• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Apple Could Discontinue 17-inch MacBook Pro

btarunr

Editor & Senior Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 9, 2007
Messages
42,068 (8.15/day)
Location
Hyderabad, India
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 2700X
Motherboard ASUS ROG Strix B450-E Gaming
Cooling AMD Wraith Prism
Memory 2x 16GB Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) Palit GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER GameRock
Storage Western Digital Black NVMe 512GB
Display(s) BenQ 1440p 60 Hz 27-inch
Case Corsair Carbide 100R
Audio Device(s) Creative Sound Blaster Recon3D PCIe
Power Supply Cooler Master MWE Gold 650W
Mouse ASUS ROG Strix Impact
Keyboard Microsoft Sidewinder X4
Software Windows 10 Pro
Market researcher Ming-Chi Kuo, who is credible with reports on Apple's product lineup in the past, predicted that Apple could discontinue the 17-inch variant of its MacBook Pro soon, owing to weak sales. Apple's next MacBook Pro could look increasingly like the MacBook Air, offering high-performance in a very compact form-factor. Being a major design rejig, Apple could take a fresh look at the viability of each variant based on its past market reception. "While adding new products, Apple is likely to stop making the 17" MacBook Pro this year due to falling shipments, in order to maintain a lean product line strategy," Kuo writes in his report.



View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 

FordGT90Concept

"I go fast!1!11!1!"
Joined
Oct 13, 2008
Messages
26,148 (5.45/day)
Location
IA, USA
System Name BY-2015
Processor Intel Core i7-6700K (4 x 4.00 GHz) w/ HT and Turbo on
Motherboard MSI Z170A GAMING M7
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 2 x Kingston HyperX DDR4-2133 8 GiB
Video Card(s) Sapphire Radeon RX 5500 XT Pulse 8 GiB
Storage Crucial MX300 275 GB, Seagate Exos X12 TB 7200 RPM
Display(s) Nixeus NX-EDG274K (3840x2160@144 DP) + Samsung SyncMaster 906BW (1440x900@60 HDMI-DVI)
Case Coolermaster HAF 932 w/ USB 3.0 5.25" bay
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1150, Micca OriGen+
Power Supply Enermax Platimax 850w
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei RAW
Keyboard Tesoro Excalibur
Software Windows 10 Pro 64-bit
Benchmark Scores Faster than the tortoise; slower than the hare.
17" laptops are meant to be "desktop replacements" and, with desktop sales slipping, it's no surprise their mobile counterpart is as well.
 
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
1,495 (0.25/day)
Location
Maribor, Slovenia
System Name i9 rig
Processor Core i9 10900X
Motherboard Asus Prime X299 Edition 30
Cooling Corsair H115i PRO RGB
Memory Gskill 4x8GB 3600MHz
Video Card(s) Asus ROG Strix RTX 2080 Super
Storage Samsung 970 PRO 1tb
Display(s) Dell UltraSharp UP3017
Case Coolermaster mastercase H500M
Audio Device(s) Onboard sound
Power Supply Enermax Platimax
Software Windows 11 PRO
Don't care. Apple is overpriced anyway. The only think I like about Macbooks is the 16:10 screen
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,661 (0.35/day)
System Name Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor Ryzen 1700 @ 3.8Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard Asus X370 Prime/ Lenovo Y580
Cooling Noctua / Big hunk of copper
Memory 16GB DDR4 3200 Ripjaws with Samsung chips / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX R9 390 / GTX 660M 2GB
Storage Crucial 1TB MX500 SSD, Segate 3TB, 64GB Synapse SSD as Pagefile drive / Western Digital 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
Power Supply Antec Truepower Blue 750W + Thermaltake 5.25in 250W / Big Power Brick
Mouse G602
Keyboard G510s
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
Well it isn't a desktop replacement. You can buy laptops with same or larger screens for a lot less money and get better performance, better specs, etc.
 

sirio111

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2012
Messages
1 (0.00/day)
Fuck the 15''..!!

If they don't make a 17''..!! Im not gonna buy the bloody small 13'' or 15''..!! no way..!!

you will lose a customer for sure..!!
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,819 (2.24/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
If they don't make a 17''..!! Im not gonna buy the bloody small 13'' or 15''..!! no way..!!

you will lose a customer for sure..!!

The idea is that they can afford to lose customers like you because its not financially viable to cater for everyone. The most of the other 17" users will most likely downgrade to 15".
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
15,027 (2.74/day)
Location
Mid-Atlantic
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard AsRock MicroATX Z170M Extreme4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x 16 Gb Gskill Ripjaws 2400
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 5700
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB m.2 NVMe + Samsung 860 EVO 2 TB SATA3 SSD
Display(s) LG 34GK950F-B 34" 21:9 Ultragear WQHD Nano IPS Curved Gaming Monitor with Radeon FreeSync 2
Case Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Logitech G915 Wireless Clicky
Software The Matrix
apple products are not overpriced. if they were overpriced they would not be selling like hotcakes. and don't give me that nonsense about brainwashing because people's money comes long before brand loyalty. the truth is companies like sony, samsung, and hp have to keep their prices lower than apple just so they can make some decent sales!
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
5,197 (0.87/day)
Location
Kansas City, KS
System Name Dell XPS 15 9560
Processor I7-7700HQ
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1050/1080 Ti
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal
Case Razer Core
Audio Device(s) Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650
Mouse Logitech Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G910
the 17" MBP really is extremely nice, but the loss of portability and the inability of apple to keep its hardware up to snuff for a 17", it really won't hurt their sales. Especially if their hybrid ultrabook is true, That way the 15" can return to the pro model they originally used to run. Right now I'm torn between a 11/13" air, and a 15" pro again. A middle man might seal the deal.
 

