• We've upgraded our forums. Please post any issues/requests in this thread.

APUs Make Up Nearly 75% of AMD's Processor Sales

Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
739 (0.31/day)
Likes
125
System Name An experiment in continuous upgrading
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.2 Ghz | Phenom II X4 965 | Phenom II X4 965
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD53 | MSI 990FXA-GD80 | Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 | Zalman CNPS10x | Coolermaster*212+
Memory Kingston KHX1866C9D3K2 |*8Gb | 8Gb
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 580 TF2 x 2 (SLI) | Sapphire Radeon 7970 + GTX 460 | Radeon 4870 1Gb
Storage Crucial M4 120gb Sata3 SSD + WD Caviar black 1Tb + 1.5Tb | WD Caviar Black 1Tb x 3 | WD Blue 500gb
Display(s) Samsung S23A700D 120hz + nVidia 3D Vision + 17" Acer secondary LCD | 40" Sony 1080p TV | Sam. 2233rz
Case Antec 1200 | Lian-Li PC-8 | Antec 302
Audio Device(s) Auzentech Prelude X-Fi + Senn. PC360 G4ME | Prelude X-Fi + Home theater | Creative HS-1200
Power Supply Corsair TX850W | Corsair TX 750 | OCZ 700
Software About 400 top-rated games. | 150 top-rated games | No games
Benchmark Scores No time for benching, I prefer gaming.
#26
AMD APUs are really good, the problem is OEMs are not building good laptops for it! For example Dell do not even have a single Trinity laptop!
Dell is Intel's whore.
 
Joined
May 20, 2011
Messages
188 (0.08/day)
Likes
80
System Name Windows 10 Pro 64 bit
Memory 16 GB
Storage 500 GB seagate + 1TB Samsung + 1 TB WD green + 250 GB SSD Samsung EVO
Display(s) LG 23MP67HQ Borderless + LG 42 Inch Full HD
#27
AMD should build Phenom CPUs on 32 nm
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
739 (0.31/day)
Likes
125
System Name An experiment in continuous upgrading
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.2 Ghz | Phenom II X4 965 | Phenom II X4 965
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD53 | MSI 990FXA-GD80 | Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 | Zalman CNPS10x | Coolermaster*212+
Memory Kingston KHX1866C9D3K2 |*8Gb | 8Gb
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 580 TF2 x 2 (SLI) | Sapphire Radeon 7970 + GTX 460 | Radeon 4870 1Gb
Storage Crucial M4 120gb Sata3 SSD + WD Caviar black 1Tb + 1.5Tb | WD Caviar Black 1Tb x 3 | WD Blue 500gb
Display(s) Samsung S23A700D 120hz + nVidia 3D Vision + 17" Acer secondary LCD | 40" Sony 1080p TV | Sam. 2233rz
Case Antec 1200 | Lian-Li PC-8 | Antec 302
Audio Device(s) Auzentech Prelude X-Fi + Senn. PC360 G4ME | Prelude X-Fi + Home theater | Creative HS-1200
Power Supply Corsair TX850W | Corsair TX 750 | OCZ 700
Software About 400 top-rated games. | 150 top-rated games | No games
Benchmark Scores No time for benching, I prefer gaming.
#28
AMD should build Phenom CPUs on 32 nm
That is so true, a tweaked Phenom III octo-core, on 32nm, would probably perform much better than those piledrivers. Hopefully, however, they can tweak piledriver into shape and become competitive again. Let's remember that the Phenoms were getting on in age. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, take Intel, who went back to the Pentium III architecture as a base for their Core series after the Pentium 4 proved to be a dud. It had been years of Netburst architecture, and then Intel took the P3 designs out of the mothballs and made the successful Core architecture from it.

I guess AMD could always do that if this new architecture proves to be problematic over the medium term.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2008
Messages
1,526 (0.46/day)
Likes
375
System Name Lailalo / Edelweiss
Processor FX 8320 @ 4.5Ghz / i7 3610QM @2.3-3.2Ghz
Motherboard ASrock 990FX Extreme 4 / Lenovo Y580
Cooling Cooler Master Hyper 212 Plus / Big hunk of copper
Memory 16GB Samsung 30nm DDR3 1600+ / 8GB Hyundai DDR3 1600
Video Card(s) XFX R9 390 / GTX 660M 2GB
Storage Seagate 3TB/1TB + OCZ Synapse 64GB SSD Cache / Western Digital 1TB 7200RPM
Display(s) LG Ultrawide 29in @ 2560x1080 / Lenovo 15.6 @ 1920x1080
Case Coolermaster Storm Sniper / Lenovo Y580
Audio Device(s) Asus Xonar DG / Whatever Lenovo used
Power Supply Antec Truepower Blue 750W + Thermaltake 5.25in 250W / Big Power Brick
Software Windows 10 Pro / Windows 10 Home
#29
I don't think Intel can catch up to AMD in APUs. Not sure they want to either, but that's another story. All these years, AMD has been merging the CPU and GPU expertise, and now it's only starting to show results. They've taken huge hits, but this kind of tech takes years to develop. If Intel starts today, they may hope to match AMD's current APUs in a few years.
Intel is probably one of the few companies able to turn designs around quickly to counter. They just have to suddenly learn that you can't throw x86 at it and expect it to poop out candy coated fps.

I said when the APUs first came out, it'll take Intel till at least gen 3 or 4 to catch up to APUs. That is looking to come true. 4000 series did better than I expected against Llano but still lagged behind. I do expect them to finally beat Llano with Haswell. But it would take a good investment from Intel to catch up to AMD's lead designs. Unless they decided to buy nVidia, it would take Intel awhile to compete toe to toe with APU graphics.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
739 (0.31/day)
Likes
125
System Name An experiment in continuous upgrading
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.2 Ghz | Phenom II X4 965 | Phenom II X4 965
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD53 | MSI 990FXA-GD80 | Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 | Zalman CNPS10x | Coolermaster*212+
Memory Kingston KHX1866C9D3K2 |*8Gb | 8Gb
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 580 TF2 x 2 (SLI) | Sapphire Radeon 7970 + GTX 460 | Radeon 4870 1Gb
Storage Crucial M4 120gb Sata3 SSD + WD Caviar black 1Tb + 1.5Tb | WD Caviar Black 1Tb x 3 | WD Blue 500gb
Display(s) Samsung S23A700D 120hz + nVidia 3D Vision + 17" Acer secondary LCD | 40" Sony 1080p TV | Sam. 2233rz
Case Antec 1200 | Lian-Li PC-8 | Antec 302
Audio Device(s) Auzentech Prelude X-Fi + Senn. PC360 G4ME | Prelude X-Fi + Home theater | Creative HS-1200
Power Supply Corsair TX850W | Corsair TX 750 | OCZ 700
Software About 400 top-rated games. | 150 top-rated games | No games
Benchmark Scores No time for benching, I prefer gaming.
#30
Intel is probably one of the few companies able to turn designs around quickly to counter. They just have to suddenly learn that you can't throw x86 at it and expect it to poop out candy coated fps.

I said when the APUs first came out, it'll take Intel till at least gen 3 or 4 to catch up to APUs. That is looking to come true. 4000 series did better than I expected against Llano but still lagged behind. I do expect them to finally beat Llano with Haswell. But it would take a good investment from Intel to catch up to AMD's lead designs. Unless they decided to buy nVidia, it would take Intel awhile to compete toe to toe with APU graphics.
I agree for the most part, however, disagree about the acquiring nVidia part. That would be a humongous mistake on Intel's part, one I wish they would make, for AMD's sake. It took AMD years to digest and incorporate ATi. It would take Intel the same amount of time, during which nothing much would come out of the acquisition: nV would keep doing what nV does, and Intel would keep doing what they do. Any truly synergistic product, any APU, would come 5 years down the line from such a takeover. It would give AMD time to increase their lead in that segment to an incredible superiority, not unlike what Intel is enjoying in the CPU market.

If Intel buys nV, I'm mortgaging my house to buy AMD stock. :D
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.24/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
#31
AMD should build Phenom CPUs on 32 nm
No they shouldn't.

They've invested so much money on manufacturing, releasing and marketing Bulldozer as the way forward it would be pointless wasting all that energy and resources to go backwards.

They need to press forward with Piledriver and Steamroller, move to 28 nm node and keep tweaking it.

If it was 2011 I would have loved to see a Phenom II on 32nm, but that boat has gone.

That is so true, a tweaked Phenom III octo-core, on 32nm, would probably perform much better than those piledrivers. .
Probably, but the longevity wouldn't last long. That architecture was tweaked out! From Athlon 64, Athlon II X2, Phenom, Phenom II. They even made a last ditch refinement with the Phenom II X6 where they managed to add two extra cores without compromising the TDP. The restricted die space means they couldnt do much apart from add more cache tighter latencies but that would only give a slight performance boost.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,283 (0.93/day)
Likes
527
Location
Burlington, VT
Processor Intel i5-2500k
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD65
Cooling Deep Cool Gammax 400
Memory 8GB (4x2GB) G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1600
Video Card(s) Gigabyte GTX 1060 Windforce OC 6GB
Storage Samsung EVO 850 256GB / WD Caviar Black 1TB
Display(s) Acer GD235HZbid 120hz LCD
Case Rosewill Challenger Mid-Tower
Audio Device(s) Onboard
Power Supply Corsair 650W 650-TX
Software Windows 10
#32
I said when the APUs first came out, it'll take Intel till at least gen 3 or 4 to catch up to APUs. That is looking to come true. 4000 series did better than I expected against Llano but still lagged behind. I do expect them to finally beat Llano with Haswell. But it would take a good investment from Intel to catch up to AMD's lead designs. Unless they decided to buy nVidia, it would take Intel awhile to compete toe to toe with APU graphics.
The performance gain from HD3000 to HD4000 was substantially better than that of Llano to Trinity when it comes to the iGPU. Intel is definitely making progress, and with Haswell focusing heavily on improving the iGPU, I expect them to start getting a lot closer than people expect.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,571 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,164
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name Red Spy
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.35 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0
Cooling TT Water 3.0 Performer + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 1 x 120mm Blue LED, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1333 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage ADATA 128GB Sata III SSD for OS, WDC Black - 1TB Storage, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD - Games
Display(s) AOC 23" 1080P LCD
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmark Scores BF4 with Mantle on Ultra settings gets around 60 FPS.
#33
With the amount of money and resource Intel has it can churn out a damn good GPU in less time. Hopefully they concentrate on CPU more with decent aggression on their iGPU. In that way AMD won't make the same mistake like they did in A64 days, if they want to survive AMD has to keep improving at a much faster pace than Intel.

In the end consumers get rewarded!!
 
Joined
Mar 18, 2008
Messages
4,474 (1.26/day)
Likes
1,025
Location
Australia
System Name Night Rider | Mini LAN PC | Workhorse
Processor AMD FX 8350 | i7 2600 | i7 970
Motherboard GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ | GA-H77M-D3H | Gigabyte EX58-UD5
Cooling AMD Wraith cooler| Coolermaster Gemini with Noctua 3000RPM Fan | Big shairkan B
Memory 4x2GB DDR3 G.Skill 1600 6-8-6-24| 2x4GB Corsair 1600 | 6x2GB DDR3 1300 Corsair
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 970 OC in Sli | Gainward GTX 650 TI GS | ASUS 7970 Matrix
Storage 250GB Plextor SSD Por 5 /1TB WD Black | 500GB WD ES/WD Black | WD 320/Seagate 320
Display(s) Samsung 2494hs 24" 1080P| Samsung 20" S20C300L/DELL 15" | 22" DELL/19"DELL
Case LIAN LI PC-18 | Mini ATX Case (custom) | Atrix C4 9001
Audio Device(s) Onboard | Onbaord | Onboard
Power Supply Silverstone 750 | Silverstone Mini 450W | Corsair CX-750
Mouse Gigabyte aivia krypton gaming mouse | Rapoo V900 | Gigabyte 6850X
Keyboard MAX Keyboard Nighthawk X8 | Creative Fatal1ty eluminx | Some POS Logitech
Software Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64 | Windows 7 Pro 64/Windows 10 Home
#34
This is no surprise to me, most of the computers i build for clients these days are APU systems. There not interested in a beast super fast computer, just something new that can do Facebook/emails/google/ebay.

Only my friends buy 4/6/8core monsters with high end GPU's to play the latest and greatest games.
 
Joined
May 14, 2012
Messages
883 (0.43/day)
Likes
75
Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
Motherboard AsRock X370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H60 Liquid Cooling
Memory 16 GB CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 3000 Mhz (Running at 2933)
Video Card(s) Gigabyte G1 GTX 1070
Storage 240 GB Kingston SSD, 7 TB's of HDD
Display(s) Dell 16:10 20" Monitor
Case Phanteks Enthos Pro M
Audio Device(s) Integrated
Power Supply Corsair 750 P2
Mouse Mionix Naos 8200
Keyboard G Skill Ripjaws RGB Mechanical Keyboard
Software Windows 10 Pro
#35
The Trinity APU that I used for my friends build is working quite well. I wish their higher end was better
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
739 (0.31/day)
Likes
125
System Name An experiment in continuous upgrading
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.2 Ghz | Phenom II X4 965 | Phenom II X4 965
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD53 | MSI 990FXA-GD80 | Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 | Zalman CNPS10x | Coolermaster*212+
Memory Kingston KHX1866C9D3K2 |*8Gb | 8Gb
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 580 TF2 x 2 (SLI) | Sapphire Radeon 7970 + GTX 460 | Radeon 4870 1Gb
Storage Crucial M4 120gb Sata3 SSD + WD Caviar black 1Tb + 1.5Tb | WD Caviar Black 1Tb x 3 | WD Blue 500gb
Display(s) Samsung S23A700D 120hz + nVidia 3D Vision + 17" Acer secondary LCD | 40" Sony 1080p TV | Sam. 2233rz
Case Antec 1200 | Lian-Li PC-8 | Antec 302
Audio Device(s) Auzentech Prelude X-Fi + Senn. PC360 G4ME | Prelude X-Fi + Home theater | Creative HS-1200
Power Supply Corsair TX850W | Corsair TX 750 | OCZ 700
Software About 400 top-rated games. | 150 top-rated games | No games
Benchmark Scores No time for benching, I prefer gaming.
#36
With the amount of money and resource Intel has it can churn out a damn good GPU in less time. Hopefully they concentrate on CPU more with decent aggression on their iGPU. In that way AMD won't make the same mistake like they did in A64 days, if they want to survive AMD has to keep improving at a much faster pace than Intel.

In the end consumers get rewarded!!
Falsehoods from beginning to end. Firstly, designing chips takes time, no matter how much money you throw at it. Do you think 10,000 engineers can design a great GPU faster than 10 (or whatever the optimal number is) engineers can? Nope. So, no matter how much money Intel throws at their GPUs, they cannot hope to catch up with AMD that quick.

Secondly, the jump in performance between Intel's previous and current IGPs may have been large, but that's so easy when your starting point is pure crappiness. There comes a point of exponentially increasing complexity and diminishing returns, and that's where the process starts to be time-consuming. There is no way around it.

Thirdly, AMD's mistakes with the Athlon 64? I'm sorry, but AMD forced Intel to abandon the Netburst architecture and take the Pentium Pro (P3) architecture back from the mothballs and tweak it to make the first Pentium M and Core CPUs, forced Intel to use the AMD64 instruction set for 64-bit computing, in short, AMD did everything, technology-wise, to take the lead from Intel.

But Intel had so much money, so much manufacturing capacity, and AMD had so little, if you remember correctly at the height of A64 popularity, AMD was selling its chips at complete manufacturing capacity and THAT is what prevented them from gaining additional market share. AMD hardly made any mistakes back then. No, the only reason Intel took back the lead from AMD is all their years of illegal monopoly practices, harming AMD, who couldn't expand when the time was right.

If AMD hadn't been harmed by Intel's illegal practices, they would have been able to expand production back then, and they would have gotten perhaps 30% of the CPU market instead of the 15% they have today. More money, more sales, would have meant more resources for engineering the following generation, but they had to do with what they had, and that wasn't enough. The first Phenoms were weak, and Intel took the lead back from them.

I don't see where AMD went wrong in any of the decisions back then, and I was following things very closely.

Even where you are saying that the consumer gets rewarded isn't right, given that Intel has been stifling competition rather than behaving legally. Consumers have been harmed by this. I wonder if a class action lawsuit would be doable LOL. Meh, it's too long ago now, however, it cannot be argued, if you look at the situation objectively, that consumers don't continue to be harmed today by Intel's monopolistic and illegal practices over the last 20 years.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,652 (0.70/day)
Likes
766
Processor Intel i5-2500k @ 3.8GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-2
Memory 8GB DDR3 1866 Gskill Snipers 9-10-9-28
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X
Storage 240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s) 23' Dell AW2310
Case Corsair 550D
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Professional
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
#37
Thirdly, AMD's mistakes with the Athlon 64? I'm sorry, but AMD forced Intel to abandon the Netburst architecture and take the Pentium Pro (P3) architecture back from the mothballs and tweak it to make the first Pentium M and Core CPUs, forced Intel to use the AMD64 instruction set for 64-bit computing, in short, AMD did everything, technology-wise, to take the lead from Intel.
This is true, if my competitor offered the latest and greatest, I myself am forced to find another way to compete. Intel's 1st and 2nd gen Core CPUs had forced AMD to build a new design from ground up. So, this is nothing new. Even if it isn't on Intel's level, there's still lots to be learned from tweaking a new architecture such as Bulldozer.


But Intel had so much money, so much manufacturing capacity, and AMD had so little, if you remember correctly at the height of A64 popularity, AMD was selling its chips at complete manufacturing capacity and THAT is what prevented them from gaining additional market share. AMD hardly made any mistakes back then. No, the only reason Intel took back the lead from AMD is all their years of illegal monopoly practices, harming AMD, who couldn't expand when the time was right.

If AMD hadn't been harmed by Intel's illegal practices, they would have been able to expand production back then, and they would have gotten perhaps 30% of the CPU market instead of the 15% they have today. More money, more sales, would have meant more resources for engineering the following generation, but they had to do with what they had, and that wasn't enough. The first Phenoms were weak, and Intel took the lead back from them.

I don't see where AMD went wrong in any of the decisions back then, and I was following things very closely.

Even where you are saying that the consumer gets rewarded isn't right, given that Intel has been stifling competition rather than behaving legally. Consumers have been harmed by this. I wonder if a class action lawsuit would be doable LOL. Meh, it's too long ago now, however, it cannot be argued, if you look at the situation objectively, that consumers don't continue to be harmed today by Intel's monopolistic and illegal practices over the last 20 years.
The majority of your post seems to be pointing towards Intel like it's the big bad wolf, and that AMD is the harmless little piggie. Even though AMD does get bashed over the head by Intel once in a while, it's there responsibility to take the necessary measures in order to stay alive and/or compete. And IMO, a good part of this if because they don't want to allocate enough funds to help their marketing department. How are people going to know what you sell if they don't know you?

However, I will say that the bigger the company, the bigger the potential for problems, money issues, bribery, illegal & unethical business practices, etc....
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2011
Messages
739 (0.31/day)
Likes
125
System Name An experiment in continuous upgrading
Processor Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.2 Ghz | Phenom II X4 965 | Phenom II X4 965
Motherboard MSI P67A-GD53 | MSI 990FXA-GD80 | Asus M4A79 Deluxe
Cooling Noctua NH-D14 | Zalman CNPS10x | Coolermaster*212+
Memory Kingston KHX1866C9D3K2 |*8Gb | 8Gb
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 580 TF2 x 2 (SLI) | Sapphire Radeon 7970 + GTX 460 | Radeon 4870 1Gb
Storage Crucial M4 120gb Sata3 SSD + WD Caviar black 1Tb + 1.5Tb | WD Caviar Black 1Tb x 3 | WD Blue 500gb
Display(s) Samsung S23A700D 120hz + nVidia 3D Vision + 17" Acer secondary LCD | 40" Sony 1080p TV | Sam. 2233rz
Case Antec 1200 | Lian-Li PC-8 | Antec 302
Audio Device(s) Auzentech Prelude X-Fi + Senn. PC360 G4ME | Prelude X-Fi + Home theater | Creative HS-1200
Power Supply Corsair TX850W | Corsair TX 750 | OCZ 700
Software About 400 top-rated games. | 150 top-rated games | No games
Benchmark Scores No time for benching, I prefer gaming.
#38
This is true, if my competitor offered the latest and greatest, I myself am forced to find another way to compete. Intel's 1st and 2nd gen Core CPUs had forced AMD to build a new design from ground up. So, this is nothing new. Even if it isn't on Intel's level, there's still lots to be learned from tweaking a new architecture such as Bulldozer.




The majority of your post seems to be pointing towards Intel like it's the big bad wolf, and that AMD is the harmless little piggie. Even though AMD does get bashed over the head by Intel once in a while, it's there responsibility to take the necessary measures in order to stay alive and/or compete. And IMO, a good part of this if because they don't want to allocate enough funds to help their marketing department. How are people going to know what you sell if they don't know you?

However, I will say that the bigger the company, the bigger the potential for problems, money issues, bribery, illegal & unethical business practices, etc....
Wait, you seem to be unaware that Intel is a convicted monopolist, if not in every single court in the world. Still...
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,274 (5.51/day)
Likes
10,361
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 4790K@4.6GHz
Motherboard AsRock Z97 Extreme6
Cooling Corsair H100i
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR3-1866 9-10-9-27
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX960 STRIX @ 1500/1900
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Corsair 650D Black
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#39
Despite being the older architecture, AMD's K10/K10.5 architecture, which makes up Phenom II series processors, outsold Bulldozer by nearly two times.
Makes me wonder why they even bothered with Bulldozer. They should have stuck with the Phenom II line and just improved on that.
 
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,571 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,164
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name Red Spy
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.35 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0
Cooling TT Water 3.0 Performer + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 1 x 120mm Blue LED, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1333 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage ADATA 128GB Sata III SSD for OS, WDC Black - 1TB Storage, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD - Games
Display(s) AOC 23" 1080P LCD
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmark Scores BF4 with Mantle on Ultra settings gets around 60 FPS.
#40
Falsehoods from beginning to end. Firstly, designing chips takes time, no matter how much money you throw at it. Do you think 10,000 engineers can design a great GPU faster than 10 (or whatever the optimal number is) engineers can? Nope. So, no matter how much money Intel throws at their GPUs, they cannot hope to catch up with AMD that quick.

Secondly, the jump in performance between Intel's previous and current IGPs may have been large, but that's so easy when your starting point is pure crappiness. There comes a point of exponentially increasing complexity and diminishing returns, and that's where the process starts to be time-consuming. There is no way around it.

Thirdly, AMD's mistakes with the Athlon 64? I'm sorry, but AMD forced Intel to abandon the Netburst architecture and take the Pentium Pro (P3) architecture back from the mothballs and tweak it to make the first Pentium M and Core CPUs, forced Intel to use the AMD64 instruction set for 64-bit computing, in short, AMD did everything, technology-wise, to take the lead from Intel.

But Intel had so much money, so much manufacturing capacity, and AMD had so little, if you remember correctly at the height of A64 popularity, AMD was selling its chips at complete manufacturing capacity and THAT is what prevented them from gaining additional market share. AMD hardly made any mistakes back then. No, the only reason Intel took back the lead from AMD is all their years of illegal monopoly practices, harming AMD, who couldn't expand when the time was right.

If AMD hadn't been harmed by Intel's illegal practices, they would have been able to expand production back then, and they would have gotten perhaps 30% of the CPU market instead of the 15% they have today. More money, more sales, would have meant more resources for engineering the following generation, but they had to do with what they had, and that wasn't enough. The first Phenoms were weak, and Intel took the lead back from them.

I don't see where AMD went wrong in any of the decisions back then, and I was following things very closely.

Even where you are saying that the consumer gets rewarded isn't right, given that Intel has been stifling competition rather than behaving legally. Consumers have been harmed by this. I wonder if a class action lawsuit would be doable LOL. Meh, it's too long ago now, however, it cannot be argued, if you look at the situation objectively, that consumers don't continue to be harmed today by Intel's monopolistic and illegal practices over the last 20 years.
Whatever you said is mostly/probably true. But you misunderstood what I meant about A64 days mistakes - AMD was rejoicing its once in a lifetime blow on P4, if they had continued more nails on further Intel lines then they would have got even more gain on the market share. It was like I win the race and thats it I did it, no, once you are on the front you need to keep yourself there, thats where AMD failed.

I had a friend (he is no more now) who worked for Intel and he used to tell how efficient the whole process of making a CPU or chipset etc that Intel can build a brand new working prototype in days not years. You don't need 10000 minds to think, you only need few brains to think and make the rest work on those lines. Their prototyping methods and skills were top notch.

I am sure other companies have similar or better process. But with Intel's capacity, money and resources if they want they can produce a good GPU, heck they can now hire all the laid off brains from ATI (AMD), form a new division and create a new GPU line.
 

Aquinus

Resident Wat-man
Joined
Jan 28, 2012
Messages
10,397 (4.85/day)
Likes
5,477
Location
Concord, NH
System Name Kratos
Processor Intel Core i7 3930k @ 4.2Ghz
Motherboard ASUS P9X79 Deluxe
Cooling Zalman CPNS9900MAX 130mm
Memory G.Skill DDR3-2133, 16gb (4x4gb) @ 9-11-10-28-108-1T 1.65v
Video Card(s) MSI AMD Radeon R9 390 GAMING 8GB @ PCI-E 3.0
Storage 2x120Gb SATA3 Corsair Force GT Raid-0, 4x1Tb RAID-5, 1x500GB
Display(s) 1x LG 27UD69P (4k), 2x Dell S2340M (1080p)
Case Antec 1200
Audio Device(s) Onboard Realtek® ALC898 8-Channel High Definition Audio
Power Supply Seasonic 1000-watt 80 PLUS Platinum
Mouse Logitech G602
Keyboard Rosewill RK-9100
Software Ubuntu 17.10
Benchmark Scores Benchmarks aren't everything.
#41
Makes me wonder why they even bothered with Bulldozer. They should have stuck with the Phenom II line and just improved on that.
Makes me wonder how many more modules they can cram on their CPUs when they eventually shrink the die.
 
Joined
May 14, 2009
Messages
2,132 (0.68/day)
Likes
477
Location
Chicago burbs
System Name Halloween Boo!
Processor Intel Core i7 3770K
Motherboard Gigabyte Z77-Up7
Cooling Custom Water/ Thermalchill TA 120.3/ Swiftech Apogeee XT/ MCP655/ Swiftech M icrores/ XSPC RX 240
Memory 16G G.Skill trident 2400MHz
Video Card(s) 3 x Radeon 7970
Storage OCZ Revo Drive 240G
Display(s) 24 inch Viewsonic
Case Phobia WayCoolIt Test Bench
Power Supply Nexus 1100 watt
#42
Blah. blah. It is about margin and profitability at this point.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2007
Messages
2,652 (0.70/day)
Likes
766
Processor Intel i5-2500k @ 3.8GHz
Motherboard ASRock Z68 Extreme4 Gen3
Cooling CM Hyper 212 EVO w/ AC MX-2
Memory 8GB DDR3 1866 Gskill Snipers 9-10-9-28
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 1060 Gaming X
Storage 240GB Corsair Force GT
Display(s) 23' Dell AW2310
Case Corsair 550D
Audio Device(s) Creative SB X-Fi Fatality Professional
Power Supply Seasonic SS-760XP2 Platinum
Software Windows 7 Pro 64-bit
#43
I am sure other companies have similar or better process. But with Intel's capacity, money and resources if they want they can produce a good GPU, heck they can now hire all the laid off brains from ATI (AMD), form a new division and create a new GPU line.
Then why haven't they? That's a little asanine to say actually, "if" they want to produce a good GPU. Of course they do, but the fact is they can't, at least not right now. That cannot be disputed.

After all these years they have tried to dive head first into the GPU industry with ridiculous claims of performance numbers only to fall short of their own expectations on the prototype, or whatever stage the thing was in at the time of revealing it (talkin' about Larabee). Unless Intel has it's own dedicated team to handling discrete graphics that has nothing to do with Intel hardware (CPU, MB, SSD, etc..), then we will see Intel's GPU division to flourish and bump heads with the big boys on that front. But that will never happen because of Intel's ego.
 
Joined
May 18, 2010
Messages
3,416 (1.24/day)
Likes
1,049
System Name My baby
Processor Athlon II X4 620 @ 3.5GHz, 1.45v, NB @ 2700Mhz, HT @ 2700Mhz - 24hr prime95 stable
Motherboard Asus M4A785TD-V EVO
Cooling Sonic Tower Rev 2 with 120mm Akasa attached, Akasa @ Front, Xilence Red Wing 120mm @ Rear
Memory 16 GB G.Skills 1600Mhz
Video Card(s) ATI ASUS Crossfire 5850
Storage Samsung 1Tb EcoGreen hard drive
Display(s) Hanngs-G 19"
Case Antec VSK 2000 Black Tower Case
Audio Device(s) Onkyo TX-SR309 Receiver, 2x Kef Cresta 1, 1x Kef Center 20c
Power Supply OCZ StealthXstream II 600w, 4x12v/18A, 80% efficiency.
Software Windows Vista X64
#44
Whatever you said is mostly/probably true. But you misunderstood what I meant about A64 days mistakes - AMD was rejoicing its once in a lifetime blow on P4, if they had continued more nails on further Intel lines then they would have got even more gain on the market share. It was like I win the race and thats it I did it, no, once you are on the front you need to keep yourself there, thats where AMD failed..


AMD has been outperforming Intel since before the A64 days, in fact since 2001 with the AMD Duron and Athlon XP.

I disagree, this isn't when AMD failed. Merely outperforming the competition isn't enough to gain market share, this is evident as AMD's performance lead was from 2001-2006 and it didn't much to benefit them. In 2006, my friends didn't know whom AMD was. You need to market your product and be able to supply it to a greater reach or audience which AMD are doing. Now in 2012 even my non technical friends have at least heard of AMD despite it's performance.


The truth is, if AMD wanted to release something that could outperform i7 they could do it at any point. It comes down to is it financially feasible as far as development, manufacturing, marketing etc?


I had a friend (he is no more now) who worked for Intel and he used to tell how efficient the whole process of making a CPU or chipset etc that Intel can build a brand new working prototype in days not years. You don't need 10000 minds to think, you only need few brains to think and make the rest work on those lines. Their prototyping methods and skills were top notch.


I am sure other companies have similar or better process. But with Intel's capacity, money and resources if they want they can produce a good GPU, heck they can now hire all the laid off brains from ATI (AMD), form a new division and create a new GPU line.
This part I agree with.

Both AMD and Intel can develop CPUs/GPUs/APUs very quickly. Maybe not days. But they've got enough backlog of research to put stuff together within a short period of time.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Jun 16, 2009
Messages
5,123 (1.65/day)
Likes
989
Location
North of Germany
System Name Heatbitch / The Dark Tower / Custom Acer
Processor AMD Phenom 2 X4 960T @ 4200mhz 1,44v,3130NB /Q9550 3.4ghz 1.20v/ X2 260 1.42v @3.6
Motherboard Asus M4A89GTD PRO / Asus Rampage Formula/Foxconn A7DA-S 3.0
Cooling Heatkiller 3.0 LT,Laing DDC+,Octakaideca-Rad /EK SP,Tt 400L, B.Ice XT2/Xiggy Black Knight
Memory 4x2gb Transcend 2400 CL10 1.65v: 1600 7-8-7-24-40 1.65 /Dominator 1066 2GB/Ripjaws 2000 CL9 4GB
Video Card(s) 6970, soon to be WCed/ 4870x2 HK Full Cover WC´d / 2xGeforce 8800GT HyperSLI
Storage 128gb Vertex 3, 32GB Ultradrive GX2, 320GB+500GB+2x1TB F1 /160gb Maxtor,500gb F1/ 160GB WD
Display(s) LG Flatron 23" W2353V /Benq 19" FP93E-S/TFT 17"
Case Thermaltake Shark /Superflower SF-860B/Acer m-ATX Tower
Audio Device(s) Realtek Onboard Sound, on all of them
Power Supply Corsair TX850/ OCZ Modxstream-Pro 600W/ MS-Tech 750w
Software XP 32bit Professional+ Win7 64Bit Ultimate
Benchmark Scores 3DMark Vantage: P21385 3DM11: P5920
#45
Joined
Apr 5, 2005
Messages
6,571 (1.42/day)
Likes
1,164
Location
Republic of Asia (a.k.a Irvine), CA
System Name Red Spy
Processor FX 8350 @ 4.35 Ghz with 1.28v
Motherboard Gigabyte 990FX-UD3 v4.0
Cooling TT Water 3.0 Performer + 2 x Cougar 120mm fan, 1 x 120mm Blue LED, 1 x 200 mm Red LED fan
Memory Kingston HyperX DDR3 1333 16GB
Video Card(s) Asus R9 290 OC @ GPU - 1050, MEM - 1300
Storage ADATA 128GB Sata III SSD for OS, WDC Black - 1TB Storage, OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD - Games
Display(s) AOC 23" 1080P LCD
Case AeroCool XPredator X3
Audio Device(s) Built-in Realtek
Power Supply Corsair HX1000 Modular
Software Windows 7 Ultimate 64 bit
Benchmark Scores BF4 with Mantle on Ultra settings gets around 60 FPS.
#46
Joined
Sep 12, 2010
Messages
13 (0.00/day)
Likes
1
#47
AMD sales are off but.....

It seems that AMD sales are off in first gen Llano and Bobcat. New gen Trinity and even Bulldozer shows growth. But the deficit is only 3.3 million units. Now, consider 5-6 million units for PS4 APU sales and the same for XBOX 720 or whatever sales add to that WiiU GPU sales and the outlook does not appear that gloomy.

The console design wins could generate $0.5 Billion easily.

Here are the numbers.
Xbox 360 to date 70 million units since 2005. = 10 million units per year. Oban APU
PS3 70.2 million since 2006 = 11.7 million units per year. A10 APU
Wii 97 million since 2006 = 13.8 million units per year. HD7000 gpu at $10 per this alone is $138 million.

Game consoles more than make up for any present short fall. Surprisingly all console makers are reporting growth in current sales.