- Joined
- Dec 13, 2008
- Messages
- 344 (0.06/day)
System Name | The Browser |
---|---|
Processor | AMD FX-8350 |
Motherboard | Asus 90 Aura Gaming |
Cooling | Noctua D14 |
Memory | Crucial Balistix Slim 16gb |
Video Card(s) | Sapphire AMD 7950 3GB |
Storage | Crucial MX 240gb + 2X3TB WD Reds |
Display(s) | Dell 2515H 25" |
Case | Corsair Carbide 540 (piece of shit case) |
Power Supply | Seasonic G-650W Gold |
Mouse | Corsair M65 RGB |
Keyboard | Corsair K70 |
Software | Win 10 |
My question to you is simple.
Is a shitty TN 144Hz monitor, to overwatch, as useful as cleats for a football player ?
Is it a matter of ALL professional-wannabes using 144hz screens, like all footballers have cleats ?
60Hz = You are 40%+ more likely lose the game.
Correct ?
I am looking for a scientific answer either in thre form of research done or statistics showing high level players winning with 60hz vs 144gz counterparts
Is a shitty TN 144Hz monitor, to overwatch, as useful as cleats for a football player ?
Is it a matter of ALL professional-wannabes using 144hz screens, like all footballers have cleats ?
60Hz = You are 40%+ more likely lose the game.
Correct ?
I am looking for a scientific answer either in thre form of research done or statistics showing high level players winning with 60hz vs 144gz counterparts
Last edited: