• Welcome to TechPowerUp Forums, Guest! Please check out our forum guidelines for info related to our community.

ASRock FM2A85X Extreme 6

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#1
Looking at overclocking your new AMD FM2 APU to the max? Just want to build a light-budget gaming rig with a ton of features? The ASRock FM2A85X Extreme6 is ready for both. It is ASRock's top AMD A85 chipset offering, packed full of features, including one or two no other FM2 board provides.

Show full review
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,240 (0.49/day)
Likes
503
#2
Thank you for the review.


ps.: Just curious: why is the post from Nov. 2012 ? Is it just the date of the template post?
 
Joined
Dec 6, 2005
Messages
9,950 (2.25/day)
Likes
3,908
Location
Manchester, NH
System Name Working on it ;)
Processor I7-4790K
Motherboard MSI Z97 U3 Plus
Cooling Be Quiet Pure Rock Air
Memory 16GB 4x4 G.Skill CAS9 2133 Sniper
Video Card(s) Power Color RD Vega 64 Reference
Storage Samsung EVO 500GB / 8 Different WDs / NAS with 2x2Tb WD Black
Display(s) 34" LG 34CB88-P 21:9 Curved UltraWide QHD (3440*1440)
Case Rosewill Challenger
Audio Device(s) Onboard + HD HDMI
Power Supply Corsair HX750 (love it)
Mouse Logitech G5
Keyboard Logitech G710 Blue / G610 Orion Red
Software Win 7 Pro
#3
With very good performance and a lot of features, this board seems like a steal at $90

ps.: Just curious: why is the post from Nov. 2012 ? Is it just the date of the template post?
Yea, that's odd.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,413 (5.50/day)
Likes
10,547
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#4
You'd have issues with the clips found on SATA 6 Gb/s-rated cabling had it been the right way up, so it is, while it may look a bit odd, clearly that way for a reason.
It is little things like this that ASRock is great at doing. They really do pay attention to the little details.

It is also nice to see the FM2 processors getting some high end board attention. This platform might be a budget minded platform, but that doesn't mean that people won't be building higher end rigs with it. And as an enthusiast I love to tinker with everything, I actually prefer tinkering with budget minded platforms more so than high-end stuff. But it is the worst when your ability to tinker is limited by the motherboard. I'm glad we have ASRock to provide a true high end board for the FM2 processors!

Power drawn was also very similar from the wall, although the FM1 ASRock board pulled, again, a bit more, but it also provides more functionality, so everything seems to be in order.
Just a little typo I noticed, I think you meant the FM2 ASRock board.

ps.: Just curious: why is the post from Nov. 2012 ? Is it just the date of the template post?
My guess is that is when he started writing up the review. But with the PSU issues, and needing to ask ASRock for another board and send everything off to ASRock, it probably took a little longer to finish.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#5
Thank you for the review.


ps.: Just curious: why is the post from Nov. 2012 ? Is it just the date of the template post?
That was when I began working on this review. As mentioned in the review, due to a PSU issue, I requested a second board when I encountered problems, and the second board came direct from Taiwan(as do most of my samples, since I typically get them before the product launches). It has the same problem, so I then sent both boards, my APU, and my PSU to ASRock in Taiwan for testing, and then had to wait for it to be tested and then returned before I could do my review testing. Of course, all of this took time.


This PSU issue, and a few other, possibly related hardware issues, are why I haven't been posting many reviews lately. It's not a shortage of samples...I've got a tonne sitting here. Diagnosing problems properly takes time. I contacted ASRock on this issue about the PSU issue, they wanted to verify to be sure, so I sent them the stuff. They confirmed the issue, of course, which also prompted me to do other testing with other products for research into what exactly went wrong.


I'll talk more about other issues I found with other products in the coming weeks, as the opportunity presents itself.

;)


:rockout:
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#7
Heh, that's a lot of time, it's nice that you finished it after all. Looking forward to hear more about the PSU issue. Thanks again.
Sometimes reviews take many months to complete. Sometimes due to myself, sometimes the product maker would rather the product wait. I do aim for completing a review every week, if not more, but at the same time, I don't rush stuff, and make sure I'm confident on what I am reporting.

I often get many products at once, saves the company on shipping at least. The Gigabyte Z77N-WiFi, they sent to me in September, and I got like 5 boards from Gigabyte within a week. All of those are done now.

I have four other products that have been waiting for months, a few memory kits, and a HTPC. HTPC was been waiting for other relevant hardware, and will be done very soon, two of those memory kits were bad, and at the same time, the PSU out of memory testing rig, that Antec, obviously had issues, and my memory testing platform is now dead and needs replacing...which means I got to re-bench a whole bunch of memory kits to get numbers for that one review. :p

Doing reviews isn't all fun and games, unfortunately. :p When you get products before they hit retail, you tend to run into bugs here and there. Boards are one of the most problematic, evidenced by BIOS updates for board being put out many many months after a launch.

I have three more ASRock boards here, one is doing a 72-hour Burn-in testing right now, another will get started Friday, and in the meantime, I'm editing pictures and making graphs for next week's review. I usually have three or four reviews on the go at once. Oh, and I'm doing memory testing as well, well, at least, I will be working more on that later today. :p


EDIT: Oh yeah, one of my test rig cards died too, just got the email that it has arrived at the vendor...for the second time in two months. :p I've had a lot of funky hardware lately, and perhaps all due to this PSU...thankfully Seasonic stepped up to the plate and gave me a new one! ;)
 
Last edited:
Joined
Feb 18, 2011
Messages
1,240 (0.49/day)
Likes
503
#8
Sometimes reviews take many months to complete. Sometimes due to myself, sometimes the product maker would rather the product wait. I do aim for completing a review every week, if not more, but at the same time, I don't rush stuff, and make sure I'm confident on what I am reporting.

I often get many products at once, saves the company on shipping at least. The Gigabyte Z77N-WiFi, they sent to me in September, and I got like 5 boards from Gigabyte within a week. All of those are done now.

I have four other products that have been waiting for months, a few memory kits, and a HTPC. HTPC was been waiting for other relevant hardware, and will be done very soon, two of those memory kits were bad, and at the same time, the PSU out of memory testing rig, that Antec, obviously had issues, and my memory testing platform is now dead and needs replacing...which means I got to re-bench a whole bunch of memory kits to get numbers for that one review. :p

Doing reviews isn't all fun and games, unfortunately. :p When you get products before they hit retail, you tend to run into bugs here and there. Boards are one of the most problematic, evidenced by BIOS updates for board being put out many many months after a launch.

I have three more ASRock boards here, one is doing a 72-hour Burn-in testing right now, another will get started Friday, and in the meantime, I'm editing pictures and making graphs for next week's review. I usually have three or four reviews on the go at once. Oh, and I'm doing memory testing as well, well, at least, I will be working more on that later today. :p
Yes, I know very well that testing computer hardware is nothing like a simple "walk in the park", it never was. :toast:

Thanks for all the hard work well done:)
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,425 (5.78/day)
Likes
8,941
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2400 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#9
Hard to beat for the price. Bustin' nuts review as always man.
 

eidairaman1

The Exiled Airman
Joined
Jul 2, 2007
Messages
19,714 (5.12/day)
Likes
5,130
System Name PCGOD
Processor AMD FX 8350@ 5.0GHz
Motherboard Asus TUF 990FX Sabertooth R2 2901 Bios
Cooling Scythe Ashura, 2×BitFenix 230mm Spectre Pro LED (Blue,Green), 2x BitFenix 140mm Spectre Pro LED
Memory 16 GB Gskill Ripjaws X 2133 (2400 OC, 10-10-12-20-20, 1T, 1.65V)
Video Card(s) AMD Radeon 290 Sapphire Vapor-X
Storage Samsung 840 Pro 256GB, WD Velociraptor 1TB
Display(s) NEC Multisync LCD 1700V (Display Port Adapter)
Case AeroCool Xpredator Evil Blue Edition
Audio Device(s) Creative Labs Sound Blaster ZxR
Power Supply Seasonic 1250 XM2 Series (XP3)
Mouse Roccat Kone XTD
Keyboard Roccat Ryos MK Pro
Software Windows 7 Pro 64
#10
wow an almost perfect 10, Ever since reading reviews of Asrock past 2010 they been kicking ass and then taking names down and putting notches in their gun belts.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
144 (0.05/day)
Likes
29
Location
Houston, TX
System Name 2600k
Processor i7 2600K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-V PRO
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE_BK
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 760 OC
Storage 120GB Agility 3/2TB WD Caviar Black x 2/Intel 311 (Cache Drive)
Display(s) Dell S2340M
Case Lian Li PC-8FIR (Silver)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium Fata1ity
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro M 1000W
Software Win 7 Pro x64 SP1
Benchmark Scores Logitech G500 | Razer Lycosa Mirror | Logitech Z-5300
#11
Performance is, obviously, quite different between platforms. There's not much I can say about individual board performance yet, but I will definitely be able to say which board is doing better where within a couple weeks, since I am already in the process of testing a few more boards.
I've only played with a few ASRock motherboards but I've noticed one thing they do that ASUS and Gigabyte don't do. If you set the FSB to 100 in the BIOS then it's 100. With ASUS and Gigabyte it's usually higher than 100, hence why there's a little variance when testing motherboards.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,413 (5.50/day)
Likes
10,547
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#12
I've only played with a few ASRock motherboards but I've noticed one thing they do that ASUS and Gigabyte don't do. If you set the FSB to 100 in the BIOS then it's 100. With ASUS and Gigabyte it's usually higher than 100, hence why there's a little variance when testing motherboards.
It would seem this board is 99.8 when set to 100...

All board, including every ASRock I've ever used, has a slight variance in the FSB from where it is set.
 
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
144 (0.05/day)
Likes
29
Location
Houston, TX
System Name 2600k
Processor i7 2600K
Motherboard ASUS P8Z77-V PRO
Cooling Phanteks PH-TC14PE_BK
Memory 16GB
Video Card(s) ASUS GTX 760 OC
Storage 120GB Agility 3/2TB WD Caviar Black x 2/Intel 311 (Cache Drive)
Display(s) Dell S2340M
Case Lian Li PC-8FIR (Silver)
Audio Device(s) X-Fi Titanium Fata1ity
Power Supply Cooler Master Silent Pro M 1000W
Software Win 7 Pro x64 SP1
Benchmark Scores Logitech G500 | Razer Lycosa Mirror | Logitech Z-5300
#13
I understand that they rarely ever set to the BIOS FSB speed. What I was saying is ASUS and Gigabyte tend to run higher (example 100.5-103). The couple ASRock boards I've installed were much closer to the set FSB in the BIOS.

This is what I'm saying might account for the differences in performance.
Example:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASRock/FM2A85X_Extreme6/images/handbrake.gif
 
Joined
Sep 19, 2012
Messages
615 (0.32/day)
Likes
75
System Name [WIP]
Processor Intel Pentium G3420 [i7-4790K SOON(tm)]
Motherboard MSI Z87-GD65 Gaming
Cooling [Corsair H100i]
Memory G.Skill TridentX 2x8GB-2400-CL10 DDR3
Video Card(s) [MSI AMD Radeon R9-290 Gaming]
Storage Seagate 2TB Desktop SSHD / [Samsung 256GB 840 PRO]
Display(s) [BenQ XL2420Z]
Case [Corsair Obsidian 750D]
Power Supply Corsair RM750
Software Windows 8.1 x64 Pro / Linux Mint 15 / SteamOS
#14
Great review, just the board I was interested in for a build...
I only would complain about the 3D tests, they're pretty poor in variance, I'd like to see a RAM speed round-up on APUs as well as more games and configurations under those tests.

I'm hoping they're already preping up a A88X succesor to this, with VirtuMVP and Realtek 898 all over again, as I'm thinking of might as well wait for Richland now, since my "customer" doesn't have the cash at hand right now anyway.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#15
I understand that they rarely ever set to the BIOS FSB speed. What I was saying is ASUS and Gigabyte tend to run higher (example 100.5-103). The couple ASRock boards I've installed were much closer to the set FSB in the BIOS.

