• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

Arrow lake might be a gaming monster?

What do you think Arroe Lake performance improvement will be?

  • Regression - another Rocket Lake.

    Votes: 4 7.7%
  • 0-10% - nothing exciting

    Votes: 24 46.2%
  • 10%-15% - pretty good...

    Votes: 15 28.8%
  • 15%-20% - Another Alder Lake.

    Votes: 6 11.5%
  • 20%+ Core2 Duo all over again!

    Votes: 3 5.8%

  • Total voters
    52
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,690 (1.72/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Planet Espresso
Processor 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Here's why I think AL is shaping up to be a giant upgrade in terms of FPS:
  1. APO showed that there is double-digit performance gains when tweaking the e-core thread scheduling -- much more than just turning them off.
  2. HT-off generally improves framerates
  3. Reducing latency, or increasing ring throughput improves FPS.
AL is coming with:
  • Core designed with no HT +5%
  • Reduced latency (rearranged core configuration) +2-5%
  • Tweaked thread scheduler and faster e cores - +2-5%+? 10%?
Combine that with any general improvements to IMC and any overclocking headroom gained by running 100W less than the predecessor - the leaks are starting to look exciting (take with a shovel of salt):
Jaykihn on X: "Preliminary Arrow Lake -S QS 250W Benchmarks. ARL-S ES2 and 8+16 Raptor Lake -S SKUs for comparison. https://t.co/aDSqJOcbqO" / X

Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" CPU Blazes Past Core i9-14900KS & Ryzen 9 9950X In Benchmark Leak (wccftech.com)

What do you guys think?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,843 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
I'm gonna say we will be lucky if it's 10-15% vs the 14900k.

There are still a lot of unknown how's the memory controller how much is the 4-500mhz clocks gonna negatively impact gaming. How conservative will power limits/voltage be given what happened to Raptorlake.

MT/ST didn't look much better than the 9950X in the current leak and we all know how that games although windows might be the culprit for that to some degree.

Depending on the reviewers game suit it would need to be 6-8% faster to outright beat the 7800X3D on overage so is another 6-7% on top of that exciting other than for fanboys to say a 600 usd (guessing) proccesor beat an old 350 usd ish one.....

I'm gonna be pessimist until reviews hit lol.
 
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,476 (1.84/day)
Location
Thessaloniki, Greece
System Name PC on since Aug 2019, 1st CPU R5 3600 + ASUS ROG RX580 8GB >> MSI Gaming X RX5700XT (Jan 2020)
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X (July 2022), 220W PPT limit, 80C temp limit, CO -6-14, +50MHz (up to 5.0GHz)
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro (Rev1.0), BIOS F39b, AGESA V2 1.2.0.C
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420mm Rev7 (Jan 2024) with off-center mount for Ryzen, TIM: Kryonaut
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo GTZN (July 2022) 3667MT/s 1.42V CL16-16-16-16-32-48 1T, tRFC:280, B-die
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900XTX (Dec 2023) 314~467W (375W current) PowerLimit, 1060mV, Adrenalin v24.10.1
Storage Samsung NVMe: 980Pro 1TB(OS 2022), 970Pro 512GB(2019) / SATA-III: 850Pro 1TB(2015) 860Evo 1TB(2020)
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW3423DW 34" QD-OLED curved (1800R), 3440x1440 144Hz (max 175Hz) HDR400/1000, VRR on
Case None... naked on desk
Audio Device(s) Astro A50 headset
Power Supply Corsair HX750i, ATX v2.4, 80+ Platinum, 93% (250~700W), modular, single/dual rail (switch)
Mouse Logitech MX Master (Gen1)
Keyboard Logitech G15 (Gen2) w/ LCDSirReal applet
Software Windows 11 Home 64bit (v24H2, OSBuild 26100.2161), upgraded from Win10 to Win11 on Jan 2024
Is ArrowLake going to be fab on a better node than 13/14th?
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,843 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Is ArrowLake going to be fab on a better node than 13/14th?

Yes, quite a bit better from my understanding but they did have issues with it with meteor lake clock and power limitations seemingly why it was canceled for desktop and we got Raptorlake refresh instead.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,690 (1.72/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Planet Espresso
Processor 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,843 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
rumor is N3B for the 9 7 and 20A for the 5

Most recent one I seen was it was still 20A for the i9 The reason people seemed confused is because the igpu uses N3B is my guess.... Could be wrong though I guess we will see soon.


This should be interesting....

"Arrow Lake" features the same "Lion Cove" P-cores and "Skymont" E-cores as "Lunar Lake," but connected differently. In "Lunar Lake," the P-core complex sits on its own tiny ringbus with an exclusive L3 cache; with the E-core clusters being separated into low-power islands. The two core types talk to each other over the chip's high bandwidth fabric





Intel is using the same Intel 4 foundry node for "Arrow Lake-S" as the compute tile of its "Meteor Lake" processor. Intel 4 offers power efficiency and performance comparable to 4 nm nodes from TSMC, although it is physically a 7 nm node. Likewise, the Intel 3 node is physically 5 nm. If you recall, the main logic tile of "Lunar Lake" is being built on the TSMC N3P (3 nm) node. This means that Intel is really gunning for performance/Watt with "Lunar Lake," to get as close to the Apple M3 Pro as possible.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Sep 3, 2019
Messages
3,476 (1.84/day)
Location
Thessaloniki, Greece
System Name PC on since Aug 2019, 1st CPU R5 3600 + ASUS ROG RX580 8GB >> MSI Gaming X RX5700XT (Jan 2020)
Processor Ryzen 9 5900X (July 2022), 220W PPT limit, 80C temp limit, CO -6-14, +50MHz (up to 5.0GHz)
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Pro (Rev1.0), BIOS F39b, AGESA V2 1.2.0.C
Cooling Arctic Liquid Freezer II 420mm Rev7 (Jan 2024) with off-center mount for Ryzen, TIM: Kryonaut
Memory 2x16GB G.Skill Trident Z Neo GTZN (July 2022) 3667MT/s 1.42V CL16-16-16-16-32-48 1T, tRFC:280, B-die
Video Card(s) Sapphire Nitro+ RX 7900XTX (Dec 2023) 314~467W (375W current) PowerLimit, 1060mV, Adrenalin v24.10.1
Storage Samsung NVMe: 980Pro 1TB(OS 2022), 970Pro 512GB(2019) / SATA-III: 850Pro 1TB(2015) 860Evo 1TB(2020)
Display(s) Dell Alienware AW3423DW 34" QD-OLED curved (1800R), 3440x1440 144Hz (max 175Hz) HDR400/1000, VRR on
Case None... naked on desk
Audio Device(s) Astro A50 headset
Power Supply Corsair HX750i, ATX v2.4, 80+ Platinum, 93% (250~700W), modular, single/dual rail (switch)
Mouse Logitech MX Master (Gen1)
Keyboard Logitech G15 (Gen2) w/ LCDSirReal applet
Software Windows 11 Home 64bit (v24H2, OSBuild 26100.2161), upgraded from Win10 to Win11 on Jan 2024
Can we compare those with any of TSMCs nodes?

I’m asking because I see a 300MHz regression in clocks (5.7GHz max single?). How different will be the all core?

Are they playing it safe?

I understand that better node doesn’t always mean higher clocks.

Allegedly this gen will be more efficient. As it should, always welcomed!
How much of the efficiency is on the clock regression and how much on fab I wonder.
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2018
Messages
6,843 (3.04/day)
Location
California
System Name His & Hers
Processor R7 5800X/ R7 7950X3D Stock
Motherboard X670E Aorus Pro X/ROG Crosshair VIII Hero
Cooling Corsair h150 elite/ Corsair h115i Platinum
Memory Trident Z5 Neo 6000/ 32 GB 3200 CL14 @3800 CL16 Team T Force Nighthawk
Video Card(s) Evga FTW 3 Ultra 3080ti/ Gigabyte Gaming OC 4090
Storage lots of SSD.
Display(s) A whole bunch OLED, VA, IPS.....
Case 011 Dynamic XL/ Phanteks Evolv X
Audio Device(s) Arctis Pro + gaming Dac/ Corsair sp 2500/ Logitech G560/Samsung Q990B
Power Supply Seasonic Ultra Prime Titanium 1000w/850w
Mouse Logitech G502 Lightspeed/ Logitech G Pro Hero.
Keyboard Logitech - G915 LIGHTSPEED / Logitech G Pro
Can we compare those with any of TSMCs nodes?

I’m asking because I see a 300MHz regression in clocks (5.7GHz max single?). How different will be the all core?

Are they playing it safe?

I understand that better node doesn’t always mean higher clocks.

Allegedly this gen will be more efficient. As it should, always welcomed!
How much of the efficiency is on the clock regression and how much on fab I wonder.

if you look at the die and how the tiles are laid out it looks both expensive and complicated to make is my guess on why clocks are going down.

I posted above what proccess node it's similar to TSMC4 above I think Raptor lake was on something similar to TSMC 7 could be wrong though don't really keep track of all that just care how they perform lol.

Raptor Lake/ Arrow Lake

WjY3NZnIcrHHBQu9.jpgqABwItrhXxDyakyb.jpg
 
Joined
Sep 10, 2024
Messages
63 (1.11/day)
Location
Greece
Processor i7 7700K
Motherboard ROG STRIX Z270F GAMING
Cooling CRYORIG H7
Memory CORSAIR VENGEANCE LPX 2400 MHz Cl14 64GB
Video Card(s) GTX 1080 MSI GAMING X (8GGB)
Storage SAMSUNG 970 EVO 1TB
Display(s) LG 4K 60hz 24"
Case COOLERMASTER CM 590 III
Audio Device(s) CREATIVE SOUNDBLASTER X AE-5 + EDIFIER 1700BT
Power Supply SUPERFLOWER GOLDEN GREEN HX 750 WATT 80+ GOLD
Mouse LOGITECH TRACKMAN MARBLE
Keyboard OLD MICROSOFT WIRED
Software WINDOWS 11 HOME
It have to be 10-15% better at least,or else goodbye Intel :(
 

las

Joined
Nov 14, 2012
Messages
1,693 (0.39/day)
System Name Meh
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI X670E Tomahawk
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit
Memory 32GB G.Skill @ 6000/CL30
Video Card(s) Gainward RTX 4090 Phantom / Undervolt + OC
Storage Samsung 990 Pro 2TB + WD SN850X 1TB + 64TB NAS/Server
Display(s) 27" 1440p IPS @ 360 Hz + 32" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 240 Hz + 77" 4K/UHD QD-OLED @ 144 Hz VRR
Case Fractal Design North XL
Audio Device(s) FiiO DAC
Power Supply Corsair RM1000x / Native 12VHPWR
Mouse Logitech G Pro Wireless Superlight + Razer Deathadder V3 Pro
Keyboard Corsair K60 Pro / MX Low Profile Speed
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
Intel with node advantage in TSMC 3N, I expect good things and much lower power draw.

Intel did not struggle with performance, but with power usage. Should be fixed with Lunar Lake and Arrow Lake and then 18A is ready for 2025+

10-15% with much lower power usage seems good to me. Especially after AMDs Zen 5 fckup and rebranded chipsets (but somehow still delayed motherboards).

Intel will have K models and Z890 motherboards ready on launch day. Thats how you do a proper CPU launch. Take note AMD.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
4,559 (0.93/day)
Location
in a van down by the river
Processor faster at instructions than yours
Motherboard more nurturing than yours
Cooling frostier than yours
Memory superior scheduling & haphazardly entry than yours
Video Card(s) better rasterization than yours
Storage more ample than yours
Display(s) increased pixels than yours
Case fancier than yours
Audio Device(s) further audible than yours
Power Supply additional amps x volts than yours
Mouse without as much gnawing as yours
Keyboard less clicky than yours
VR HMD not as odd looking as yours
Software extra mushier than yours
Benchmark Scores up yours

Ruru

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
12,604 (2.90/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name 4K-gaming
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ PBO +200 -20CO
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Arctic Freezer 50, EKWB Vector TUF
Memory 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury DDR4-3466
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX 3080 TUF OC 10GB
Storage A pack of SSDs totaling 3.2TB + 3TB HDDs
Display(s) 27" 4K120 IPS + 32" 4K60 IPS + 24" 1080p60
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow White
Audio Device(s) Asus TUF H3 Wireless / Corsair HS35
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech MX518 + Asus ROG Strix Edge Nordic
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores It runs Crysis
The most important thing is that will people even get these after the 13/14th gen fiasco. At least I'm staying with AMD now and in the future.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
4,559 (0.93/day)
Location
in a van down by the river
Processor faster at instructions than yours
Motherboard more nurturing than yours
Cooling frostier than yours
Memory superior scheduling & haphazardly entry than yours
Video Card(s) better rasterization than yours
Storage more ample than yours
Display(s) increased pixels than yours
Case fancier than yours
Audio Device(s) further audible than yours
Power Supply additional amps x volts than yours
Mouse without as much gnawing as yours
Keyboard less clicky than yours
VR HMD not as odd looking as yours
Software extra mushier than yours
Benchmark Scores up yours
At least I'm staying with AMD now and in the future.
why? I understand not getting a 13/14th but has AMD made some sort of promise to you that they will offer more performance & less issues than Intel for less money or your money back? If so can other people sign up for this?
 
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
6,020 (2.89/day)
Location
Poland
Processor Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Motherboard Gigabyte X570 Aorus Elite
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit 120 SE
Memory 2x16 GB Crucial Ballistix 3600 CL16 Rev E @ 3800 CL16
Video Card(s) RTX3080 Ti FE
Storage SX8200 Pro 1 TB, Plextor M6Pro 256 GB, WD Blue 2TB
Display(s) LG 34GN850P-B
Case SilverStone Primera PM01 RGB
Audio Device(s) SoundBlaster G6 | Fidelio X2 | Sennheiser 6XX
Power Supply SeaSonic Focus Plus Gold 750W
Mouse Endgame Gear XM1R
Keyboard Wooting Two HE
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,690 (1.72/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Planet Espresso
Processor 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.

Ruru

S.T.A.R.S.
Joined
Dec 16, 2012
Messages
12,604 (2.90/day)
Location
Jyväskylä, Finland
System Name 4K-gaming
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 5800X @ PBO +200 -20CO
Motherboard Asus ROG Crosshair VII Hero
Cooling Arctic Freezer 50, EKWB Vector TUF
Memory 32GB Kingston HyperX Fury DDR4-3466
Video Card(s) Asus GeForce RTX 3080 TUF OC 10GB
Storage A pack of SSDs totaling 3.2TB + 3TB HDDs
Display(s) 27" 4K120 IPS + 32" 4K60 IPS + 24" 1080p60
Case Corsair 4000D Airflow White
Audio Device(s) Asus TUF H3 Wireless / Corsair HS35
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Logitech MX518 + Asus ROG Strix Edge Nordic
Keyboard Roccat Vulcan 121 AIMO
VR HMD Oculus Rift CV1
Software Windows 11 Pro
Benchmark Scores It runs Crysis
why? I understand not getting a 13/14th but has AMD made some sort of promise to you that they will offer more performance & less issues than Intel for less money or your money back? If so can other people sign up for this?
No reason to upgrade now, and if Zen will continue improving like it's done every time, I don't see a reason to change. Also I'm interested that will Intel continue to consume as much power as HEDT chips did back in the day.
 
Joined
May 13, 2022
Messages
140 (0.15/day)
System Name Main PC
Processor I5 12400F
Motherboard MAG B660M MORTAR WIFI
Cooling Noctua NH-U12S
Memory Corsair Vengenance LPX 2x8 GB DDR4 3000 MHZ C16
Video Card(s) EVGA RTX 2060 KO
Storage WD SN550 500GB M.2-2280 (Main drive)/ Crucial MX500 500 GB 2.5" SSD/ SanDisk Ultra 2 TB 2.5" SSD
Display(s) Main: AOC C24G1 24.0" 1920 x 1080 144 Hz 1ms, 2nd: AOC 24B2XH 23.8" 1920 x 1080 75 Hz
Case Fractal Design Pop Air
Audio Device(s) Razer Kraken 7.1
Power Supply Be quiet System Power 9 500 CM 500 W 80+ Bronze Semi-modular
Mouse Razer Deathadder Chroma
Keyboard Corsair strafe (Cherry MX Silent)
Software Windows 10
The most important thing is that will people even get these after the 13/14th gen fiasco. At least I'm staying with AMD now and in the future.
It's going to be take a while for Intel to regain trust yet again. Their handling of that fiasco left a sour taste in my mouth to the point that unless Arrow Lake shows absolute reliablilty, i'll still be avoiding and be recommending against Intel.
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
4,559 (0.93/day)
Location
in a van down by the river
Processor faster at instructions than yours
Motherboard more nurturing than yours
Cooling frostier than yours
Memory superior scheduling & haphazardly entry than yours
Video Card(s) better rasterization than yours
Storage more ample than yours
Display(s) increased pixels than yours
Case fancier than yours
Audio Device(s) further audible than yours
Power Supply additional amps x volts than yours
Mouse without as much gnawing as yours
Keyboard less clicky than yours
VR HMD not as odd looking as yours
Software extra mushier than yours
Benchmark Scores up yours
So a CPU that bottlenecks the GPU is a gaming monster in your definition?
no but when you can get an avg 100 FPS across a modern 21 game suite from a five year mid level CPU than the CPU is not what's preventing anyone from achieving high FPS in PC gaming.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,690 (1.72/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Planet Espresso
Processor 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
no but when you can get an avg 100 FPS across a modern 21 game suite from a five year mid level CPU than the CPU is not what's preventing anyone from achieving high FPS in PC gaming.
But why would we want 100 fps... if we can have 200-500 fps with fewer stutters?

I can game on my old 6700K and get an average of 60 fps... but that feels like crap and limits my enjoyment of said game compared to the 180 FPS i would otherwise get.
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2023
Messages
2,180 (6.32/day)
System Name The Workhorse
Processor AMD Ryzen R9 5900X
Motherboard Gigabyte Aorus B550 Pro
Cooling CPU - Noctua NH-D15S Case - 3 Noctua NF-A14 PWM at the bottom, 2 Fractal Design 180mm at the front
Memory GSkill Trident Z 3200CL14
Video Card(s) NVidia GTX 1070 MSI QuickSilver
Storage Adata SX8200Pro
Display(s) LG 32GK850G
Case Fractal Design Torrent (Solid)
Audio Device(s) FiiO E-10K DAC/Amp, Samson Meteorite USB Microphone
Power Supply Corsair RMx850 (2018)
Mouse Razer Viper (Original) on a X-Raypad Equate Plus V2
Keyboard Cooler Master QuickFire Rapid TKL keyboard (Cherry MX Black)
Software Windows 11 Pro (23H2)
But why would we want 100 fps... if we can have 200-500 fps?
…because diminishing returns? That’s kinda how frame times work by default. For slower single-player games going past 120 is barely relevant and even sweaty MP shooters approach the limit of human reaction at 240, especially taking into consideration that playing online will always have inherent delay. The ridiculous 500+ framerates are only barely relevant for e-sports pros playing CS at LANs. And even there it’s questionable.
 
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
22,325 (6.03/day)
Location
The Washing Machine
Processor 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI MAG Mortar b650m wifi
Cooling Thermalright Peerless Assassin
Memory 32GB Corsair Vengeance 30CL6000
Video Card(s) ASRock RX7900XT Phantom Gaming
Storage Lexar NM790 4TB + Samsung 850 EVO 1TB + Samsung 980 1TB + Crucial BX100 250GB
Display(s) Gigabyte G34QWC (3440x1440)
Case Lian Li A3 mATX White
Audio Device(s) Harman Kardon AVR137 + 2.1
Power Supply EVGA Supernova G2 750W
Mouse Steelseries Aerox 5
Keyboard Lenovo Thinkpad Trackpoint II
Software W11 IoT Enterprise LTSC
Benchmark Scores Over 9000
I'm not seeing the supposed big changes in Arrow Lake. Its still an Intel design/core/the basics haven't changed much. They're doing samey things but 'faster & more'. We've seen this before, some dozen iterations of it. The Intel procs already gamed 'faster' because of E cores but the real bottleneck is in feeding the CPU faster, its not just a latency thing, but a capacity thing. I'm not seeing a huge amount of cache, so I'm just simply not convinced there are going to be meaningful shifts in gaming performance. I'm sure 180 FPS can rise to 200. But that's hardly relevant performance. I care about 40 FPS rising to 70, as the X3D's tend to make happen in the gaming workloads that historically struggled on CPUs everywhere. E cores won't do jack shit for a heavy sequential load.

But why would we want 100 fps... if we can have 200-500 fps with fewer stutters?

I can game on my old 6700K and get an average of 60 fps... but that feels like crap and limits my enjoyment of said game compared to the 180 FPS i would otherwise get.
I'll take stable framerates over excessively high ones that fluctuate heavily, any day of the week tbh. Beyond 100-120 its whateverland anyway, diminishing returns kick in hard.
 
Joined
Jul 26, 2024
Messages
12 (0.12/day)
System Name Karen
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 7800X3D
Motherboard MSI Mag X670E Tomahawk WiFi
Cooling Thermalright PS120SE
Video Card(s) Gigabyte RTX 3080 Gaming OC 10G
Storage Yes
Case Corsair 4000D
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
But why would we want 100 fps... if we can have 200-500 fps with fewer stutters?

I can game on my old 6700K and get an average of 60 fps... but that feels like crap and limits my enjoyment of said game compared to the 180 FPS i would otherwise get.
I'm with dirtyferret on this: reaching triple digit frames is an achievement in itself. Are other bigger CPU monsters? Hell yes! But that doesn't mean that a R5 3600, not bottlenecked by the GPU, can give you a very smoooth experience in almost every modern games. And that gives it the title of "gaming monster".
 
Joined
Jun 1, 2011
Messages
4,559 (0.93/day)
Location
in a van down by the river
Processor faster at instructions than yours
Motherboard more nurturing than yours
Cooling frostier than yours
Memory superior scheduling & haphazardly entry than yours
Video Card(s) better rasterization than yours
Storage more ample than yours
Display(s) increased pixels than yours
Case fancier than yours
Audio Device(s) further audible than yours
Power Supply additional amps x volts than yours
Mouse without as much gnawing as yours
Keyboard less clicky than yours
VR HMD not as odd looking as yours
Software extra mushier than yours
Benchmark Scores up yours
Except you would be getting 180 fps with less stutter with a 7600x3d, for example. I like to game at 200fps when I can — it feels great.

ut why would we want 100 fps... if we can have 200-500 fps with fewer stutters?
great, knock yourself out. No one said don't go for it but rather modern CPU performance is not a major player in holding back good FPS across game suites
 
Joined
Aug 29, 2009
Messages
72 (0.01/day)
Location
southern ontario
Processor Intel 6700K
Motherboard GIGABYTE Z170 Gamming 7
Cooling Corsaid H115i
Memory G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 32GB F4-2800C15Q-32GVR
Video Card(s) MSI GTX 970
Storage Samsung 950 pro 312 gb
Display(s) 24" Benq FP241W
Case Corsair 750D
Power Supply EVGA 750 G2
Mouse Corsair M65 pro
Keyboard Corsair K70
Software W10 64 bit premium
There is a lot of pre release hype right now .You can show me benchmarks and all the new stuff making it run but in the end its all hype till real people get a hold of them and test the hell out of them, Remember how all this hype turned out for AMD. Right now all I will say is it could be a flop or it could really give Intel a kick in a good way if it turns out well enough. Who knows ? Right now I'm just waiting for the NDA,s to run out within the next 6 weeks or so.
.
 
Joined
Nov 13, 2007
Messages
10,690 (1.72/day)
Location
Austin Texas
System Name Planet Espresso
Processor 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap
Motherboard MSI 690-I PRO
Cooling Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO
Memory 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36
Video Card(s) RTX 4090 FE
Storage 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X
Display(s) Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED
Case Jonsbo Z20
Audio Device(s) Yes
Power Supply Corsair SF750
Mouse Xlite V2
Keyboard 65% HE Keyboard
Software Windows 11
Benchmark Scores They're pretty good, nothing crazy.
I'm not seeing the supposed big changes in Arrow Lake. Its still an Intel design/core/the basics haven't changed much. They're doing samey things but 'faster & more'. We've seen this before, some dozen iterations of it. The Intel procs already gamed 'faster' because of E cores but the real bottleneck is in feeding the CPU faster, its not just a latency thing, but a capacity thing. I'm not seeing a huge amount of cache, so I'm just simply not convinced there are going to be meaningful shifts in gaming performance. I'm sure 180 FPS can rise to 200. But that's hardly relevant performance. I care about 40 FPS rising to 70, as the X3D's tend to make happen in the gaming workloads that historically struggled on CPUs everywhere. E cores won't do jack shit for a heavy sequential load.


I'll take stable framerates over excessively high ones that fluctuate heavily, any day of the week tbh. Beyond 100-120 its whateverland anyway, diminishing returns kick in hard.

I'm with dirtyferret on this: reaching triple digit frames is an achievement in itself. Are other bigger CPU monsters? Hell yes! But that doesn't mean that a R5 3600, not bottlenecked by the GPU, can give you a very smoooth experience in almost every modern games. And that gives it the title of "gaming monster".
You guys need to actually game on a 3600 -- i've done it back in the day - it was just 'fine' - and the framerates were not very stable, lots of stutters.

Looking at an averages graph thats skewed by CS:GO and F1 2021 does not really paint the picture of the experience.
 
Top