3volvedcombat

New Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
1,514 (0.33/day)
Location
South California, The desert.
System Name My Computer
Processor Core 2 Q9550 4Ghz 1.23volts
Motherboard Gigabyte
Cooling Corsair
Memory OCZ
Video Card(s) Galaxy
Storage Western Digital
Display(s) Acer
Case Lian li
Audio Device(s) Asus
Power Supply Corsiar
Software Microsoft
Benchmark Scores 25,000 3dmark06 at 4.35Ghz processor, 835core card!
Well looking at 2500$ for a starting price, no wonder it's low in sales.

Regardless.

Apple has a good grip on getting people to spend 300 to 1500$

But the Mac book pro 17 inch fails to deliver an appropriate amount of performance or a neccessary incentive to put a large amount of money down on a purchase, when their smaller sized/priced alternative does everything perfectly for the expecting user.

And the more expensive and classy the laptop, the more a consumer is going to check out alternatives
That ends up being a "duh" decision when they compare the Mac book pro to other products that offer the same specs for cheaper or more for the same price.

Apple products like the Mac book air and iPad tablits offer impressive quality of use and quality product for more redible and common prices 1200$ n below.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,629 (0.33/day)
Processor RyZen R9 3950X
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB
Memory 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB)
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Samsung 1TB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Zulman MS800
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic 650W
VR HMD Oculus Rift and Oculus Quest V1
Software Windows 10 64bit
Exactly,….

The 17” Mac Book Pro entry level pricing likely isn’t in the typical realm of comfort for the majority of consumers. The ~$2500 entry level price of the Mac Book Pro is the same as the entry level price of the Mac Pro. Keep in mind that the hardware configuration options of the 17” MBP don’t dramatically improve over the 15”, whereas, the Mac Pro performance effecting options are greatly improved over something like the Mac Mini or iMac.

If Apple dropped the price of the 17” Mac Book Pro or effected price change by altering the options so that the hardware wasn’t only on the higher end of the spectrum, they might sell more.

People like options and Apple does have some options but they are fairly inflexible when it comes to the 17” Mac Book Pro.
 
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
They will alienate a big part of their installed base if they do that. Many professionals loyally plunk down big numbers for Mac Pros and Macbook pros. It will engender tremendous ill will. The good news is, that might be the incentive for competitors to step up and develop equivalent NON WINDOWS products. The pros will not run Pro Tools on Windows.
 
Joined
Apr 24, 2008
Messages
1,629 (0.33/day)
Processor RyZen R9 3950X
Motherboard ASRock X570 Taichi
Cooling Coolermaster Master Liquid ML240L RGB
Memory 64GB DDR4 3200 (4x16GB)
Video Card(s) GTX 970
Storage Samsung 1TB SSD
Display(s) Asus VE276Q, VE278Q and VK278Q triple 27” 1920x1080
Case Zulman MS800
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic 650W
VR HMD Oculus Rift and Oculus Quest V1
Software Windows 10 64bit
All I was suggesting was having the 17” Mac Book Pro with more options such as basically being the same internally as the 13” model. Having a 2.4GHz dual-core Intel Core i5 as an “option“, for example, to help lower the price shouldn’t turn the industry on its ear. This doesn’t effect the quality of the product, it only gives it more options which could lower the minimum out of pocket expense.

I’m not saying Apple should do this only that more general purpose consumers may buy the 17” MBP model if they had a base model unit or option that would lower the price by ~$300 to ~$500 USD down from the standard ~$2500.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
5,197 (0.87/day)
Location
Kansas City, KS
System Name Dell XPS 15 9560
Processor I7-7700HQ
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1050/1080 Ti
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal
Case Razer Core
Audio Device(s) Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650
Mouse Logitech Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G910
They will alienate a big part of their installed base if they do that. Many professionals loyally plunk down big numbers for Mac Pros and Macbook pros. It will engender tremendous ill will. The good news is, that might be the incentive for competitors to step up and develop equivalent NON WINDOWS products. The pros will not run Pro Tools on Windows.

This is why they're getting rid of the 17" line.

They aren't really alienating a "large" user base by any means.

100% of everyone I have ever seen with a 17" macbook pro, only has the 17" model because they weren't the ones that paid for it.

Hardware wise, the only advantage is 2" physical real estate and screen resolution. Res. can easily be fixed on the 15" line (and IMO would be nice if they did bump it up a notch.)
 
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
This is why they're getting rid of the 17" line.

They aren't really alienating a "large" user base by any means.

100% of everyone I have ever seen with a 17" macbook pro, only has the 17" model because they weren't the ones that paid for it.

Hardware wise, the only advantage is 2" physical real estate and screen resolution. Res. can easily be fixed on the 15" line (and IMO would be nice if they did bump it up a notch.)

I respectfully disagree. power users NEED the 17 inch or the MAC PRO. If you ever have to do a recording session on a 15 inch it is painfully small. I know many many 17 inch MBP users in LA, and they paid for them themselves.
 

Completely Bonkers

New Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
2,576 (0.48/day)
Processor Mysterious Engineering Prototype
Motherboard Intel 865
Cooling Custom block made in workshop
Memory Corsair XMS 2GB
Video Card(s) FireGL X3-256
Display(s) 1600x1200 SyncMaster x 2 = 3200x1200
Software Windows 2003
I think 15" is probably OK if with "retina" display, ie resolution of new 15" is still significantly better than the current 17". So although a smaller screen, in terms of capability, the new screen will be much better.
 
Joined
Jul 1, 2005
Messages
5,197 (0.87/day)
Location
Kansas City, KS
System Name Dell XPS 15 9560
Processor I7-7700HQ
Memory 32GB DDR4
Video Card(s) GTX 1050/1080 Ti
Storage 1TB SSD
Display(s) 2x Dell P2715Q/4k Internal
Case Razer Core
Audio Device(s) Creative E5/Objective 2 Amp/Senn HD650
Mouse Logitech Proteus Core
Keyboard Logitech G910
I respectfully disagree. power users NEED the 17 inch or the MAC PRO. If you ever have to do a recording session on a 15 inch it is painfully small. I know many many 17 inch MBP users in LA, and they paid for them themselves.

If you are sitting in a studio, get an external monitor. 17" is dinky compared to 24-30" real estate if it means that much in productivity to you.

I definately consider myself a power user (I chew up screen realestate as fast as I can get it) and certainly don't enjoy doing my work on a 11-15[excluding the high res option]", but the size of a 17" is truely cumbersome compare to the little gain you get (little to no extra power, and a tiny bit more space), compared to the loss of mobility.

Take that $200-500+ saved, and just get a real monitor to dock with at your workstation and more than double your work space.
 
Joined
May 8, 2009
Messages
76 (0.02/day)
If you are sitting in a studio, get an external monitor. 17" is dinky compared to 24-30" real estate if it means that much in productivity to you.

I definately consider myself a power user (I chew up screen realestate as fast as I can get it) and certainly don't enjoy doing my work on a 11-15[excluding the high res option]", but the size of a 17" is truely cumbersome compare to the little gain you get (little to no extra power, and a tiny bit more space), compared to the loss of mobility.

Take that $200-500+ saved, and just get a real monitor to dock with at your workstation and more than double your work space.
When one is on the road that doesn't work. 17" is a must for me and many of my associates.
 

Easy Rhino

Linux Advocate
Staff member
Joined
Nov 13, 2006
Messages
15,027 (2.74/day)
Location
Mid-Atlantic
System Name Desktop
Processor i5 7500 Kaby Lake
Motherboard AsRock MicroATX Z170M Extreme4
Cooling Stock
Memory 2x 16 Gb Gskill Ripjaws 2400
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 5700
Storage Samsung 970 EVO 1 TB m.2 NVMe + Samsung 860 EVO 2 TB SATA3 SSD
Display(s) LG 34GK950F-B 34" 21:9 Ultragear WQHD Nano IPS Curved Gaming Monitor with Radeon FreeSync 2
Case Corsair Carbide 400C
Audio Device(s) On Board
Power Supply Seasonic SSR-650GD Flagship Prime Series 650W Gold
Mouse Logitech G900 Chaos Spectrum
Keyboard Logitech G915 Wireless Clicky
Software The Matrix
When one is on the road that doesn't work. 17" is a must for me and many of my associates.
well then looks like u will have to find an alternative. apple doesnt mind losing you as you account for a very small percentage.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2007
Messages
5,106 (0.96/day)
Location
Kansas
Processor Core i5 3570K
Motherboard AsRock z77 Pro4
Cooling Zalman CNPS10X Extreme
Memory 2x4GB GSkill Sniper
Video Card(s) MSI GTX970 Gaming
Storage 240GB OCZ ARC 100, Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB
Display(s) LG 23" 1920x1080
Case Antec P100
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Antec Edge 750W
Software Windows 8.1 Pro 64
I guess more of your associates should have bought one.
 

Oxford

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2010
Messages
26 (0.01/day)
Not having an IPS screen option (particularly one that has a wide-gamut backlight and good sRGB emulation) is pretty silly for a premium Apple laptop.

I'd also like to see the newest A-MVA tech in an Apple laptop. The battery life won't be as good as with TN, but the contrast ratio and viewing angles will be much improved. OS X isn't much of a gaming platform, so the slow response time of A-MVA (although it is supposedly improved in the panels about to hit the market) isn't much of an issue. IPS still lags considerably when it comes to contrast ratio.
 
Top