This is what I'm saying might account for the differences in performance.
Example:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASRock/FM2A85X_Extreme6/images/handbrake.gif
Yep, exactly, glad you caught that.

Great review, just the board I was interested in for a build...
I only would complain about the 3D tests, they're pretty poor in variance, I'd like to see a RAM speed round-up on APUs as well as more games and configurations under those tests.

I'm hoping they're already preping up a A88X succesor to this, with VirtuMVP and Realtek 898 all over again, as I'm thinking of might as well wait for Richland now, since my "customer" doesn't have the cash at hand right now anyway.
Thanks for your feedback. Unfortunately, no new test additions are planned at this time. The tests I do use are specifically chosen as they show differences between boards, on average. Each test is run manually, and is run 5 times to cover test variances. Each test is sensitive to different parts of a system, like F1 2010..it's very sensitive to changes in memory performance. PCMark and 3DMark are sensitive to other things(desktop and general 3D performance).

SuperPi alone takes of 20 minutes. multiply that by 5, and you have nearly 2 hours spent on a single test. I also do burn-in tests of all boards, for 72 hours(something I picked up from working in a PC store).

If I told you how much doing reviews actually pays, You'd understand why time is so important to me. Every review, I have to carefully budget my time. Board reviews are the most complex, as they incorporate more components than any other part, and as such, there is a huge amount of work involved in putting out a board review like I do. The fact of the matter is, I put out more test results than many other sites, and I actually use each product for at least a week so that I might uncover any oddities that can happen due to memory or parts incompatibility.

Doing construction, I make 2.5 times what I get for a single review, that might take a week or more, but in construction, I earn that 2.5x in just one hour. The fact I've been doing reviews now for a bit over two years is pretty amazing in and of itself, since I do have a wife and four kids who take up the rest of my time.
 

Athlon2K15

HyperVtX™
Joined
Sep 27, 2006
Messages
7,848 (1.90/day)
Likes
2,305
Location
O-H-I-O
Processor AMD Ryzen 7 1800x
Motherboard Asus Crosshair VI Hero
Cooling CH6 EK MonoBlock
Memory TridentZ 16GB DDR4 3600
Video Card(s) GTX 1080Ti EK Full Cover Block
Storage Samsung 960 Pro
Display(s) LG 34UC88 Curved Ultrawide
Case EVGA DG86
Power Supply Corsair RM850x
Mouse Asus Strix Evolve
Keyboard Asus Strix Claymore
#16

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#17
Time to ask for a raise :toast:
:laugh:


TPU cannot afford to pay me $80k a year, working only 8 months out of a year.

I don't really get paid, so to speak, as I am not employed by TPU. TPU gives me a "per diem" so that TPU owns the reviews, and that's enough. I'm not doing reviews to make money...I'm doing them to ensure realistic perspective is given. :p
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,413 (5.50/day)
Likes
10,547
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#18
I understand that they rarely ever set to the BIOS FSB speed. What I was saying is ASUS and Gigabyte tend to run higher (example 100.5-103). The couple ASRock boards I've installed were much closer to the set FSB in the BIOS.

This is what I'm saying might account for the differences in performance.
Example:
http://tpucdn.com/reviews/ASRock/FM2A85X_Extreme6/images/handbrake.gif
The variance in performance wasn't what I was addressing in your post, I was addressing your claim that when you set the FSB to 100 on an ASRock board it actually is 100. That part just simply isn't true.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#19
The variance in performance wasn't what I was addressing in your post, I was addressing your claim that when you set the FSB to 100 on an ASRock board it actually is 100. That part just simply isn't true.
That changes from board to board, even, and isn't a brand-specific thing.
 

newtekie1

Semi-Retired Folder
Joined
Nov 22, 2005
Messages
24,413 (5.50/day)
Likes
10,547
Location
Indiana, USA
Processor Intel Core i7 8700K@4.8GHz(Quick and dirty)
Motherboard AsRock Z370 Taichi
Cooling Corsair H110i GTX
Memory 32GB Corsair DDR4-3000
Video Card(s) PNY XLR8 GTX1060 6GB
Storage 480GB Crucial MX200 + 2TB Seagate Solid State Hybrid Drive with 128GB OCZ Synapse SSD Cache
Display(s) QNIX QX2710 1440p@120Hz
Case Fractal Design Define S
Audio Device(s) Onboard is good enough for me
Power Supply Corsair HX850
Software Windows 10 Pro x64
#20
That changes from board to board, even, and isn't a brand-specific thing.
That's my point. I mean, I honestly can't even remember a single time when I had a board that ran at exactly the FSB I set in the BIOS.
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#21
That's my point. I mean, I honestly can't even remember a single time when I had a board that ran at exactly the FSB I set in the BIOS.
Most Z77 products do, although you have to manually input the frequency. Even then, some boards offer more granularity than they can actually provide...like you set 100.1 MHz, and you get 100.3 MHz. Set 100.3 MHz, you get 100.5 MHz. :p


It's really dependant on BIOS, and some board makers have better BIOS programmers than others. Really, after doing so many reviews...that is the one thing I have learned...BIOS, and who makes it, is really what sets board makers apart from one another. ASRock makes a damn good BIOS, both on Intel and AMD platforms, while some other brands do well on Intel, but horrible on AMD.
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,425 (5.78/day)
Likes
8,941
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2400 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#22
What sets the FSB then if its not consistent?
 
Joined
Jun 3, 2007
Messages
22,425 (5.78/day)
Likes
8,941
Location
'Merica. The Great SOUTH!
System Name TheMailbox 5.0 / The Mailbox 4.5
Processor RYZEN 1700X / Intel i7 2600k @ 4.2GHz
Motherboard Fatal1ty X370 Gaming K4 / Gigabyte Z77X-UP5 TH Intel LGA 1155
Cooling MasterLiquid PRO 280 / Scythe Katana 4
Memory ADATA RGB 16GB DDR4 2400 16-16-16-39 / G.SKILL Sniper Series 16GB DDR3 1866: 9-9-9-24
Video Card(s) MSI 1080 "Duke" with 8Gb of RAM. Boost Clock 1847 MHz / ASUS 780ti
Storage 256Gb M4 SSD / 128Gb Agelity 4 SSD , 500Gb WD (7200)
Display(s) LG 29" Class 21:9 UltraWide® IPS LED Monitor 2560 x 1080 / Dell 27"
Case Cooler Master MASTERBOX 5t / Cooler Master 922 HAF
Audio Device(s) Realtek ALC1220 Audio Codec / SupremeFX X-Fi with Bose Companion 2 speakers.
Power Supply Seasonic FOCUS Plus Series SSR-750PX 750W Platinum / SeaSonic X Series X650 Gold
Mouse SteelSeries Sensei (RAW) / Logitech G5
Keyboard Razer BlackWidow / Logitech (Unknown)
Software Windows 10 Pro (64-bit)
Benchmark Scores Benching is for bitches.
#24
Different clock generating chips(other onboard controllers, PCIe buffers), and different "size" of adjustments in BIOS. What sets the clock, really, depends on the platform, too.
Different clock generating chips? That means it could vary from board to board in the exact same model no? Not just vendor?
 

cadaveca

My name is Dave
Staff member
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
16,576 (3.85/day)
Likes
10,943
Location
Parkland County, Alberta
#25
Different clock generating chips? That means it could vary from board to board in the exact same model no? Not just vendor?
No. Every board of the same model should be the same. Different models will be different, to a degree...depends on what they are built with.

Specifically with FM2, quite a few boards use outside clock generators, in order to allow more clocking ability(such as the Biostar A85W-HiFi).

That chip is here:



This is a clock gen you'll find on 9-series AM3+ boards. As you can see in the picture, it's uses a quartz crystal to generate it's clocks, and the type of crystal used dictates what steps in frequency are available. If you changed that crystal, you'd have different clocking ability, too.