- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 10,804 (1.73/day)
- Location
- Austin Texas
System Name | stress-less |
---|---|
Processor | 9800X3D @ 5.42GHZ |
Motherboard | MSI PRO B650M-A Wifi |
Cooling | Thermalright Phantom Spirit EVO |
Memory | 64GB DDR5 6400 1:1 CL30-36-36-76 FCLK 2200 |
Video Card(s) | RTX 4090 FE |
Storage | 2TB WD SN850, 4TB WD SN850X |
Display(s) | Alienware 32" 4k 240hz OLED |
Case | Jonsbo Z20 |
Audio Device(s) | Yes |
Power Supply | Corsair SF750 |
Mouse | DeathadderV2 X Hyperspeed |
Keyboard | 65% HE Keyboard |
Software | Windows 11 |
Benchmark Scores | They're pretty good, nothing crazy. |
Here's why I think AL is shaping up to be a giant upgrade in terms of FPS:
Jaykihn on X: "Preliminary Arrow Lake -S QS 250W Benchmarks. ARL-S ES2 and 8+16 Raptor Lake -S SKUs for comparison. https://t.co/aDSqJOcbqO" / X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" CPU Blazes Past Core i9-14900KS & Ryzen 9 9950X In Benchmark Leak (wccftech.com)
What do you guys think?
- APO showed that there is double-digit performance gains when tweaking the e-core thread scheduling -- much more than just turning them off.
- HT-off generally improves framerates
- Reducing latency, or increasing ring throughput improves FPS.
- Core designed with no HT +5%
- Reduced latency (rearranged core configuration) +2-5%
- Tweaked thread scheduler and faster e cores - +2-5%+? 10%?
Jaykihn on X: "Preliminary Arrow Lake -S QS 250W Benchmarks. ARL-S ES2 and 8+16 Raptor Lake -S SKUs for comparison. https://t.co/aDSqJOcbqO" / X
Intel Core Ultra 9 285K "Arrow Lake" CPU Blazes Past Core i9-14900KS & Ryzen 9 9950X In Benchmark Leak (wccftech.com)
What do you guys think?
Last edited: