- Sep 11, 2009
- 2,680 (0.89/day)
- Reaching your left retina.
Incorrect. These news posts of inexpensive or quasi inexpensive 27” 1920x1080 monitors are filled with the same comments expressing discontent over the resolution. These replete ad nauseam comments specific to the cheaper monitor news threads makes it very clear that people are expecting 2560x1440 at that low price from name brand manufacturers. Some exemptions to this would be the newer 29” 2560 x 1080 21:9 monitors.
For example the simple act of ice melting which obviously requires specific conditions be met. Expecting ice to melt without the conditions being met is indeed “unrealistic”.
I personally don’t like to complain about things I can’t change by the simple act of complaining.
You would need to retool your factory, why bother when current production is still selling like hotcakes?
They are a business, not charity, hence profit comes first. Especially the listed companies with a good amount of debt, they live and die by profits.
And one of them did! see: Catleaps