Any plans to include PUBG in GPU and CPU stuff?

[dj-electric]

Mostly reviews of course. Not a fan of the game but its popularity speaks for itself.

 

[jormungand]

Its not a finished game...need a lot of patches and updates ... Good idea anyway when the jobs done.

 

[jboydgolfer]

I've never played the game personally, but I am familiar with it. Clearly it's either very poorly optimized, or running on a badly optimized game engine, or has poor developers ,or some combination of several things. There's no doubt to the popularity of it and it's built on a great foundation. That game mode when it was in Arma was great and I knew someone was going to take it and turned it into a standalone title. Unfortunately it being popular doesn't really make a difference, because using it to determine a given components performance level ,would be like using "a pinch" or a "little bit" to measure ingredients in a recipe. Once the game is finished, (I'm assuming it's not right now), obviously what I said above would not be accurate and that it could be used as a way to test a given components performance levels. But consistency above all else is required for a benchmark, and consistency is one thing pubg doesnt have, except of course for a consistent ,inconsistent performance.

 

[Solaris17]

popularity doesn't make it a good game to bench with though. Maybe if you want a black and white print out of FPS specifically for that game but I always was under the assumption that benchmarks stressed different games for the engine that they run not ther playability meta score.

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

popularity doesn't make it a good game to bench with though. Maybe if you want a black and white print out of FPS specifically for that game but I always was under the assumption that benchmarks stressed different games for the engine that they run not ther playability meta score.

I agree and I like and play it, it's too beta atm, it usually runs fine but that's not a given and with benches you want some consistency.

 

[cadaveca]

I agree and I like and play it, it's too beta atm, it usually runs fine but that's not a given and with benches you want some consistency.

you can get consistency, even with the varied online paly, but it takes a long time and many rounds to see right. SO it's not worth the effort

 

[TheoneandonlyMrK]

you can get consistency, even with the varied online paly, but it takes a long time and many rounds to see right. SO it's not worth the effort

I meant more the long-term consistency im not sure if it will run smoother or worse in six months I just hope better.

 

[W1zzard]

No plans due to always online. From one day to the next they could issue a patch that changes CPU or GPU performance or both, making all results invalid

 

[FYFI13]

I've never played the game personally, but I am familiar with it. Clearly it's either very poorly optimized, or running on a badly optimized game engine, or has poor developers ,or some combination of several things.

You can't be serious? On new map I get stable 120 FPS in open areas and about 90 FPS in towns, at 1440p. It's an open world game with 100 chickens running on it. My CPU is almost 4 years old and graphics card not the highest end either.
When i launch Arma 3 after playing PUBG my eyes starts bleeding

Regarding benchmarks... It's not suitable due to forced updates and online-only. Results would be all over the place.

 

[purecain]

its the hacking vids on youtube that put me off... shame...

 

[eidairaman1]

Pubg creators are griping about a Game mode that has been around since the Late 90s, found in Quake and UT, Last Man Standing/King of the Hill. Lets bench Fortnight instead.

 

[Toothless]

Or we could bench none of them.