi
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H ][ None
Case Antec Nine Hundred ][ it's a server blade, lol
Audio Device(s) Supreme FX II (Integrated); Using optical S/PDIF output ][ none
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i ][ [stock]
Software Gentoo Linux ][ Linux Mint 16
Benchmark Scores 65970 BogoMIPS. Ha. Ha. Ha. >=|
Time for some lulz.
From the very same W1zz's review:

わはは~!


わははは~!
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,998 (0.62/day)
Likes
1,578
Location
Visalia, CA
System Name Crimson Titan 2.5
Processor Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme
Cooling CPU: Swiftech H220-X, RAM: Geil Cyclone 2, VGA: Custom EK water loop
Memory 8x4GBs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 XMP2 3000MHz @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX Titan X SCs in SLI under full cover EK water blocks
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Acer XB280HK 28" 4K G-Sync - 2x27" Acer HN274s 1920x1080 120Hz
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T - EK Pump/Reservoir, 360mm EK Radiator
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
I don't really care for your cherry-picked reviews TBH...

Also, I do want to remind everyone that TPH does not hold the absolute truth in regards to GPU reviews, you know?
Cherry picked? This is the TPU forums you're posting at, what more appropriate than W1zzard's own reviews?

Not only that, but every scenario presented completely contradicts the facts mentioned by you, I'm not cherry picking anything, I'm actually posting every single test result, and you mention TR and DiRT... now I'm the one cherry picking?

You know, it doesn't really matter, if even showing you all the results (including studies from a Ph.D no less) won't convince you, then nothing will, if that's how you feel about this card in particular, you're entitled to your opinions...

Moving on...

EDIT: Just saw Vinska's reply, and I'm the one cherry picking, right...? I presented the condensed results for every single resolution in every single game... but this can drag on forever I see, it doesn't really matter, you guys win, OK ;)

Peace :)
 
Joined
Jul 23, 2011
Messages
1,555 (0.67/day)
Likes
1,459
Location
Kaunas, Lithuania
System Name Eternal WIP ][ HP ProLiant server blade
Processor AMD FX-8320 @ 4.4/4.1 GHz ][ 2x Intel Xeon L5520 @ 2.27GHz
Motherboard Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z ][ -
Cooling Corsair H55 ][ Stock
Memory 2x4GB Kingston HyperX Genesis @ 1866MHz ][ 4x4 GiB Hynix @ 1333 MHz; ECC on
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GeForce GTX 770 DirectCU II OC ][ None
Storage 1TB WD Black + 1.5TB WD Green + 750GB Samsung + 64GB OCZ Agility 4 ][ 3x 1 TB Hitachi
Display(s) Asus VG278H + Asus VH226H ][ None
Case Antec Nine Hundred ][ it's a server blade, lol
Audio Device(s) Supreme FX II (Integrated); Using optical S/PDIF output ][ none
Power Supply Corsair AX1200i ][ [stock]
Software Gentoo Linux ][ Linux Mint 16
Benchmark Scores 65970 BogoMIPS. Ha. Ha. Ha. >=|
EDIT: Just saw Vinska's reply, and I'm the one cherry picking, right...? I presented the condensed results for every single resolution in every single game... but this can drag on forever I see, it doesn't really matter, you guys win, OK ;)

Peace :)
yeah, it seems like cherry picking, but my point actually was:
Take these reviews with a HUGE grain of salt.

If You take a better look at W1zz's review, on Sleeping Dogs, the 7970 [GE] had almost twice [!] the fps on 5760x1080 when compared to 2560x1600. And on 1920x1200 it was slightly behind 5760x1080.
Similar situation with AC3 - on 5760x1080 it run significantly faster compared to 2560x1600 and 1920x1200 had pretty much the same framerates as 5760x1080

If that doesn't spell out the phrase "something is fishy with this review", then I don't know what would.

EDIT: I pointed out these things in the review discussion thread (there was a similar thing with the 7990, too). But no one seemed to care at all. Yet, I would LOVE to get an explanation or even a guess to WTH is wrong here (as something obviously is).
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Messages
2,463 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,885
Location
GMT +2
System Name Red Radiance
Processor fx 8320
Motherboard GA-990FXA-UD5
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16gb G.skill TridentX 2400mhz (2x8 kit)
Video Card(s) GV-R929XOC-4GD
Storage OCZ vertex 460 480gb
Display(s) 32" Toshiba Full HD TV
Case CMstorm Trooper
Audio Device(s) sennheiser's pc323d usb soundcard
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse roccat tyon
Keyboard roccat ryos mk fx
Software windows 7
ok fanboy wars will never end so cant we finish with dick size contest and go back to topic.
what i see on cleared pictures (thx apocolypes) looks more like pelidriver based apu (may be for next gen console) then discrete gpu. was exciting and the begging but at closer look it is more likely fake news. :(
 
Last edited:

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,397 (4.85/day)
Likes
5,477
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
ok fanboy wars will never end so cant we finsh with dick size contest and go back to topic.
Disagreements and conversation about said topic does not qualify as fanaticism so I recommend not clumping everyone together and calling them "fan boys" when you're just adding to the noise by saying this.

I think we can all agree that the Titan is a powerful card at the cost of some extra moollah where the 7970 provides some less performance for considerably less moollah. Weather or not the 700-series cards will be more like Titan or not, we don't know, but what I will say is that regardless of what NVidia has up their sleeves, AMD is working on something else well.

I think everyone should calm down and acknowledge that both NVidia and AMD are both two very good companies that produce quality hardware and if you disagree with me then maybe you're being a fanatic and I'll challenge you to design a GPU that does better if people are going to continue bashing on people who are doing things that most here can probably only dream of.
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
(including studies from a Ph.D no less)
OK, now I know you are joking... How the Hell is that relevant to anything ever discussed here... What, Doctors or highly educated or top positioned people can't be biased, wrong or just simply... mistaken? If anything, they are more prone to ego mistakes and corruption. But then again, that's some pure generalization to make a point right there.

I can find any number of reviews where we can see the TITAN hover at 35W or more over the 7970GHz as well as benches showing it being beaten by a bunch of frames in DiRT:S, Tomb Raider and probably some other not-so-known titles, as well as having breathing down it's neck or tying by the Radeon in Sleeping Dogs, Far Cry 3: Blood Dragon, Metro 2033, AvP 2010, Sniper Elite V2, Max Payne 3 and some games at 4K... As for compute... don't get me started.
And so could you very probably (heck, you just did)... so I don't really care, I just hate praising an overpriced piece of late hardware for things that aren't even true.


Disagreements and conversation about said topic does not qualify as fanaticism so I recommend not clumping everyone together and calling them "fan boys" when you're just adding to the noise by saying this.
What I was about to reply to him. LOL
Thanks.


Edit: So more on-topic. Like GF 7900GTX to 8800GTX (DX 9.0c to DX10) and Radeon HD 4870 to Radeon HD 5870 (DX10 to DX11) I see this Volcanic Islands card as another huge jump in performance... but related to the jump from HD to UHD more so than anything else, like API upgrade, because let's face it, none of today's card cut it for 3840x2160 gaming (not that it's here yet anyway)... I dislike multi-monitor setups so much that multi-GPU and subsequent issues with them are a none-issue for me from the get-go.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jan 21, 2013
Messages
3,800 (2.13/day)
Likes
1,320
System Name Out of the game..
Benchmark Scores d1nky@hwbot.org
did you see the review with the 4k resolutions. on a single card set up the 7970 performed quite well, but titan did come out top. and tbh like people say before the hardware Is performing well on both sides and its up to the software to catch up.

and is that volcanic islands diagram real?
 
Joined
May 2, 2013
Messages
146 (0.09/day)
Likes
18
From W1zzard's own GTX Titan review you can find in the TPU website:

Power consumption:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_Titan/images/power_multimon.gif

http://tpucdn.com/reviews/NVIDIA/GeForce_GTX_Titan/images/power_average.gif

7970 GHz beat by Titan in terms of power consumption efficiency in every single scenario
Well, the power consumption figures from tech report show a different picture:

The 7970GHz edition consumes less than 10 watts more than the GTX680 on full load , but it consumes less power than the 680 on idle and up to 11 watts less when the display is off, and that's makes it more power efficient than the 680.


As for the 7970 "trashing" Titan in compute performance, the theoretical max double precision performance (FP64) for 7970 is 1.08TFLOPs whereas Titan's is 1.3TFLOPs, but don't take it from me, this is (once again) from Anandtech, an analysis of Titan's compute performance by Rahul Garg, a Ph D. specializing in the field of parallel computing and GPGPU technology:

Out of all compute tests performed, only in SystemCompute benchmark Titan is beat by 7970GHz, in all other benchmarks Titan leaves 7970 in the dust... I exactly wouldn't call that "trashing"
I wouldn't trust anandtech, and I certainly think that they are biased in favor of Intel and against AMD.

In the compute tests from toms hardware and techreport or even Hexus, you get a completely different picture. The 7970 does trash even the dual gpu 690 and blow it out of the water when it comes to shader performance in in GPGPU.
 
Joined
Mar 15, 2013
Messages
2,463 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,885
Location
GMT +2
System Name Red Radiance
Processor fx 8320
Motherboard GA-990FXA-UD5
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO
Memory 16gb G.skill TridentX 2400mhz (2x8 kit)
Video Card(s) GV-R929XOC-4GD
Storage OCZ vertex 460 480gb
Display(s) 32" Toshiba Full HD TV
Case CMstorm Trooper
Audio Device(s) sennheiser's pc323d usb soundcard
Power Supply corsair AX860i
Mouse roccat tyon
Keyboard roccat ryos mk fx
Software windows 7
Disagreements and conversation about said topic does not qualify as fanaticism so I recommend not clumping everyone together and calling them "fan boys" when you're just adding to the noise by saying this.
so you are telling that titan vs 7970 fits nice to "AMD's Answer to GeForce GTX 700 Series: Volcanic Islands ".
english isnt my native and i dont pretend to perfectly understand it but obviously i understand it quite worse then i thought. seams noone want (or can) comment what is shown on the picture so lets share more "test results" that favor "my grafic card".
anyway discusion went too far away from that to be useful. gl in diagram comparison
truth i out there
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,543 (3.88/day)
Likes
10,907
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
System Name Gamer
Processor Intel i7-6700K (ES)
Motherboard MSI Aegis TI
Cooling Custom Dragon Cooler
Memory 16 GB Kingston HyperX 2133 MHz C13
Video Card(s) 2x MSI GAMING GTX 980
Storage 2x Intel 600P
Display(s) Dell 3008WFP
Case MSI Aegis Ti
Mouse MSI Interceptor DS B1
Keyboard MSI DS4200 GAMING Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Home
Similar situation with AC3 - on 5760x1080 it run significantly faster compared to 2560x1600 and 1920x1200 had pretty much the same framerates as 5760x1080

If that doesn't spell out the phrase "something is fishy with this review", then I don't know what would.

EDIT: I pointed out these things in the review discussion thread (there was a similar thing with the 7990, too). But no one seemed to care at all. Yet, I would LOVE to get an explanation or even a guess to WTH is wrong here (as something obviously is).


Only AMD can answer why this is the case. I tested myself and get the same results as W1zz does. AMD said their memory management is broken/sub-optimal, and that's how it's noticed...Eyefinity.

Also, Eyefinity doesn't actually draw every single pixel on the side monitors in the same ratio/aspect as on the primary monitor, due to fish-eye effect. So although the resolution of the monitors is 5670x1080/1200, the workload may not actually be that many pixels, depending on app.


Do keep in mind that W1zz used to write ATITool, and writes other AMD-specific clocking apps. Best I can tell, he really doesn't care who is faster, and has no agenda...notice we don't have ads here except on the front page. TPU is not a site driven by the opportunity to make money doing reviews...we all just provide the numbers, and you decide who you like based on the results. Because anyone can replicate our tests, in every review. For me, I actually hope you do test and check our numbers... I know you'll find you get the same results.
 
Joined
Aug 16, 2004
Messages
2,998 (0.62/day)
Likes
1,578
Location
Visalia, CA
System Name Crimson Titan 2.5
Processor Intel Core i7 5930K @ 4.5GHz 1.28V
Motherboard Asus ROG Rampage V Extreme
Cooling CPU: Swiftech H220-X, RAM: Geil Cyclone 2, VGA: Custom EK water loop
Memory 8x4GBs G.Skill Ripjaws DDR4 XMP2 3000MHz @ 1.35V
Video Card(s) 2x EVGA GTX Titan X SCs in SLI under full cover EK water blocks
Storage OS: 256GBs Samsung 850 Pro SSD/Games: 3TBs WD Black
Display(s) Acer XB280HK 28" 4K G-Sync - 2x27" Acer HN274s 1920x1080 120Hz
Case Corsair Graphite Black 760T - EK Pump/Reservoir, 360mm EK Radiator
Audio Device(s) SB X-Fi Fatal1ty Pro on Logitech THX Z-5500 5.1/Razer Tiamat 7.1 Headset
Power Supply Silvestone ST1500 1.5 kW
Mouse Cyborg R.A.T. 9
Keyboard Corsair K70 RGB Cherry MX Red
Software Windows 10 Pro 64bit
yeah, it seems like cherry picking, but my point actually was:
Take these reviews with a HUGE grain of salt.

If You take a better look at W1zz's review, on Sleeping Dogs, the 7970 [GE] had almost twice [!] the fps on 5760x1080 when compared to 2560x1600. And on 1920x1200 it was slightly behind 5760x1080.
Similar situation with AC3 - on 5760x1080 it run significantly faster compared to 2560x1600 and 1920x1200 had pretty much the same framerates as 5760x1080

If that doesn't spell out the phrase "something is fishy with this review", then I don't know what would.

EDIT: I pointed out these things in the review discussion thread (there was a similar thing with the 7990, too). But no one seemed to care at all. Yet, I would LOVE to get an explanation or even a guess to WTH is wrong here (as something obviously is).
That's interesting, have you tried sending a PM to W1zzard with your findings? I'm sure he'll appreciate it and change the charts accordingly :)

Disagreements and conversation about said topic does not qualify as fanaticism so I recommend not clumping everyone together and calling them "fan boys" when you're just adding to the noise by saying this.
Couldn't agree more, thank you very much for your post. In the almost 9 years I've been visiting this forum, this is the first time I've been labeled a fanboy. Truth is I had never before made a post with so many charts to try and get my point accross, and all for naught LOL :toast:


OK, now I know you are joking... How the Hell is that relevant to anything ever discussed here... What, Doctors or highly educated or top positioned people can't be biased, wrong or just simply... mistaken? If anything, they are more prone to ego mistakes and corruption. But then again, that's some pure generalization to make a point right there.
The guy's field of study is parallel computing and GPGPU technology, not much room for bias in that field, then again, like I said before, you're entitled to your opinion, and you have already mentioned your mistrust of doctors in general - and science by extension (?!) - so no point in trying to convince you otherwise, right?

I guess we can all agree that a this point speculating on the performance of graphic cards that are yet to be released is pointless, as there no evidence whatsoever to back these facts, all we can do is wait and see, no point in fighting to try and show the world who has the biggest e-peen :p

It's all good, like I said, this could drag on forever, perhaps it's better to move on, for the sake of this thread :)
 
Last edited: