- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 10,691 (1.72/day)
- Location
- Austin Texas
System Name | Planet Espresso |
---|---|
Processor | 13700KF @ 5.5GHZ 1.285v - 235W cap |
Motherboard | MSI 690-I PRO |
Cooling | Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO |
Memory | 48 GB DDR5 7600 MHZ CL36 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 FE |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X |
Display(s) | Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED |
Case | Jonsbo Z20 |
Audio Device(s) | Yes |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 |
Mouse | Xlite V2 |
Keyboard | 65% HE Keyboard |
Software | Windows 11 |
Benchmark Scores | They're pretty good, nothing crazy. |
Here's why I think AL is shaping up to be a giant upgrade in terms of FPS:
Jaykihn on X: "Preliminary Arrow Lake -S QS 250W Benchmarks. ARL-S ES2 and 8+16 Raptor Lake -S SKUs for comparison. https://t.co/aDSqJOcbqO" / X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" CPU Blazes Past Core i9-14900KS & Ryzen 9 9950X In Benchmark Leak (wccftech.com)
What do you guys think?
- APO showed that there is double-digit performance gains when tweaking the e-core thread scheduling -- much more than just turning them off.
- HT-off generally improves framerates
- Reducing latency, or increasing ring throughput improves FPS.
- Core designed with no HT +5%
- Reduced latency (rearranged core configuration) +2-5%
- Tweaked thread scheduler and faster e cores - +2-5%+? 10%?
Jaykihn on X: "Preliminary Arrow Lake -S QS 250W Benchmarks. ARL-S ES2 and 8+16 Raptor Lake -S SKUs for comparison. https://t.co/aDSqJOcbqO" / X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" CPU Blazes Past Core i9-14900KS & Ryzen 9 9950X In Benchmark Leak (wccftech.com)
What do you guys think?
Last edited: