• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Apple's M1-Based MacBook Air Benchmarked

AleksandarK

Staff member
Joined
Aug 19, 2017
Messages
769 (0.64/day)
When Apple announced that they are going to switch their Mac lineup from Intel-based x86 processors to the custom "Apple Silicon," everyone was wondering how the new processors will look and perform. To everyone's luck, Apple has just a few days ago announced its first Apple Silicon custom processor for MacBook. The M1, as the company calls it, is their first processor designed for higher-power and performance tasks The M1 features eight CPU cores (four high-performance and four-high efficiency) paired with eight cores dedicated to the graphics. On the die, there is also a 16-core neural engine made to accelerate machine learning tasks found in the new applications.

Today, we are getting the first GeekBench 5 CPU benchmarks that showcase just how far Apple has come with its custom design. What we have is the M1 processor found in MacBook Air. This Mac model features a passive cooling system, cooling a CPU with a base frequency of 3.2 GHz. The system scored 1719 points in the single-core result, and 6967 points in the multi-core result. The single-threaded results measure itself with some of the highest-end offerings from Intel and AMD, while the multi-threaded results are very good given the mix and match of small and big cores.


View at TechPowerUp Main Site
 
Joined
Apr 6, 2015
Messages
164 (0.08/day)
Location
Japan
System Name ChronicleScienceWorkStation
Processor AMD Threadripper 1950X
Motherboard Asrock X399 Taichi
Cooling Noctua U14S-TR4
Memory G.Skill DDR4 3200 C14 16GB*4
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon VII
Storage Samsung 970 Pro*1, Kingston A2000 1TB*2 RAID 0, HGST 8TB*5 RAID 6
Case Lian Li PC-A75X
Power Supply Corsair AX1600i
Software Proxmox 6.2
These are actually very good numbers for a laptop:
My AMD Ryzen 3600X desktop is ST 1251 and MT 6973.
A laptop with AMD 4900HS is ST 1091 and MT 7075.
More: https://browser.geekbench.com/processor-benchmarks/

I guess at the beginning the software support might be limited, but this suddenly makes Apple's laptop a high performance option, especially at $999.
I had been discouraged by the fact that paying a premium for mac is giving me overpriced, outdated spec, guess this has changed now.
 
Joined
May 31, 2017
Messages
684 (0.54/day)
System Name Blackbox
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Ultra
Cooling Scythe Fuma 2
Memory 2x8GB DDR4 G.Skill FlareX 3200Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) Sapphire RX 480 NITRO+ 4GB
Storage 250 GB Samsung 850 EVO + 1TB Samsung 860 QVO
Display(s) Asus MG248Q
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Logitech Z200
Power Supply Seasonic Focus+ Gold 750W
Mouse Logitech G400
Keyboard MasterKeys Pro S White (MX Brown)
Software Windows 10
Geekbench is worthless for comparing between different architectures.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,112 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Here is why Geekbench is dogshit :

1.png
2.png


Every time other SoCs inch closer to Apple's the app gets updated and a chasm appears again between their chips and everyone else's.

In 4.4 there was less than 10% difference between A13 and Exynos 990, in 5 that somehow became a colossal 50%. This happens every single time a new version appears, without exception. Only an idiot would take these numbers for granted and not realize that this benchmark is always optimized specifically for Apple's chips.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Oct 28, 2012
Messages
512 (0.17/day)
Processor AMD Ryzen 3700x
Motherboard asus ROG Strix B-350I Gaming
Cooling cooler master masterliquid 240
Memory Gskill Aegis 2x 8GB DDR4
Video Card(s) zotac amp GTX 1660 super
Storage WD sn550 1To/WD ssd sata 1To /Samsung 960 evo 256 Gb/Seagate 2To/WD book 4 To back-up
Display(s) LG 25UM58
Case Ncase M1
Audio Device(s) sennheiser HD58X
Power Supply bequiet SFX L power 500w
Mouse MX master 3
Keyboard Master Key Mx
Software win 10 pro
Let's just wait for some leaks of that new R23 cinbench :). Or just next week even.
 
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
1,255 (1.17/day)
Location
Buenos Aires, Argentina
System Name System V
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 3600
Motherboard Asus Prime X570-P
Cooling AMD Wraith Stealth // a bunch of 120 mm Xigmatek 1500 RPM fans (2 ins, 3 outs)
Memory 2x8GB Ballistix Sport LT 3200 MHz (BLS8G4D32AESCK.M8FE) (CL16-18-18-36)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte AORUS Radeon RX 580 8 GB
Storage SHFS37A240G / DT01ACA200 / WD20EZRX / MKNSSDTR256GB-3DL / LG BH16NS40 / ST10000VN0008
Display(s) LG 22MP55 IPS Display
Case NZXT Source 210
Audio Device(s) Logitech G430 Headset
Power Supply Corsair CX650M
Mouse Microsoft Trackball Optical 1.0
Keyboard HP Vectra VE keyboard (Part # D4950-63004)
Software Whatever build of Windows 10 is being served in Dev channel at the time.
Benchmark Scores Corona 1.3: 3120620 r/s Cinebench R20: 3355 FireStrike: 12490 TimeSpy: 4624
Here is why Geekbench is dogshit :

View attachment 175372View attachment 175373

Every time other SoCs inch closer to Apple's the app gets updated and a chasm appears again between their chips and everyone else's.

In 4.4 there was just 10% difference between A13 and Exynos 990, in 5 that somehow became a colossal 50%. This happens every single time a new version appears, without exception. Only an idiot would take these numbers for granted and not realize that this benchmark is always optimized specifically for Apple's chips.
That's starting to look like another Userbenchmark
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,674 (2.41/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
Wonder if there are any other cross platform benchmarks we can use with high degree of confidence. A lot of people seem to dislike Geekbench.
 
Joined
Jul 7, 2014
Messages
65 (0.03/day)
Processor Intel i5-3350P
Cooling Scythe Kotetsu
Memory 8GB mixed
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro RX 470
Storage 840 EVO + WD Red
Display(s) DELL U2412M
Case CM N200
Audio Device(s) O2+ODAC
Power Supply EVGA Bronze 600W
Mouse Mionix Naos 7000
Keyboard 6Gv2 (it's shit)
Software W10
Wonder if there are any other cross platform benchmarks we can use with high degree of confidence. A lot of people seem to dislike Geekbench.
You mean like for example SPECint, here showing Apple's previous A14 chip powering Iphone 12?



I'm very curious about Cinebench R23 results of the M1.
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,674 (2.41/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
You mean like for example SPECint, here showing Apple's previous A14 chip powering Iphone 12?



I'm very curious about Cinebench R23 results of the M1.
There are also people who like to say SPECint is not representative of real world usage.
 
Joined
Aug 30, 2006
Messages
6,513 (1.25/day)
System Name ICE-QUAD // ICE-CRUNCH
Processor Q6600 // 2x Xeon 5472
Memory 2GB DDR // 8GB FB-DIMM
Video Card(s) HD3850-AGP // FireGL 3400
Display(s) 2 x Samsung 204Ts = 3200x1200
Audio Device(s) Audigy 2
Software Windows Server 2003 R2 as a Workstation now migrated to W10 with regrets.
Real-world figures needed. Without a doubt Apple is using whatever PR and benchmarking tricks they can in order to make M1 look good. The question is: todays application software, how does it perform? And I don't mean having the whole CPU and memory space dedicated to one application, but making it work with multitasking or memory constrained typical use situation: e.g. Right now I have 50 tabs open in Chrome instance 1, another 50 or so tabs in Chrome instance 2, Chromium with another 30 tabs there, skype, MS Office, Adobe Acrobat, and then some. How the OS handles memory once it has so shoe-horn into virtual, and how even simple applications can get bogged down with multiple instances, is what is of interest to me. Then, battery life on that.

I'm hopeful M1 will deliver. But a synthetic benchmark optimised for strange workloads where there are different codepaths depending on what CPU registers/functions are available, isn't going to cut it with me.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
136 (0.33/day)
There are also people who like to say SPECint is not representative of real world usage.
And what are the usual reasons to say so?
The different subscores come from very relevant performance metrics, like compression/decompression, h264, code compiling etc.
 

Fourstaff

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Nov 29, 2009
Messages
9,674 (2.41/day)
Location
Home
System Name Orange! // ItchyHands
Processor 3570K // 10400F
Motherboard ASRock z77 Extreme4 // TUF Gaming B460M-Plus
Cooling Stock // Stock
Memory 2x4Gb 1600Mhz CL9 Corsair XMS3 // 2x8Gb 3200 Mhz XPG D41
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 570 // Asus TUF RTX 2070
Storage Samsung 840 250Gb // SX8200 480GB
Display(s) LG 22EA53VQ // Philips 275M QHD
Case NZXT Phantom 410 Black/Orange // Tecware Forge M
Power Supply Corsair CXM500w // CM MWE 600w
And what are the usual reasons to say so?
The different subscores come from very relevant performance metrics, like compression/decompression, h264, code compiling etc.
Real life benchmarks uses a mixture of workloads etc etc. Everyone have their preferred reason to disregard a certain benchmark, but once you have enough of them there is really not much left but to accept.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,112 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
And what are the usual reasons to say so?
The different subscores come from very relevant performance metrics, like compression/decompression, h264, code compiling etc.
Is code compilation relevant to most people ?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 19, 2009
Messages
1,094 (0.25/day)
Location
I live in Norway
System Name 3 sys spec seperated by "|"
Processor R9 3900x| R7 1700 @3.75 | 4800H
Motherboard Asrock X570M | AB350M Pro 4 | Asus Tuf A15
Cooling Air | Air | duh laptop
Memory 64gb G.skill SniperX @3600 CL16 | 64gb | 16gb
Video Card(s) EK-FC - RX Vega 64 | server | RTX2060M
Storage MP510 2TB, 660P 2TB, 2x860 evo 1tb | 960 500gb Intel 660P 1tb PM871 4x256gb ++| 1TB 660+ 1tb A1000
Display(s) AOC 28" 4K something + 1440p AOC 144hz something.
Case Phanteks EvolvX M-Atx
Power Supply Corsair RM850
Mouse g502 Lightspeed
Keyboard TT Meka G1
There are also people who like to say SPECint is not representative of real world usage.
Yes, It's not.
It's a integer benchmark.

"designed to test exclusively the integer performance of the system. "

AVX, AVX2, AVX512 is not included at all.
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,112 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
Yes, It's not.
It's a integer benchmark.

"designed to test exclusively the integer performance of the system. "

AVX, AVX2, AVX512 is not included at all.
Incidentally or not Apple's cores are known for featuring a very wide integer pipeline unlike most other CPUs out which usually have wider floating point pipelines. What's also interesting is that SPECint is Apple's darling for a very long time, they used to make comparisons based on it since PowerPC days.
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2019
Messages
136 (0.33/day)
Real life benchmarks uses a mixture of workloads etc etc. Everyone have their preferred reason to disregard a certain benchmark, but once you have enough of them there is really not much left but to accept.
Is code compilation relevant to most people ?
You can just dismiss the sub-benchmarks that you don’t find relevant and see who comes on top (it’s apple).
Yes, It's not.
It's a integer benchmark.

"designed to test exclusively the integer performance of the system. "

AVX, AVX2, AVX512 is not included at all.
Then look at other benchmarks from the SPEC suite, like SPECfp, which can be compiled with whatever AVX support you wish.
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
149 (0.08/day)
Processor Intel I7 6700
Motherboard Msi Z170i Pro Gaming AC
Cooling Be Quiet Shadow Rock LP
Memory Corsair LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 980ti Extreme Gaming W3
Storage Samsung Evo 850 500GB + 250GB
Display(s) 3x Dell Ultrasharp U2515H
Case Ncase M1
Power Supply Sharkoon Silentstorm SFX
Mouse Logitech MX Master, Steelseries Rival 300
Keyboard Corsair K65RGB
Software Win 10
Say what you want about Geekbench, but I found this quote from Andrei interesting;

There’s been a lot of criticism about more common benchmark suites such as GeekBench, but frankly I've found these concerns or arguments to be quite unfounded. The only factual differences between workloads in SPEC and workloads in GB5 is that the latter has less outlier tests which are memory-heavy, meaning it’s more of a CPU benchmark whereas SPEC has more tendency towards CPU+DRAM.

I can only say that I'm really excited about the new M1 chips. As a lover of technology I'm all for new technology, and seeing people hate on a product they will never buy is beyond me.

PCMasterrace amirite?/s
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,112 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
You can just dismiss the sub-benchmarks that you don’t find relevant
That has to be ironic, SPECint has absolutely nothing to do with the real world, it is purely a synthetic benchmark :

00.perlbenchCPerl Programming LanguageDerived from Perl V5.8.7. The workload includes SpamAssassin, MHonArc (an email indexer), and specdiff (SPEC's tool that checks benchmark outputs).
401.bzip2CCompressionJulian Seward's bzip2 version 1.0.3, modified to do most work in memory, rather than doing I/O.
403.gccCC CompilerBased on gcc Version 3.2, generates code for Opteron.
429.mcfCCombinatorial OptimizationVehicle scheduling. Uses a network simplex algorithm (which is also used in commercial products) to schedule public transport.
445.gobmkCArtificial Intelligence: go playingPlays the game of Go, a simply described but deeply complex game.
456.hmmerCSearch Gene SequenceProtein sequence analysis using profile hidden Markov models (profile HMMs)
458.sjengCArtificial Intelligence: chess playingA highly-ranked chess program that also plays several chess variants.
462.libquantumCPhysics: Quantum ComputingSimulates a quantum computer, running Shor's polynomial-time factorization algorithm.
464.h264refCVideo CompressionA reference implementation of H.264/AVC, encodes a videostream using 2 parameter sets. The H.264/AVC standard is expected to replace MPEG2
471.omnetppC++Discrete Event SimulationUses the OMNet++ discrete event simulator to model a large Ethernet campus network.
473.astarC++Path-finding AlgorithmsPathfinding library for 2D maps, including the well known A* algorithm.
483.xalancbmkC++XML Processing

Nearly all of those are completely irrelevant to real world workloads performed by your average user. Even for me, someone who knows what all of those tests entail it still means nothing.

and seeing people hate on a product they will never buy is beyond me.
Huh ? Wouldn't it be strange if I were to hate on something that I will buy ? :kookoo:
 
Joined
Jul 4, 2015
Messages
149 (0.08/day)
Processor Intel I7 6700
Motherboard Msi Z170i Pro Gaming AC
Cooling Be Quiet Shadow Rock LP
Memory Corsair LPX 16GB
Video Card(s) Gigabyte 980ti Extreme Gaming W3
Storage Samsung Evo 850 500GB + 250GB
Display(s) 3x Dell Ultrasharp U2515H
Case Ncase M1
Power Supply Sharkoon Silentstorm SFX
Mouse Logitech MX Master, Steelseries Rival 300
Keyboard Corsair K65RGB
Software Win 10
Huh ? Wouldn't it be strange if I were to hate on something that I will buy ? :kookoo:
You are hating on something brand new. Never before has something like this been released with so tight integration of SW and HW with ARM.
For all we know hating on this, might be like hating on the iPhone when it was released.
 
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
668 (0.17/day)
Processor Intel Core i5 8400
Motherboard Gigabyte Z370N-Wifi
Cooling Silverstone AR05
Memory Micron Crucial 16GB DDR4-2400
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX1080 G1 Gaming 8G
Storage Micron Crucial MX300 275GB
Display(s) Dell U2415
Case Silverstone RVZ02B
Power Supply Silverstone SSR-SX550
Keyboard Ducky One Red Switch
Software Windows 10 Pro 1909
I guess the only benchmark to trust is the one that actually does something we use our computers for. e.g. something we does a lot of video encoding will want to see how quickly this CPU encodes a 1 hr long video
 
Joined
Jan 8, 2017
Messages
6,112 (4.31/day)
System Name Good enough
Processor AMD Ryzen R7 1700X - 4.0 Ghz / 1.350V
Motherboard ASRock B450M Pro4
Cooling Deepcool Gammaxx L240 V2
Memory 16GB - Corsair Vengeance LPX - 3333 Mhz CL16
Video Card(s) OEM Dell GTX 1080 with Kraken G12 + Water 3.0 Performer C
Storage 1x Samsung 850 EVO 250GB , 1x Samsung 860 EVO 500GB
Display(s) 4K Samsung TV
Case Deepcool Matrexx 70
Power Supply GPS-750C
You are hating on something brand new. Never before has something like this been released with so tight integration of SW and HW with ARM.
I don't know why you feel the need to defend Apple when I actually said nothing about them. I only spoke against Geekbench and offered a pretty clear example on why it should be disregarded completely since it generates discrepancies from version to version than can only be explained by tailoring the code for specific uarchs. And I don't need to say why that's a big no no if you want to pretended that a certain benchmark is a reliable way to compare processors.
 
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
85 (0.02/day)
Well still, Apple would received way less hate if they were either sellings these chips whitout the full package and had a way better policy on "right to repair"

i don't hate device itself, altought i am neither a fan of IOS and Mac OS, but i really hate Apple as a company. Their reps are a bunch of arroguant pricks that think you don't need what you think you need...

These chips are certainly impressive, but real world usage test will be needed. How much it consume? does it throttle ? etc..
 
Top